Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Techniques in Coloproctology 4/2009

01-12-2009 | Original Article

Short-term results of DST EEA 33 stapler and neu@ anoscope for stapled haemorrhoidectomy: a prospective study of 1,118 patients from a single centre

Authors: Ming Hian Kam, Jit Fong Lim, Kok Sun Ho, Boon Swee Ooi, Kong Weng Eu

Published in: Techniques in Coloproctology | Issue 4/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Stapled haemorrhoidectomy has been performed with different techniques and staplers. We review our initial experience with the new DST EEA 33 stapler and neu@ anoscope.

Methods

A review of all patients who underwent stapled haemorrhoidectomy using the DST EEA 33 over a 14-month period was conducted. Short-term outcomes of bleeding, pain and retention of urine requiring admission or strictures requiring surgical intervention were studied.

Results

There were 1,118 patients operated from August 2007 to October 2008. The median age was 46-year-old (20–82 years) and 51% were females. The median operating time was 15 min (range 5–45 min), and median follow-up was 7 months (range 3–16 months). There were 26 patients (2.3%) who were admitted for inability to pass urine and 20 required catheterisation. Fifty-two patients (4.6%) were admitted for post-operative bleeding. In 32 cases the bleeding stopped spontaneously, while 19 patients required adrenaline injection and packing for hemostasis. Only one patient required surgical hemostasis. Thirty-three patients (2.9%) were admitted for post-operative pain and stayed for a median of 1 day (range 1–4 days). There were 14 patients (1.2%) who developed anorectal strictures requiring surgical intervention. All underwent anoplasty at a median of 3 months post-operatively (range 2–5 months), with good result. There were no recurrent haemorrhoids during follow-up.

