Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Abdominal Radiology 9/2017

Open Access 01-09-2017

Shortened oral contrast preparation for improved small bowel distension at MR enterography

Authors: M. I. J. Bekendam, C. A. J. Puylaert, S. K. S. S. Phoa, C. Y. Nio, J. Stoker

Published in: Abdominal Radiology | Issue 9/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Adequate small bowel distension in MR enterography is important for the evaluation of disease activity in Crohn’s disease patients. While distension of the distal small bowel can be achieved using standard oral contrast preparation, proximal small bowel distension remains a common impediment. The aim of this study was to compare small bowel distension between a 60-min oral contrast preparation and a 45-min oral contrast preparation.

Methods

Fifty retrospectively included patients with a 60-min oral preparation protocol and 50 prospectively included patients with a 45-min three-portion oral preparation protocol were included in the study. Both groups gradually ingested a total of 1600 mL 2% Mannitol solution during the preparation time. Two observers independently graded distension of the stomach, duodenum, jejunum, ileum, and (neo-) terminal ileum. Total small bowel distension was calculated as the sum of all small bowel segment scores. Individual and averaged observer distension scores were compared between both groups of patients using χ 2 test for ordinal variables.

Results

Significant differences in distension for one of both observers in favor of the 45-min protocol were found for the stomach (p = 0.04), duodenum (p = 0.02), jejunum (p = 0.02), and total small bowel (p = 0.02). When distension scores were averaged between observers, the stomach, jejunum, and total small bowel showed a significant difference in favor of the 45-min protocol (p = 0.04, 0.02, and 0.02, respectively).

