Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Documenta Ophthalmologica 1/2008

01-07-2008 | TECHNICAL NOTE

Signal and noise in P300 recordings to visual stimuli

Authors: Sven P. Heinrich, Michael Bach

Published in: Documenta Ophthalmologica | Issue 1/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

The P300 of the event-related potential is typically obtained for infrequent target stimuli that are embedded in a sequence of frequent irrelevant stimuli. The P300 has been suggested as a marker of high-level cognitive processing and might be useful in ophthalmology to confirm the diagnosis of a functional disorder. However, typical P300 measurements require relatively lengthy recording sessions. It would therefore be desirable to minimize the required time and to maximize the signal-to-noise ratio by finding the optimal balance between parameters such as stimulus probability and the number of target trials or the recording time. This is different from previous studies, which assessed the amplitude only. We recorded event-related potentials to visual stimuli using standard oddball paradigms with various target frequencies ranging from 2:1 (target majority) to 1:16 (massive non-target majority). We compared the signal-to-noise ratios for a fixed number of target trials as well as for a fixed total recording time and assessed effects of the immediate stimulus history. As expected, P300 amplitudes depend strongly on target infrequency. This did not reach saturation within the range tested. For a given number of target trials, the signal-to-noise ratio also increases with target infrequency. For a given recording duration, the signal-to-noise ratio is optimal around 1:8. In the 1:4 condition, the signal-to-noise ratio can be improved by excluding trials that were preceded by a target trial.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Linden DEJ (2005) The P300: where in the brain is it produced and what does it tell us? Neuroscientist 11:563–576PubMedCrossRef Linden DEJ (2005) The P300: where in the brain is it produced and what does it tell us? Neuroscientist 11:563–576PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Polich J, Herbst KL (2000) P300 as a clinical assay: rationale, evaluation, and findings. Int J Psychophysiol 38:3–19PubMedCrossRef Polich J, Herbst KL (2000) P300 as a clinical assay: rationale, evaluation, and findings. Int J Psychophysiol 38:3–19PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Patel SH, Azzam PN (2005) Characterization of N200 and P300: selected studies of the event-related potential. Int J Med Sci 2:147–154PubMed Patel SH, Azzam PN (2005) Characterization of N200 and P300: selected studies of the event-related potential. Int J Med Sci 2:147–154PubMed
4.
go back to reference Pratap-Chand R, Sinniah M, Salem FA (1988) Cognitive evoked potential (P300): a metric for cerebral concussion. Acta Neurol Scand 78:185–189PubMedCrossRef Pratap-Chand R, Sinniah M, Salem FA (1988) Cognitive evoked potential (P300): a metric for cerebral concussion. Acta Neurol Scand 78:185–189PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Rousseff RT, Tzvetanov P, Atanassova PA, Volkov I, Hristova I (2006) Correlation between cognitive P300 changes and the grade of closed head injury. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 46:275–277PubMed Rousseff RT, Tzvetanov P, Atanassova PA, Volkov I, Hristova I (2006) Correlation between cognitive P300 changes and the grade of closed head injury. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 46:275–277PubMed
6.
go back to reference Wang JT, Young GB, Connolly JF (2004) Prognostic value of evoked responses and event-related brain potentials in coma. Can J Neurol Sci 31:438–450PubMed Wang JT, Young GB, Connolly JF (2004) Prognostic value of evoked responses and event-related brain potentials in coma. Can J Neurol Sci 31:438–450PubMed
7.
go back to reference Comi G, Leocani L, Locatelli T, Medaglini S, Martinelli V (1999) Electrophysiological investigations in multiple sclerosis dementia. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl 50:480–485PubMed Comi G, Leocani L, Locatelli T, Medaglini S, Martinelli V (1999) Electrophysiological investigations in multiple sclerosis dementia. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl 50:480–485PubMed
8.
go back to reference Magnano I, Aiello I, Piras MR (2006) Cognitive impairment and neurophysiological correlates in MS. J Neurol Sci 245:117–122PubMedCrossRef Magnano I, Aiello I, Piras MR (2006) Cognitive impairment and neurophysiological correlates in MS. J Neurol Sci 245:117–122PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Lorenz J, Kunze K, Bromm B (1998) Differentiation of conversive sensory loss and malingering by P300 in a modified oddball task. Neuroreport 9:187–191PubMed Lorenz J, Kunze K, Bromm B (1998) Differentiation of conversive sensory loss and malingering by P300 in a modified oddball task. Neuroreport 9:187–191PubMed
10.
