Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Cancer
Published in: BMC Cancer 1/2023

Open Access 01-12-2023 | Seroma | Study protocol

The QUILT study: quilting sutures in patients undergoing breast cancer surgery: a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial study

Authors: L. J. van Zeelst, B. ten Wolde, J. D. J. Plate, J. H. Volders, R.R.J.P. van Eekeren, A. Doeksen, M. L. Hoven-Gondrie, A. F. T. Olieman, Y. E. A. van Riet, A. P. Schouten van der Velden, S. Vijfhuize, H. H. G. Witjes, J. H. W. de Wilt, L. J. A. Strobbe

Published in: BMC Cancer | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Seroma is the most common complication following breast cancer surgery, with reported incidence up to 90%. Seroma causes patient discomfort, is associated with surgical site infections (SSI), often requires treatment and increases healthcare consumption. The quilting suture technique, in which the skin flaps are sutured to the pectoralis muscle, leads to a significant reduction of seroma with a decrease in the number of aspirations and surgical site infections. However, implementation is lagging due to unknown side effects, increase in operation time and cost effectiveness. Main objective of this study is to assess the impact of large scale implementation of the quilting suture technique in patients undergoing mastectomy and/or axillary lymph node dissection (ALND).

Methods

The QUILT study is a stepped wedge design study performed among nine teaching hospitals in the Netherlands. The study consists of nine steps, with each step one hospital will implement the quilting suture technique. Allocation of the order of implementation will be randomization-based. Primary outcome is ‘textbook outcome’, i.e.no wound complications, no re-admission, re-operation or unscheduled visit to the outpatient clinic and no increased use of postoperative analgesics. A total of 113 patients is required based on a sample size calculation. Secondary outcomes are shoulder function, cosmetic outcome, satisfaction with thoracic wall and health care consumption. Follow-up lasts for 6 months.

