Top

Published in:

01-01-2020 | Silicone | Original Article

Comparison of ultimate force revealed by compression tests on extracted first premolars and FEA with a true scale 3D multi-component tooth model based on a CBCT dataset

Authors: Nuttapol Limjeerajarus, Phetcharat Dhammayannarangsi, Anon Phanijjiva, Pavita Tangsripongkul, Thanomsuk Jearanaiphaisarn, Pisha Pittayapat, Chalida Nakalekha Limjeerajarus

Published in: Clinical Oral Investigations | Issue 1/2020

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this study was to develop a new method for creating a multi-component and true scale 3-dimensional (3D) model of a human tooth based on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images.

Materials and methods

First maxillary premolar tooth model was reconstructed from a patient’s CBCT images. The 2D serial sections were used to create the 3D model. This model was used for finite element analysis (FEA). Model validation was performed by comparing the ultimate compressive force (UF) obtained experimentally using a universal testing machine and from simulation. The simulations of three component-omitting models (silicone, cementum, and omitting both) were performed to analyze the maximum (max.) principal stress and stress distribution.

Results

The simulation-based UF indicating tooth fracture was 637 N, while the average UF in the in vitro loading was 651 N. The discrepancy between the simulation-based UF and the experimental UF was 2.2%. From the simulation, the silicone-omitting models showed a significant change in max. principal stress, resulting in a UF error of 26%, whereas there was no notable change in the cementum-omitting model.

Conclusion

This study, for the first time, developed a true scale multi-component 3D model from CBCT for predicting stress distribution in a human tooth.

Clinical relevance

This study proposed a method to create 3D modeling from CBCT in a true scale and multi-component manner. The PDL-like component-omitting simulation led to a higher error value of UF, indicating the importance of multi-component tooth modeling in FEA. Tooth 3D modeling could help determine mechanical failure in dental treatments in a more precise manner.

Manokawinchoke J, Limjeerajarus N, Limjeerajarus C, Sastravaha P, Everts V, Pavasant P (2015) Mechanical force-induced TGFB1 increases expression of SOST/POSTN by hPDL cells. J Dent Res 94:983–989. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034515581372 CrossRefPubMed

Manokawinchoke J, Sumrejkanchanakij P, Pavasant P, Osathanon T (2017) Notch signaling participates in TGF-β-induced SOST expression under intermittent compressive stress. J Cell Physiol 232:2221–2230. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.25740 CrossRefPubMed

Ramazanzadeh BA, Sahhafian AA, Mohtasham N, Hassanzadeh N, Jahanbin A, Shakeri MT (2009) Histological changes in human dental pulp following application of intrusive and extrusive orthodontic forces. J Oral Sci 51:109–115. https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.51.109 CrossRefPubMed

Soares CJ, Santana FR, Castro CG, Santos-Filho PCF, Soares PV, Qian F, Armstrong SR (2008) Finite element analysis and bond strength of a glass post to intraradicular dentin: comparison between microtensile and push-out tests. Dent Mater 24:1405–1411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2008.03.004 CrossRefPubMed

Soares C, Versluis A, Valdivia A, Bicalho A, Verossimo C, Barreto BCF, Roscoe M (2012) Finite element analysis in dentistry; improving the quality of oral health care. https://doi.org/10.5772/37353

Soares PV, Souza LV, Veríssimo C, Zeola LF, Pereira AG, Santos-Filho PCF, Fernandes-Neto AJ (2014) Effect of root morphology on biomechanical behaviour of premolars associated with abfraction lesions and different loading types. J Oral Rehabil 41:108–114. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12113 CrossRefPubMed

Benazzi S, Grosse IR, Gruppioni G, Weber GW, Kullmer O (2014) Comparison of occlusal loading conditions in a lower second premolar using three-dimensional finite element analysis. Clin Oral Investig 18:369–375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-0973-8 CrossRefPubMed

McCormack SW, Witzel U, Watson PJ, Fagan MJ, Groning F (2014) The biomechanical function of periodontal ligament fibres in orthodontic tooth movement. PLoS One 9:e102387. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0102387 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Dejak B, Młotkowski A (2015) A comparison of stresses in molar teeth restored with inlays and direct restorations, including polymerization shrinkage of composite resin and tooth loading during mastication. Dent Mater 31:e77–e87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2014.11.016 CrossRefPubMed

10.

Benazzi S, Nguyen HN, Kullmer O, Kupczik K (2016) Dynamic modelling of tooth deformation using occlusal kinematics and finite element analysis. PLoS One 11:e0152663. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152663 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

11.

