Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 12/2017

01-12-2017

Simultaneous conversion of gastric band to sleeve gastrectomy is associated with increased postoperative complications: an analysis of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program

Authors: Zachary C. Dietch, Bruce D. Schirmer, Peter T. Hallowell

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 12/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has gained popularity for the treatment of morbid obesity as gastric banding (BAND) has fallen out of favor. As a result, simultaneous conversion (CONV) of BAND to LSG is commonly performed. We hypothesized that CONV is associated with higher 30-day risk-adjusted serious morbidity.

Methods

Preoperative characteristics and 30-day outcomes from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Participant Use Files 2010–2014 were selected for patients who underwent LSG. Patients undergoing CONV were identified. Descriptive comparisons were performed using Chi-square and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests as appropriate. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to assess the association between CONV and a composite measure of 30-day serious morbidity and mortality.

Results

Overall, 35,307 patients met criteria for inclusion, of which 943 (2.7%) underwent CONV. The median age of patients undergoing CONV was higher (46 vs 44 years, p < 0.001) and a greater percentage of CONV patients was female (84.8 vs 77.9%, p < 0.001) than LSG patients. CONV patients had lower rates of common comorbidities, including diabetes (14.9 vs 23.1%, p < 0.001), hypertension (41.9 vs 48.6%, p < 0.001), and tobacco use (7.2 vs 9.8%, p < 0.001), as well as lower median BMI (41 vs 44, p < 0.001). Individual unadjusted outcomes of serious 30-day complications were similar between both groups, as was a composite measure of serious morbidity (CONV 4.3% vs LSG 3.6%, p = 0.1). However, after controlling for demographics, comorbidities, and concurrent band removal, CONV was associated with increased odds of serious 30-day morbidity (1.44, 95% CI 1.03–1.97) (c-statistic: 0.60).

