Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 5/2021

01-05-2021 | Sinus Surgery | Rhinology

Gigantic paranasal sinuses osteomas: clinical features, management considerations, and long-term outcomes

Authors: Evangelos Giotakis, Valentinos Sofokleous, Alexander Delides, Andriana Razou, Georgios Pallis, Alexandra Karakasi, Pavlos Maragoudakis

Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology | Issue 5/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Paranasal sinus osteomas are slow-growing, benign bony tumours that when larger than 30 mm, they are termed ‘gigantic’. Special considerations apply for tumours of this calibre, and their rarity renders their management fairly controversial. This study seeks to contribute to an increased understanding concerning their management by presenting a 12-year experience from a single institution.

Methods

Retrospective review of files of patients treated for a gigantic paranasal sinus osteoma from January 2008 to December 2019. Additionally, all patients were prospectively reexamined in early 2020 for late complications or clinical recurrence.

Results

Ten patients were included, with a mean age of 53.8 years (range: 23–77 years). The leading presenting findings were proptosis (80%) and diplopia (70%). Transient visual impairment was remarkably frequent (30%). Five patients were managed with an open approach, two with an endoscopic, and three with a combined technique. The most common adverse characteristics that dictated the use of an open approach, alone or in combination with an endoscopic approach, were the involvement of the anterior wall of the frontal sinus (40%), erosion of its posterior wall (30%), and a far-anterior intraorbital extension (30%). No major postoperative complications were observed, and also no recurrences.

Conclusion

Our study illustrates that these tumours may require a different management attitude. Despite substantial advances in the endoscopic management of benign sinonasal tumours, managing these massive tumours solely endoscopically could, in many cases, be inefficacious or impossible. Open approaches remain valuable, representing a safe and straightforward method for adequate exposure.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Lund VJ, Stammberger H, Nicolai P, Castelnuovo P, Beal T, Beham A et al (2010) European position paper on endoscopic management of tumours of the nose, paranasal sinuses and skull base. Rhinol Suppl 22:1–143PubMed Lund VJ, Stammberger H, Nicolai P, Castelnuovo P, Beal T, Beham A et al (2010) European position paper on endoscopic management of tumours of the nose, paranasal sinuses and skull base. Rhinol Suppl 22:1–143PubMed
11.
go back to reference Wang Y, Li D, Jiang A, Zhang H, Sun Y, Liu Z et al (2016) Endoscopic resection of giant ethmoid osteomas with the assistance of an image-guidance system. Anticancer Res 36:1325–1330PubMed Wang Y, Li D, Jiang A, Zhang H, Sun Y, Liu Z et al (2016) Endoscopic resection of giant ethmoid osteomas with the assistance of an image-guidance system. Anticancer Res 36:1325–1330PubMed
32.
go back to reference Schick B, Steigerwald C, El Tahan AER, Draf W (2001) The role of endonasal surgery in the management of frontoethmoidal osteomas. Rhinology 39:66–70PubMed Schick B, Steigerwald C, El Tahan AER, Draf W (2001) The role of endonasal surgery in the management of frontoethmoidal osteomas. Rhinology 39:66–70PubMed
Metadata
Title
Gigantic paranasal sinuses osteomas: clinical features, management considerations, and long-term outcomes
Authors
Evangelos Giotakis
Valentinos Sofokleous
Alexander Delides
Andriana Razou
Georgios Pallis
Alexandra Karakasi
Pavlos Maragoudakis
Publication date
01-05-2021
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology / Issue 5/2021
Print ISSN: 0937-4477
Electronic ISSN: 1434-4726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-06420-x

Other articles of this Issue 5/2021

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 5/2021 Go to the issue