Discussion

This will be one of the first multicentre prospective studies in which quilting without postoperative wound drain is compared with conventional wound closure. We hypothesize that quilting is a simple technique to increase textbook outcome, enhance patient comfort and reduce health care consumption.
Literature
1.
Nadkarni MS, Rangole AK, Sharma RK, Hawaldar RV, Parmar VV, Badwe RA. Influence of surgical technique on axillary seroma formation: a randomized study. ANZ J Surg. 2007;77(5):385–9.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Gonzalez EA, Saltzstein EC, Riedner CS, Nelson BK. Seroma formation following breast cancer surgery. Breast J. 2003;9(5):385–8.CrossRefPubMed
3.
van Bemmel AJ, van de Velde CJ, Schmitz RF, Liefers GJ. Prevention of seroma formation after axillary dissection in breast cancer: a systematic review. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2011;37(10):829–35.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Woodworth PA, McBoyle MF, Helmer SD, Beamer RL. Seroma formation after breast cancer surgery: incidence and predicting factors. Am Surg. 2000;66(5):444–50 discussion 50–1.CrossRefPubMed
5.
de Rooij L, van Kuijk SMJ, Granzier RWY, Hintzen KFH, Heymans C, Theunissen LLB, et al. Reducing Seroma Formation and Its Sequelae After Mastectomy by Closure of the Dead Space: A Multi-center, Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial (SAM-Trial). Ann Surg Oncol. 2021;28(5):2599–608.CrossRefPubMed
6.
ten Wolde B, van den Wildenberg FJ, Keemers-Gels ME, Polat F, Strobbe LJ. Quilting prevents seroma formation following breast cancer surgery: closing the dead space by quilting prevents seroma following axillary lymph node dissection and mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21(3):802–7.CrossRefPubMed
7.
van Zeelst LJ, Ten Wolde B, van Eekeren R, Volders JH, de Wilt JHW, Strobbe LJA. Quilting following mastectomy reduces seroma, associated complications and health care consumption without impairing patient comfort. J Surg Oncol. 2022;125(3):369–76.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Jansen RF, van Geel AN, de Groot HG, Rottier AB, Olthuis GA, van Putten WL. Immediate versus delayed shoulder exercises after axillary lymph node dissection. Am J Surg. 1990;160(5):481–4.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Carless PA, Henry DA. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the use of fibrin sealant to prevent seroma formation after breast cancer surgery. Br J Surg. 2006;93(7):810–9.CrossRefPubMed
10.
O’Hea BJ, Ho MN, Petrek JA. External compression dressing versus standard dressing after axillary lymphadenectomy. Am J Surg. 1999;177(6):450–3.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Burak WE Jr, Goodman PS, Young DC, Farrar WB. Seroma formation following axillary dissection for breast cancer: risk factors and lack of influence of bovine thrombin. J Surg Oncol. 1997;64(1):27–31.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Bailey SH, Oni G, Guevara R, Wong C, Saint-Cyr M. Latissimus dorsi donor-site morbidity: the combination of quilting and fibrin sealant reduce length of drain placement and seroma rate. Ann Plast Surg. 2012;68(6):555–8.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Rossetto LA, Garcia EB, Abla LF, Neto MS, Ferreira LM. Quilting suture in the donor site of the transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap in breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2009;62(3):240–3.CrossRefPubMed
14.
van Bastelaar J, van Roozendaal L, Granzier R, Beets G, Vissers Y. A systematic review of flap fixation techniques in reducing seroma formation and its sequelae after mastectomy. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018;167(2):409–16.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Ouldamer L, Caille A, Giraudeau B, Body G. Quilting Suture of Mastectomy Dead Space Compared with Conventional Closure with Drain. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(13):4233–40.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Myint ST, Khaing KS, Yee W, Mon SM, Lwin T. Quilting suture versus conventional closure in prevention of seroma after total mastectomy and axillary dissection in breast cancer patients. ANZ J Surg. 2020;90(7–8):1408–13.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Granzier RWY, van Bastelaar J, van Kuijk SMJ, Hintzen KFH, Heymans C, Theunissen LLB, et al. Reducing seroma formation and its sequelae after mastectomy by closure of the dead space: The interim analysis of a multi-center, double-blind randomized controlled trial (SAM trial). Breast. 2019;46:81–6.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Ouldamer L, Bonastre J, Brunet-Houdard S, Body G, Giraudeau B, Caille A. Dead space closure with quilting suture versus conventional closure with drainage for the prevention of seroma after mastectomy for breast cancer (QUISERMAS): protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2016;6(4): e009903.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
Mazouni C, Mesnard C, Cloutier AS, Amabile MI, Bentivegna E, Garbay JR, et al. Quilting Sutures Reduces Seroma in Mastectomy. Clin Breast Cancer. 2015;15(4):289–93.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Ten Wolde B, Strobbe FFR, Schlooz-de Vries M, van den Wildenberg FJH, Keemers-Gels M, de Wilt JHW, et al. Omitting Postoperative Wound Drainage After Mastectomy With Skin-Flap Quilting. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019;26(9):2773–8.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Classe JM, Dupre PF, François T, Robard S, Theard JL, Dravet F. Axillary padding as an alternative to closed suction drain for ambulatory axillary lymphadenectomy: a prospective cohort of 207 patients with early breast cancer. Arch Surg. 2002;137(2):169–72 discussion 73.CrossRefPubMed
