Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2004

Open Access 01-12-2004 | Debate

Setting priorities in health care organizations: criteria, processes, and parameters of success

Authors: Jennifer L Gibson, Douglas K Martin, Peter A Singer

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2004

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Hospitals and regional health authorities must set priorities in the face of resource constraints. Decision-makers seek practical ways to set priorities fairly in strategic planning, but find limited guidance from the literature. Very little has been reported from the perspective of Board members and senior managers about what criteria, processes and parameters of success they would use to set priorities fairly.

Discussion

We facilitated workshops for board members and senior leadership at three health care organizations to assist them in developing a strategy for fair priority setting. Workshop participants identified 8 priority setting criteria, 10 key priority setting process elements, and 6 parameters of success that they would use to set priorities in their organizations. Decision-makers in other organizations can draw lessons from these findings to enhance the fairness of their priority setting decision-making.

Summary

Lessons learned in three workshops fill an important gap in the literature about what criteria, processes, and parameters of success Board members and senior managers would use to set priorities fairly.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Mitton CR, Donaldson C: Setting priorities and allocating resources in health regions: lessons from a project evaluating program budgeting and marginal analysis (PBMA). Health Policy. 2003, 64: 335-348. 10.1016/S0168-8510(02)00198-7.CrossRefPubMed Mitton CR, Donaldson C: Setting priorities and allocating resources in health regions: lessons from a project evaluating program budgeting and marginal analysis (PBMA). Health Policy. 2003, 64: 335-348. 10.1016/S0168-8510(02)00198-7.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Kapiriri L, Norheim OF, Heggenhougen K: Using burden of disease information for health planning in developing countries: the experience from Uganda. Social Science & Medicine. 2003, 56: 2433-2441. 10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00246-0.CrossRef Kapiriri L, Norheim OF, Heggenhougen K: Using burden of disease information for health planning in developing countries: the experience from Uganda. Social Science & Medicine. 2003, 56: 2433-2441. 10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00246-0.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference PausJenssen A, Singer PA, Detsky AS: How Ontario's formulary committee makes recommendations. Pharmacoeconomics. 2003, 21: 285-294.CrossRefPubMed PausJenssen A, Singer PA, Detsky AS: How Ontario's formulary committee makes recommendations. Pharmacoeconomics. 2003, 21: 285-294.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Ham C, McIver S: Contested decisions: priority setting in the NHS. 2000, London: King's Fund Publishing Ham C, McIver S: Contested decisions: priority setting in the NHS. 2000, London: King's Fund Publishing
5.
go back to reference Foy R, So J, Rous E, Scarffe JH: Perspectives of commissioners and cancer specialists in prioritizing new cancer drugs: impact of the evidence threshold. BMJ. 1999, 318: 456-459.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Foy R, So J, Rous E, Scarffe JH: Perspectives of commissioners and cancer specialists in prioritizing new cancer drugs: impact of the evidence threshold. BMJ. 1999, 318: 456-459.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Deber R, Wiktorowicz M, Leatt P, Champagne F: Technology acquisition in Canadian hospitals: How is it done, and where is the information coming from?. Healthcare Management Forum. 1994, 7: 18-27.CrossRefPubMed Deber R, Wiktorowicz M, Leatt P, Champagne F: Technology acquisition in Canadian hospitals: How is it done, and where is the information coming from?. Healthcare Management Forum. 1994, 7: 18-27.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Holm S: Developments in Nordic countries – goodbye to the simple solutions. In The Global Challenge of Health Care Rationing. Edited by: Coulter A, Ham C. 2000, Buckingham: Open University Press, 29-37. Holm S: Developments in Nordic countries – goodbye to the simple solutions. In The Global Challenge of Health Care Rationing. Edited by: Coulter A, Ham C. 2000, Buckingham: Open University Press, 29-37.
9.
go back to reference Martin D, Shulman K, Santiago-Sorrell P, Singer P: Priority-setting and hospital strategic planning: a qualitative case study. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy. 2003, 8 (4): 197-201. 10.1258/135581903322403254.CrossRefPubMed Martin D, Shulman K, Santiago-Sorrell P, Singer P: Priority-setting and hospital strategic planning: a qualitative case study. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy. 2003, 8 (4): 197-201. 10.1258/135581903322403254.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Emanuel EJ: Justice and managed care: four principles for the just allocation of health care resources. Hastings Center Report. 2000, 30: 8-16.CrossRefPubMed Emanuel EJ: Justice and managed care: four principles for the just allocation of health care resources. Hastings Center Report. 2000, 30: 8-16.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Mooney G: Vertical equity in health care resource allocation. Health Care Analysis. 2000, 8: 203-215. 10.1023/A:1009439917796.CrossRefPubMed Mooney G: Vertical equity in health care resource allocation. Health Care Analysis. 2000, 8: 203-215. 10.1023/A:1009439917796.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Mitton C, Donaldson C: Setting priorities and allocating resources in health regions: lessons from a project evaluating program budgeting and marginal analysis (PMBA). Health Policy. 