Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Skeletal Radiology 6/2017

Open Access 01-06-2017 | Scientific Article

Skeletal development of the hand and wrist: digital bone age companion—a suitable alternative to the Greulich and Pyle atlas for bone age assessment?

Authors: Paul M. Bunch, Talissa A. Altes, Joan McIlhenny, James Patrie, Cree M. Gaskin

Published in: Skeletal Radiology | Issue 6/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To assess reader performance and subjective workflow experience when reporting bone age studies with a digital bone age reference as compared to the Greulich and Pyle atlas (G&P). We hypothesized that pediatric radiologists would achieve equivalent results with each method while digital workflow would improve speed, experience, and reporting quality.

Materials and methods

IRB approval was obtained for this HIPAA-compliant study. Two pediatric radiologists performed research interpretations of bone age studies randomized to either the digital (Digital Bone Age Companion, Oxford University Press) or G&P method, generating reports to mimic clinical workflow. Bone age standard selection, interpretation-reporting time, and user preferences were recorded. Reports were reviewed for typographical or speech recognition errors. Comparisons of agreement were conducted by way of Fisher’s exact tests. Interpretation-reporting times were analyzed on the natural logarithmic scale via a linear mixed model and transformed to the geometric mean. Subjective workflow experience was compared with an exact binomial test. Report errors were compared via a paired random permutation test.

Results

There was no difference in bone age determination between atlases (p = 0.495). The interpretation-reporting time (p < 0.001) was significantly faster with the digital method. The faculty indicated preference for the digital atlas (p < 0.001). Signed reports had fewer errors with the digital atlas (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Bone age study interpretations performed with the digital method were similar to those performed with the Greulich and Pyle atlas. The digital atlas saved time, improved workflow experience, and reduced reporting errors relative to the Greulich and Pyle atlas when integrated into electronic workflow.
Literature
4.
go back to reference Tanner JM, Healy M, Goldstein H, Cameron N. Assessment of skeletal maturity and prediction of adult height (TW3 method). London; New York: W.B. Saunders; 2001. Tanner JM, Healy M, Goldstein H, Cameron N. Assessment of skeletal maturity and prediction of adult height (TW3 method). London; New York: W.B. Saunders; 2001.
6.
go back to reference Greulich WW, Pyle SI. Radiographic atlas of skeletal development of the hand and wrist. 2nd ed. [reprint]. Stanford: Stanford University Press; 1959. Greulich WW, Pyle SI. Radiographic atlas of skeletal development of the hand and wrist. 2nd ed. [reprint]. Stanford: Stanford University Press; 1959.
8.
go back to reference Gaskin CM, Kahn SL, Bertozzi JC, Bunch PM. Skeletal development of the hand and wrist: a radiographic atlas and digital bone age companion. New York: Oxford University Press; 2011.CrossRef Gaskin CM, Kahn SL, Bertozzi JC, Bunch PM. Skeletal development of the hand and wrist: a radiographic atlas and digital bone age companion. New York: Oxford University Press; 2011.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Gilsanz V, Ratib O. Hand bone age a digital atlas of skeletal maturity. New York: Springer; 2005. Gilsanz V, Ratib O. Hand bone age a digital atlas of skeletal maturity. New York: Springer; 2005.
10.
go back to reference Thiemann H-H, Nitz I, Schmeling A. Röntgenatlas der normalen Hand im Kindesalter: 74 Tabellen, 3, überarb. und erw. Aufl. Stuttgart: Thieme; 2006.CrossRef Thiemann H-H, Nitz I, Schmeling A. Röntgenatlas der normalen Hand im Kindesalter: 74 Tabellen, 3, überarb. und erw. Aufl. Stuttgart: Thieme; 2006.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Roche AF, Rohmann CG, French NY, Dávila GH. Effect of training on replicability of assessments of skeletal maturity (Greulich-Pyle). Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med. 1970;108:511–5.CrossRefPubMed Roche AF, Rohmann CG, French NY, Dávila GH. Effect of training on replicability of assessments of skeletal maturity (Greulich-Pyle). Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med. 1970;108:511–5.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Loder RT, Estle DT, Morrison K, et al. Applicability of the Greulich and Pyle skeletal age standards to black and white children of today. Am J Dis Child. 1993;147(12):1329–33.PubMed Loder RT, Estle DT, Morrison K, et al. Applicability of the Greulich and Pyle skeletal age standards to black and white children of today. Am J Dis Child. 1993;147(12):1329–33.PubMed
18.
19.
go back to reference Pechnikova M, Gibelli D, De Angelis D, et al. The “blind age assessment”: applicability of Greulich and Pyle, Demirjian and Mincer aging methods to a population of unknown ethnic origin. Radiol Med (Torino). 2011;116:1105–14. doi:10.1007/s11547-011-0694-5.CrossRef Pechnikova M, Gibelli D, De Angelis D, et al. The “blind age assessment”: applicability of Greulich and Pyle, Demirjian and Mincer aging methods to a population of unknown ethnic origin. Radiol Med (Torino). 2011;116:1105–14. doi:10.​1007/​s11547-011-0694-5.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Skeletal development of the hand and wrist: digital bone age companion—a suitable alternative to the Greulich and Pyle atlas for bone age assessment?
Authors
Paul M. Bunch
Talissa A. Altes
Joan McIlhenny
James Patrie
Cree M. Gaskin
Publication date
01-06-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Skeletal Radiology / Issue 6/2017
Print ISSN: 0364-2348
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2161
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-017-2616-7

Other articles of this Issue 6/2017

Skeletal Radiology 6/2017 Go to the issue