22.
De Rooij L, Bosmans J, van Kuijk SMJ, Vissers YLJ, Beets GL, van Bastelaar J. A systematic review of seroma formation following drain-free mastectomy. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021;47(4):757–63.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Coveney EC, O’Dwyer PJ, Geraghty JG, O’Higgins NJ. Effect of closing dead space on seroma formation after mastectomy–a prospective randomized clinical trial. Eur J Surg Oncol. 1993;19(2):143–6.PubMed
24.
Gong Y, Tan Q, Qin Q, Wei C. Prevalence of postmastectomy pain syndrome and associated risk factors: A large single-institution cohort study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020;99(20): e19834.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Kolfschoten NE, Kievit J, Gooiker GA, van Leersum NJ, Snijders HS, Eddes EH, et al. Focusing on desired outcomes of care after colon cancer resections; hospital variations in “textbook outcome.” Eur J Surg Oncol. 2013;39(2):156–63.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Aiken T, Abbott DE. Textbook oncologic outcome: A promising summary metric of high-quality care, but are we on the same page? J Surg Oncol. 2020;121(6):923–4.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205–13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
Douay N, Akerman G, Clément D, Malartic C, Morel O, Barranger E. Seroma after axillary lymph node dissection in breast cancer. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2008;36(2):130–5.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Kuroi K, Shimozuma K, Taguchi T, Imai H, Yamashiro H, Ohsumi S, et al. Evidence-based risk factors for seroma formation in breast surgery. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2006;36(4):197–206.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Loo WT, Chow LW. Factors predicting seroma formation after mastectomy for Chinese breast cancer patients. Indian J Cancer. 2007;44(3):99–103.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Lumachi F, Brandes AA, Burelli P, Basso SM, Iacobone M, Ermani M. Seroma prevention following axillary dissection in patients with breast cancer by using ultrasound scissors: a prospective clinical study. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2004;30(5):526–30.CrossRefPubMed
32.
33.
Veehof MM, Sleegers EJ, van Veldhoven NH, Schuurman AH, van Meeteren NL. Psychometric qualities of the Dutch language version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire (DASH-DLV). J Hand Ther. 2002;15(4):347–54.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Cano SJ, Klassen AF, Scott AM, Cordeiro PG, Pusic AL. The BREAST-Q: further validation in independent clinical samples. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129(2):293–302.CrossRefPubMed
35.
Killip S, Mahfoud Z, Pearce K. What is an intracluster correlation coefficient? Crucial concepts for primary care researchers. Ann Fam Med. 2004;2(3):204–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
36.
Hemming K, Taljaard M. Sample size calculations for stepped wedge and cluster randomised trials: a unified approach. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;69:137–46.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
37.
Fuzesi S, Cano SJ, Klassen AF, Atisha D, Pusic AL. Validation of the electronic version of the BREAST-Q in the army of women study. Breast. 2017;33:44–9.CrossRefPubMed
38.
Swan Tan S, Bouwmans-Frijters C, Hakkaart-van RL. Handleiding voor kostenonderzoek: methoden en referentieprijzen voor economische evaluaties in de gezondheidszorg. Tijds gezondheidswetenschappen. 2012;90:367–72.CrossRef
39.
van Bastelaar J, Granzier R, van Roozendaal LM, Beets G, Dirksen CD, Vissers Y. A multi-center, double blind randomized controlled trial evaluating flap fixation after mastectomy using sutures or tissue glue versus conventional closure: protocol for the Seroma reduction After Mastectomy (SAM) trial. BMC Cancer. 2018;18(1):830.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
The QUILT study: quilting sutures in patients undergoing breast cancer surgery: a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial study
Authors
L. J. van Zeelst
B. ten Wolde
J. D. J. Plate
J. H. Volders
R.R.J.P. van Eekeren
A. Doeksen
M. L. Hoven-Gondrie
A. F. T. Olieman
Y. E. A. van Riet
A. P. Schouten van der Velden
S. Vijfhuize
H. H. G. Witjes
J. H. W. de Wilt
L. J. A. Strobbe
Publication date
01-12-2023
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Cancer / Issue 1/2023
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2407
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-11154-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

BMC Cancer 1/2023 Go to the issue

Study Protocol

Identifying trajectories and predictors of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy symptoms, physical functioning, and falls across treatment and recovery in adults treated with neurotoxic chemotherapy: the PATTERN observational study protocol (NCT05790538)

Research

A novel clinically significant prostate cancer prediction system with multiparametric MRI and PSA: P.Z.A. score

Research

Identification of ZBTB4 as an immunological biomarker that can inhibit the proliferation and invasion of pancreatic cancer

Research

Dissemination feature based on PET/CT is a risk factor for diffuse large B cell lymphoma patients outcome

Research

HOXA9 gene promotor methylation and copy number variation of SOX2 and HV2 genes in cell free DNA: A potential diagnostic panel for non-small cell lung cancer

Research

Association between NDRG1 protein expression and aggressive features of breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Watch now

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Image Credits