Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 3/2020

01-06-2020 | Review

Setbacks in Forehead Feminization Cranioplasty: A Systematic Review of Complications and Patient-Reported Outcomes

Authors: Michael Eggerstedt, Young Soo Hong, Connor J. Wakefield, Jennifer Westrick, Ryan M. Smith, Peter C. Revenaugh

Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery | Issue 3/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Importance

Forehead feminization cranioplasty (FFC) is an important component of gender-affirming surgery and has become increasingly popular in recent years. Little objective evidence exists for the procedure’s safety and clinical impact via patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).

Objective

To determine what complications are observed following FFC, the relative frequency of complications by surgical technique, and what impact the procedure has on patient’s quality of life.

Data Sources

Database searches were performed in PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, CINAHL, Cochrane CENTRAL, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and PsycINFO. The search terms included variations of forehead setback/FFC. Both controlled vocabularies (i.e., MeSH and CINAHL’s Suggested Subject Terms) and keywords in the title or abstract fields were searched.

Study Selection

Two independent reviewers screened the titles and abstracts of all articles. Two independent surgeon reviewers evaluated the full text of all included articles, and relevant data points were extracted.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Complications and complication rate observed following FFC. Additional outcome measures were the approach utilized, concurrent procedures performed, and the use and findings of a PROM.

Results

Ten articles describing FFC were included, encompassing 673 patients. The overall pooled complication rate was 1.3%. PROMs were used in half of studies, with no standardization among studies.

Conclusions and Relevance

Complications following FFC are rare and infrequently require reoperation. Further studies into standardized and validated PROMs in facial feminization patients are warranted.

