Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Gynecological Surgery 4/2016

01-11-2016 | Original Article

Should we use visual entry techniques in patients with previous laparotomies?

Authors: P. G. Paul, Reena Garg, Aditya S. Khurd, Tanuka Das, Manju Thomas, K. T. Radhika

Published in: Gynecological Surgery | Issue 4/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Laparoscopic surgery has become the method of choice for treating an ever increasing number of gynaecological disorders that require surgery. However, primary port insertion is a potentially dangerous step especially in patients with previous laparotomies. The aim of this study is to identify whether visual entry technique has any advantage over the closed one in patients with previous laparotomies. This is a retrospective observational case control study of 2541 patients with previous laparotomies who underwent laparoscopic surgery from January 1992 to September 2003 at Vijaya Hospital, Kochi and from October 2003 to October 2015 at Department of Endoscopy, Paul’s Hospital, Kochi, India. The control group comprised of 1261 patients, operated between January 1992 and September 2003 at Vijaya Hospital, Kochi, in whom closed technique of abdominal access for primary port creation was used. The study group comprised of 1280 patients, operated between October 2003 and October 2015 at Department of Endoscopy, Paul’s Hospital, Kochi, in whom visual entry (EndoTIP) was used for primary port creation. Procedures included in both groups were total laparoscopic hysterectomy, laparoscopic myomectomy, laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy, laparoscopic conservative surgery, laparoscopic tubal reanastomosis, laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy, laparoscopic sacrocervicopexy, laparoscopic adhesiolysis and laparoscopic sterilisation. There was no evidence of intestinal or vascular injury during visual entry using a blunt EndoTIP cannula. There were three cases of bowel injury with the closed, blind entry technique using a sharp linear trocar in the control group. The p value (Chi-square test) is 0.04, which is statistically significant. Visual entry, as an approach to abdominal access in patients with previous laparotomies, wherein chances of encountering peritoneal and bowel adhesions are very high, is safer than the closed blind entry technique in preventing bowel injuries.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Garry R (1999) Towards evidence based laparoscopic entry techniques: clinical problems and dilemmas. Gynaecol Endosc 8:315–326CrossRef Garry R (1999) Towards evidence based laparoscopic entry techniques: clinical problems and dilemmas. Gynaecol Endosc 8:315–326CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Hashizume M, Sugimachi K (1997) Needle and trocar injury during laparoscopic surgery in Japan. Study group of endoscopic surgery in Kyushu, Japan. Surg Endosc 11:1198–1201CrossRefPubMed Hashizume M, Sugimachi K (1997) Needle and trocar injury during laparoscopic surgery in Japan. Study group of endoscopic surgery in Kyushu, Japan. Surg Endosc 11:1198–1201CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Chapron CM, Pierre F, Lacroix S, Querleu D, Lansac J, Dubuisson JB (1997) Major vascular injuries during gynecologic laparoscopy. J Am Coll Surg 185:461–465CrossRefPubMed Chapron CM, Pierre F, Lacroix S, Querleu D, Lansac J, Dubuisson JB (1997) Major vascular injuries during gynecologic laparoscopy. J Am Coll Surg 185:461–465CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Jansen FW, Kolkman W, Bakkum EA, de Kroon CD, Trimbos-Kemper TCM, Trimbos JB (2004) Complications of laparoscopy: an inquiry about closed versus open-entry technique. Am J Obstet Gynecol 190:634–638CrossRefPubMed Jansen FW, Kolkman W, Bakkum EA, de Kroon CD, Trimbos-Kemper TCM, Trimbos JB (2004) Complications of laparoscopy: an inquiry about closed versus open-entry technique. Am J Obstet Gynecol 190:634–638CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Fuller J, Scott W, Ashar B, Corrado J (2005) Laparoscopic trocar injuries: a report from a U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) Systematic Technology Assessment of Medical Products (STAMP) Committee 1–14 Fuller J, Scott W, Ashar B, Corrado J (2005) Laparoscopic trocar injuries: a report from a U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) Systematic Technology Assessment of Medical Products (STAMP) Committee 1–14
7.
go back to reference Philips PA, Amaral JF (2001) Abdominal access complications in laparoscopic surgery. J Am Coll Surg 192(4):525–536CrossRefPubMed Philips PA, Amaral JF (2001) Abdominal access complications in laparoscopic surgery. J Am Coll Surg 192(4):525–536CrossRefPubMed
