Top

Current Sexual Health Reports

Published in:

01-09-2018 | Preclinical and Psychophysiology (F Guarraci and L Marson, Section Editors)

Sexual Incentive and Choice

Authors: Armando Ferreira-Nuño, Jesús Olayo-Lortia, Antonio Cruz-Benites, Raúl G. Paredes

Published in: Current Sexual Health Reports | Issue 3/2018

Abstract

Purpose of the Review

In the present manuscript, we review the most important sexual cues in rodents and mammals that influence mate choice. Sexual cues lead to the approach and selection of a partner.

Recent Findings

In both sexes, hormone levels play an important role by increasing the sensitivity towards the sexual signals emitted by the potential partners and determining the expression of sexual signals that allows the potential partner or intra-sexual competitor to identify the reproductive status. Similarly, sexual cues emitted by both sexes can modify the hormonal status of the potential partner or intra-sexual competitors, so that they can be better skilled reproductively for sexual competition.

Summary

Future research should analyze the impact of the use of hormonal contraceptives, since it has been shown that they alter the sexual signals emitted and could influence the selection of partners in humans. In addition, this review will be important for anyone using a rodent model to understand sexual motivation.

Darwin C. The descent of man, and selection in selection to sex. London: Murray; 1871.CrossRef

• Jones AD, Ratterman NL. Mate choice and sexual selection: what have we learned since Darwin? Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(Suppl 1):10001–8. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0901129106. This study points why does mate choice evolve at all? And second, what factors determine the strength of mate choice. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

•• Ågmo A. Functional and dysfunctional sexual behavior a synthesis of neuroscience and comparative psychology. London: Academic Press; 2007. 512 pp. This book reviews the role of sexual incentives and the relationship with the endocrine and central nervous systems.

Agmo A. Sexual motivation. An inquiry into events determining the occurrence of sexual behavior. Behav Brain Res. 1999;105:129–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4328(99)00088-1.CrossRefPubMed

Candolin U. The use of multiple cues in mate choice. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2003;78:575–95. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1464793103006158.CrossRefPubMed

Calhoun JB. The ecology and sociology of the Norway rat. Washington, D.C.: US Government Printing Office; 1962.

Robitaille JA, Bouvet J. Field observations on the social behavior of the Norway rat, Rattus norvegicus (Berkenhout). Biol Behav. 1976;1:289–308.

McClintock MK, Anisko JJ, Adler NT. Group mating among Norway rats. II. The social dynamics of copulation: competition, cooperation, and mate choice. Anim Behav. 1982;30:410–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(82)80052-3.CrossRef

Chu X, Ågmo A. Sociosexual behaviors of male rats (Rattus norvegicus) in a seminatural environment. J Comp Psychol. 2015;129:132–44. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038722.CrossRefPubMed

10.

Chu X, Ågmo A. Sociosexual behaviors during the transition from non-receptivity to receptivity in rats housed in a seminatural environment. Behav Process. 2015;113:24–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2015.01.001.CrossRef

11.

Ferreira-Nuño A, Morales-Otal A, Paredes RG, Velázquez-Moctezuma J. Sexual behavior of female rats in a multiple-partner preference test. Horm Behav. 2005;47:290–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2004.11.012.CrossRefPubMed

12.

Snoeren EM, Ågmo A. The role of odors and ultrasonic vocalizations in female rat (Rattus norvegicus) partner choice. J Comp Psychol. 2014;128:367–77. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036541.CrossRefPubMed

13.

Snoeren EM, Helander LR, Iversen EE, Ågmo A. On the role of individual differences in female odor and ultrasonic vocalizations for male’s choice of partner. Physiol Behav. 2014;132:17–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2014.04.048.CrossRefPubMed

14.

Chu AÅ. Sociosexual behaviors in cycling, intact female rats (Rattus norvegicus) housed in a seminatural environment. Behaviour. 2014;151:1143–84. https://doi.org/10.1163/1568539x-00003177.CrossRef

15.

Chu X, Guarraci FA, Ågmo A. Sociosexual behaviors and reproductive success of rats (Rattus norvegicus) in a seminatural environment. Physiol Behav. 2015;151:46–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.07.005.CrossRefPubMed

16.

Charlton BD. Experimental tests of mate choice in nonhuman mammals: the need for an integrative approach. J Exp Biol. 2013;216(Pt 7):1127–30. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.070318. CrossRefPubMed

17.

Ferreira-Nuño A, Fernández-Soto C, Olayo-Lortia J, Ramirez-Carreto R, Paredes RG, Velázquez-Moctezuma J, et al. Copulatory pattern of male rats in a multiple partner choice arena. J Sex Med. 2010;7:3845–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.01746.x.CrossRefPubMed

18.