Barreto BCF, Van Ende A, Lise DP, Noritomi PY, Jaecques S, Sloten JV, De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B (2016) Short fibre-reinforced composite for extensive direct restorations: a laboratory and computational assessment. Clin Oral Investig 20:959–966. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-015-1576-3 CrossRefPubMed

12.

Chieruzzi M, Pagano S, Cianetti S, Lombardo G, Kenny JM, Torre L (2017) Effect of fibre posts, bone losses and fibre content on the biomechanical behaviour of endodontically treated teeth: 3D-finite element analysis. Mater Sci Eng C 74:334–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2016.12.022 CrossRef

13.

Lee HE, Lin CL, Wang CH, Cheng CH, Chang CH (2002) Stresses at the cervical lesion of maxillary premolar—a finite element investigation. J Dent 30:283–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(02)00020-9 CrossRefPubMed

14.

Guimarães JC, Guimarães Soella G, Brandão Durand L, Horn F, Narciso Baratieri L, Monteiro S Jr, Belli R (2014) Stress amplifications in dental non-carious cervical lesions. J Biomech 47:410–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.11.012 CrossRefPubMed

15.

Zeola L, Pereira F, Machado A, Reis B, Kaidonis J, Xie Z, Townsend G, Ranjitkar S, Soares P (2016) Effects of non-carious cervical lesion size, occlusal loading and restoration on biomechanical behaviour of premolar teeth. Aust Dent J 61:408–417. https://doi.org/10.1111/adj.12391 CrossRefPubMed

16.

Correia AMO, Tribst JPM, Matos FS, Platt JA, Caneppele TMF, Borges ALS (2018) Polymerization shrinkage stresses in different restorative techniques for non-carious cervical lesions. J Dent 76:68–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2018.06.010 CrossRefPubMed

17.

Nikolaus A, Currey JD, Lindtner T, Fleck C, Zaslansky P (2017) Importance of the variable periodontal ligament geometry for whole tooth mechanical function: a validated numerical study. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 67:61–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.11.020 CrossRefPubMed

18.

Gröning F, Bright JA, Fagan MJ, O'Higgins P (2012) Improving the validation of finite element models with quantitative full-field strain comparisons. J Biomech 45:1498–1506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.02.009 CrossRefPubMed

19.

Cuddihy M, Gorman CM, Burke FM, Ray NJ, Kelliher D (2013) Endodontic access cavity simulation in ceramic dental crowns. Dent Mater 29:626–634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2013.03.001 CrossRefPubMed

20.

Jakupović S, Anić I, Ajanović M, Korać S, Konjhodžić A, Džanković A, Vuković A (2016) Biomechanics of cervical tooth region and noncarious cervical lesions of different morphology; three-dimensional finite element analysis. Eur J Dent 10:413–418. https://doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.184166 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

21.

Ruengdit S, Riengrojpitak S, Tiensuwan M and Santiwong P (2011) Sex determination from teeth size in Thais. Proceeding the 6th CIFS Academic Day 2011:1–12. http://www.forensic.sc.mahidol.ac.th/proceeding/52_Sittiporn.pdf, accessed on 30th May 2018

22.

Özcan E, Çolak H, Hamidi MM (2012) Root and canal morphology of maxillary first premolars in a Turkish population. J Dent Sci 7:390–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2012.09.003 CrossRef

23.

Mathew R, Katyal A, Shetty A, Krishna Nayak U (2016) Effect of increasing the vertical intrusive force to obtain torque control in lingual orthodontics: a three-dimensional finite element method study. Indian J Dent Res 27:163–167. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-9290.183120 CrossRefPubMed

24.

Miura J, Maeda Y, Nakai H, Zako M (2009) Multiscale analysis of stress distribution in teeth under applied forces. Dent Mater 25:67–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2008.04.015 CrossRefPubMed

25.

Ho SP, Marshall SJ, Ryder MI, Marshall GW (2007) The tooth attachment mechanism defined by structure, chemical composition and mechanical properties of collagen fibers in the periodontium. Biomaterials 28:5238–5245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.08.031 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

26.

Farah JW, Craig RG, Merough KA (1989) Finite element analysis of three- and four-unit bridges. J Oral Rehabil 16:603–611. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1989.tb01384.x CrossRefPubMed

27.

Eisenburger M, Gray G and H. T (2000) Long-term results of telescopic crown retained dentures--a retrospective study. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 8:87–91

28.