Conclusion

We advise to use a 45-min three-portion oral preparation protocol for MR enterography for improved overall small bowel distension, proximal small bowel distension, and especially jejunal distension.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Panes J, Bouhnik Y, Reinisch W, et al. (2013) Imaging techniques for assessment of inflammatory bowel disease: joint ECCO and ESGAR evidence-based consensus guidelines. J Crohns Colitis 7(7):556–585CrossRefPubMed Panes J, Bouhnik Y, Reinisch W, et al. (2013) Imaging techniques for assessment of inflammatory bowel disease: joint ECCO and ESGAR evidence-based consensus guidelines. J Crohns Colitis 7(7):556–585CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Gourtsoyiannis NC, Papanikolaou N, Karantanas A (2006) Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of small intestinal Crohn’s disease. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 20(1):137–156CrossRefPubMed Gourtsoyiannis NC, Papanikolaou N, Karantanas A (2006) Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of small intestinal Crohn’s disease. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 20(1):137–156CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Lauenstein TC, Schneemann H, Vogt FM, et al. (2003) Optimization of oral contrast agents for MR imaging of the small bowel. Radiology 228(1):279–283CrossRefPubMed Lauenstein TC, Schneemann H, Vogt FM, et al. (2003) Optimization of oral contrast agents for MR imaging of the small bowel. Radiology 228(1):279–283CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Kavaliauskiene G, Ziech ML, Nio CY, Stoker J (2011) Small bowel MRI in adult patients: not just Crohn’s disease-a tutorial. Insights Imaging 2(5):501–513CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kavaliauskiene G, Ziech ML, Nio CY, Stoker J (2011) Small bowel MRI in adult patients: not just Crohn’s disease-a tutorial. Insights Imaging 2(5):501–513CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Negaard A, Paulsen V, Sandvik L, et al. (2007) A prospective randomized comparison between two MRI studies of the small bowel in Crohn’s disease, the oral contrast method and MR enteroclysis. Eur Radiol 17(9):2294–2301CrossRefPubMed Negaard A, Paulsen V, Sandvik L, et al. (2007) A prospective randomized comparison between two MRI studies of the small bowel in Crohn’s disease, the oral contrast method and MR enteroclysis. Eur Radiol 17(9):2294–2301CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Sinha R, Rawat S (2013) MRI enterography with divided dose oral preparation: effect on bowel distension and diagnostic quality. Indian J Radiol Imaging 23(1):86–91CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sinha R, Rawat S (2013) MRI enterography with divided dose oral preparation: effect on bowel distension and diagnostic quality. Indian J Radiol Imaging 23(1):86–91CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Schreyer AG, Geissler A, Albrich H, et al. (2004) Abdominal MRI after enteroclysis or with oral contrast in patients with suspected or proven Crohn’s disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2(6):491–497CrossRefPubMed Schreyer AG, Geissler A, Albrich H, et al. (2004) Abdominal MRI after enteroclysis or with oral contrast in patients with suspected or proven Crohn’s disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2(6):491–497CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Negaard A, Sandvik L, Berstad AE, et al. (2008) MRI of the small bowel with oral contrast or nasojejunal intubation in Crohn’s disease: randomized comparison of patient acceptance. Scand J Gastroenterol 43(1):44–51CrossRefPubMed Negaard A, Sandvik L, Berstad AE, et al. (2008) MRI of the small bowel with oral contrast or nasojejunal intubation in Crohn’s disease: randomized comparison of patient acceptance. Scand J Gastroenterol 43(1):44–51CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Puylaert CA, Tielbeek JA, Bipat S, Stoker J (2015) Grading of Crohn’s disease activity using CT, MRI, US and scintigraphy: a meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 25(11):3295–3313CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Puylaert CA, Tielbeek JA, Bipat S, Stoker J (2015) Grading of Crohn’s disease activity using CT, MRI, US and scintigraphy: a meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 25(11):3295–3313CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Taylor SA, Avni F, Cronin CG, et al. (2016) The first joint ESGAR/ESPR consensus statement on the technical performance of cross-sectional small bowel and colonic imaging. Eur Radiol Taylor SA, Avni F, Cronin CG, et al. (2016) The first joint ESGAR/ESPR consensus statement on the technical performance of cross-sectional small bowel and colonic imaging. Eur Radiol
11.
go back to reference Lohan D, Cronin C, Meehan C, et al. (2007) MR small bowel enterography: optimization of imaging timing. Clin Radiol 62(8):804–807CrossRefPubMed Lohan D, Cronin C, Meehan C, et al. (2007) MR small bowel enterography: optimization of imaging timing. Clin Radiol 62(8):804–807CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Young BM, Fletcher JG, Booya F, et al. (2008) Head-to-head comparison of oral contrast agents for cross-sectional enterography: small bowel distention, timing, and side effects. J Comput Assist Tomogr 32(1):32–38CrossRefPubMed Young BM, Fletcher JG, Booya F, et al. (2008) Head-to-head comparison of oral contrast agents for cross-sectional enterography: small bowel distention, timing, and side effects. J Comput Assist Tomogr 32(1):32–38CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33(1):159–174CrossRefPubMed Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33(1):159–174CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Kuehle CA, Ajaj W, Ladd SC, et al. (2006) Hydro-MRI of the small bowel: effect of contrast volume, timing of contrast administration, and data acquisition on bowel distention. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187(4):W375–W385CrossRefPubMed Kuehle CA, Ajaj W, Ladd SC, et al. (2006) Hydro-MRI of the small bowel: effect of contrast volume, timing of contrast administration, and data acquisition on bowel distention. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187(4):W375–W385CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Schmidt SA, Baumann JA, Stanescu-Siegmund N, et al. (2016) Oral distension methods for small bowel MRI: comparison of different agents to optimize bowel distension. Acta Radiol Schmidt SA, Baumann JA, Stanescu-Siegmund N, et al. (2016) Oral distension methods for small bowel MRI: comparison of different agents to optimize bowel distension. Acta Radiol
16.
go back to reference Teramoto H, Shimizu T, Yogo H, et al. (2012) Assessment of gastric emptying and duodenal motility upon ingestion of a liquid meal using rapid magnetic resonance imaging. Exp Physiol 97(4):516–524CrossRefPubMed Teramoto H, Shimizu T, Yogo H, et al. (2012) Assessment of gastric emptying and duodenal motility upon ingestion of a liquid meal using rapid magnetic resonance imaging. Exp Physiol 97(4):516–524CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Schwizer W, Fox M, Steingotter A. (2003) Non-invasive investigation of gastrointestinal functions with magnetic resonance imaging: towards an “ideal” investigation of gastrointestinal function. Gut 52 Suppl 4:iv34-9 Schwizer W, Fox M, Steingotter A. (2003) Non-invasive investigation of gastrointestinal functions with magnetic resonance imaging: towards an “ideal” investigation of gastrointestinal function. Gut 52 Suppl 4:iv34-9
19.
go back to reference Fletcher JG, Fidler JL, Bruining DH, Huprich JE (2011) New concepts in intestinal imaging for inflammatory bowel diseases. Gastroenterology 140(6):1795–1806CrossRefPubMed Fletcher JG, Fidler JL, Bruining DH, Huprich JE (2011) New concepts in intestinal imaging for inflammatory bowel diseases. Gastroenterology 140(6):1795–1806CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Shortened oral contrast preparation for improved small bowel distension at MR enterography
Authors
M. I. J. Bekendam
C. A. J. Puylaert
S. K. S. S. Phoa
C. Y. Nio
J. Stoker
Publication date
01-09-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Abdominal Radiology / Issue 9/2017
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Electronic ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-017-1133-4

Other articles of this Issue 9/2017

Abdominal Radiology 9/2017 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine