Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Health Services Research
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2024

Open Access 01-12-2024 | Sexually Transmitted Infection | Research

Nurses’ perspectives on user-friendly self-sampling interventions for diagnosis of sexually transmitted infections among young women in eThekwini district municipality: a nominal group technique

Authors: Ziningi N. Jaya, Witness Mapanga, Boitumelo Moetlhoa, Tivani P. Mashamba-Thompson

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Syndromic management in the main non-laboratory-based management approach for sexually transmitted infections (STI) in most low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) but it has limitations. Self-sampling has been proven as a suitable alternative approach to help improve management STIs by improving access to diagnosis among vulnerable populations. We sought to determine health workers’ perspectives on user-friendly self-sampling interventions for STIs among young women in eThekwini District Municipality.

Methods

Healthcare workers providing STI healthcare services in the study location participated in a nominal group technique (NGT) workshop. The NGT workshop was aimed enabling collaboration with key health providers in identifying user-friendly self-sampling interventions for diagnosis of STIs among young women. Data collection was conducted in two phases: phase 1 determined barrier that hinder young women from accessing current STI healthcare services and phase 2 focused on determining the key strategies for self-sampling interventions to diagnose STIs in young women. Thematic analysis and percentage form analysis were used to examine qualitative and quantitative data respectively.

Results

The following barriers were identified: negligence; myths about STIs; fear of judgement; denial; operating hours; lack of knowledge of STI symptoms and safe sex practices; and stigma associated with STIs. The following strategies were suggested: hand out self-sampling kits at popular restaurants; collect self-sampling kits from security guard at primary healthcare clinics (PHCs); receive STI diagnostic results via SMS or email or the clinic for treatment; improve youth friendly services at PHCs; educate the public on proper use of the kits. Education about STIs and handing out self-sampling kits at clinics, universities, schools, pharmacies or via outreach teams were ranked high priority strategies.

Conclusions

The findings highlight the need to address stigma and fear of judgment and provide comprehensive education to improve healthcare-seeking behaviour in young women. Additionally, the study also indicates that using eHealth solutions could significantly enhance the accessibility and efficiency of STI healthcare services in LMICs.
Literature
1.
World Health Organization. Sexually transmitted infections: implementing the global STI strategy. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017
2.
Fu L, Sun Y, Han M, Wang B, Xiao F, Zhou Y, et al. Incidence trends of five common sexually transmitted Infections excluding HIV from 1990 to 2019 at the global, regional, and national levels: results from the global burden of Disease Study 2019. Front Med. 2022;9:851635.CrossRef
3.
Yarbrough ML, Burnham C-AD. The ABCs of STIs: an update on sexually transmitted Infections. Clin Chem. 2016;62(6):811–23.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Casebolt MT. Barriers to reproductive health services for women with disability in low-and middle-income countries: a review of the literature. Sex Reproductive Healthc. 2020;24:100485.CrossRef
5.
Ferreyra C, Redard-Jacot M, Wi T, Daily J, Kelly-Cirino C. Barriers to access to new gonorrhea point-of-care diagnostic tests in low-and middle-income countries and potential solutions: a qualitative interview-based study. Sex Transm Dis. 2020;47(10):698.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Gupta V, Sharma VK. Syndromic management of sexually transmitted infections: a critical appraisal and the road ahead. Natl Med J India. 2019;32(3):147–52.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Ghebremichael M. The syndromic versus laboratory diagnosis of sexually transmitted Infections in resource-limited settings. Int Sch Res Notices. 2014;2014:103452.
8.
Lush L, Walt G, Ogden J. Transferring policies for treating sexually transmitted Infections: what’s wrong with global guidelines? Health Policy Plann. 2003;18(1):18–30.CrossRef
9.
Mason E, Tomlins L, Lewis D. Sexually transmissible infections: current approaches to management. South Afr Gen Practitioner. 2022;3(3):89–94.CrossRef
10.
Diseases TLI. Time to take sexually transmitted infections seriously. 2016. p. 981.
11.
Fernández-Huerta M, Espasa M. Mycoplasma genitalium co-infection with Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae among asymptomatic patients: the silent wick for macrolide resistance spread. Sex Transm Infect. 2019;95(5):391.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Ogale Y, Yeh PT, Kennedy CE, Toskin I, Narasimhan M. Self-collection of samples as an additional approach to deliver testing services for sexually transmitted Infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Glob Health. 2019;4(2):e001349.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
Flowers P, Vojt G, Pothoulaki M, Mapp F, Woode Owusu M, Estcourt C, et al. Understanding the barriers and facilitators to using self-sampling packs for sexually transmitted Infections and blood‐borne viruses: thematic analyses for intervention optimization. Br J Health Psychol. 2023;28(1):156–73.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Paudyal P, Llewellyn C, Lau J, Mahmud M, Smith H. Obtaining self-samples to diagnose curable sexually transmitted Infections: a systematic review of patients’ experiences. PLoS One. 2015;10(4):e0124310.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Garland SM, Tabrizi SN. Diagnosis of sexually transmitted Infections (STI) using self-collected non-invasive specimens. Sex Health. 2004;1(2):121–6.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Khan Z, Bhargava A, Mittal P, Bharti R, Puri P, Khunger N, et al. Evaluation of reliability of self-collected vaginal swabs over physician-collected samples for diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis, candidiasis and trichomoniasis, in a resource-limited setting: a cross-sectional study in India. BMJ Open. 2019;9(8):e025013.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
Cadman L, Reuter C, Jitlal M, Kleeman M, Austin J, Hollingworth T, et al. A randomized comparison of different vaginal self-sampling devices and urine for human papillomavirus testing—predictors 5.1. cancer epidemiology. Biomarkers Prev. 2021;30(4):661–8.CrossRef
18.
Aarnio R, Isacson I, Sanner K, Gustavsson I, Gyllensten U, Olovsson M. Comparison of vaginal self-sampling and cervical sampling by medical professionals for the detection of HPV and CIN2+: a randomized study. Int J Cancer. 2021;148(12):3051–9.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Davis S, Toledo C, Lewis L, Maughan-Brown B, Ayalew K, Kharsany AB. Does voluntary medical male circumcision protect against sexually transmitted Infections among men and women in real-world scale-up settings? Findings of a household survey in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. BMJ Glob Health. 2019;4(3):e001389.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
Gallagher M, Hares T, Spencer J, Bradshaw C, Webb I. The nominal group technique: a research tool for general practice? Fam Pract. 1993;10(1):76–81.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Cooper S, Cant R, Luders E, Waters D, Henderson A, Hood K, et al. The nominal group technique: Generating consensus in nursing research. J Nurs Educ. 2020;59(2):65–7.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Murphy M, Black N, Lamping D, McKee C, Sanderson C, Askham J, et al. Consensus development methods, and their use in clinical guideline development. Health Technol Assess (Winchester Eng). 1998;2(3):i–88.
23.
Potter M, Gordon S, Hamer P. The nominal group technique: a useful consensus methodology in physiotherapy research. NZ J Physiotherapy. 2004;32(3):126–30.
24.
Cook CE, Bailliard A, Bent JA, Bialosky JE, Carlino E, Colloca L, et al. An international consensus definition for contextual factors: findings from a nominal group technique. Front Psychol. 2023;14:14.CrossRef