2003, 64: 335-348. 10.1016/S0168-8510(02)00198-7.CrossRefPubMed Mitton C, Donaldson C: Setting priorities and allocating resources in health regions: lessons from a project evaluating program budgeting and marginal analysis (PMBA). Health Policy. 2003, 64: 335-348. 10.1016/S0168-8510(02)00198-7.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Farrar S, Ryan M, Ross D, Ludbrook A: Using discrete choice modelling in priority setting: an application to clinical service developments. Social Science and Medicine. 2000, 50: 63-75. 10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00268-3.CrossRefPubMed Farrar S, Ryan M, Ross D, Ludbrook A: Using discrete choice modelling in priority setting: an application to clinical service developments. Social Science and Medicine. 2000, 50: 63-75. 10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00268-3.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Mullen PM: Public involvement in health care priority setting: are the methods appropriate and valid?. In The global challenge of health care rationing. Edited by: Coulter A, Ham C. 2000, Buckingham, UK: Open University Press, 163-174. Mullen PM: Public involvement in health care priority setting: are the methods appropriate and valid?. In The global challenge of health care rationing. Edited by: Coulter A, Ham C. 2000, Buckingham, UK: Open University Press, 163-174.
16.
go back to reference Daniels N, Sabin JE: Setting limits fairly: Can we learn to share medical resources?. 2002, Oxford: Oxford University PressCrossRef Daniels N, Sabin JE: Setting limits fairly: Can we learn to share medical resources?. 2002, Oxford: Oxford University PressCrossRef
17.
18.
go back to reference Klein R, William A: Setting priorities: what is holding us back – inadequate information or inadequate institutions?. In The global challenge of health care rationing. Edited by: Coulter A, Ham C. 2000, Buckingham, UK: Open University Press, 15-26. Klein R, William A: Setting priorities: what is holding us back – inadequate information or inadequate institutions?. In The global challenge of health care rationing. Edited by: Coulter A, Ham C. 2000, Buckingham, UK: Open University Press, 15-26.
19.
go back to reference Singer PA, Martin DK, Giacomini M, Purdy L: Priority setting for new technologies in medicine: a qualitative case study. BMJ. 2000, 321: 1316-1318. 10.1136/bmj.321.7272.1316.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Singer PA, Martin DK, Giacomini M, Purdy L: Priority setting for new technologies in medicine: a qualitative case study. BMJ. 2000, 321: 1316-1318. 10.1136/bmj.321.7272.1316.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Mitton C, Donaldson C: Health care priority setting: principles, practice and challenge. Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation. 2004, 2: 3-10.1186/1478-7547-2-3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Mitton C, Donaldson C: Health care priority setting: principles, practice and challenge. Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation. 2004, 2: 3-10.1186/1478-7547-2-3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference Norheim O: Procedures for priority setting and mechanisms of appeal in the Norwegian health care system. Presentation at the 3rd International Conference on Priorities in Health Care, Amsterdam. 2000 Norheim O: Procedures for priority setting and mechanisms of appeal in the Norwegian health care system. Presentation at the 3rd International Conference on Priorities in Health Care, Amsterdam. 2000
23.
go back to reference Martin D, Singer P: A strategy to improve priority setting in health care institutions. 2003, 11: 59-68. Martin D, Singer P: A strategy to improve priority setting in health care institutions. 2003, 11: 59-68.
24.
go back to reference PausJenssen A, Singer PA, Detsky AS: How Ontario's formulary committee makes recommendations. Pharmacoeconomics. 2003, 21: 285-294.CrossRefPubMed PausJenssen A, Singer PA, Detsky AS: How Ontario's formulary committee makes recommendations. Pharmacoeconomics. 2003, 21: 285-294.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Russel LB, Gold MR, Siegel JE, Daniels N, Weinstein MC, for the Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine: Journal of the American Medical Association. 1996, 276: 1172-1177. 10.1001/jama.276.14.1172.CrossRef Russel LB, Gold MR, Siegel JE, Daniels N, Weinstein MC, for the Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine: Journal of the American Medical Association. 1996, 276: 1172-1177. 10.1001/jama.276.14.1172.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Jan S, Dommers E, Mooney G: A politico-economic analysis of decision-making in funding health service organisations. Social Science and Medicine. 2003, 57: 427-435. 10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00368-4.CrossRefPubMed Jan S, Dommers E, Mooney G: A politico-economic analysis of decision-making in funding health service organisations. Social Science and Medicine. 2003, 57: 427-435. 10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00368-4.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Martin DK, Walton N, Singer PA: Priority setting in surgery: improve the process and share the learning. World Journal of Surgery. 2003, 27: 962-966. 10.1007/s00268-003-7100-y.CrossRefPubMed Martin DK, Walton N, Singer PA: Priority setting in surgery: improve the process and share the learning. World Journal of Surgery. 2003, 27: 962-966. 10.1007/s00268-003-7100-y.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Setting priorities in health care organizations: criteria, processes, and parameters of success
Authors
Jennifer L Gibson
Douglas K Martin
Peter A Singer
Publication date
01-12-2004
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2004
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-4-25

Other articles of this Issue 1/2004

BMC Health Services Research 1/2004 Go to the issue