Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences 8/2011

01-08-2011 | Original Article

Should a Colonoscopy be Recommended for Healthy Individuals with Increased Carcinoembryonic Antigen Levels? A Case–Control Study

Authors: Jin Ha Lee, Sung Pil Hong, Tae Joo Jeon, Gun-Hi Kang, Won-Choong Choi, Soung Min Jeon, Chang Mo Moon, Jae Jun Park, Jae Hee Cheon, Tae Il Kim, Won Ho Kim

Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences | Issue 8/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Background and Aim

Despite the limitations of screening or early diagnosis of colorectal cancers (CRC), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is frequently measured in practice and during health promotion programs. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of colonoscopy in healthy individuals with elevated CEA levels.

Methods

From January 2003 to November 2008, 117,731 healthy persons underwent an opportunistic screening program in two health promotion centers; 1,497 subjects (1.3%) showed an elevated CEA level (>5 ng/ml). Among them, 174 patients were recruited to undergo a colonoscopy to determine if colorectal malignancies were present. A total of 372 age- and sex-matched persons were selected as controls from among the healthy subjects who had a normal level of CEA and had received surveillance colonoscopy. The primary outcome was the incidences of CRC in elevated CEA and normal CEA groups. The secondary outcome was the predictive factors of CRC in the elevated CEA group.

Results

The incidence of CRC was higher in the group with higher CEA-levels than in the group with normal CEA levels (4.6 vs. 1.3%; P = 0.031). In the CEA-elevated group, patients with CRCs were diagnosed at more advanced stages than were those in the CEA-normal group. The incidence of colorectal polyps was not different between the two groups. In the CEA-elevated group, anemia was an independent predictive factor of CRCs by multivariate analysis (P = 0.002).

