Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Original research

Situational awareness and information flow in prehospital emergency medical care from the perspective of paramedic field supervisors: a scenario-based study

Authors: Teija Norri-Sederholm, Heikki Paakkonen, Jouni Kurola, Kaija Saranto

Published in: Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In prehospital emergency medical services, one of the key factors in the successful delivery of appropriate care is the efficient management and supervision of the area’s emergency medical services units. Paramedic field supervisors have an important role in this task. One of the key factors in the daily work of paramedic field supervisors is ensuring that they have enough of the right type of information when co-operating with other authorities and making decisions. However, a gap in information sharing still exists especially due to information overload. The aim of this study was to find out what type of critical information paramedic field supervisors need during multi-authority missions in order to manage their emergency medical services area successfully. The study also investigated both the flow of information, and interactions with the paramedic field supervisors and the differences that occur depending on the incident type.

Methods

Ten paramedic field supervisors from four Finnish rescue departments participated in the study in January–March 2012. The data were collected using semi-structured interviews based on three progressive real-life scenarios and a questionnaire. Data were analysed using deductive content analysis. Data management and analysis were performed using Atlas.ti 7 software.

Results

Five critical information categories were formulated: Incident data, Mission status, Area status, Safety at work, and Tactics. Each category’s importance varied depending on the incident and on whether it was about information needed or information delivered by the paramedic field supervisors. The main communication equipment used to receive information was the authority radio network (TETRA). However, when delivering information, mobile phones and TETRA were of equal importance. Paramedic field supervisors needed more information relating to area status.

Conclusions

Paramedic field supervisors communicate actively with EMS units and other authorities such as Emergency Medical Dispatch, police, and rescue services during the multi-authority incidents. This study provides knowledge about the critical information categories when receiving and sharing the information to obtain and maintain situational awareness. However, further research is needed to examine more the information flow in prehospital emergency care to enable a better understanding of required communication in situational awareness formation.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Decree of the Ministry of Social and Health on Prehospital Emergency Care 340/2011. Finland; 2011. Decree of the Ministry of Social and Health on Prehospital Emergency Care 340/2011. Finland; 2011.
2.
go back to reference Silfvast T. Paramedic field supervisor. In: Silfvast T, Castrén M, Kurola J, Lund V, Martikainen M, editors. Manual of prehospital emergency care. Saarijärvi, Finland: Duodecim; 2013. In Finnish. Ensihoitopalvelun kenttäjohtaja, in Ensihoito-opas. Silfvast T. Paramedic field supervisor. In: Silfvast T, Castrén M, Kurola J, Lund V, Martikainen M, editors. Manual of prehospital emergency care. Saarijärvi, Finland: Duodecim; 2013. In Finnish. Ensihoitopalvelun kenttäjohtaja, in Ensihoito-opas.
3.
go back to reference Busby S, Witucki-Brown J. Theory development for situational awareness in multi-casualty incidents. J Emerg Nurs. 2011;37:444–52.PubMedCrossRef Busby S, Witucki-Brown J. Theory development for situational awareness in multi-casualty incidents. J Emerg Nurs. 2011;37:444–52.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Endsley M. Theoretical underpinnings of situation awareness: a critical review. In: Endsley M, Garland DJ, editors. Situation awareness analysis and measurement. New Jersey: Laurence Erlbaum Associates; 2000. Endsley M. Theoretical underpinnings of situation awareness: a critical review. In: Endsley M, Garland DJ, editors. Situation awareness analysis and measurement. New Jersey: Laurence Erlbaum Associates; 2000.
5.
go back to reference Kuusisto R. From Common Operational Picture to Precision Management. In: Managemental Information Flows in Crisis Management Network. Helsinki Finland: Publications of the Ministry of Transport and Communications 81/2005; 2005. Kuusisto R. From Common Operational Picture to Precision Management. In: Managemental Information Flows in Crisis Management Network. Helsinki Finland: Publications of the Ministry of Transport and Communications 81/2005; 2005.
6.
go back to reference Toner S. Creating Situational Awareness: A Systems Approach. In: Altevogt BM, Stroud C, Nadig L, editors. Medical Surge Capacity: Workshop Summary. Washington: National Academies Press; 2009. Toner S. Creating Situational Awareness: A Systems Approach. In: Altevogt BM, Stroud C, Nadig L, editors. Medical Surge Capacity: Workshop Summary. Washington: National Academies Press; 2009.
7.
go back to reference Norri-Sederholm T, Kuusisto R, Kurola J, Saranto K, Paakkonen H. A paramedic field supervisor’s situational awareness in prehospital emergency care. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2014;29(2):151–9. doi:10.1017/S1049023X14000132.PubMedCrossRef Norri-Sederholm T, Kuusisto R, Kurola J, Saranto K, Paakkonen H. A paramedic field supervisor’s situational awareness in prehospital emergency care. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2014;29(2):151–9. doi:10.1017/S1049023X14000132.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Endsley MR, Jones WM. A model of inter‐ and intrateam situation awareness: Implications for design, training and measurement. In: McNeese M, Salas E, Endsley M, editors. New trends in cooperative activities: Understanding system dynamics in complex environments. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society; 2001. Endsley MR, Jones WM. A model of inter‐ and intrateam situation awareness: Implications for design, training and measurement. In: McNeese M, Salas E, Endsley M, editors. New trends in cooperative activities: Understanding system dynamics in complex environments. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society; 2001.
10.
go back to reference Kuusisto R: "SHIFT" Theoretically-Practically Motivated Framework: Information Exchange Viewpoint on Developing Collaboration Support Systems. Helsinki: Edita Prima Oy; 2008. Finnish Defence University, Department of Tactics and Operations Art, Series 3, No 1/2008. Kuusisto R: "SHIFT" Theoretically-Practically Motivated Framework: Information Exchange Viewpoint on Developing Collaboration Support Systems. Helsinki: Edita Prima Oy; 2008. Finnish Defence University, Department of Tactics and Operations Art, Series 3, No 1/2008.
11.
go back to reference Silverman D. Interpreting Qualitative Data. 4th ed. Padstow, UK: SAGE Publications Ltd.; 2012. Silverman D. Interpreting Qualitative Data. 4th ed. Padstow, UK: SAGE Publications Ltd.; 2012.
12.
go back to reference Krippendorf K. Content analysis An introduction to Its Methodology. 3rd ed. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications Inc.; 2013. Krippendorf K. Content analysis An introduction to Its Methodology. 3rd ed. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications Inc.; 2013.
13.
go back to reference Choo CW. Information Management for the Intelligent Organization – The Art of Scanning the Environment. Thirdth ed. Medford, NJ: Information Today, Inc; 2001. Choo CW. Information Management for the Intelligent Organization – The Art of Scanning the Environment. Thirdth ed. Medford, NJ: Information Today, Inc; 2001.
14.
go back to reference Coiera E. Communication in Emergency Medical Teams. In: Croskerry P, Cosby KS, Schenkel SM, Wears RL, editors. Patient Safety in Emergency Medicine. Philadelphia, USA: Lippincot Williams & Wilkins; 2009. Coiera E. Communication in Emergency Medical Teams. In: Croskerry P, Cosby KS, Schenkel SM, Wears RL, editors. Patient Safety in Emergency Medicine. Philadelphia, USA: Lippincot Williams & Wilkins; 2009.
16.
go back to reference Eppich W. Speech is Golden: Communication. In: St Pierre M, Hofinger G, Buerschaper C, Simon R, editors. Crisis Management in Acute Care Settings. Secondth ed. Berlin Heidelberg, Germany: Springer; 2011. Eppich W. Speech is Golden: Communication. In: St Pierre M, Hofinger G, Buerschaper C, Simon R, editors. Crisis Management in Acute Care Settings. Secondth ed. Berlin Heidelberg, Germany: Springer; 2011.
17.
go back to reference Croskerry P, Cosby KS, Schenkel SM, Wears RL. Forging a Path for Safety. In: Croskerry P, Cosby K, Schenkel SM, Wears RL, editors. Patient Safety in Emergency Medicine. Philadelphia, USA: Lippincot Williams & Wilkins; 2009. Croskerry P, Cosby KS, Schenkel SM, Wears RL. Forging a Path for Safety. In: Croskerry P, Cosby K, Schenkel SM, Wears RL, editors. Patient Safety in Emergency Medicine. Philadelphia, USA: Lippincot Williams & Wilkins; 2009.
18.
Metadata
Title
Situational awareness and information flow in prehospital emergency medical care from the perspective of paramedic field supervisors: a scenario-based study
Authors
Teija Norri-Sederholm
Heikki Paakkonen
Jouni Kurola
Kaija Saranto
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-014-0083-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine 1/2015 Go to the issue