go back to reference Towle VL, Sutcliffe E, Sokol S (1985) Diagnosing functional visual deficits with the P300 component of the visual evoked potential. Arch Ophthalmol 103:47–50PubMed Towle VL, Sutcliffe E, Sokol S (1985) Diagnosing functional visual deficits with the P300 component of the visual evoked potential. Arch Ophthalmol 103:47–50PubMed
11.
go back to reference Verleger R (1997) On the utility of P3 latency as an index of mental chronometry. Psychophysiology 34:131–156PubMedCrossRef Verleger R (1997) On the utility of P3 latency as an index of mental chronometry. Psychophysiology 34:131–156PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Soltani M, Knight RT (2000) Neural origins of the P300. Crit Rev Neurobiol 14:199–224PubMed Soltani M, Knight RT (2000) Neural origins of the P300. Crit Rev Neurobiol 14:199–224PubMed
13.
go back to reference Polich J (2003) Theoretical overview of P3a and P3b. In: Polich J (ed) Detection of change: event-related potential and fMRI findings. Kluwer Academic Press, Boston, pp 83–98 Polich J (2003) Theoretical overview of P3a and P3b. In: Polich J (ed) Detection of change: event-related potential and fMRI findings. Kluwer Academic Press, Boston, pp 83–98
14.
go back to reference Polich J (2004) Neuropsychology of P3a and P3b: a theoretical overview. In: Moore NC, Arikan K (eds) Brainwaves and mind: recent developments. Kjellberg, Wheaton, IL, pp 15–29 Polich J (2004) Neuropsychology of P3a and P3b: a theoretical overview. In: Moore NC, Arikan K (eds) Brainwaves and mind: recent developments. Kjellberg, Wheaton, IL, pp 15–29
15.
go back to reference Katayama J, Polich J (1996) P300, probability, and the three-tone paradigm. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 100:555–562PubMedCrossRef Katayama J, Polich J (1996) P300, probability, and the three-tone paradigm. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 100:555–562PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Picton TW (1992) The P300 wave of the human event-related potential. J Clin Neurophysiol 9:456–479PubMedCrossRef Picton TW (1992) The P300 wave of the human event-related potential. J Clin Neurophysiol 9:456–479PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Ji J, Porjesz B, Begleiter H, Chorlian D (1999) P300: the similarities and differences in the scalp distribution of visual and auditory modality. Brain Topogr 11:315–327PubMedCrossRef Ji J, Porjesz B, Begleiter H, Chorlian D (1999) P300: the similarities and differences in the scalp distribution of visual and auditory modality. Brain Topogr 11:315–327PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Polich J, Margala C (1997) P300 and probability: comparison of oddball and single-stimulus paradigms. Int J Psychophysiol 25:169–176PubMedCrossRef Polich J, Margala C (1997) P300 and probability: comparison of oddball and single-stimulus paradigms. Int J Psychophysiol 25:169–176PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Duncan-Johnson CC, Donchin E (1977) On quantifying surprise: the variation of event-related potentials with subjective probability. Psychophysiology 14:456–467PubMedCrossRef Duncan-Johnson CC, Donchin E (1977) On quantifying surprise: the variation of event-related potentials with subjective probability. Psychophysiology 14:456–467PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Rosenfeld JP, Biroschak JR, Kleschen MJ, Smith KM (2005) Subjective and objective probability effects on P300 amplitude revisited. Psychophysiology 42:356–359PubMedCrossRef Rosenfeld JP, Biroschak JR, Kleschen MJ, Smith KM (2005) Subjective and objective probability effects on P300 amplitude revisited. Psychophysiology 42:356–359PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Gonsalvez CL, Polich J (2002) P300 amplitude is determined by target-to-target interval. Psychophysiology 39:388–396PubMedCrossRef Gonsalvez CL, Polich J (2002) P300 amplitude is determined by target-to-target interval. Psychophysiology 39:388–396PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Golob EJ, Starr A (2000) Effects of stimulus sequence on event-related potentials and reaction time during target detection in Alzheimer’s disease. Clin Neurophysiol 111:1438–1449PubMedCrossRef Golob EJ, Starr A (2000) Effects of stimulus sequence on event-related potentials and reaction time during target detection in Alzheimer’s disease. Clin Neurophysiol 111:1438–1449PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Holm A, Ranta-aho PO, Sallinen M, Karjalainen PA, Muller K (2006) Relationship of P300 single-trial responses with reaction time and preceding stimulus sequence. Int J Psychophysiol 61:244–252PubMedCrossRef Holm A, Ranta-aho PO, Sallinen M, Karjalainen PA, Muller K (2006) Relationship of P300 single-trial responses with reaction time and preceding stimulus sequence. Int J Psychophysiol 61:244–252PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Potts GF, Patel SH, Azzam PN (2004) Impact of instructed relevance on the visual ERP. Int J Psychophysiol 52:197–209PubMedCrossRef Potts GF, Patel SH, Azzam PN (2004) Impact of instructed relevance on the visual ERP. Int J Psychophysiol 52:197–209PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Williams