Level of Evidence III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.​springer.​com/​00266.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Meerwijk EL (2017) Sevelius JM (2017) Transgender population size in the United States: a meta-regression of population-based probability samples. Am J Public Health. 107(2):e8CrossRef Meerwijk EL (2017) Sevelius JM (2017) Transgender population size in the United States: a meta-regression of population-based probability samples. Am J Public Health. 107(2):e8CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Villepelet A, Jafari A, Baujat B (2018) Fronto-orbital feminization technique. A surgical strategy using fronto-orbital burring with or without eggshell technique to optimize the risk/benefit ratio. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 135(5):353–356CrossRef Villepelet A, Jafari A, Baujat B (2018) Fronto-orbital feminization technique. A surgical strategy using fronto-orbital burring with or without eggshell technique to optimize the risk/benefit ratio. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 135(5):353–356CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Ainsworth TA, Spiegel JH (2010) Quality of life of individuals with and without facial feminization surgery or gender reassignment surgery. Qual Life Res 19(7):1019–1024CrossRef Ainsworth TA, Spiegel JH (2010) Quality of life of individuals with and without facial feminization surgery or gender reassignment surgery. Qual Life Res 19(7):1019–1024CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Ousterhout DK (1987) Feminization of the forehead: contour changing to improve female aesthetics. Plast Reconstr Surg 79(5):701–713CrossRef Ousterhout DK (1987) Feminization of the forehead: contour changing to improve female aesthetics. Plast Reconstr Surg 79(5):701–713CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Nouraei SAR, Randhawa P, Andrews PJ, Saleh HA (2007) The role of nasal feminization rhinoplasty in male-to-female gender reassignment. Arch Facial Plast Surg 9(5):318–320CrossRef Nouraei SAR, Randhawa P, Andrews PJ, Saleh HA (2007) The role of nasal feminization rhinoplasty in male-to-female gender reassignment. Arch Facial Plast Surg 9(5):318–320CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Wolfort FG, Dejerine ES, Ramos DJ, Parry RG (1990) Chondrolaryngoplasty for appearance. Plast Reconstr Surg 86(3):464–469CrossRef Wolfort FG, Dejerine ES, Ramos DJ, Parry RG (1990) Chondrolaryngoplasty for appearance. Plast Reconstr Surg 86(3):464–469CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Hoenig JF (2011) Frontal bone remodeling for gender reassignment of the male forehead: a gender-reassignment surgery. Aesthetic Plast Surg 35(6):1043–1049CrossRef Hoenig JF (2011) Frontal bone remodeling for gender reassignment of the male forehead: a gender-reassignment surgery. Aesthetic Plast Surg 35(6):1043–1049CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Bellinga RJ, Capitan L, Simon D, Tenorio T (2017) Technical and clinical considerations for facial feminization surgery with rhinoplasty and related procedures. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 19(3):175–181CrossRef Bellinga RJ, Capitan L, Simon D, Tenorio T (2017) Technical and clinical considerations for facial feminization surgery with rhinoplasty and related procedures. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 19(3):175–181CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Raffaini M, Magri AS, Agostini T (2016) Full facial feminization surgery: patient satisfaction assessment based on 180 procedures involving 33 consecutive patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 137(2):438–448CrossRef Raffaini M, Magri AS, Agostini T (2016) Full facial feminization surgery: patient satisfaction assessment based on 180 procedures involving 33 consecutive patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 137(2):438–448CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Salgado CJ, AlQattan H, Nugent A (2018) Feminizing the face: combination of frontal bone reduction and reduction rhinoplasty. Case Rep Surg 2018(2018):1947807PubMedPubMedCentral Salgado CJ, AlQattan H, Nugent A (2018) Feminizing the face: combination of frontal bone reduction and reduction rhinoplasty. Case Rep Surg 2018(2018):1947807PubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Balaji SM (2016) Facial feminization—surgical modification for Indian, European and African faces. Ann Maxillofac Surg 6(2):210–213CrossRef Balaji SM (2016) Facial feminization—surgical modification for Indian, European and African faces. Ann Maxillofac Surg 6(2):210–213CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Spiegel JH (2017) Rhinoplasty as a significant component of facial feminization and beautification. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 19(3):181–182CrossRef Spiegel JH (2017) Rhinoplasty as a significant component of facial feminization and beautification. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 19(3):181–182CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Capitan L, Simon D, Meyer T (2017) Facial feminization surgery: simultaneous hair transplant during forehead reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 139(3):573–584CrossRef Capitan L, Simon D, Meyer T (2017) Facial feminization surgery: simultaneous hair transplant during forehead reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 139(3):573–584CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Capitán L, Simon D, Kaye K, Tenorio T (2014) Facial feminization surgery: the forehead. Surgical techniques and analysis of results. Plast Reconstr Surg 134(4):609–619CrossRef Capitán L, Simon D, Kaye K, Tenorio T (2014) Facial feminization surgery: the forehead. Surgical techniques and analysis of results. Plast Reconstr Surg 134(4):609–619CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Brown E, Perrett DI (1993) What gives a face its gender? Perception 22(7):829–840CrossRef Brown E, Perrett DI (1993) What gives a face its gender? Perception 22(7):829–840CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Bruce V, Burton AM, Hanna E (1993) Sex discrimination: how do we tell the difference between male and female faces? Perception 22(2):131–152CrossRef Bruce V, Burton AM, Hanna E (1993) Sex discrimination: how do we tell the difference between male and female faces? Perception 22(2):131–152CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Morrison S, Vyas K, Motakef S (2016) Facial feminization: systematic review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg 137(6):1759–1770CrossRef Morrison S, Vyas K, Motakef S (2016) Facial feminization: systematic review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg 137(6):1759–1770CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Xu CC, Côté DWJ, Chowdhury RH, Morrissey AT, Ansari K (2011) Trends in level of evidence in facial plastic surgery research. Plast Reconstr Surg 127(4):1499–1504CrossRef Xu CC, Côté DWJ, Chowdhury RH, Morrissey AT, Ansari K (2011) Trends in level of evidence in facial plastic surgery research. Plast Reconstr Surg 127(4):1499–1504CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Kumar VS, Rao NK, Mohan KR (2016) Minimizing complications associated with coronal approach by application of various modifications in surgical technique for treating facial trauma: a prospective study. Natl J Maxillofac Surg 7(1):21–28CrossRef Kumar VS, Rao NK, Mohan KR (2016) Minimizing complications associated with coronal approach by application of various modifications in surgical technique for treating facial trauma: a prospective study. Natl J Maxillofac Surg 7(1):21–28CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Vijfeijken SECM, Münker TJAG et al (2018) Autologous bone is inferior to alloplastic cranioplasties: safety of autograft and allograft materials for cranioplasties, a systematic review. World Neurosurg 117:452.e8 Vijfeijken SECM, Münker TJAG et al (2018) Autologous bone is inferior to alloplastic cranioplasties: safety of autograft and allograft materials for cranioplasties, a systematic review. World Neurosurg 117:452.e8
21.
go back to reference Malcolm JG, Mahmooth Z, Rindler RS (2018) Autologous cranioplasty is associated with increased reoperation rate: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World Neurosurgery 2018(116):60–68CrossRef Malcolm JG, Mahmooth Z, Rindler RS (2018) Autologous cranioplasty is associated with increased reoperation rate: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World Neurosurgery 2018(116):60–68CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Lee MK, Sakai O, Spiegel JH (2010) CT measurement of the frontal sinus—gender differences and implications for frontal cranioplasty. J Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surg 38(7):494–500CrossRef Lee MK, Sakai O, Spiegel JH (2010) CT measurement of the frontal sinus—gender differences and implications for frontal cranioplasty. J Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surg 38(7):494–500CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Morrison SD, Crowe CS, Wilson SC (2017) Consistent quality of life outcome measures are needed for facial feminization surgery. J Craniofacial Surg 28(3):851–852CrossRef Morrison SD, Crowe CS, Wilson SC (2017) Consistent quality of life outcome measures are needed for facial feminization surgery. J Craniofacial Surg 28(3):851–852CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Verbruggen C, Weigert R, Corre P, Casoli V, Bondaz M (2018) Development of the facial feminization surgery patient's satisfaction questionnaire (QESFF1): qualitative phase. Annales de chirurgie plastique et esthetique 63(3):205CrossRef Verbruggen C, Weigert R, Corre P, Casoli V, Bondaz M (2018) Development of the facial feminization surgery patient's satisfaction questionnaire (QESFF1): qualitative phase. Annales de chirurgie plastique et esthetique 63(3):205CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Setbacks in Forehead Feminization Cranioplasty: A Systematic Review of Complications and Patient-Reported Outcomes
Authors
Michael Eggerstedt
Young Soo Hong
Connor J. Wakefield
Jennifer Westrick
Ryan M. Smith
Peter C. Revenaugh
Publication date
01-06-2020
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery / Issue 3/2020
Print ISSN: 0364-216X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5241
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-020-01664-8

Other articles of this Issue 3/2020

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 3/2020 Go to the issue