Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Osteoporosis International 1/2017

01-01-2017 | Short Communication

Sensitivity and specificity of radiographic characteristics in atypical femoral fractures

Authors: A. L. Adams, F. Xue, J. Q. Chantra, R. M. Dell, S. M. Ott, S. Silverman, J. C. Giaconi, C. Critchlow

Published in: Osteoporosis International | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Summary

Using the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research Task Force case definition for atypical femoral fractures, sensitivity and specificity of radiographic fracture characteristics were calculated. Fracture pattern was the most sensitive and specific characteristic. This suggests that some characteristics should be weighted more heavily when identifying these fractures.

Introduction

To estimate the sensitivity and specificity of each radiographic criterion in the 2013 ASBMR atypical femoral fracture (AFF) case definition for distinguishing AFF from other subtrochanteric/diaphyseal fractures (non-AFF) among women enrolled in a large integrated health care organization.

Methods

Radiographs from 55 physician-confirmed AFFs and a sample of 39 non-AFFs were reviewed by four independent expert reviewers representing four medical specialties. One image per fracture was selected for review. Using a standardized data collection tool, based on the 2013 AFF case definition, reviewers indicated the presence or absence of the following characteristics viewable on radiograph: fracture pattern, comminution, periosteal and/or endosteal thickening, and cortical thickening. Sensitivity and specificity for each characteristic was calculated for each reviewer and summarized across reviewers with the mean and range. Agreement across reviewers was quantified using Fleiss’s kappa (FK) statistic.

Results

The most sensitive factors distinguishing AFF from non-AFF were lateral cortex transverse fracture pattern (mean 93.6 %, range 85.5–98.2 %), medial cortex transverse or oblique fracture pattern (mean 84.1 %, range 72.7–98.2 %), and minimal/non-comminution (mean 93.2 %, range 89.1–98.2 %). Specificity was the greatest for lateral cortex transverse fracture pattern (mean 95.5 %, range 92.3–97.4 %). Agreement across reviewers was the highest for lateral cortex transverse fracture pattern (FK 0.83) and incomplete fracture through the lateral cortex only (FK 0.80).