LM, Simms E, Clark CR, Paul RH, Rowe D, Gordon E (2005) The test–retest reliability of a standardized neurocognitive and neurophysiological test battery: “Neuromarker”. Int J Neurosci 115:1605–1630PubMedCrossRef Williams LM, Simms E, Clark CR, Paul RH, Rowe D, Gordon E (2005) The test–retest reliability of a standardized neurocognitive and neurophysiological test battery: “Neuromarker”. Int J Neurosci 115:1605–1630PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Ravden D, Polich J (1999) On P300 measurement stability: habituation, intra-trial block variation, and ultradian rhythms. Biol Psychol 51:59–76PubMedCrossRef Ravden D, Polich J (1999) On P300 measurement stability: habituation, intra-trial block variation, and ultradian rhythms. Biol Psychol 51:59–76PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Ravden D, Polich J (1998) Habituation of P300 from visual stimuli. Int J Psychophysiol 30:359–365PubMedCrossRef Ravden D, Polich J (1998) Habituation of P300 from visual stimuli. Int J Psychophysiol 30:359–365PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Kinoshita S, Maeda H, Nakamura J, Kodama E, Morita K (1995) Reliability of the probability effect on event-related potentials during repeated testing. Kurume Med J 42:199–210PubMed Kinoshita S, Maeda H, Nakamura J, Kodama E, Morita K (1995) Reliability of the probability effect on event-related potentials during repeated testing. Kurume Med J 42:199–210PubMed
30.
go back to reference van Beijsterveldt CEM, van Baal GCM (2002) Twin and family studies of the human electroencephalogram: a review and a meta-analysis. Biol Psychol 61:111–138PubMedCrossRef van Beijsterveldt CEM, van Baal GCM (2002) Twin and family studies of the human electroencephalogram: a review and a meta-analysis. Biol Psychol 61:111–138PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Ahlfors SP, Ilmoniemi RJ, Portin K (1993) The effect of stimulation rate on the signal-to-noise ratio of evoked responses. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 88:339–342PubMedCrossRef Ahlfors SP, Ilmoniemi RJ, Portin K (1993) The effect of stimulation rate on the signal-to-noise ratio of evoked responses. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 88:339–342PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Stecker MM (2000) Generalized averaging and noise levels in evoked responses. Comput Biol Med 30:247–265PubMedCrossRef Stecker MM (2000) Generalized averaging and noise levels in evoked responses. Comput Biol Med 30:247–265PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Farwell LA, Donchin E (1988) Talking off the top of your head: toward a mental prosthesis utilizing event-related brain potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 70:510–523PubMedCrossRef Farwell LA, Donchin E (1988) Talking off the top of your head: toward a mental prosthesis utilizing event-related brain potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 70:510–523PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference American Clinical Neurophysiology Society (2006) Guideline 5: guidelines for standard electrode position nomenclature. J Clin Neurophysiol 23:107–110CrossRef American Clinical Neurophysiology Society (2006) Guideline 5: guidelines for standard electrode position nomenclature. J Clin Neurophysiol 23:107–110CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Murphy TI, Segalowitz SJ (2004) Eliminating the P300 rebound in short oddball paradigms. Int J Psychophysiol 53:233–238PubMedCrossRef Murphy TI, Segalowitz SJ (2004) Eliminating the P300 rebound in short oddball paradigms. Int J Psychophysiol 53:233–238PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Taylor JR (1997) An introduction to error analysis: the study of uncertainties in physical measurements, 2nd edn. University Science Books, Sausalito CA Taylor JR (1997) An introduction to error analysis: the study of uncertainties in physical measurements, 2nd edn. University Science Books, Sausalito CA
37.
go back to reference Silverman MP, Strange W, Lipscombe TC (2004) The distribution of composite measurements: how to be certain of the uncertainties in what we measure. Am J Phys 72:1068–1081CrossRef Silverman MP, Strange W, Lipscombe TC (2004) The distribution of composite measurements: how to be certain of the uncertainties in what we measure. Am J Phys 72:1068–1081CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Holm S (1979) A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand J Statist 6:65–70 Holm S (1979) A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand J Statist 6:65–70
Metadata
Title
Signal and noise in P300 recordings to visual stimuli
Authors
Sven P. Heinrich
Michael Bach
Publication date
01-07-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Documenta Ophthalmologica / Issue 1/2008
Print ISSN: 0012-4486
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2622
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10633-007-9107-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2008

Documenta Ophthalmologica 1/2008 Go to the issue