Published in:
Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research article
Simultaneous antegrade and retrograde endoscopic treatment of non-malignant ureterointestinal anastomotic strictures following urinary diversion
Published in: BMC Urology | Issue 1/2017
Login to get accessAbstract
Background
The ureterointestinal anastomosis stricture (UAS) is a common complication of urinary diversion after radical cystectomy. For decades, open anastomotic revision remained the gold standard for the treatment of UAS. However, with the advancement in endoscopic technology, mini-invasive therapeutic approaches have been used in its management. Here, we report our experience with and long-term results of combined simultaneous antegrade and retrograde endoscopy (SARE) in the treatment of non-malignant UASs after urinary diversion in a consecutive series of patients.
Methods
From March 2012 to January 2015, there were 32 consecutive patients with 32 non-malignant UASs following radical cystectomy and urinary diversion. Twenty-nine patients were treated with SARE technique and comprised the study group. Using simultaneous antegrade flexible ureteroscope combined with retrograde semi-rigid ureteroscope or nephroscope, partial or complete strictures were managed with laser incision and balloon dilation under direct visualization. A 7/12 Fr graded endopyelotomy stent was left for 3–6 months after the procedure. Success was defined as symptomatic improvement and radiographic resolution of obstruction.
Results
With a median followup of 22 months (6–36), the overall success rate for SARE was 69.0%. Twenty patients with partial stricture had a success rate of 85%, and 9 patients with complete stricture had a success rate of 33.3%. Renal function, hydronephrosis grade, stricture type, and stricture length were significant influences on the outcome (P < 0.05). No complication was observed.
Conclusions
The SARE is a safe and effective treatment for UAS, and may be the only endoscopic treatment approach for complete UAS. While success rate for complete strictures is low compared to open revision, it should be considered as an initial approach given its low overall morbidity. For partial strictures, prudent patient selection results in higher success rates that are nearly comparable to open revision.