25.
Manera K, Hanson CS, Gutman T, Tong A. Consensus methods: nominal group technique. 2019.
26.
Carballo-Fazanes A, Bierens JJ, Behaviour IEGSD. The visible behaviour of drowning persons: a pilot observational study using analytic software and a nominal group technique. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(18):6930.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
Hiligsmann M, van Durme C, Geusens P, Dellaert BG, Dirksen CD, van der Weijden T, et al. Nominal group technique to select attributes for discrete choice experiments: an example for drug treatment choice in osteoporosis. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2013;7:133–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
Moore MD, Hall AG, Wingate MS, Ford EW. Achieving Consensus among stakeholders using the nominal group technique: a perinatal quality collaborative approach. Qual Saf Health Care. 2023;32(3):161–9.CrossRef
29.
Delbecq AL, Van de Ven AH. A group process model for problem identification and program planning. J Appl Behav Sci. 1971;7(4):466–92.CrossRef
30.
Cassidy C, Bishop A, Steenbeek A, Langille D, Martin-Misener R, Curran J. Barriers and enablers to sexual health service use among university students: a qualitative descriptive study using the theoretical domains framework and COM-B model. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):1–12.CrossRef
31.
Avuvika E, Masese LN, Wanje G, Wanyonyi J, Nyaribo B, Omoni G, et al. Barriers and facilitators of screening for sexually transmitted Infections in adolescent girls and young women in Mombasa, Kenya: a qualitative study. PLoS One. 2017;12(1):e0169388.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
Newton-Levinson A, Leichliter JS, Chandra-Mouli V. Sexually transmitted Infection services for adolescents and youth in low-and middle-income countries: perceived and experienced barriers to accessing care. J Adolesc Health. 2016;59(1):7–16.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
33.
Nguyen SH, Dang AK, Vu GT, Nguyen CT, Le THT, Truong NT, et al. Lack of knowledge about Sexually Transmitted Diseases (STDs): implications for STDs prevention and care among dermatology patients in an urban city in Vietnam. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(6):1080.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
34.
Levano W, Miller JW, Leonard B, Bellick L, Crane BE, Kennedy SK, et al. Public education and targeted outreach to underserved women through the national breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program. Cancer. 2014;120(S16):2591–6.CrossRefPubMed
35.
Wang M, Han X, Fang H, Xu C, Lin X, Xia S, et al. Impact of health education on knowledge and behaviors toward infectious diseases among students in Gansu Province, China. BioMed Res Int. 2018;2018:6397340.PubMedPubMedCentral
36.
Jones NR, Haynes R. The association between young people’s knowledge of Sexually Transmitted Diseases and their behaviour: a mixed methods study. Health Risk Soc. 2006;8(3):293–303.CrossRef
37.
Wilson A, David U, Beatrice E, Mary O. How TelecommunicationDevelopment Aids Economic Growth: evidence from ITU ICT Development Index (IDI) Top five Countries for African Region. Int J Bus Econ Manage. 2014;1(2):16–28.
38.
Khumalo F, Passmore J-AS, Manhanzva M, Meyer B, Duyver M, Lurie M, et al. Shifting the power: scale-up of access to point-of-care and self-testing for sexually transmitted Infections in low-income and middle-income settings. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2023;36(1):49–56.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Griner SB, Vamos CA, Puccio JA, Perrin KM, Beckstead JW, Daley EM. I’ll just pick it up… women’s acceptability of self-sampling methods for sexually transmitted Infection screening. Sex Transm Dis. 2019;46(12):762–7.CrossRefPubMed
40.
Spence T, Kander I, Walsh J, Griffiths F, Ross J. Perceptions and experiences of internet-based testing for sexually transmitted Infections: systematic review and synthesis of qualitative research. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(8):e17667.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
41.
Delbecq AL, Van de Ven AH, Gustafson DH. Group techniques for program planning: a guide to nominal group and Delphi processes. Foresman: Scott; 1975.
42.
World Health Organization, Pepfar U. Task shifting: rational redistribution of tasks among health workforce teams: global recommendations and guidelines. Geneva: WHO; 2007.
Metadata
Title
Nurses’ perspectives on user-friendly self-sampling interventions for diagnosis of sexually transmitted infections among young women in eThekwini district municipality: a nominal group technique
Authors
Ziningi N. Jaya
Witness Mapanga
Boitumelo Moetlhoa
Tivani P. Mashamba-Thompson
Publication date
01-12-2024
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2024
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-10353-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

BMC Health Services Research 1/2024 Go to the issue

Research

Quality improvement in public–private partnerships in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review

Research

A closer look at the international health regulations capacities in Lebanon: a mixed method study

Research

A cross-sectional study on turnover intention of nurses in eastern China

Research

Rural and regional maternity managers’ and educators’ views of the Maternity and Newborn Emergencies (MANE) education program in Victoria, Australia: a qualitative descriptive study

Research

The role of governance in shaping health system reform: a case study of the design and implementation of new health regions in Ireland, 2018–2023

Research

Process evaluation of the 90-90-90 targets of surge project in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a case study evaluation