Ferreira-Nuño A, Cruz-Benites A, Morales-Otal A. Evidence of rejection of a sexually receptive female rat by a group of male rats. Society for Neuroscience. XLVII Annual Meeting. Washington DC, 2017, 11–17.

19.

Morales-Otal A, Olayo-Lortia J, Cruz-Benites A, Ferreira-Nuño A. Exploring the rewarding effect of sexual contacts in the partner preference of the rat. Society for Neuroscience. XLVII Annual Meeting. Washington DC, 2017, 11–17.

20.

Olayo-Lortia J, Cruz-Benites A, Morales-Otal A, Ferreira-Nuño A. Preference for the same receptive female shown by a group of male rats in a multiple partner paradigm. Society for Neuroscience XLVII Annual Meeting. Washington DC, 2017, 11–17.

21.

Bialy M, Rydz M, Kaczmarek L. Precontact 50-kHz vocalizations in male rats during acquisition of sexual experience. Behav Neurosci. 2000;114:983–90. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7044.114.5.983.CrossRefPubMed

22.

Brudzynski SM. Principles of rat communication: quantitative parameters of ultrasonic calls in rats. Behav Genet. 2005;35:85–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10519-004-0858-3.CrossRefPubMed

23.

Snoeren EM, Ågmo A. Female ultrasonic vocalizations have no incentive value for male rats. Behav Neurosci. 2013;127:439–50. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032027.CrossRefPubMed

24.

Thor DH, Flannelly KJ. Peripheral anosmia and social investigatory behavior of the male rat. Behav Biol. 1977;20:128–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0091-6773(77)90682-4.CrossRefPubMed

25.

•• Ågmo A, Snoeren EM. A cooperative function for multisensory stimuli in the induction of approach behavior of a potential mate. PLoS One. 2017;12(3):e0174339. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174339. This study highlights the importance of different sexual cues in the initial approach and what makes a conspecific attractive. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

26.

Hetta J, Meyerson BJ. Sexual motivation in male rat: methodological study of sex-specific orientation and effects of gonadal hormones. Acta Physiol Scand. 1978;453:5±68.

27.

Hard E, Larsson K. Visual stimulation and mating behavior in male rats. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1968;66:805±7. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0026557.CrossRef

28.

•• Kavaliers M, Matta R, Choleris E. Mate-choice copying, social information processing, and the roles of oxytocin. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2017;72:232–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.12.003. This study analyzes the relationship of mate choice copying with the social learning and social recognition, as well as the neurobiological mechanisms associated with this behavior. CrossRefPubMed

29.

Germain M, Blanchet S, Loyau A, Danchin É. Mate-choice copying in Drosophila melanogaster: impact of demonstration conditions and male-male competition. Behav Process. 2016;125:76–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2016.02.002.CrossRef

30.

Dugatkin LA, Godin GJ. Reversal of female mate choice by copying in the guppy: Poecilia reticulata. Proc R Soc Lond B. 1992;249:179–84. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1992.0101.CrossRef

31.

Dugatkin LA. Sexual selection and imitation: females copy the mate choice of others. Am Nat. 1992;139:1384–9. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2462347 CrossRef

32.

Dugatkin LA, Godin JGJ. Female mate copying in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata): age dependent effects. Behav Ecol. 1993;4:282–92. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/4.4.289 CrossRef

33.

Flamarique IN, Bergstrom C, Cheng CL, Reimchen TE. Role of the iridescent eye in stickleback female mate choice. J Exp Biol. 2013;216(Pt15):2806–12. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.084889.CrossRefPubMed

34.

Kniel N, Schmitz J, Witte K. Quality of public information matters in mate-choice copying in female zebra finches. Front Zool. 2015;12(26):26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12983-015-0119-8. eCollection 2015.

35.

Galef BG, Lim TCW, Gilbert GS. Evidence of mate choice copying in Norway rats, Rattus norvegicus. Anim Behav. 2008;75:117–1123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.08.026.CrossRef

36.

Kavaliers M, Choleris E, Agmo A, Braun WJ, Colwell DD, Muglia LJ, et al. Inadvertent social information and the avoidance of parasitized male mice: a role for oxytocin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:4293–8. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0600410103.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

37.

• Jennions MD, Petrie M. Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: a review of causes and consequences. Biol Rev. 1997;72:283–327. This study analyzes the variation in mating preferences and cost of choosiness among females. CrossRefPubMed

38.

Plath M, Bierbach D. Sex and the public: social eavesdropping, sperm competition risk and male mate choice. Commun Integr Biol. 2011;4:276–80. https://doi.org/10.4161/cib.4.3.14916.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

39.

Waynforth D. Mate choice copying in humans. Hum Nat. 2007;18:264–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-007-9004-2.CrossRefPubMed

40.

Huchard E, Courtiol A, Benavides JA, Knapp LA, Raymond M, Cowlishaw G. Can fertility signals lead to quality signals? Insights from the evolution of primate sexual swellings. Proc Biol Sci. 2009;276:1889–97. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2008.1923.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

41.