Conclusion

Stapled haemorrhoidectomy using the DST EEA 33 stapler is safe. The neu@ anoscope provides good visibility and handling, and is a useful tool in this procedure.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ooi BS, Ho YH, Tang CL, Eu KW, Seow-Choen F (2002) Results of stapling and conventional haemorrhoidectomy. Tech Coloproctol 6:59–60CrossRefPubMed Ooi BS, Ho YH, Tang CL, Eu KW, Seow-Choen F (2002) Results of stapling and conventional haemorrhoidectomy. Tech Coloproctol 6:59–60CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Shao WJ, Li GC, Zhang ZH, Yang BL, Sun GD, Chen YQ (2008) Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing stapled haemorrhoidopexy with conventional haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 95:147–160CrossRefPubMed Shao WJ, Li GC, Zhang ZH, Yang BL, Sun GD, Chen YQ (2008) Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing stapled haemorrhoidopexy with conventional haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 95:147–160CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Corman ML, Gravié JF, Hager T et al (2003) Stapled haemorrhoidopexy: a consensus position paper by an international working party—indications, contra-indications and technique. Colorectal Dis 5:304–310CrossRefPubMed Corman ML, Gravié JF, Hager T et al (2003) Stapled haemorrhoidopexy: a consensus position paper by an international working party—indications, contra-indications and technique. Colorectal Dis 5:304–310CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Jayaraman S, Colquhoun PH, Malthaner RA (2006) Stapled versus conventional surgery for hemorrhoids. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 18(4):CD005393 Jayaraman S, Colquhoun PH, Malthaner RA (2006) Stapled versus conventional surgery for hemorrhoids. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 18(4):CD005393
5.
go back to reference Nisar PJ, Acheson AG, Neal KR, Scholefield JH (2004) Stapled hemorrhoidopexy compared with conventional hemorrhoidectomy: systematic review of randomized, controlled trials. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1837–1845CrossRefPubMed Nisar PJ, Acheson AG, Neal KR, Scholefield JH (2004) Stapled hemorrhoidopexy compared with conventional hemorrhoidectomy: systematic review of randomized, controlled trials. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1837–1845CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Lan P, Wu X, Zhou X, Wang J, Zhang L (2006) The safety and efficacy of stapled hemorrhoidectomy in the treatment of hemorrhoids: a systematic review and meta-analysis of ten randomized control trials. Int J Colorectal Dis 21:172–178CrossRefPubMed Lan P, Wu X, Zhou X, Wang J, Zhang L (2006) The safety and efficacy of stapled hemorrhoidectomy in the treatment of hemorrhoids: a systematic review and meta-analysis of ten randomized control trials. Int J Colorectal Dis 21:172–178CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Tjandra JJ, Chan MK (2007) Systematic review on the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (stapled hemorrhoidopexy). Dis Colon Rectum 50:878–892CrossRefPubMed Tjandra JJ, Chan MK (2007) Systematic review on the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (stapled hemorrhoidopexy). Dis Colon Rectum 50:878–892CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Ng KH, Chew MH, Eu KW (2008) Modified stapled haemorrhoidectomy: a suggested improved technique. ANZ J Surg 78:394–397CrossRefPubMed Ng KH, Chew MH, Eu KW (2008) Modified stapled haemorrhoidectomy: a suggested improved technique. ANZ J Surg 78:394–397CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Eu KW, Lai JH (2005) Stapled haemorrhoidectomy or Longo’s procedure? Two totally different concepts. Singapore Med J 46:566–567PubMed Eu KW, Lai JH (2005) Stapled haemorrhoidectomy or Longo’s procedure? Two totally different concepts. Singapore Med J 46:566–567PubMed
10.
go back to reference Jayaraman S, Colquhoun PH, Malthaner RA (2007) Stapled haemorrhoidopexy is associated with a higher long-term recurrence rate of internal hemorrhoids compared with conventional excisional hemorrhoid surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 50:1297–1305CrossRefPubMed Jayaraman S, Colquhoun PH, Malthaner RA (2007) Stapled haemorrhoidopexy is associated with a higher long-term recurrence rate of internal hemorrhoids compared with conventional excisional hemorrhoid surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 50:1297–1305CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Giordano P, Gravante G, Sorge R, Ovens L, Nastro P (2009) Long-term outcomes of stapled hemorrhoidopexy vs conventional hemorrhoidectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Surg 144:266–272CrossRefPubMed Giordano P, Gravante G, Sorge R, Ovens L, Nastro P (2009) Long-term outcomes of stapled hemorrhoidopexy vs conventional hemorrhoidectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Surg 144:266–272CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Lim YK, Eu KW, Ho KS, Ooi BS, Tang CL (2006) PPH 03 stapled haemorrhoidopexy: our experience. Tech Coloproctol 10:43–46CrossRefPubMed Lim YK, Eu KW, Ho KS, Ooi BS, Tang CL (2006) PPH 03 stapled haemorrhoidopexy: our experience. Tech Coloproctol 10:43–46CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Ng KH, Ho KS, Ooi BS, Tang CL, Eu KW (2006) Experience of 3711 stapled haemorrhoidectomy operations. Br J Surg 93:226–230CrossRefPubMed Ng KH, Ho KS, Ooi BS, Tang CL, Eu KW (2006) Experience of 3711 stapled haemorrhoidectomy operations. Br J Surg 93:226–230CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Ng KH, Eu KW, Ooi BS, Heah SM, Tang CL, Seow-Choen F (2003) Stapled haemorrhoidopexy for prolapsed piles performed with concurrent perianal conditions. Tech Coloproctol 7:214–215CrossRefPubMed Ng KH, Eu KW, Ooi BS, Heah SM, Tang CL, Seow-Choen F (2003) Stapled haemorrhoidopexy for prolapsed piles performed with concurrent perianal conditions. Tech Coloproctol 7:214–215CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Kam MH, Mathur P, Peng XH, Seow-Choen F, Chew IW, Kumarasinghe MP (2005) Correlation of histology with anorectal function following stapled haemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 48:1437–1441CrossRefPubMed Kam MH, Mathur P, Peng XH, Seow-Choen F, Chew IW, Kumarasinghe MP (2005) Correlation of histology with anorectal function following stapled haemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 48:1437–1441CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Chew MH, Tan WS, Eu KW (2008) The use of CEEA 34 in stapled haemorrhoidectomy: suggested modifications in technique. World J Surg 32:1160–1161CrossRefPubMed Chew MH, Tan WS, Eu KW (2008) The use of CEEA 34 in stapled haemorrhoidectomy: suggested modifications in technique. World J Surg 32:1160–1161CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Chew MH, Kam MH, Lim JF et al (2009) The evaluation of CEEA 34 for stapled haemorrhoidectomy: results of a prospective clinical trial and patient satisfaction. Am J Surg 197:695–701CrossRefPubMed Chew MH, Kam MH, Lim JF et al (2009) The evaluation of CEEA 34 for stapled haemorrhoidectomy: results of a prospective clinical trial and patient satisfaction. Am J Surg 197:695–701CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Guy RJ, Ng CE, Eu KW (2003) Stapled anoplasty for haemorrhoids: a comparison of ambulatory vs in-patient procedures. Colorectal Dis 5:29–32CrossRefPubMed Guy RJ, Ng CE, Eu KW (2003) Stapled anoplasty for haemorrhoids: a comparison of ambulatory vs in-patient procedures. Colorectal Dis 5:29–32CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Ho YH, Cheong WK, Tsang C et al (2000) Stapled haemorrhoidectomy–cost and effectiveness. Randomized controlled trial including incontinence scoring, anorectal manometry, and endoanal ultrasound assessments up to 3 months. Dis Colon Rectum 43:1666–1675CrossRefPubMed Ho YH, Cheong WK, Tsang C et al (2000) Stapled haemorrhoidectomy–cost and effectiveness. Randomized controlled trial including incontinence scoring, anorectal manometry, and endoanal ultrasound assessments up to 3 months. Dis Colon Rectum 43:1666–1675CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Ho YH, Seow-Choen F, Tsang C, Eu KW (2001) Randomized trial assessing anal sphincter injuries after stapled haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 88:1449–1455CrossRefPubMed Ho YH, Seow-Choen F, Tsang C, Eu KW (2001) Randomized trial assessing anal sphincter injuries after stapled haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 88:1449–1455CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Short-term results of DST EEA 33 stapler and neu@ anoscope for stapled haemorrhoidectomy: a prospective study of 1,118 patients from a single centre
Authors
Ming Hian Kam
Jit Fong Lim
Kok Sun Ho
Boon Swee Ooi
Kong Weng Eu
Publication date
01-12-2009
Publisher
Springer Milan
Published in
Techniques in Coloproctology / Issue 4/2009
Print ISSN: 1123-6337
Electronic ISSN: 1128-045X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-009-0532-0

Other articles of this Issue 4/2009

Techniques in Coloproctology 4/2009 Go to the issue