Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Dysphagia 4/2005

01-10-2005

Sensitivity of Upper Endoscopy in Diagnosing Esophageal Cancer

Authors: Richard S. Bloomfeld, MD, David I. Bridgers III, MD, Benoit C. Pineau, MD, MSc (Epid)

Published in: Dysphagia | Issue 4/2005

Login to get access

Abstract

Esophageal cancer is a common cause of dysphagia and upper endoscopy is the accepted standard for making the diagnosis; however, the accuracy of endoscopy is not known. The purpose of this study is to determine the sensitivity of upper endoscopy in making the diagnosis of esophageal cancer in clinical practice. All patients with a new diagnosis of esophageal cancer from 1997 to 2001 in the Tumor Registry of Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center were identified. The medical records were reviewed to identify all patients who had undergone a previous endoscopy within two years that failed to diagnose esophageal cancer. The reason for failure was recorded. One hundred ten new cases of esophageal carcinoma were identified, and ten patients had had a previous false-negative endoscopy within two years for a sensitivity of 90.9% in clinical practice. The reasons for the failure of endoscopy were (1) lesion not seen in seven patients, (2) lesion seen and biopsied with benign histology in two patients, and (3) lesion seen but felt to be benign and not biopsied in one patient. Given the uncertain natural history of esophageal cancer, the data were also analyzed using a one-year window; this resulted in a sensitivity of 94.5%. The sensitivity of upper endoscopy in the diagnosis of esophageal cancer in general clinical practice is 90.9% using a two-year window and 94.5% using a one-year window. Understanding the reasons for the failure of endoscopy may allow us to improve the practice of endoscopy.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Jemal A, Murray T, Samuels A, Ghafoor A, Ward E, Thun MJ: Cancer statistics, 2003. CA Cancer J Clin 53:5–26, 2003PubMed Jemal A, Murray T, Samuels A, Ghafoor A, Ward E, Thun MJ: Cancer statistics, 2003. CA Cancer J Clin 53:5–26, 2003PubMed
2.
go back to reference Lambert R: Diagnosis of esophagogastric tumors. Endoscopy 34:129–138, 2002PubMed Lambert R: Diagnosis of esophagogastric tumors. Endoscopy 34:129–138, 2002PubMed
3.
go back to reference Shaheen NJ, Provenzale D, Sandler RS: Upper endoscopy as a screening and surveillance tool in esophageal adenocarcinoma: a review of the evidence. Am J Gastroenterol 97:1319–1327, 2002CrossRefPubMed Shaheen NJ, Provenzale D, Sandler RS: Upper endoscopy as a screening and surveillance tool in esophageal adenocarcinoma: a review of the evidence. Am J Gastroenterol 97:1319–1327, 2002CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference El Serag HB, Mason AC, Petersen N, Key CR: Epidemiological differences between adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus and adenocarcinoma of the gastric cardia in the USA. Gut 50:368–372, 2002PubMed El Serag HB, Mason AC, Petersen N, Key CR: Epidemiological differences between adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus and adenocarcinoma of the gastric cardia in the USA. Gut 50:368–372, 2002PubMed
5.
go back to reference Pottern LM, Morris LE, Blot WJ, Ziegler RG, Fraumeni JF: Esophageal cancer among black men in Washington, D.C. I. Alcohol, tobacco, and other risk factors. J Natl Cancer Inst 67:777–783, 1981PubMed Pottern LM, Morris LE, Blot WJ, Ziegler RG, Fraumeni JF: Esophageal cancer among black men in Washington, D.C. I. Alcohol, tobacco, and other risk factors. J Natl Cancer Inst 67:777–783, 1981PubMed
6.
go back to reference Rex DK, Rahmani EY, Haseman JH, Lemmel GT, Kaster S, Buckley JS: Relative sensitivity of colonoscopy and barium enema for detection of colorectal cancer in clinical practice. Gastroenterology 112:17–23, 1997PubMed Rex DK, Rahmani EY, Haseman JH, Lemmel GT, Kaster S, Buckley JS: Relative sensitivity of colonoscopy and barium enema for detection of colorectal cancer in clinical practice. Gastroenterology 112:17–23, 1997PubMed
7.
go back to reference Hosokawa O, Tsuda S, Kidani E, Watanabe K, Tanigawa Y, Shirasaki S, et al.: Diagnosis of gastric cancer up to three years after negative upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Endoscopy 30:669–674, 1998PubMed Hosokawa O, Tsuda S, Kidani E, Watanabe K, Tanigawa Y, Shirasaki S, et al.: Diagnosis of gastric cancer up to three years after negative upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Endoscopy 30:669–674, 1998PubMed
8.
go back to reference Lambert R, Rey JF: Endoscopy and early neoplasia: better but not the best. Endoscopy 33:348–352, 2001PubMed Lambert R, Rey JF: Endoscopy and early neoplasia: better but not the best. Endoscopy 33:348–352, 2001PubMed
9.
go back to reference Younes M, Henson DE, Ertan A, Miller CC: Incidence and survival trends of esophageal carcinoma in the United States: Racial and gender differences by histological type. Scand J Gastroenterol 12:1359–1365, 2002 Younes M, Henson DE, Ertan A, Miller CC: Incidence and survival trends of esophageal carcinoma in the United States: Racial and gender differences by histological type. Scand J Gastroenterol 12:1359–1365, 2002
10.
go back to reference Graham DY, Schwartz JT, Cain GD, Gyorkey F: Prospective evaluation of biopsy number in the diagnosis of esophageal and gastric carcinoma. Gastroenterology 82:228–231, 1982PubMed Graham DY, Schwartz JT, Cain GD, Gyorkey F: Prospective evaluation of biopsy number in the diagnosis of esophageal and gastric carcinoma. Gastroenterology 82:228–231, 1982PubMed
Metadata
Title
Sensitivity of Upper Endoscopy in Diagnosing Esophageal Cancer
Authors
Richard S. Bloomfeld, MD
David I. Bridgers III, MD
Benoit C. Pineau, MD, MSc (Epid)
Publication date
01-10-2005
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Dysphagia / Issue 4/2005
Print ISSN: 0179-051X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0460
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-005-0025-x

Other articles of this Issue 4/2005

Dysphagia 4/2005 Go to the issue

Erratum

Erratum II