Conclusion

Lateral cortex transverse fracture pattern was the most sensitive and specific characteristic and the most highly agreed upon across reviewers. Other characteristics were less readily agreed upon across reviewers. Measurement of discrete combinations of individual characteristics may enhance sensitivity and/or specificity.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Food and Drug Administration (2011) Background document for meeting of advisory committee for reproductive health drugs and drug safety and risk management advisory committee. In: Food and drug administration, p 182 Food and Drug Administration (2011) Background document for meeting of advisory committee for reproductive health drugs and drug safety and risk management advisory committee. In: Food and drug administration, p 182
2.
go back to reference Dell RM, Adams AL, Greene DF, Funahashi TT, Silverman SL, Eisemon EO, Zhou H, Burchette RJ, Ott SM (2012) Incidence of atypical nontraumatic diaphyseal fractures of the femur. J Bone Miner Res 27:2544–2550. doi:10.1002/jbmr.1719 CrossRefPubMed Dell RM, Adams AL, Greene DF, Funahashi TT, Silverman SL, Eisemon EO, Zhou H, Burchette RJ, Ott SM (2012) Incidence of atypical nontraumatic diaphyseal fractures of the femur. J Bone Miner Res 27:2544–2550. doi:10.​1002/​jbmr.​1719 CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Kim SY, Schneeweiss S, Katz JN, Levin R, Solomon DH (2011) Oral bisphosphonates and risk of subtrochanteric or diaphyseal femur fractures in a population-based cohort. J Bone Miner Res 26:993–1001. doi:10.1002/jbmr.288 CrossRefPubMed Kim SY, Schneeweiss S, Katz JN, Levin R, Solomon DH (2011) Oral bisphosphonates and risk of subtrochanteric or diaphyseal femur fractures in a population-based cohort. J Bone Miner Res 26:993–1001. doi:10.​1002/​jbmr.​288 CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Lenart BA, Neviaser AS, Lyman S, Chang CC, Edobor-Osula F, Steele B, van der Meulen MC, Lorich DG, Lane JM (2009) Association of low-energy femoral fractures with prolonged bisphosphonate use: a case control study. Osteoporos Int 20:1353–1362. doi:10.1007/s00198-008-0805-x CrossRefPubMed Lenart BA, Neviaser AS, Lyman S, Chang CC, Edobor-Osula F, Steele B, van der Meulen MC, Lorich DG, Lane JM (2009) Association of low-energy femoral fractures with prolonged bisphosphonate use: a case control study. Osteoporos Int 20:1353–1362. doi:10.​1007/​s00198-008-0805-x CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Park-Wyllie LY, Mamdani MM, Juurlink DN, Hawker GA, Gunraj N, Austin PC, Whelan DB, Weiler PJ, Laupacis A (2011) Bisphosphonate use and the risk of subtrochanteric or femoral shaft fractures in older women. JAMA 305:783–789. doi:10.1001/jama.2011.190 CrossRefPubMed Park-Wyllie LY, Mamdani MM, Juurlink DN, Hawker GA, Gunraj N, Austin PC, Whelan DB, Weiler PJ, Laupacis A (2011) Bisphosphonate use and the risk of subtrochanteric or femoral shaft fractures in older women. JAMA 305:783–789. doi:10.​1001/​jama.​2011.​190 CrossRefPubMed
13.
15.
16.
go back to reference Schilcher J, Koeppen V, Ranstam J, Skripitz R, Michaelsson K, Aspenberg P (2013) Atypical femoral fractures are a separate entity, characterized by highly specific radiographic features. A comparison of 59 cases and 218 controls. Bone 52:389–392. doi:10.1016/j.bone.2012.10.016 CrossRefPubMed Schilcher J, Koeppen V, Ranstam J, Skripitz R, Michaelsson K, Aspenberg P (2013) Atypical femoral fractures are a separate entity, characterized by highly specific radiographic features. A comparison of 59 cases and 218 controls. Bone 52:389–392. doi:10.​1016/​j.​bone.​2012.​10.​016 CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Shane E, Burr D, Ebeling PR et al (2010) Atypical subtrochanteric and diaphyseal femoral fractures: report of a task force of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. J Bone Miner Res 25:2267–2294. doi:10.1002/jbmr.253 CrossRefPubMed Shane E, Burr D, Ebeling PR et al (2010) Atypical subtrochanteric and diaphyseal femoral fractures: report of a task force of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. J Bone Miner Res 25:2267–2294. doi:10.​1002/​jbmr.​253 CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Shane E, Burr D, Abrahamsen B et al (2014) Atypical subtrochanteric and diaphyseal femoral fractures: second report of a task force of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. J Bone Miner Res 29:1–23. doi:10.1002/jbmr.1998 CrossRefPubMed Shane E, Burr D, Abrahamsen B et al (2014) Atypical subtrochanteric and diaphyseal femoral fractures: second report of a task force of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. J Bone Miner Res 29:1–23. doi:10.​1002/​jbmr.​1998 CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174CrossRefPubMed Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Rosenberg ZS, La Rocca Vieira R, Chan SS et al (2011) Bisphosphonate-related complete atypical subtrochanteric femoral fractures: diagnostic utility of radiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 197:954–960. doi:10.2214/AJR.10.6262 CrossRefPubMed Rosenberg ZS, La Rocca Vieira R, Chan SS et al (2011) Bisphosphonate-related complete atypical subtrochanteric femoral fractures: diagnostic utility of radiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 197:954–960. doi:10.​2214/​AJR.​10.​6262 CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Sensitivity and specificity of radiographic characteristics in atypical femoral fractures
Authors
A. L. Adams
F. Xue
J. Q. Chantra
R. M. Dell
S. M. Ott
S. Silverman
J. C. Giaconi
C. Critchlow
Publication date
01-01-2017
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
Osteoporosis International / Issue 1/2017
Print ISSN: 0937-941X
Electronic ISSN: 1433-2965
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-016-3809-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Osteoporosis International 1/2017 Go to the issue