Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 7/2017

01-07-2017 | Shoulder

Serial clinical and MRI examinations after arthroscopic rotator cuff reconstruction using double-row technique

Authors: F. Pfalzer, J. Huth, E. Stürmer, D. Endele, B. Kniesel, F. Mauch

Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | Issue 7/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Rotator cuff reconstruction using arthroscopic double-row technique enables a better repair of the anatomical footprint at the tendon insertion. Objective of this serial study was to illustrate structural and functional results during recovery following double-row reconstruction.

Methods

Forty-five patients with mid-sized ruptures of the supraspinatus tendon were assessed prospectively and underwent arthroscopic surgery using the double-row technique. Rupture localization, size, form, and extent of retraction were recorded intraoperatively. Clinical and MRI follow-up examinations were carried out for all patients after 6, 12, 26, and 52 weeks. A A standard protocol was used during the follow-up examinations to determine tendon integration, signal changes in the tendon, extent of bone marrow edema near the enclosed absorbable suture anchors, muscle changes. The clinical results were correlated with the MRI appearance.

Results

After 26 weeks, the Constant score (CS) showed a highly significant increase for the first time with a value of 78 (p < 0.001). Tendon integration according to Sugaya showed a left shift over time, with higher CS-values for lower Sugaya classifications. Significant improvements in strength were first measured between the 26-week and 52-week follow-ups (9−>19/p < 0.001). Highly significant improvement (p < 0.001) of the tendon signal and the fatty infiltration was found in the same time interval. The hypotrophy showed slight improvement, while a highly significant reduction of the bone marrow edema was found between weeks 12 and 26 (p < 0.001). There were no re-ruptures after week 26.

Conclusions

The present serial study showed that it took 26 weeks to reach a significant clinical improvement concerning CS. With regard to tendon healing, no further deterioration of the structural results occurred between week 26 and week 52 postoperative. There were slightly but not significant better clinical results according to the the Sugaya classification. However, parameter “strength” was significantly increased between weeks 26 and 52. This was consistent with a significant decrease in the signal intensity at the repaired tendon site, an additional improvement in the fatty infiltration, and the atrophy according to Thomazeau in the same time interval.