Conclusions

Serious morbidity following LSG is uncommon; however, CONV is associated with a modest increase in risk-adjusted adverse 30-day outcomes. Patients being evaluated for CONV should be counseled about the added risks versus LSG alone. Further research is warranted to identify whether the incremental risks of CONV may be modifiable.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Angrisani L, Santonicola A, Iovino P, Formisano G, Buchwald H, Scopinaro N (2015) Bariatric surgery worldwide 2013. Obes Surg 25(10):1822–1832CrossRefPubMed Angrisani L, Santonicola A, Iovino P, Formisano G, Buchwald H, Scopinaro N (2015) Bariatric surgery worldwide 2013. Obes Surg 25(10):1822–1832CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Bilimoria KY, Liu Y, Paruch JL, Zhou L, Kmiecik TE, Ko CY et al (2013) Development and evaluation of the universal ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator: a decision aid and informed consent tool for patients and surgeons. J Am Coll Surg. American College of Surgeons 217(5):833–42-3. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24055383. Accessed 21 Oct 2014 Bilimoria KY, Liu Y, Paruch JL, Zhou L, Kmiecik TE, Ko CY et al (2013) Development and evaluation of the universal ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator: a decision aid and informed consent tool for patients and surgeons. J Am Coll Surg. American College of Surgeons 217(5):833–42-3. http://​www.​ncbi.​nlm.​nih.​gov/​pubmed/​24055383. Accessed 21 Oct 2014
3.
go back to reference Davis CL, Pierce JR, Henderson W, Spencer CD, Tyler C, Langberg R et al (2007) Assessment of the reliability of data collected for the Department of Veterans Affairs National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg 204(4):550–560CrossRefPubMed Davis CL, Pierce JR, Henderson W, Spencer CD, Tyler C, Langberg R et al (2007) Assessment of the reliability of data collected for the Department of Veterans Affairs National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg 204(4):550–560CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Shiloach M, Frencher SK, Steeger JE, Rowell KS, Bartzokis K, Tomeh MG et al (2010) Toward robust information: data quality and inter-rater reliability in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg 210(1):6–16. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.09.031 CrossRefPubMed Shiloach M, Frencher SK, Steeger JE, Rowell KS, Bartzokis K, Tomeh MG et al (2010) Toward robust information: data quality and inter-rater reliability in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg 210(1):6–16. doi:10.​1016/​j.​jamcollsurg.​2009.​09.​031 CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Studio R (2014) RStudio: integrated development environment for R. Studio R, Boston Studio R (2014) RStudio: integrated development environment for R. Studio R, Boston
6.
go back to reference R Core Team (2014) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. www.R-project.org R Core Team (2014) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. www.​R-project.​org
11.
go back to reference Ramly EP, Safadi BY, Aridi HD, Kantar R, Mailhac A, Alami RS (2017) Concomitant removal of gastric band and gastric bypass: analysis of outcomes and complications from the ACS-NSQIP database. Obes Surg 27(2):462–468. doi:10.1007/s11695-016-2348-0 CrossRefPubMed Ramly EP, Safadi BY, Aridi HD, Kantar R, Mailhac A, Alami RS (2017) Concomitant removal of gastric band and gastric bypass: analysis of outcomes and complications from the ACS-NSQIP database. Obes Surg 27(2):462–468. doi:10.​1007/​s11695-016-2348-0 CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Fernando Santos B, Wallaert JB, Trus TL (2014) Band removal and conversion to sleeve or bypass: are they equally safe? Surg Endosc Other Interv Technol 28(11):3086–3091CrossRef Fernando Santos B, Wallaert JB, Trus TL (2014) Band removal and conversion to sleeve or bypass: are they equally safe? Surg Endosc Other Interv Technol 28(11):3086–3091CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Stroh C, Benedix D, Weiner R, Benedix F, Wolff S, Knoll C et al (2014) Is a one-step sleeve gastrectomy indicated as a revision procedure after gastric banding? Data analysis from a quality assurance study of the surgical treatment of obesity in Germany. Obes Surg 24(1):9–14CrossRefPubMed Stroh C, Benedix D, Weiner R, Benedix F, Wolff S, Knoll C et al (2014) Is a one-step sleeve gastrectomy indicated as a revision procedure after gastric banding? Data analysis from a quality assurance study of the surgical treatment of obesity in Germany. Obes Surg 24(1):9–14CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Pencovich N, Lahat G, Goldray O, Abu-Abeid S, Klausner JM, Meron Eldar S (2016) Safety and outcome of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy following removal of adjustable gastric banding: lessons from 109 patients in a single center and review of the literature. Obes Surg. doi:10.1007/s11695-016-2463-y Pencovich N, Lahat G, Goldray O, Abu-Abeid S, Klausner JM, Meron Eldar S (2016) Safety and outcome of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy following removal of adjustable gastric banding: lessons from 109 patients in a single center and review of the literature. Obes Surg. doi:10.​1007/​s11695-016-2463-y
17.
go back to reference Alqahtani AR, Elahmedi MO, Al Qahtani AR, Yousefan A, Al-Zuhair AR (2016) 5-Year outcomes of 1-stage gastric band removal and sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2016:1–7 Alqahtani AR, Elahmedi MO, Al Qahtani AR, Yousefan A, Al-Zuhair AR (2016) 5-Year outcomes of 1-stage gastric band removal and sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2016:1–7
19.
go back to reference Obeid NR, Schwack BF, Kurian MS, Ren-Fielding CJ, Fielding GA (2014) Single-stage versus 2-stage sleeve gastrectomy as a conversion after failed adjustable gastric banding: 30-day outcomes. Surg Endosc Other Interv Technol 28(11):3186–3192CrossRef Obeid NR, Schwack BF, Kurian MS, Ren-Fielding CJ, Fielding GA (2014) Single-stage versus 2-stage sleeve gastrectomy as a conversion after failed adjustable gastric banding: 30-day outcomes. Surg Endosc Other Interv Technol 28(11):3186–3192CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Simultaneous conversion of gastric band to sleeve gastrectomy is associated with increased postoperative complications: an analysis of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program
Authors
Zachary C. Dietch
Bruce D. Schirmer
Peter T. Hallowell
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 12/2017
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5591-0

Other articles of this Issue 12/2017

Surgical Endoscopy 12/2017 Go to the issue