• Alvergne A, Lummaa V. Does the contraceptive pill alter mate choice in humans? Trends Ecol Evol. 2010;25:171–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2009.08.003. This study shows evidence of how the oral contraceptive pill might significantly alter both female and male mate choices. CrossRefPubMed

42.

Perrett DI, Lee KJ, Penton-Voak I, Rowland D, Yoshikawa S, Burt DM, et al. Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness. Nature. 1998;27(394):884–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/29772.CrossRef

43.

Cobey KD, Buunk AP, Pollet TV, Klipping C, Roberts SC. Men perceive their female partners, and themselves, as more attractive around ovulation. Biol Psychol. 2013;94:513–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2013.09.011.CrossRefPubMed

44.

Fischer J, Semple S, Fickenscher G, Juergens R, Kruse E, Heistermann M, et al. Do women’s voices provide cues of the likelihood of ovulation? The importance of sampling regime. PLoS One. 2011;6:e24490. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0024490.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

45.

Banai PI. Voice in different phases of menstrual cycle among naturally cycling women and users of hormonal contraceptives. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0183462. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183462.CrossRef

46.

Puts DA, Bailey DH, Cárdenas RA, Burriss RP, Welling LL, Wheatley JR, et al. Women’s attractiveness changes with estradiol and progesterone across the ovulatory cycle. Horm Behav. 2013;63:13–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2012.11.007.CrossRefPubMed

47.

Cantú SM, Simpson JA, Griskevicius V, Weisberg YJ, Durante KM, Beal DJ. Fertile and selectively flirty: women’s behavior toward men changes across the ovulatory cycle. Psychol Sci. 2014;25:431–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613508413. CrossRefPubMed

48.

Fink B, Hugill N, Lange BP. Women’s body movements are a potential cue to ovulation. Pers Indiv Differ. 2012;53:759–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.06.005.CrossRef

49.

Miller G, Tybur JM, Jordan BD. Ovulatory cycle effects on tip earnings by lap dancers: economic evidence for human estrus? Evol Hum Behav. 2007;28:375–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2007.06.002.CrossRef

50.

Welling LL, Jones BC, De Bruine LM, Smith FG, Feinberg DR, Little AC, et al. Men report stronger attraction to femininity in women’s faces when their testosterone levels are high. Horm Behav. 2008;54:703–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2008.07.012.CrossRefPubMed

51.

Bobst C, Lobmaier JS. Is preference for ovulatory female’s faces associated with men’s testosterone levels? Horm Behav. 2014;66:487–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2014.06.015.CrossRefPubMed

52.

Bird BM, Welling LL, Ortiz TL, Moreau BJ, Hansen S, Emond M, et al. Effects of exogenous testosterone and mating context on men’s preferences for female facial femininity. Horm Behav. 2016;85:76–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2016.08.003. CrossRefPubMed

53.

O’Connor JJ, Fraccaro PJ, Pisanski K, Tigue CC, Feinberg DR. Men’s preferences for women’s femininity in dynamic cross-modal stimuli. PLoS One. 2013;8:e69531. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0069531.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

54.

Valentová J, Roberts SC, Havlícek J. Preferences for facial and vocal masculinity in homosexual men: the role of relationship status, sexual restrictiveness, and self-perceived masculinity. Perception. 2013;42(2):187–97.CrossRefPubMed

55.

Roney JR, Simmons ZL. Women’s estradiol predicts preference for facial cues of men’s testosterone. Horm Behav. 2008;53:14–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2007.09.008.CrossRefPubMed

56.

Roney JR, Simmons ZL, Gray PB. Changes in estradiol predict within-women shifts in attraction to facial cues of men’s testosterone. Psychoneuroendocrinol. 2011;36:742–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen. 2010.10.010.

57.

Welling LL, Jones BC, DeBruine LM, Conway CA, Law Smith MJ, Little AC, et al. Raised salivary testosterone in women is associated with increased attraction to masculine faces. Horm Behav. 2007;52:156–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2007.01.010.CrossRefPubMed

58.

Marcinkowska UM, Ellison PT, Galbarczyk A, Milkowska K, Pawlowski B, Thune I, et al. Lack of support for relation between woman’s masculinity preference, estradiol level and mating context. Horm Behav. 2016;78:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2015.10.012. CrossRefPubMed

59.

Cobey KD, Havlíček J, Klapilová K, Roberts SC. Hormonal contraceptive use during relationship formation and sexual desire during pregnancy. Arch Sex Behav. 2016;45:2117–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-015-0662-6.CrossRefPubMed

60.

Bobst C, Sauter S, Foppa A, Lobmaier JS. Early follicular testosterone level predicts preference for masculinity in male faces—but not for women taking hormonal contraception. Psychoneuroendocrinol. 2014;41:142–50.CrossRef

61.