Level of evidence

I.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Boileau P, Brassart N, Watkinson DJ, Carles M, Hatzidakis AM, Krishnan SG (2005) Arthroscopic repair of full-thickness tears of the supraspinatus: does the tendon really heal? J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:1229–1240PubMed Boileau P, Brassart N, Watkinson DJ, Carles M, Hatzidakis AM, Krishnan SG (2005) Arthroscopic repair of full-thickness tears of the supraspinatus: does the tendon really heal? J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:1229–1240PubMed
2.
go back to reference Burkhart SS (2000) A stepwise approach to arthroscopic rotator cuff repair based on biomechanical principles. Arthroscopy 16:82–90CrossRefPubMed Burkhart SS (2000) A stepwise approach to arthroscopic rotator cuff repair based on biomechanical principles. Arthroscopy 16:82–90CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Burks RT, Crim J, Brown N, Fink B, Greis PE (2009) A prospective randomized clinical trial comparing arthroscopic single- and double-row rotator cuff repair: magnetic resonance imaging and early clinical evaluation. Am J Sports Med 37:674–682CrossRefPubMed Burks RT, Crim J, Brown N, Fink B, Greis PE (2009) A prospective randomized clinical trial comparing arthroscopic single- and double-row rotator cuff repair: magnetic resonance imaging and early clinical evaluation. Am J Sports Med 37:674–682CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Constant CR, Murley AH (1987) A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res 214:160–164 Constant CR, Murley AH (1987) A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res 214:160–164
5.
go back to reference Crim J, Burks R, Manaster BJ, Hanrahan C, Hung M, Greis P (2010) Temporal evolution of MRI findings after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195:1361–1366CrossRefPubMed Crim J, Burks R, Manaster BJ, Hanrahan C, Hung M, Greis P (2010) Temporal evolution of MRI findings after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195:1361–1366CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Goutallier D, Postel JM, Bernageau J, Lavau L, Voisin MC (1994) Fatty muscle degeneration in cuff ruptures. Pre- and postoperative evaluation by CT scan. Clin Orthop Relat Res 304:78–83 Goutallier D, Postel JM, Bernageau J, Lavau L, Voisin MC (1994) Fatty muscle degeneration in cuff ruptures. Pre- and postoperative evaluation by CT scan. Clin Orthop Relat Res 304:78–83
7.
go back to reference Goutallier D, Postel JM, Gleyze P, Leguilloux P, Van Driessche S (2003) Influence of cuff muscle fatty degeneration on anatomic and functional outcomes after simple suture of full-thickness tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 12:550–554CrossRefPubMed Goutallier D, Postel JM, Gleyze P, Leguilloux P, Van Driessche S (2003) Influence of cuff muscle fatty degeneration on anatomic and functional outcomes after simple suture of full-thickness tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 12:550–554CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Haneveld H, Hug K, Diederichs G, Scheibel M, Gerhardt C (2013) Arthroscopic double-row repair of the rotator cuff: a comparison of bio-absorbable and non-resorbable anchors regarding osseous reaction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21:1647–1654CrossRefPubMed Haneveld H, Hug K, Diederichs G, Scheibel M, Gerhardt C (2013) Arthroscopic double-row repair of the rotator cuff: a comparison of bio-absorbable and non-resorbable anchors regarding osseous reaction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21:1647–1654CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Huijsmans PE, Pritchard MP, Berghs BM, van Rooyen KS, Wallace AL, de Beer JF (2007) Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with double-row fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:1248–1257CrossRefPubMed Huijsmans PE, Pritchard MP, Berghs BM, van Rooyen KS, Wallace AL, de Beer JF (2007) Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with double-row fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:1248–1257CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Iannotti JP, Deutsch A, Green A, Rudicel S, Christensen J, Marraffino S, Rodeo S (2013) Time to failure after rotator cuff repair: a prospective imaging study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95:965–971CrossRefPubMed Iannotti JP, Deutsch A, Green A, Rudicel S, Christensen J, Marraffino S, Rodeo S (2013) Time to failure after rotator cuff repair: a prospective imaging study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95:965–971CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Jo CH, Park JW, Shin JS (2016) Changes of Muscle Atrophy According to the Immediate Postoperative Time Point in Magnetic Resonance Imaging After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair. Arthroscopy. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2016.04.032 Jo CH, Park JW, Shin JS (2016) Changes of Muscle Atrophy According to the Immediate Postoperative Time Point in Magnetic Resonance Imaging After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair. Arthroscopy. doi:10.​1016/​j.​arthro.​2016.​04.​032
12.
go back to reference Jo CH, Shin JS (2013) Cross-sectional area of the supraspinatus muscle after rotator cuff repair: an anatomic measure of outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95:1785–1791CrossRefPubMed Jo CH, Shin JS (2013) Cross-sectional area of the supraspinatus muscle after rotator cuff repair: an anatomic measure of outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95:1785–1791CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Kim DH, Elattrache NS, Tibone JE, Jun BJ, DeLaMora SN, Kvitne RS, Lee TQ (2006) Biomechanical comparison of a single-row versus double-row suture anchor technique for rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med 34:407–414CrossRefPubMed Kim DH, Elattrache NS, Tibone JE, Jun BJ, DeLaMora SN, Kvitne RS, Lee TQ (2006) Biomechanical comparison of a single-row versus double-row suture anchor technique for rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med 34:407–414CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Koh KH, Laddha MS, Lim TK, Park JH, Yoo JC (2012) Serial structural and functional assessments of rotator cuff repairs: do they differ at 6 and 19 months postoperatively? J Shoulder Elbow Surg 21:859–866CrossRefPubMed Koh KH, Laddha MS, Lim TK, Park JH, Yoo JC (2012) Serial structural and functional assessments of rotator cuff repairs: do they differ at 6 and 19 months postoperatively? J Shoulder Elbow Surg 21:859–866CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Lafosse L, Brzoska R, Toussaint B, Gobezie R (2008) The outcome and structural integrity of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with use of the double-row suture anchor technique. Surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90 Suppl 2 Pt 2:275–286CrossRef Lafosse L, Brzoska R, Toussaint B, Gobezie R (2008) The outcome and structural integrity of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with use of the double-row suture anchor technique. Surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90 Suppl 2 Pt 2:275–286CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Liem D, Lichtenberg S, Magosch P, Habermeyer P (2007) Magnetic resonance imaging of arthroscopic supraspinatus tendon repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:1770–1776PubMed Liem D, Lichtenberg S, Magosch P, Habermeyer P (2007) Magnetic resonance imaging of arthroscopic supraspinatus tendon repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:1770–1776PubMed