Conclusion

Anemia itself is not a predictive factor of CRC in the entire population, but is an independent predictive factor of CRC in healthy individuals with an elevated level of CEA. Therefore, colonoscopy should be recommended for healthy subjects with an elevated level of CEA accompanied with anemia in the absence of other adenocarcinomas to evaluate the presence of colorectal malignancy.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Boulware LE, Marinopoulos S, Phillips KA, et al. Systematic review: the value of the periodic health evaluation. Ann Intern Med. 2007;146:289–300.PubMed Boulware LE, Marinopoulos S, Phillips KA, et al. Systematic review: the value of the periodic health evaluation. Ann Intern Med. 2007;146:289–300.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Han PK. Historical changes in the objectives of the periodic health examination. Ann Intern Med. 1997;127:910–917.PubMed Han PK. Historical changes in the objectives of the periodic health examination. Ann Intern Med. 1997;127:910–917.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Fenton JJ, Cai Y, Weiss NS, et al. Delivery of cancer screening: how important is the preventive health examination? Arch Intern Med. 2007;167:580–585.PubMedCrossRef Fenton JJ, Cai Y, Weiss NS, et al. Delivery of cancer screening: how important is the preventive health examination? Arch Intern Med. 2007;167:580–585.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Lee TW, Lee CY, Kim HS, et al. Health promotion health center project. Public Health Nurs. 2007;24:529–537.PubMedCrossRef Lee TW, Lee CY, Kim HS, et al. Health promotion health center project. Public Health Nurs. 2007;24:529–537.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Kim HR, Lee CH, Kim YW, et al. Increased CA 19–9 level in patients without malignant disease. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2009;47:750–754.PubMedCrossRef Kim HR, Lee CH, Kim YW, et al. Increased CA 19–9 level in patients without malignant disease. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2009;47:750–754.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Kim JE, Lee KT, Lee JK, et al. Clinical usefulness of carbohydrate antigen 19–9 as a screening test for pancreatic cancer in an asymptomatic population. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;19:182–186.PubMedCrossRef Kim JE, Lee KT, Lee JK, et al. Clinical usefulness of carbohydrate antigen 19–9 as a screening test for pancreatic cancer in an asymptomatic population. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;19:182–186.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Lim YK, Kam MH, Eu KW. Carcinoembryonic antigen screening: how far should we go? Singapore Med J. 2009;50:862–865.PubMed Lim YK, Kam MH, Eu KW. Carcinoembryonic antigen screening: how far should we go? Singapore Med J. 2009;50:862–865.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Sturgeon C. Practice guidelines for tumor marker use in the clinic. Clin Chem. 2002;48:1151–1159.PubMed Sturgeon C. Practice guidelines for tumor marker use in the clinic. Clin Chem. 2002;48:1151–1159.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Bast RC Jr, Ravdin P, Hayes DF, et al. 2000 update of recommendations for the use of tumor markers in breast and colorectal cancer: clinical practice guidelines of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:1865–1878.PubMed Bast RC Jr, Ravdin P, Hayes DF, et al. 2000 update of recommendations for the use of tumor markers in breast and colorectal cancer: clinical practice guidelines of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:1865–1878.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Duffy MJ. Carcinoembryonic antigen as a marker for colorectal cancer: is it clinically useful? Clin Chem. 2001;47:624–630.PubMed Duffy MJ. Carcinoembryonic antigen as a marker for colorectal cancer: is it clinically useful? Clin Chem. 2001;47:624–630.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Rubio CA, Nesi G, Messerini L, et al. The Vienna classification applied to colorectal adenomas. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;21:1697–1703.PubMedCrossRef Rubio CA, Nesi G, Messerini L, et al. The Vienna classification applied to colorectal adenomas. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;21:1697–1703.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Schlemper RJ, Riddell RH, Kato Y, et al. The Vienna classification of gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia. Gut. 2000;47:251–255.PubMedCrossRef Schlemper RJ, Riddell RH, Kato Y, et al. The Vienna classification of gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia. Gut. 2000;47:251–255.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, O’Brien MJ, et al. Randomized comparison of surveillance intervals after colonoscopic removal of newly diagnosed adenomatous polyps. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:901–906.PubMedCrossRef Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, O’Brien MJ, et al. Randomized comparison of surveillance intervals after colonoscopic removal of newly diagnosed adenomatous polyps. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:901–906.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Compton C, Fenoglio-Preiser CM, Pettigrew N, et al. American Joint Committee on Cancer Prognostic Factors Consensus Conference: Colorectal Working Group. Cancer. 2000;88:1739–1757.PubMedCrossRef Compton C, Fenoglio-Preiser CM, Pettigrew N, et al. American Joint Committee on Cancer Prognostic Factors Consensus Conference: Colorectal Working Group. Cancer. 2000;88:1739–1757.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Wei EK, Giovannucci E, Wu K, et al. Comparison of risk factors for colon and rectal cancer. Int J Cancer. 