Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 8/2013

01-08-2013 | Otology

Short-term hearing results after primary stapedotomy with nitinol and teflon–platinum prostheses for otosclerosis

Authors: Haralampos Gouveris, Miklós Tóth, Dimitrios Koutsimpelas, Irene Schmidtmann, Wolf J. Mann

Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology | Issue 8/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

The aim of this study is to determine differences in postoperative air–bone gap (ABG) after placement of teflon–platinum or nitinol middle ear prostheses in primary stapedotomy patients with otosclerosis. Thirty otosclerosis patients (24 female, 6 male; age 10–61 years) with primary stapedotomy were studied prospectively. Before and after surgery, the mean and standard deviations of the ABG were measured at eight frequencies (0.25–4 kHz). Patients were randomized into one of two groups receiving either teflon–platinum or nitinol prostheses. Hearing results were assessed 1 year after surgery. To assess the joint influence of treatment and frequency on ABG reduction, a linear mixed model was used (significance level was p = 5 %). The Tukey–Kramer method was used to adjust for multiple comparisons. Significant differences were found between treatment groups (p < 0.0001) and between frequencies within the same treatment group (p < 0.0001) but no interaction (p = 0.7963), i.e. the reduction of the conductive components over frequencies was nearly parallel in both groups. Overall, patients in the Teflon group had a larger reduction of conductive components, on average 8.0 dB more reduction, than patients in the nitinol group. However, after adjusting for multiple comparisons, we could not identify a single frequency with a significant difference in reduction of conductive components. Use of the teflon–platinum prosthesis results in statistically non-significant better ABG closure at 0.25–4 kHz 1 year postoperatively than the use of the nitinol prosthesis.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Shea JJ Jr (1958) Fenestration of the oval window. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 67:932–951PubMed Shea JJ Jr (1958) Fenestration of the oval window. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 67:932–951PubMed
2.
go back to reference Rajan GP, Diaz J, Blackham R, Eikelboom RH, Atlas MD, Shelton C, Huber AM (2007) Eliminating the limitations of manual crimping in stapes surgery: mid-term results of 90 patients in the Nitinol stapes piston multicenter trial. Laryngoscope 117:1236–1239PubMedCrossRef Rajan GP, Diaz J, Blackham R, Eikelboom RH, Atlas MD, Shelton C, Huber AM (2007) Eliminating the limitations of manual crimping in stapes surgery: mid-term results of 90 patients in the Nitinol stapes piston multicenter trial. Laryngoscope 117:1236–1239PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Babighian G, Fontana M, Caltran S, Ciccolella M, Amadori M, De Zen M (2007) The heatactivated stapes prosthesis ‘SMart’ Piston: technique and preliminary results. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 65:190–196PubMed Babighian G, Fontana M, Caltran S, Ciccolella M, Amadori M, De Zen M (2007) The heatactivated stapes prosthesis ‘SMart’ Piston: technique and preliminary results. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 65:190–196PubMed
4.
go back to reference Rajan GP, Atlas MD, Subramaniam K, Eikelboom RH (2005) Eliminating the limitations of manual crimping in stapes surgery? A preliminary trial with the shape memory Nitinol stapes piston. Laryngoscope 115:366–369PubMedCrossRef Rajan GP, Atlas MD, Subramaniam K, Eikelboom RH (2005) Eliminating the limitations of manual crimping in stapes surgery? A preliminary trial with the shape memory Nitinol stapes piston. Laryngoscope 115:366–369PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Gerlinger I, Tóth M, Bakó P, Németh A, Pytel J (2008) KTP-laser stapedotomy with a self-crimping, thermal shape memory nitinol smart piston: 1 year follow up results: how we do it. Clin Otolaryngol 33:472–480CrossRef Gerlinger I, Tóth M, Bakó P, Németh A, Pytel J (2008) KTP-laser stapedotomy with a self-crimping, thermal shape memory nitinol smart piston: 1 year follow up results: how we do it. Clin Otolaryngol 33:472–480CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Pudel EI, Briggs RJS (2008) Laser-assisted stapedotomy with a nitinol heat-crimping prosthesis: outcomes compared with a platinum fluoroplastic prosthesis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 139:51–54PubMedCrossRef Pudel EI, Briggs RJS (2008) Laser-assisted stapedotomy with a nitinol heat-crimping prosthesis: outcomes compared with a platinum fluoroplastic prosthesis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 139:51–54PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Fisch U (2008) Stapedotomy and stapedectomy in tympanoplasty, mastoidectomy and stapes surgery, 2nd edn. Thieme, Stuttgart, New York, pp 222–238 Fisch U (2008) Stapedotomy and stapedectomy in tympanoplasty, mastoidectomy and stapes surgery, 2nd edn. Thieme, Stuttgart, New York, pp 222–238
9.
go back to reference Mann W, Beck Chl (1983) Functional results after stapesplasty (Funktionelle Ergebnisse nach Stapesplastik). Laryng Rhinol Otol 62:387–390 in germanCrossRef Mann W, Beck Chl (1983) Functional results after stapesplasty (Funktionelle Ergebnisse nach Stapesplastik). Laryng Rhinol Otol 62:387–390 in germanCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Gerard JM, Serry P, Gersdorff MC (2008) Outcome and lack of prognostic factors in stapes surgery. Otol Neurotol 29:290–294PubMedCrossRef Gerard JM, Serry P, Gersdorff MC (2008) Outcome and lack of prognostic factors in stapes surgery. Otol Neurotol 29:290–294PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Huber AM, Veragut D, Schmid S, Roth T, Eiber A (2008) Tight stapes prosthesis fixation leads to better functional results in otosclerosis surgery. Otol Neurotol 29:893–899PubMedCrossRef Huber AM, Veragut D, Schmid S, Roth T, Eiber A (2008) Tight stapes prosthesis fixation leads to better functional results in otosclerosis surgery. Otol Neurotol 29:893–899PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Monsell EM, Balkany TA, Gates GA, Goldenberg RA, Meyerhoff WL, House JW (1995) Committee on Hearingg and Equilibrium guidelines for the evaluation of results of treatment of conductive hearing loss. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 113:186–187CrossRef Monsell EM, Balkany TA, Gates GA, Goldenberg RA, Meyerhoff WL, House JW (1995) Committee on Hearingg and Equilibrium guidelines for the evaluation of results of treatment of conductive hearing loss. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 113:186–187CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Brown KD, Gantz BJ (2007) Hearing results after stapedotomy with a nitinol piston prosthesis. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 133:758–762PubMedCrossRef Brown KD, Gantz BJ (2007) Hearing results after stapedotomy with a nitinol piston prosthesis. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 133:758–762PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Harris JP, Gong S (2007) Comparison of hearing results of nitinol smart stapes piston prosthesis with conventional piston prostheses: postoperative results of nitinol stapes prosthesis. Otol Neurotol 28:692–695PubMed Harris JP, Gong S (2007) Comparison of hearing results of nitinol smart stapes piston prosthesis with conventional piston prostheses: postoperative results of nitinol stapes prosthesis. Otol Neurotol 28:692–695PubMed
15.
go back to reference Van Rompaey V, Claes G, Potvin J, Wouters K, Van de Heyning PH (2011) Systematic review of the literature on nitinol prostheses in surgery for otosclerosis: assessment of the adequacy of statistical power. Otol Neurotol 32(3):357–366PubMedCrossRef Van Rompaey V, Claes G, Potvin J, Wouters K, Van de Heyning PH (2011) Systematic review of the literature on nitinol prostheses in surgery for otosclerosis: assessment of the adequacy of statistical power. Otol Neurotol 32(3):357–366PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Short-term hearing results after primary stapedotomy with nitinol and teflon–platinum prostheses for otosclerosis
Authors
Haralampos Gouveris
Miklós Tóth
Dimitrios Koutsimpelas
Irene Schmidtmann
Wolf J. Mann
Publication date
01-08-2013
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology / Issue 8/2013
Print ISSN: 0937-4477
Electronic ISSN: 1434-4726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-012-2262-6

Other articles of this Issue 8/2013

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 8/2013 Go to the issue