17.
go back to reference Lo IK, Burkhart SS (2003) Double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: re-establishing the footprint of the rotator cuff. Arthroscopy 19:1035–1042CrossRefPubMed Lo IK, Burkhart SS (2003) Double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: re-establishing the footprint of the rotator cuff. Arthroscopy 19:1035–1042CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Ma HL, Chiang ER, Wu HT, Hung SC, Wang ST, Liu CL, Chen TH (2012) Clinical outcome and imaging of arthroscopic single-row and double-row rotator cuff repair: a prospective randomized trial. Arthroscopy 28:16–24CrossRefPubMed Ma HL, Chiang ER, Wu HT, Hung SC, Wang ST, Liu CL, Chen TH (2012) Clinical outcome and imaging of arthroscopic single-row and double-row rotator cuff repair: a prospective randomized trial. Arthroscopy 28:16–24CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Malavolta EA, Assuncao JH, Ramos FF, Ferreira TC, Gracitelli ME, Bordalo-Rodrigues M, Ferreira Neto AA (2016) Serial structural MRI evaluation of arthroscopy rotator cuff repair: does Sugaya’s classification correlate with the postoperative clinical outcomes? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 136:791–797CrossRefPubMed Malavolta EA, Assuncao JH, Ramos FF, Ferreira TC, Gracitelli ME, Bordalo-Rodrigues M, Ferreira Neto AA (2016) Serial structural MRI evaluation of arthroscopy rotator cuff repair: does Sugaya’s classification correlate with the postoperative clinical outcomes? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 136:791–797CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Mazzocca AD, Millett PJ, Guanche CA, Santangelo SA, Arciero RA (2005) Arthroscopic single-row versus double-row suture anchor rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med 33:1861–1868CrossRefPubMed Mazzocca AD, Millett PJ, Guanche CA, Santangelo SA, Arciero RA (2005) Arthroscopic single-row versus double-row suture anchor rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med 33:1861–1868CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Meier SW, Meier JD (2006) The effect of double-row fixation on initial repair strength in rotator cuff repair: a biomechanical study. Arthroscopy 22:1168–1173CrossRefPubMed Meier SW, Meier JD (2006) The effect of double-row fixation on initial repair strength in rotator cuff repair: a biomechanical study. Arthroscopy 22:1168–1173CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Patte D (1990) Classification of rotator cuff lesions. Clin Orthop Relat Res 254:81–86 Patte D (1990) Classification of rotator cuff lesions. Clin Orthop Relat Res 254:81–86
23.
go back to reference Pawaskar AC, Kekatpure A, Cho NS, Rhee YG, Jeon IH (2015) Magnetic resonance appearance of bioabsorbable anchor screws for double row arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs. Indian J Orthop 49:164–170CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pawaskar AC, Kekatpure A, Cho NS, Rhee YG, Jeon IH (2015) Magnetic resonance appearance of bioabsorbable anchor screws for double row arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs. Indian J Orthop 49:164–170CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference Saridakis P, Jones G (2010) Outcomes of single-row and double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a systematic review. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92:732–742CrossRefPubMed Saridakis P, Jones G (2010) Outcomes of single-row and double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a systematic review. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92:732–742CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Snyder SJ (1993) Evaluation and treatment of the rotator cuff. Orthop Clin North Am 24:173–192PubMed Snyder SJ (1993) Evaluation and treatment of the rotator cuff. Orthop Clin North Am 24:173–192PubMed
26.
go back to reference Stahnke K, Nikulka C, Diederichs G, Haneveld H, Scheibel M, Gerhardt C (2016) Serial MRI evaluation following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in double-row technique. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 136:665–672CrossRefPubMed Stahnke K, Nikulka C, Diederichs G, Haneveld H, Scheibel M, Gerhardt C (2016) Serial MRI evaluation following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in double-row technique. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 136:665–672CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Sugaya H, Maeda K, Matsuki K, Moriishi J (2005) Functional and structural outcome after arthroscopic full-thickness rotator cuff repair: single-row versus dual-row fixation. Arthroscopy 21:1307–1316CrossRefPubMed Sugaya H, Maeda K, Matsuki K, Moriishi J (2005) Functional and structural outcome after arthroscopic full-thickness rotator cuff repair: single-row versus dual-row fixation. Arthroscopy 21:1307–1316CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Thomazeau H, Rolland Y, Lucas C, Duval JM, Langlais F (1996) Atrophy of the supraspinatus belly. Assessment by MRI in 55 patients with rotator cuff pathology. Acta Orthop Scand 67:264–268CrossRefPubMed Thomazeau H, Rolland Y, Lucas C, Duval JM, Langlais F (1996) Atrophy of the supraspinatus belly. Assessment by MRI in 55 patients with rotator cuff pathology. Acta Orthop Scand 67:264–268CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Serial clinical and MRI examinations after arthroscopic rotator cuff reconstruction using double-row technique
Authors
F. Pfalzer
J. Huth
E. Stürmer
D. Endele
B. Kniesel
F. Mauch
Publication date
01-07-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy / Issue 7/2017
Print ISSN: 0942-2056
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7347
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-017-4437-6

Other articles of this Issue 7/2017

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 7/2017 Go to the issue