Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 8/2011

01-08-2011

Seprafilm slurry does not increase complication rates after laparoscopic colectomy

Authors: Adit Suresh, Brian G. Celso, Ziad T. Awad

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 8/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The ability of the Seprafilm adhesion barrier to prevent adhesion formation after abdominal and pelvic operations has been proved. With laparoscopy, a major technical roadblock with these sheets is their delivery into the peritoneal cavity. This study aimed to evaluate the incidence of postoperative complications and death after laparoscopic placement of Seprafilm slurry in patients who underwent laparoscopic colectomy.

Methods

A total of 100 laparoscopic colectomies performed by a single surgeon were analyzed. For 50 patients, Seprafilm was delivered into the peritoneal cavity as a slurry. Group characteristics were evaluated in terms of age, sex, body mass index (BMI), and American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) score. Complications within the first 30 days after surgery were reviewed. The relative risks with 95% confidence intervals were calculated to determine whether differences in the complication rates between the groups were statistically significant.

Results

Both groups were statistically similar in terms of age, sex, BMI, and ASA score. The differences between the control and experimental groups were examined for abdominal or pelvic abscess (4 vs. 2%), anastomotic leak (4% in both groups), subcutaneous abscess (2% in both groups), wound infection (8 vs. 0%), reoperative rate (8 vs. 6%), and readmission rate (6 vs. 8%). Although the mortality rate was slightly higher in group 2, all the deaths were unrelated to intraabdominal complications. The relative risks for complications were not statistically significant.

