Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Legal Medicine 6/2013

01-11-2013 | Original Article

Setting the boundaries of prior influence on kinship relation testing: the case of many hypotheses

Authors: Michael Hubig, Juliane Sanft, Holger Muggenthaler, Gita Mall

Published in: International Journal of Legal Medicine | Issue 6/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Kinship relation and, in particular, paternity probability estimation using a Bayesian approach require the input of a priori probabilities of different hypotheses. In practical case work, a priori probabilities or priors, for short, must often be estimated using only common sense and symmetry arguments because in most cases, there is no evidence-based information on which the priors may be determined. In contrast to the accuracy of the likelihood probabilities or the likelihood ratios, the precision of the priors is usually very poor. Thus, a quantitative estimation of the priors’ influence on the paternity probability is desirable. This article presents exact formulae to define sharp minimum and maximum boundaries of posterior probabilities as a function of prior boundaries which may be applied in kinship cases with varying numbers of hypotheses and also presents two case examples.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Loredo T (1989) From Laplace to Supernova SN 1987A: Bayesian inference in astrophysics. In: Fougere P (ed) Maximum-Entropy and Bayesian Methods. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dartmouth, pp 81–142 Loredo T (1989) From Laplace to Supernova SN 1987A: Bayesian inference in astrophysics. In: Fougere P (ed) Maximum-Entropy and Bayesian Methods. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dartmouth, pp 81–142
3.
go back to reference Essen-Möller E (1938) Die Beweiskraft der Ähnlichkeit im Vaterschaftsnachweis; Theoretische Grundlagen. Mitt Anthr Ges Wien 68:9–53 Essen-Möller E (1938) Die Beweiskraft der Ähnlichkeit im Vaterschaftsnachweis; Theoretische Grundlagen. Mitt Anthr Ges Wien 68:9–53
5.
go back to reference Hepler AB, Weir BS (2008) Object-oriented Bayesian networks for paternity cases with allelic dependencies. Forensic Sci Int-Gen 2(3):166–175 Hepler AB, Weir BS (2008) Object-oriented Bayesian networks for paternity cases with allelic dependencies. Forensic Sci Int-Gen 2(3):166–175
6.
go back to reference Salmon D, Brocteur J (1976) Probability of paternity. Am J Hum Genet 28(6):622–625PubMed Salmon D, Brocteur J (1976) Probability of paternity. Am J Hum Genet 28(6):622–625PubMed
7.
go back to reference Salmon D, Jacquard A (1971) Existe-t-il une probabilitede paternite? Med Leg Domm Corpor (Paris) 4(4):348–350 Salmon D, Jacquard A (1971) Existe-t-il une probabilitede paternite? Med Leg Domm Corpor (Paris) 4(4):348–350
8.
go back to reference Langaney A, Pison G (1975) Probability of paternity: useless. Am J Hum Genet 27(4):558–561PubMed Langaney A, Pison G (1975) Probability of paternity: useless. Am J Hum Genet 27(4):558–561PubMed
9.
go back to reference Gastwirth J (1987) The statistical precision of medical screening procedures: application to polygraph and AIDS antibodies test data. Statist Sci 2(3):213–232 Gastwirth J (1987) The statistical precision of medical screening procedures: application to polygraph and AIDS antibodies test data. Statist Sci 2(3):213–232
10.
go back to reference Chakravarti A, Li CC (1984) Estimating the prior probability of paternity from the results of exclusion tests. Forensic Sci Int 24(2):143–147PubMed Chakravarti A, Li CC (1984) Estimating the prior probability of paternity from the results of exclusion tests. Forensic Sci Int 24(2):143–147PubMed
11.
go back to reference Baur MP, Rittner C, Wehner HD (1981) The prior probability in paternity testing. Its relevance and estimation by maximum likelihood. Lectures of the 9th International Congress of the Society for Forensic Haematogenetics, Bern:389–392 Baur MP, Rittner C, Wehner HD (1981) The prior probability in paternity testing. Its relevance and estimation by maximum likelihood. Lectures of the 9th International Congress of the Society for Forensic Haematogenetics, Bern:389–392
12.
go back to reference Pericchi LR, Sanso B (1995) A note on bounded influence in Bayesian analysis. Biometrika 82(1):223–225 Pericchi LR, Sanso B (1995) A note on bounded influence in Bayesian analysis. Biometrika 82(1):223–225
13.
go back to reference Ruggeri F, Wasserman L (1993) Infinitesimal sensitivity of posterior distributions. Can J Stat 21(2):195–203. doi:10.2307/3315811 Ruggeri F, Wasserman L (1993) Infinitesimal sensitivity of posterior distributions. Can J Stat 21(2):195–203. doi:10.​2307/​3315811
14.
go back to reference Jang Qing S (1995) Assessing local prior influence in Bayesian analysis. Applied Mathematics. J Chin Univ 10:123–132 Jang Qing S (1995) Assessing local prior influence in Bayesian analysis. Applied Mathematics. J Chin Univ 10:123–132
15.
16.
go back to reference Rootzen H, Olsson J (2006) On the influence of the prior distribution in image reconstruction. Comput Stat 21(3-4):431–444 Rootzen H, Olsson J (2006) On the influence of the prior distribution in image reconstruction. Comput Stat 21(3-4):431–444
17.
go back to reference Qi L (2009) Study on the influence of prior reliability for Bayesian estimation. In: Reliability, maintainability and safety, 2009. ICRMS 2009. 8th International Conference on, 20–24 July 2009 pp 407–410 Qi L (2009) Study on the influence of prior reliability for Bayesian estimation. In: Reliability, maintainability and safety, 2009. ICRMS 2009. 8th International Conference on, 20–24 July 2009 pp 407–410
18.
go back to reference Clarke B, Gustafson P (1998) On the overall sensitivity of the posterior distribution to its inputs. J Stat Plan Infer 71(1-2):137–150 Clarke B, Gustafson P (1998) On the overall sensitivity of the posterior distribution to its inputs. J Stat Plan Infer 71(1-2):137–150
19.
go back to reference Stock KF, Distl O, Hoeschele I (2007) Influence of priors in Bayesian estimation of genetic parameters for multivariate threshold models using Gibbs sampling. Genet Sel Evol 39(2):123–137PubMed Stock KF, Distl O, Hoeschele I (2007) Influence of priors in Bayesian estimation of genetic parameters for multivariate threshold models using Gibbs sampling. Genet Sel Evol 39(2):123–137PubMed
Metadata
Title
Setting the boundaries of prior influence on kinship relation testing: the case of many hypotheses
Authors
Michael Hubig
Juliane Sanft
Holger Muggenthaler
Gita Mall
Publication date
01-11-2013
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
International Journal of Legal Medicine / Issue 6/2013
Print ISSN: 0937-9827
Electronic ISSN: 1437-1596
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-013-0827-6

Other articles of this Issue 6/2013

International Journal of Legal Medicine 6/2013 Go to the issue