8.
9.
go back to reference Hasson HM (1971) A modified instrument and method for laparoscopy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 110:886–887CrossRefPubMed Hasson HM (1971) A modified instrument and method for laparoscopy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 110:886–887CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Dingfelder JR (1978) Direct laparoscopic trocar insertion without prior pneumoperitoneum. J Reprod Med 21:45–47PubMed Dingfelder JR (1978) Direct laparoscopic trocar insertion without prior pneumoperitoneum. J Reprod Med 21:45–47PubMed
11.
go back to reference Nezhat FR, Silfen SL, Evans D, Nezhat C (1991) Comparison of direct insertion of disposable and standard reusable laparoscopic trocars and previous pneumoperitoneum with veress needle. Obstet Gynecol 78:148–150PubMed Nezhat FR, Silfen SL, Evans D, Nezhat C (1991) Comparison of direct insertion of disposable and standard reusable laparoscopic trocars and previous pneumoperitoneum with veress needle. Obstet Gynecol 78:148–150PubMed
12.
go back to reference McGurgan P, O’Donovan P (1999) Optical veress as an entry technique. Gynaecol Endosc 18:379–392CrossRef McGurgan P, O’Donovan P (1999) Optical veress as an entry technique. Gynaecol Endosc 18:379–392CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kaali SG (1993) Introduction of the Opti-trocar. J Am Assoc Gynecol 1:50–53 Kaali SG (1993) Introduction of the Opti-trocar. J Am Assoc Gynecol 1:50–53
14.
go back to reference Turner DJ (1999) Making the case for the radially expanding access system. Gynaecol Endosc 8:391–395CrossRef Turner DJ (1999) Making the case for the radially expanding access system. Gynaecol Endosc 8:391–395CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Ternamian AM (1997) Laparoscopy without trocars. Surg Endosc 11:8159–8168CrossRef Ternamian AM (1997) Laparoscopy without trocars. Surg Endosc 11:8159–8168CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Marret H, Harchaoui Y, Chapron C, et al. (1998) Trocar injuries during laparoscopic gynaecological surgery. Report from the French Society of Gynaecological Laparoscopy. Gynaecol Endosc 7:235–241CrossRef Marret H, Harchaoui Y, Chapron C, et al. (1998) Trocar injuries during laparoscopic gynaecological surgery. Report from the French Society of Gynaecological Laparoscopy. Gynaecol Endosc 7:235–241CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Mettler L, Ibrahim M, Vinh VQ, Jonat W (1997) Clinical experience with an optical access trocar in gynecological laparoscopy-pelviscopy. J Soc Laparoend Surg 1:315–318 Mettler L, Ibrahim M, Vinh VQ, Jonat W (1997) Clinical experience with an optical access trocar in gynecological laparoscopy-pelviscopy. J Soc Laparoend Surg 1:315–318
18.
go back to reference Vilos GA, Ternamian A, Dempster J, Laberge PY, The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (2007) Laparoscopic entry: a review of techniques, technologies, and complications. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 29:433–465CrossRefPubMed Vilos GA, Ternamian A, Dempster J, Laberge PY, The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (2007) Laparoscopic entry: a review of techniques, technologies, and complications. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 29:433–465CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Ott J, JaegerLansky A, Poschalko G, Promberger R, Rothschedl E, Wenz R (2012) Entry techniques in gynecologic laparoscopy—a review. Gynecol Surg Volume 9, Issue 2, : 139–146 Ott J, JaegerLansky A, Poschalko G, Promberger R, Rothschedl E, Wenz R (2012) Entry techniques in gynecologic laparoscopy—a review. Gynecol Surg Volume 9, Issue 2, : 139–146
20.
go back to reference Brill AI, Nezhat F, Nezhat CH, Nezhat C (1995) The incidence of adhesions after prior laparotomy: a laparoscopic appraisal. Obstet Gynecol 85:269–272CrossRefPubMed Brill AI, Nezhat F, Nezhat CH, Nezhat C (1995) The incidence of adhesions after prior laparotomy: a laparoscopic appraisal. Obstet Gynecol 85:269–272CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Levrant SG, Bieber EJ, Barnes RB, et al. (1997) Anterior abdominal wall adhesions after laparotomy or laparoscopy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 4(3):353–356CrossRefPubMed Levrant SG, Bieber EJ, Barnes RB, et al. (1997) Anterior abdominal wall adhesions after laparotomy or laparoscopy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 4(3):353–356CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Brosens I, Gordon A (2001) Bowel injuries during gynecological laparoscopy: a multinational survey. Gynaecol Endosc 10:141–145CrossRef Brosens I, Gordon A (2001) Bowel injuries during gynecological laparoscopy: a multinational survey. Gynaecol Endosc 10:141–145CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Bhoyrul S, Vierra A, Nezhat CR, Krummel T, Way LA (2000) Trocar injuries in laparoscopic surgery. [abstract no O-145]. Fertil Steril 73(suppl 1):S55CrossRef Bhoyrul S, Vierra A, Nezhat CR, Krummel T, Way LA (2000) Trocar injuries in laparoscopic surgery. [abstract no O-145]. Fertil Steril 73(suppl 1):S55CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Reich H, Robeiro SC, Rasmussen C, Rosenberg J, Vidali A (1999) High-pressure trocar insertion technique. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 3:45–48 Reich H, Robeiro SC, Rasmussen C, Rosenberg J, Vidali A (1999) High-pressure trocar insertion technique. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 3:45–48
25.
go back to reference Vilos GA, Vilos AG, Abu-Rafea B, et al. (2009) Three simple steps during closed laparoscopic entry may minimize major injuries. Surg Endosc 23:758–764CrossRefPubMed Vilos GA, Vilos AG, Abu-Rafea B, et al. (2009) Three simple steps during closed laparoscopic entry may minimize major injuries. Surg Endosc 23:758–764CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Molloy D, Kalloo PD, Cooper M, Nguyen TV (2002) Laparoscopic entry: a literature review and analysis of techniques and complications of primary port entry. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 42:246–254CrossRefPubMed Molloy D, Kalloo PD, Cooper M, Nguyen TV (2002) Laparoscopic entry: a literature review and analysis of techniques and complications of primary port entry. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 42:246–254CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Merlin T, Hiller J, Maddern G, Jamieson GG, Brown AR, Kolbe A (2003) Systematic review of the safety and effectiveness of methods used to establish pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic surgery. Br J Surg 90:668–670CrossRefPubMed Merlin T, Hiller J, Maddern G, Jamieson GG, Brown AR, Kolbe A (2003) Systematic review of the safety and effectiveness of methods used to establish pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic surgery. Br J Surg 90:668–670CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Ahmad G, Gent D, Henderson D, O’Flynn H, Phillips K, Watson A (2015) Laparoscopic entry techniques. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 8:CD006583. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006583.pub4 Ahmad G, Gent D, Henderson D, O’Flynn H, Phillips K, Watson A (2015) Laparoscopic entry techniques. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 8:CD006583. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006583.pub4
29.
go back to reference Garry R (2009) Surgeons may continue to use their chosen entry technique. Gynecol Surg 6:87–92CrossRef Garry R (2009) Surgeons may continue to use their chosen entry technique. Gynecol Surg 6:87–92CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Ternamian AM, Vilos GA, Vilos AG, Abu-Rafea B, Tyrwhitt J, MacLeod NT (2010) Laparoscopic peritoneal entry with the reusable threaded visual cannula. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 17(4):461–467CrossRefPubMed Ternamian AM, Vilos GA, Vilos AG, Abu-Rafea B, Tyrwhitt J, MacLeod NT (2010) Laparoscopic peritoneal entry with the reusable threaded visual cannula. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 17(4):461–467CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Ternamian AM, Deitel M (1999) Endoscopic threaded imaging port (EndoTIP) for laparoscopy: experience with different body weights. Obes Surg 9(1):44–47CrossRefPubMed Ternamian AM, Deitel M (1999) Endoscopic threaded imaging port (EndoTIP) for laparoscopy: experience with different body weights. Obes Surg 9(1):44–47CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Ternamian A (2012) Laparoscopic abdominal entry by the Ternamian threaded visual system. In: Tinelli A (ed) Laparoscopic entry—traditional methods, new insights and novel approaches. Springer-Verlag, London Limited, pp. 33–60 Ternamian A (2012) Laparoscopic abdominal entry by the Ternamian threaded visual system. In: Tinelli A (ed) Laparoscopic entry—traditional methods, new insights and novel approaches. Springer-Verlag, London Limited, pp. 33–60
Metadata
Title
Should we use visual entry techniques in patients with previous laparotomies?
Authors
P. G. Paul
Reena Garg
Aditya S. Khurd
Tanuka Das
Manju Thomas
K. T. Radhika
Publication date
01-11-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Gynecological Surgery / Issue 4/2016
Print ISSN: 1613-2076
Electronic ISSN: 1613-2084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10397-016-0964-2

Other articles of this Issue 4/2016

Gynecological Surgery 4/2016 Go to the issue