Cobey KD, Klipping C, Buunk AP. Hormonal contraceptive use lowers female intrasexual competition in pair-bonded women. Evol Hum Behav. 2013;2013(34):294–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2013.04.003.CrossRef

62.

Haselton MG, Mortezaie M, Pillsworth EG, Bleske-Rechek A, Frederick DA. Ovulatory shifts in human female ornamentation: near ovulation, women dress to impress. Horm Behav. 2007;51:40–5.CrossRefPubMed

63.

Saad G, Stenstrom E. Calories, beauty, and ovulation: the effects of the menstrual cycle on food and appearance-related consumption. J Consum Psychol. 2012;22:102–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2011.10.001.CrossRef

64.

Blake KR, Bastian B, O’Dean SM, Denson TF. High estradiol and low progesterone are associated with high assertiveness in women. Psychoneuroendocrinol. 2017;75:91–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2016.10.008.CrossRef

65.

Beall AT, Tracy JL. Women are more likely to wear red or pink at peak fertility. Psychol Sci. 2013;24:1837–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613476045.CrossRefPubMed

66.

Pazda AD, Prokop P, Elliot AJ. Red and romantic rivalry: viewing another woman in red increases perceptions of sexual receptivity, derogation, and intentions to mate-guard. Personal Soc Psychol Bull. 2014;40:1260–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167214539709. CrossRef

67.

Tracy JL, Beall AT. The impact of weather on women’s tendency to wear red or pink when at high risk for conception. PLoS One. 2014;9(2):e88852. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.

68.

Elliot AJ, Pazda AD. Dressed for sex: red as a female sexual signal in humans. PLoS One. 2012;7:e34607. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034607.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

69.

Prokop P, Hromada M. Women use red in order to attract mates. Ethol Sociobiol. 2013;119:605–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/eth.12102.CrossRef

70.

Prokop P, Pazda AD. Women’s red clothing can increase mate-guarding from their male partner. Personal Individ Differ. 2016;98:114–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.04.021.CrossRef

71.

Guéguen N, Jacob C. Clothing color and tipping: gentlemen patrons give more tips to waitresses with red clothes. Int J Hospital Manag. 2012;31:1333–5. https://doi.org/10.1177/1096348012442546.CrossRef

72.

Elliot AJ, Kayser DN, Greitemeyer T, Lichtenfeld S, Gramzow RH, Maier MA, et al. Red, rank, and romance in women viewing men. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2010;139:399–417. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019689.CrossRefPubMed

73.

Fink B, Bunse L, Matts PJ, D’Emiliano D. Visible skin colouration predicts perception of male facial age, health and attractiveness. Int J Cosmet Sci. 2012;34:307–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2494.2012.00724.x.CrossRefPubMed

74.

Gildersleeve KA, Haselton MG, Larson CM, Pillsworth EG. Body odor attractiveness as a cue of impending ovulation in women: evidence from a study using hormone-confirmed ovulation. Horm Behav. 2012;61:157–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2011.11.005.CrossRefPubMed

75.

Maner JK, McNulty JK. Attunement to the fertility status of same-sex rivals: women’s testosterone responses to olfactory ovulation cues. Evol Hum Behav. 2013;34:412–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2013.07.005.CrossRef

76.

Jones BC, De Bruine LM, Little AC, Burriss RP, Feinberg DR. Social transmission of face preferences among humans. Proc Biol Sci. 2007;274:899–903. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2006.0205.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

77.

Hill SE, Buss DM. The mere presence of opposite-sex others on judgments of sexual and romantic desirability: opposite effects for men and women. Personal Soc Psychol Bull. 2008;34:635–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207313728.CrossRef

Title: Sexual Incentive and Choice
Authors: Armando Ferreira-Nuño
Jesús Olayo-Lortia
Antonio Cruz-Benites
Raúl G. Paredes
Publication date: 01-09-2018
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: Current Sexual Health Reports / Issue 3/2018
Print ISSN: 1548-3584
Electronic ISSN: 1548-3592
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11930-018-0158-1

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

Springer Medicine

Sexual Incentive and Choice

Abstract

Purpose of the Review

Recent Findings

Summary

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Purpose of the Review

Recent Findings

Summary

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 3/2018

Preoperative and Postoperative Considerations in Gender-Affirming Surgery

Sexual Motivation: A Comparative Approach in Vertebrate Species

The Post-finasteride Syndrome: Clinical Manifestation of Drug-Induced Epigenetics Due to Endocrine Disruption

Compulsive Sexual Behavior in Humans and Preclinical Models

Couple Sex Therapy Versus Group Therapy for Women with Genito-pelvic Pain

Interstitial Cystitis and Sexual Dysfunction: Diagnostic Accuracy Is Essential