Pepper T (2001) Polyester resins, ASM handbook volume 21, composites. ASM International

29.

Composite Materials Handbook. SAE, (2012) vol2. SAE International

30.

Khurukijwanich C, Aimmanee S, Kaikeerati N, Polmook K (2013) Analysis and design of electricity transmission pole composed of glass-fiber reinforced composite. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.34633.65123

31.

Thaipipe, Co. Ltd. Product catalogue manual, http://www.thaipipe.co.th/product-01-01-th.html, accessed on 27th May 2018

32.

Stain Steel- Grade 304 (UNS S304400), (2001), https://www.lenntech.com/stainless-steel-304.htm, accessed on 9th Feb 2018

33.

Holberg C, Rudzki-Janson I, Wichelhaus A, Winterhalder P (2013) Ceramic inlays: is the inlay thickness an important factor influencing the fracture risk? J Dent 41:628–635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2013.04.010 CrossRefPubMed

34.

Liao S-H, Tong R-F, Dong J-X (2008) Influence of anisotropy on peri-implant stress and strain in complete mandible model from CT. Comput Med Imaging Graph 32:53–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compmedimag.2007.09.001 CrossRefPubMed

35.

Khasnis SA, Kidiyoor KH, Patil AB, Kenganal SB (2014) Vertical root fractures and their management. J Conserv Dent 17:103–110. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.128034 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

36.

Štamfelj I, Vidmar G, Cvetko E, Gašperšič D (2008) Cementum thickness in multirooted human molars: a histometric study by light microscopy. Ann Anat 190:129–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2007.10.006 CrossRefPubMed

37.

Reimann S, Keilig L, Jäger A, Brosh T, Shpinko Y, Vardimon AD, Bourauel C (2009) Numerical and clinical study of the biomechanical behaviour of teeth under orthodontic loading using a headgear appliance. Med Eng Phys 31:539–546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2008.08.008 CrossRefPubMed

38.

Ahmed SS, Bhardwaj S, Ansari MK, Farooq O, Khan AA (2017) Role of 1.5 mm microplates in treatment of symphyseal fracture of mandible: a stress analysis based comparative study. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res 7:119–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobcr.2017.03.009 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

39.

Ruse ND (2008) Propagation of erroneous data for the modulus of elasticity of periodontal ligament and gutta percha in FEM/FEA papers: a story of broken links. Dent Mater 24:1717–1719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2008.04.006 CrossRefPubMed

40.

O'Mahony AM, Williams JL, Spencer P (2001) Anisotropic elasticity of cortical and cancellous bone in the posterior mandible increases peri-implant stress and strain under oblique loading. Clin Oral Implants Res 12:648–657. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.120614.x CrossRefPubMed

41.

Wang S, Xu Y, Shen Z, Wang L, Qiao F, Zhang X, Li M, Wu L (2017) The extent of the crack on artificial simulation models with CBCT and periapical radiography. PLoS One 12:e0169150. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169150 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Title: Comparison of ultimate force revealed by compression tests on extracted first premolars and FEA with a true scale 3D multi-component tooth model based on a CBCT dataset
Authors: Nuttapol Limjeerajarus
Phetcharat Dhammayannarangsi
Anon Phanijjiva
Pavita Tangsripongkul
Thanomsuk Jearanaiphaisarn
Pisha Pittayapat
Chalida Nakalekha Limjeerajarus
Publication date: 01-01-2020
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Keyword: Silicone
Published in: Clinical Oral Investigations / Issue 1/2020
Print ISSN: 1432-6981
Electronic ISSN: 1436-3771
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-02919-8

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Comparison of ultimate force revealed by compression tests on extracted first premolars and FEA with a true scale 3D multi-component tooth model based on a CBCT dataset

Abstract

Objective

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusion

Clinical relevance

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Objective

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusion

Clinical relevance

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

Randomised clinical trial investigating self-assembling peptide P11-4 in the treatment of early caries

Treatment of temporomandibular joint luxation: a systematic literature review

Systemic and periodontal conditions of overweight/obese patients during pregnancy and after delivery: a prospective cohort

Letter to the editor replying to Holliday et al. about the article published in clinical oral investigations titled “Impact of cigarette smoking and vaping on the outcome of full-mouth ultrasonic scaling among patients with gingival inflammation: a prospective study”

Relationship between mast cells and E-cadherin in odontogenic keratocysts and radicular cysts

CD146 expression in oral lichen planus and oral cancer