Conclusion

The initial data regarding Seprafilm slurry indicate no significant difference in complication rates between the control and experimental groups. This is the first study to evaluate the safety of Seprafilm slurry for patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Menzies D, Ellis H (1990) Intestinal obstruction from adhesions: how big is the problem? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 72:60–63PubMed Menzies D, Ellis H (1990) Intestinal obstruction from adhesions: how big is the problem? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 72:60–63PubMed
2.
go back to reference Shinohara T, Kashiwagi H, Yanagisawa S, Yanaga K (2008) A simple and novel technique for the placement of anti adhesive membrane in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 18:188–191PubMedCrossRef Shinohara T, Kashiwagi H, Yanagisawa S, Yanaga K (2008) A simple and novel technique for the placement of anti adhesive membrane in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 18:188–191PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Ray NF, Denton WG, Thamer M, Henderson SC, Perry S (1998) Abdominoadhesiolysis: inpatient care and expenditures in the United States in 1994. J Am Coll Surg 186:1–9PubMedCrossRef Ray NF, Denton WG, Thamer M, Henderson SC, Perry S (1998) Abdominoadhesiolysis: inpatient care and expenditures in the United States in 1994. J Am Coll Surg 186:1–9PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Lundorff P, Hahlin M, Kallfelt B, Thorburn J, Lindblom B (1991) Adhesion formation after laparoscopic surgery in tubal pregnancy: a randomized trial versus laparotomy. Fertil Steril 55:911–915PubMed Lundorff P, Hahlin M, Kallfelt B, Thorburn J, Lindblom B (1991) Adhesion formation after laparoscopic surgery in tubal pregnancy: a randomized trial versus laparotomy. Fertil Steril 55:911–915PubMed
5.
go back to reference Szomstein S, Lo Menzo E, Simpfendorfer C, Zundel N, Rosenthal RJ (2006) Laparoscopic lysis of adhesions. World J Surg 30:535–540PubMedCrossRef Szomstein S, Lo Menzo E, Simpfendorfer C, Zundel N, Rosenthal RJ (2006) Laparoscopic lysis of adhesions. World J Surg 30:535–540PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Tittel A, Treutner KH, Titkova S, Öttinger A, Schumpelick V (2001) Comparison of adhesion reformation after laparoscopic and conventional adhesiolysis in an animal model. Langenbecks Arch Surg 386:141–145PubMedCrossRef Tittel A, Treutner KH, Titkova S, Öttinger A, Schumpelick V (2001) Comparison of adhesion reformation after laparoscopic and conventional adhesiolysis in an animal model. Langenbecks Arch Surg 386:141–145PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Bailey IS, Rhodes M, O’Rourke N, Nathanson L, Fielding G (1998) Laparoscopic management of acute small bowel obstruction. Br J Surg 85:84–87PubMedCrossRef Bailey IS, Rhodes M, O’Rourke N, Nathanson L, Fielding G (1998) Laparoscopic management of acute small bowel obstruction. Br J Surg 85:84–87PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Onders RP, Mittendorf EA (2003) Utility of laparoscopy in chronic abdominal pain. Surgery 134:549–552PubMedCrossRef Onders RP, Mittendorf EA (2003) Utility of laparoscopy in chronic abdominal pain. Surgery 134:549–552PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Borzellino G, Tasselli S, Zerman G et al (2004) Laparoscopic approach to postoperative adhesive obstruction. Surg Endosc 18:686–690PubMedCrossRef Borzellino G, Tasselli S, Zerman G et al (2004) Laparoscopic approach to postoperative adhesive obstruction. Surg Endosc 18:686–690PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Gago L, Saed G, Chauhan S, Elhammady EF, Diamond MP (2003) Seprafilm (modified hyaluronic acid and carboxymethylcellulose) acts as a physical barrier. Fertil Steril 80:612–616PubMedCrossRef Gago L, Saed G, Chauhan S, Elhammady EF, Diamond MP (2003) Seprafilm (modified hyaluronic acid and carboxymethylcellulose) acts as a physical barrier. Fertil Steril 80:612–616PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Beck D, Cohen Z, Fleshman J, Kaufman HS, Goor HV, Wolff BG (2003) A prospective, randomized, multicenter, controlled study of the safety of Seprafilm adhesion barrier in abdominopelvic surgery of the intestine. Dis Colon Rectum 46:1310–1319PubMedCrossRef Beck D, Cohen Z, Fleshman J, Kaufman HS, Goor HV, Wolff BG (2003) A prospective, randomized, multicenter, controlled study of the safety of Seprafilm adhesion barrier in abdominopelvic surgery of the intestine. Dis Colon Rectum 46:1310–1319PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Becker J, Dayton M, Fazio V, Beck DE, Stryker SJ, Wexner SD, Wolff BG, Roberts PL, Smith LE, Sweeney SA, Moore M (1996) Prevention of postoperative abdominal adhesions by a sodium hyaluronate-based bioresorbable membrane: a prospective, randomized double blind multicenter study. J Am Coll Surg 183:297–306PubMed Becker J, Dayton M, Fazio V, Beck DE, Stryker SJ, Wexner SD, Wolff BG, Roberts PL, Smith LE, Sweeney SA, Moore M (1996) Prevention of postoperative abdominal adhesions by a sodium hyaluronate-based bioresorbable membrane: a prospective, randomized double blind multicenter study. J Am Coll Surg 183:297–306PubMed
13.
go back to reference Chuang Y, Fan C, Cho F, Kan YY, Chang Y, Kang H (2008) A novel technique to apply a Seprafilm (hyaluronate-carboxymethylcellulose) barrier following laparoscopic surgeries. Fertil Steril 90:1959–1963PubMedCrossRef Chuang Y, Fan C, Cho F, Kan YY, Chang Y, Kang H (2008) A novel technique to apply a Seprafilm (hyaluronate-carboxymethylcellulose) barrier following laparoscopic surgeries. Fertil Steril 90:1959–1963PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Ortiz M, Awad ZT (2009) An easy technique for laparoscopic placement of Seprafilm. Surg Laparoscopic Endosc Percutan Tech 19(5):e181–e183CrossRef Ortiz M, Awad ZT (2009) An easy technique for laparoscopic placement of Seprafilm. Surg Laparoscopic Endosc Percutan Tech 19(5):e181–e183CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Vrijland W, Tseng L, Eijkman H, Hop W, Jakimowicz J, Leguit P, Stassen L, Swank D, Haverlag R, Bonjer J, Jeekel H (2002) Fewer intraperitoneal adhesions with use of hyaluronic acid–carboxymethylcellulose membrane. Ann Surg 235:193–199PubMedCrossRef Vrijland W, Tseng L, Eijkman H, Hop W, Jakimowicz J, Leguit P, Stassen L, Swank D, Haverlag R, Bonjer J, Jeekel H (2002) Fewer intraperitoneal adhesions with use of hyaluronic acid–carboxymethylcellulose membrane. Ann Surg 235:193–199PubMedCrossRef
16.
Metadata
Title
Seprafilm slurry does not increase complication rates after laparoscopic colectomy
Authors
Adit Suresh
Brian G. Celso
Ziad T. Awad
Publication date
01-08-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 8/2011
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1624-2

Other articles of this Issue 8/2011

Surgical Endoscopy 8/2011 Go to the issue