Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 6/2014

01-06-2014 | Otology

Short-term results of Neurelec Digisonic SP cochlear implantation in prelingually deafened children

Authors: Ozgul Akin Senkal, Evren Hizal, Haluk Yavuz, Ismail Yilmaz, Levent Naci Ozluoglu

Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology | Issue 6/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

This paper examines the reports on the selection criteria and the post-operative performance of 25 children implanted with the Neurelec Digisonic SP. This study reported benefits from Neurelec Digisonic SP cochlear implant in auditory and speech perception outcomes. There has been a lack of studies into the additional factors such as level of the mothers’ education and bilingualism, which is a factor that may have a significant effect on the success of cochlear implantation. This paper examines the reports on the reasons for the differences in performance and the post-operative performance of 25 children implanted with the Neurelec Digisonic SP. Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale and Meaningful Use of Speech Scale questionnaires were used just before 3, 6, 12, and 18 months following implantation. Electrode array was inserted without difficulty in all cases, with no complications to date. This is a retrospective and cross-sectional study and all the data were collected between March 2010 and December 2012. Auditory performance improved over time for up to 12 months after implantation. Our experience indicates that the Neurelec Digisonic SP cochlear implant system in children under the age of two is relatively safe and reliable. The Neurelec Digisonic SP device surgery can be performed without complications. Auditory performance results support the effectiveness of early implantation. These important findings further support the importance of professionals working very closely with parents or especially mothers and enhancing their involvement in achieving therapy goals to develop auditory skills and speech in young children following cochlear implantation.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Richter B, Eissele S, Laszig R, Lohle E (2002) Receptive and expressive language skills of 106 children with a minimum of 2 years’ experience in hearing with a cochlear implant. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 64(2):111–125PubMedCrossRef Richter B, Eissele S, Laszig R, Lohle E (2002) Receptive and expressive language skills of 106 children with a minimum of 2 years’ experience in hearing with a cochlear implant. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 64(2):111–125PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference O’Donoghue GM, Nikolopoulos TP, Archbold SM, Tait M (1998) Speech perception in children after cochlear implantation. Am J Otol 19(6):762–767PubMed O’Donoghue GM, Nikolopoulos TP, Archbold SM, Tait M (1998) Speech perception in children after cochlear implantation. Am J Otol 19(6):762–767PubMed
5.
go back to reference Waltzman SB, Robbins AM, Green JE, Cohen NL (2003) Second oral language capabilities in children with cochlear implants. Otol Neurotol: Off Publ Am Otol Soc Am Neurotol Soc Eur Acad Otol Neurotol 24(5):757–763CrossRef Waltzman SB, Robbins AM, Green JE, Cohen NL (2003) Second oral language capabilities in children with cochlear implants. Otol Neurotol: Off Publ Am Otol Soc Am Neurotol Soc Eur Acad Otol Neurotol 24(5):757–763CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Archbold SM, Nikolopoulos TP, Tait M, O’Donoghue GM, Lutman ME, Gregory S (2000) Approach to communication, speech perception and intelligibility after paediatric cochlear implantation. Br J Audiol 34(4):257–264PubMedCrossRef Archbold SM, Nikolopoulos TP, Tait M, O’Donoghue GM, Lutman ME, Gregory S (2000) Approach to communication, speech perception and intelligibility after paediatric cochlear implantation. Br J Audiol 34(4):257–264PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Harrison RV, Gordon KA, Mount RJ (2005) Is there a critical period for cochlear implantation in congenitally deaf children? analyses of hearing and speech perception performance after implantation. Dev Psychobiol 46(3):252–261. doi:10.1002/dev.20052 PubMedCrossRef Harrison RV, Gordon KA, Mount RJ (2005) Is there a critical period for cochlear implantation in congenitally deaf children? analyses of hearing and speech perception performance after implantation. Dev Psychobiol 46(3):252–261. doi:10.​1002/​dev.​20052 PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Kirk KI, Miyamoto RT, Lento CL, Ying E, O’Neill T, Fears B (2002) Effects of age at implantation in young children. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 189:69–73PubMed Kirk KI, Miyamoto RT, Lento CL, Ying E, O’Neill T, Fears B (2002) Effects of age at implantation in young children. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 189:69–73PubMed
15.
go back to reference Umat C, Siti Hufaidah K, Azlizawati AR (2010) Auditory functionality and early use of speech in a group of pediatric cochlear implant users. Med J Malays 65(1):7–13 Umat C, Siti Hufaidah K, Azlizawati AR (2010) Auditory functionality and early use of speech in a group of pediatric cochlear implant users. Med J Malays 65(1):7–13
16.
go back to reference Bertram B, Päd D (1995) Importance of auditory-verbal education and parents’ participation after cochlear implantation of very young children. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 166:97–100PubMed Bertram B, Päd D (1995) Importance of auditory-verbal education and parents’ participation after cochlear implantation of very young children. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 166:97–100PubMed