2004;108:433–442.PubMedCrossRef Wei EK, Giovannucci E, Wu K, et al. Comparison of risk factors for colon and rectal cancer. Int J Cancer. 2004;108:433–442.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Imperiale TF, Glowinski EA, Juliar BE, et al. Variation in polyp detection rates at screening colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69:1288–1295.PubMedCrossRef Imperiale TF, Glowinski EA, Juliar BE, et al. Variation in polyp detection rates at screening colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69:1288–1295.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Gold P, Freedman SO. Demonstration of tumor-specific antigens in human colonic carcinomata by immunological tolerance and absorption techniques. J Exp Med. 1965;121:439–462.PubMedCrossRef Gold P, Freedman SO. Demonstration of tumor-specific antigens in human colonic carcinomata by immunological tolerance and absorption techniques. J Exp Med. 1965;121:439–462.PubMedCrossRef
19.
20.
go back to reference Stevens DP, Mackay IR, Cullen KJ. Carcinoembryonic antigen in an unselected elderly population: a four year follow up. Br J Cancer. 1975;32:147–151.PubMedCrossRef Stevens DP, Mackay IR, Cullen KJ. Carcinoembryonic antigen in an unselected elderly population: a four year follow up. Br J Cancer. 1975;32:147–151.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Cullen KJ, Stevens DP, Frost MA, et al. Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), smoking, and cancer in a longitudinal population study. Aust N Z J Med. 1976;6:279–283.PubMed Cullen KJ, Stevens DP, Frost MA, et al. Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), smoking, and cancer in a longitudinal population study. Aust N Z J Med. 1976;6:279–283.PubMed
22.
go back to reference Goldstein MJ, Mitchell EP. Carcinoembryonic antigen in the staging and follow-up of patients with colorectal cancer. Cancer Invest. 2005;23:338–351.PubMed Goldstein MJ, Mitchell EP. Carcinoembryonic antigen in the staging and follow-up of patients with colorectal cancer. Cancer Invest. 2005;23:338–351.PubMed
23.
go back to reference Eom BW, Lee HJ, Yoo MW, et al. Synchronous and metachronous cancers in patients with gastric cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2008;98:106–110.PubMedCrossRef Eom BW, Lee HJ, Yoo MW, et al. Synchronous and metachronous cancers in patients with gastric cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2008;98:106–110.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Lim SB, Jeong SY, Choi HS, et al. Synchronous gastric cancer in primary sporadic colorectal cancer patients in Korea. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2008;23:61–65.PubMedCrossRef Lim SB, Jeong SY, Choi HS, et al. Synchronous gastric cancer in primary sporadic colorectal cancer patients in Korea. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2008;23:61–65.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Tomoda H, Taketomi A, Baba H, et al. Multiple primary colorectal and gastric carcinoma in Japan. Oncol Rep. 1998;5:147–149.PubMed Tomoda H, Taketomi A, Baba H, et al. Multiple primary colorectal and gastric carcinoma in Japan. Oncol Rep. 1998;5:147–149.PubMed
26.
go back to reference Begent RH. The value of carcinoembryonic antigen measurement in clinical practice. Ann Clin Biochem. 1984;21:231–238.PubMed Begent RH. The value of carcinoembryonic antigen measurement in clinical practice. Ann Clin Biochem. 1984;21:231–238.PubMed
27.
go back to reference Thomas P, Toth CA, Saini KS, et al. The structure, metabolism and function of the carcinoembryonic antigen gene family. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1990;1032:177–189.PubMed Thomas P, Toth CA, Saini KS, et al. The structure, metabolism and function of the carcinoembryonic antigen gene family. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1990;1032:177–189.PubMed
28.
go back to reference Doos WG, Wolff WI, Shinya H, et al. CEA levels in patients with colorectal polyps. Cancer. 1975;36:1996–2003.PubMedCrossRef Doos WG, Wolff WI, Shinya H, et al. CEA levels in patients with colorectal polyps. Cancer. 1975;36:1996–2003.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Fischbach W, Mossner J. Do size, histology, or cytology of colorectal adenomas and their removal influence serum CEA? Dis Colon Rectum. 1987;30:595–599.PubMedCrossRef Fischbach W, Mossner J. Do size, histology, or cytology of colorectal adenomas and their removal influence serum CEA? Dis Colon Rectum. 1987;30:595–599.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Slattery ML, Boucher KM, Caan BJ, et al. Eating patterns and risk of colon cancer. Am J Epidemiol. 1998;148:4–16.PubMed Slattery ML, Boucher KM, Caan BJ, et al. Eating patterns and risk of colon cancer. Am J Epidemiol. 1998;148:4–16.PubMed
31.
go back to reference Center MM, Jemal A, Ward E. International trends in colorectal cancer incidence rates. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009;18:1688–1694.PubMedCrossRef Center MM, Jemal A, Ward E. International trends in colorectal cancer incidence rates. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009;18:1688–1694.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Should a Colonoscopy be Recommended for Healthy Individuals with Increased Carcinoembryonic Antigen Levels? A Case–Control Study
Authors
Jin Ha Lee
Sung Pil Hong
Tae Joo Jeon
Gun-Hi Kang
Won-Choong Choi
Soung Min Jeon
Chang Mo Moon
Jae Jun Park
Jae Hee Cheon
Tae Il Kim
Won Ho Kim
Publication date
01-08-2011
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Digestive Diseases and Sciences / Issue 8/2011
Print ISSN: 0163-2116
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2568
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-011-1606-1

Other articles of this Issue 8/2011

Digestive Diseases and Sciences 8/2011 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine