Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology 1/2019

01-01-2019 | Original Article • HIP - TUMORS

Silver-coated megaprostheses in the proximal femur in patients with sarcoma

Authors: Arne Streitbuerger, Marcel P. Henrichs, Gregor Hauschild, Markus Nottrott, Wiebke Guder, Jendrik Hardes

Published in: European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Proximal femur replacements in patients with sarcoma are associated with high rates of infection. This study is the largest one comparing infection rates with titanium versus silver-coated megaprostheses in sarcoma patients.

Methods

Infection rates were assessed in 99 patients with proximal femur sarcoma who underwent placement of a titanium (n = 35) or silver-coated (n = 64) megaprosthesis. Treatments administered for infection were also analyzed.

Results

Infections occurred in 14.3% of patients in the titanium group, in comparison with 9.4% of those in the silver group, when the development of infection was the primary end point. The 5- and 10-year event-free survival rates for the prosthesis relative to the parameter of infection were 90% in the silver group and 83% in the titanium group. The overall infection rates were 10.9% in the silver group and 20% in the titanium group. Two patients each in the silver and titanium groups ultimately had to undergo amputation. The need for two-stage prosthesis exchanges (57.1% in the titanium group) declined to 14.3% in the silver group.

Conclusion

Using a silver-coated proximal femoral replacement nearly halved the overall infection rate. When infections occurred, it was usually possible to avoid two-stage prosthesis exchanges in the silver group.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Chandrasekar CR, Grimer RJ, Carter SR et al (2009) Modular endoprosthetic replacement for tumours of the proximal femur. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91:108–112CrossRefPubMed Chandrasekar CR, Grimer RJ, Carter SR et al (2009) Modular endoprosthetic replacement for tumours of the proximal femur. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91:108–112CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Hardes J, Budny T, Hauschild G et al (2009) Proximal femur replacement in revision arthroplasty. Z Orthop Unfall 147:694–699CrossRefPubMed Hardes J, Budny T, Hauschild G et al (2009) Proximal femur replacement in revision arthroplasty. Z Orthop Unfall 147:694–699CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Gosheger G, Gebert C, Ahrens H et al (2006) Endoprosthetic reconstruction in 250 patients with sarcoma. Clin Orthop 450:164–171CrossRefPubMed Gosheger G, Gebert C, Ahrens H et al (2006) Endoprosthetic reconstruction in 250 patients with sarcoma. Clin Orthop 450:164–171CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Jeys LM, Kulkarni A, Grimer RJ et al (2008) Endoprosthetic reconstruction for the treatment of musculoskeletal tumors of the appendicular skeleton and pelvis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90:1265–1271CrossRefPubMed Jeys LM, Kulkarni A, Grimer RJ et al (2008) Endoprosthetic reconstruction for the treatment of musculoskeletal tumors of the appendicular skeleton and pelvis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90:1265–1271CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Hardes J, Gebert C, Schwappach A et al (2006) Characteristics and outcome of infections associated with tumor endoprostheses. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 126:289–296CrossRefPubMed Hardes J, Gebert C, Schwappach A et al (2006) Characteristics and outcome of infections associated with tumor endoprostheses. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 126:289–296CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Hardes J, von Eiff C, Streitbuerger A et al (2010) Reduction of periprosthetic infection with silver-coated megaprostheses in patients with bone sarcoma. J Surg Oncol 101:389–395PubMed Hardes J, von Eiff C, Streitbuerger A et al (2010) Reduction of periprosthetic infection with silver-coated megaprostheses in patients with bone sarcoma. J Surg Oncol 101:389–395PubMed
9.
go back to reference Hardes J, Ahrens H, Gebert C et al (2007) Lack of toxicological side-effects in silver-coated megaprostheses in humans. Biomaterials 28:2869–2875CrossRefPubMed Hardes J, Ahrens H, Gebert C et al (2007) Lack of toxicological side-effects in silver-coated megaprostheses in humans. Biomaterials 28:2869–2875CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Gosheger G, Hillmann A, Lindner N et al (2001) Soft tissue reconstruction of megaprostheses using a Trevira tube. Clin Orthop 393:264–271CrossRef Gosheger G, Hillmann A, Lindner N et al (2001) Soft tissue reconstruction of megaprostheses using a Trevira tube. Clin Orthop 393:264–271CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Dahlberg PJ, Agger WA, Singer JR et al (1995) Subclavian hemodialysis catheter infections: a prospective, randomized trial of an attachable silver-impregnated cuff for prevention of catheter-related infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 16:506–511CrossRefPubMed Dahlberg PJ, Agger WA, Singer JR et al (1995) Subclavian hemodialysis catheter infections: a prospective, randomized trial of an attachable silver-impregnated cuff for prevention of catheter-related infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 16:506–511CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Riley DK, Classen DC, Stevens LE et al (1995) A large randomized clinical trial of a silver-impregnated urinary catheter: lack of efficacy and staphylococcal superinfection. Am J Med 98:349–356CrossRefPubMed Riley DK, Classen DC, Stevens LE et al (1995) A large randomized clinical trial of a silver-impregnated urinary catheter: lack of efficacy and staphylococcal superinfection. Am J Med 98:349–356CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Gosheger G, Hardes J, Ahrens H et al (2004) Silver-coated megaendoprostheses in a rabbit model—an analysis of the infection rate and toxicological side effects. Biomaterials 25:5547–5556CrossRefPubMed Gosheger G, Hardes J, Ahrens H et al (2004) Silver-coated megaendoprostheses in a rabbit model—an analysis of the infection rate and toxicological side effects. Biomaterials 25:5547–5556CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Schierholz JM, Lucas LJ, Rump A et al (1998) Efficacy of silver-coated medical devices. J Hosp Infect 40:257–262CrossRefPubMed Schierholz JM, Lucas LJ, Rump A et al (1998) Efficacy of silver-coated medical devices. J Hosp Infect 40:257–262CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Jeys LM, Grimer RJ, Carter SR et al (2003) Risk of amputation following limb salvage surgery with endoprosthetic replacement, in a consecutive series of 1261 patients. Int Orthop 27:160–163PubMedPubMedCentral Jeys LM, Grimer RJ, Carter SR et al (2003) Risk of amputation following limb salvage surgery with endoprosthetic replacement, in a consecutive series of 1261 patients. Int Orthop 27:160–163PubMedPubMedCentral
26.
go back to reference Jeys LM, Grimer RJ, Carter SR et al (2005) Periprosthetic infection in patients treated for an orthopaedic oncological condition. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:842–849CrossRefPubMed Jeys LM, Grimer RJ, Carter SR et al (2005) Periprosthetic infection in patients treated for an orthopaedic oncological condition. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:842–849CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Silver-coated megaprostheses in the proximal femur in patients with sarcoma
Authors
Arne Streitbuerger
Marcel P. Henrichs
Gregor Hauschild
Markus Nottrott
Wiebke Guder
Jendrik Hardes
Publication date
01-01-2019
Publisher
Springer Paris
Published in
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology / Issue 1/2019
Print ISSN: 1633-8065
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1068
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-018-2270-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology 1/2019 Go to the issue