17.
go back to reference Geers A, Brenner C, Davidson L (2003) Factors associated with development of speech perception skills in children implanted by age five. Ear Hear 24(1):24S–35SPubMed Geers A, Brenner C, Davidson L (2003) Factors associated with development of speech perception skills in children implanted by age five. Ear Hear 24(1):24S–35SPubMed
18.
go back to reference Strube M (2003) Statistical analysis and interpretation in a study of prelinguistic deaf children implanted before 5 years of age. Ear Hear 24(1):15S–23SPubMed Strube M (2003) Statistical analysis and interpretation in a study of prelinguistic deaf children implanted before 5 years of age. Ear Hear 24(1):15S–23SPubMed
19.
go back to reference Robbins AM, Osberger MJ (1992) Meaningful use of speech scale. Indiana university school of medicine, Indianapolis Robbins AM, Osberger MJ (1992) Meaningful use of speech scale. Indiana university school of medicine, Indianapolis
20.
go back to reference Robbins AM, Renshaw JJ, Berry SW (1991) Evaluating meaningful auditory integration in profoundly hearing-impaired children. Am J Otol 12(Suppl):144–150PubMed Robbins AM, Renshaw JJ, Berry SW (1991) Evaluating meaningful auditory integration in profoundly hearing-impaired children. Am J Otol 12(Suppl):144–150PubMed
21.
go back to reference Sorkin DL, Zwolan TA (2008) Parental perspectives regarding early intervention and its role in cochlear implantation in children. Otol Neurotol: Off Publ Am Otol Soc Am Neurotol Soc Eur Acad Otol Neurotol 29(2):137–141. doi:10.1097/mao.0b013e3181616c88 CrossRef Sorkin DL, Zwolan TA (2008) Parental perspectives regarding early intervention and its role in cochlear implantation in children. Otol Neurotol: Off Publ Am Otol Soc Am Neurotol Soc Eur Acad Otol Neurotol 29(2):137–141. doi:10.​1097/​mao.​0b013e3181616c88​ CrossRef
22.
23.
go back to reference Arndt P, Staller S, Arcaroli J, Hines A, Ebinger K (1999) Within-subject comparison of advanced coding strategies in the Nucleus 24 Cochlear Implant. Cochlear Corporation, Englewood Arndt P, Staller S, Arcaroli J, Hines A, Ebinger K (1999) Within-subject comparison of advanced coding strategies in the Nucleus 24 Cochlear Implant. Cochlear Corporation, Englewood
24.
go back to reference Spencer P (2003) Considerations for the future: putting it all together. In: Nussbaum D, LaPorta R, Hinger J (eds) Cochlear implant and sign language: putting it all together (Identifying effective practices for Educational Settings). Gallaudet University, Clerc Center Publications, Washington, pp 23–31 Spencer P (2003) Considerations for the future: putting it all together. In: Nussbaum D, LaPorta R, Hinger J (eds) Cochlear implant and sign language: putting it all together (Identifying effective practices for Educational Settings). Gallaudet University, Clerc Center Publications, Washington, pp 23–31
25.
go back to reference Kubo T, Iwaki T, Sasaki T (2008) Auditory perception and speech production skills of children with cochlear implant assessed by means of questionnaire batteries. ORL J Oto-Rhino-Laryngol Relat Spec 70(4):224–228. doi:10.1159/000130869 CrossRef Kubo T, Iwaki T, Sasaki T (2008) Auditory perception and speech production skills of children with cochlear implant assessed by means of questionnaire batteries. ORL J Oto-Rhino-Laryngol Relat Spec 70(4):224–228. doi:10.​1159/​000130869 CrossRef
27.
go back to reference O’Neill C, O’Donoghue GM, Archbold SM, Nikolopoulos TP, Sach T (2002) Variations in gains in auditory performance from pediatric cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol: Off Publ Am Otol Soc Am Neurotol Soc Eur Acad Otol Neurotol 23(1):44–48CrossRef O’Neill C, O’Donoghue GM, Archbold SM, Nikolopoulos TP, Sach T (2002) Variations in gains in auditory performance from pediatric cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol: Off Publ Am Otol Soc Am Neurotol Soc Eur Acad Otol Neurotol 23(1):44–48CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Thomas E, El-Kashlan H, Zwolan TA (2008) Children with cochlear implants who live in monolingual and bilingual homes. Otol Neurotol: Off Publ Am Otol Soc Am Neurotol Soc Eur Acad Otol Neurotol 29(2):230–234. doi:10.1097/mao.0b013e31815f668b CrossRef Thomas E, El-Kashlan H, Zwolan TA (2008) Children with cochlear implants who live in monolingual and bilingual homes. Otol Neurotol: Off Publ Am Otol Soc Am Neurotol Soc Eur Acad Otol Neurotol 29(2):230–234. doi:10.​1097/​mao.​0b013e31815f668b​ CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Margalit M (1994) Loneliness among children with special needs: Theory, research and intervention. Springer, New YorkCrossRef Margalit M (1994) Loneliness among children with special needs: Theory, research and intervention. Springer, New YorkCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Luterman D (2003) Counseling parents about cochlear implants. The ASHA Leader Luterman D (2003) Counseling parents about cochlear implants. The ASHA Leader
Metadata
Title
Short-term results of Neurelec Digisonic SP cochlear implantation in prelingually deafened children
Authors
Ozgul Akin Senkal
Evren Hizal
Haluk Yavuz
Ismail Yilmaz
Levent Naci Ozluoglu
Publication date
01-06-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology / Issue 6/2014
Print ISSN: 0937-4477
Electronic ISSN: 1434-4726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-013-2576-z

Other articles of this Issue 6/2014

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 6/2014 Go to the issue