Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 1/2020

Open Access 01-12-2020 | Research

Sensing form - finger gaiting as key to tactile object exploration - a data glove analysis of a prototypical daily task

Authors: Werner Krammer, John H. Missimer, Simon Habegger, Manuela Pastore-Wapp, Roland Wiest, Bruno J. Weder

Published in: Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Motor hand skill and associated dexterity is important for meeting the challenges of daily activity and an important resource post-stroke. In this context, the present study investigated the finger movements of right-handed subjects during tactile manipulation of a cuboid, a prototypical task underlying tactile exploration. During one motor act, the thumb and fingers of one hand surround the cuboid in a continuous and regular manner. While the object is moved by the guiding thumb, the opposed supporting fingers are replaced once they reach their joint limits by free fingers, a mechanism termed finger gaiting.

Methods

For both hands of 22 subjects, we acquired the time series of consecutive manipulations of a cuboid at a frequency of 1 Hz, using a digital data glove consisting of 29 sensors. Using principle component analysis, we decomposed the short action into motor patterns related to successive manipulations of the cuboid. The components purport to represent changing grasp configurations involving the stabilizing fingers and guiding thumb. The temporal features of the components permits testing whether the distinct configurations occur at the frequency of 1 Hz, i.e. within the time window of 1 s, and, thus, taxonomic classification of the manipulation as finger gaiting.

Results

The fraction of variance described by the principal components indicated that three components described the salient features of the single motor acts for each hand. Striking in the finger patterns was the prominent and varying roles of the MCP and PIP joints of the fingers, and the CMC joint of the thumb. An important aspect of the three components was their representation of distinct finger configurations within the same motor act. Principal component and graph theory analysis confirmed modular, functionally synchronous action of the involved joints. The computation of finger trajectories in one subject illustrated the workspace of the task, which differed for the right and left hands.

Conclusion

In this task one complex motor act of 1 s duration could be described by three elementary and hierarchically ordered grasp configurations occurring at the prescribed frequency of 1 Hz. Therefore, these configurations represent finger gaiting, described until now only in artificial systems, as the principal mechanism underlying this prototypical task.

Trial registration

clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02865642, registered 12 August 2016.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ekstrand E, Rylander L, Lexell J, Brogårdh C. Perceived ability to perform daily hand activities after stroke and associated factors: a cross-sectional study. BMC Neurol BioMed Central. 2016;16(1):208. Ekstrand E, Rylander L, Lexell J, Brogårdh C. Perceived ability to perform daily hand activities after stroke and associated factors: a cross-sectional study. BMC Neurol BioMed Central. 2016;16(1):208.
2.
go back to reference Térémetz M, Colle F, Hamdoun S, Maier MA, Lindberg PG. A novel method for the quantification of key components of manual dexterity after stroke. J Neuroeng Rehabil. BioMed Central. 2015;12:64. Térémetz M, Colle F, Hamdoun S, Maier MA, Lindberg PG. A novel method for the quantification of key components of manual dexterity after stroke. J Neuroeng Rehabil. BioMed Central. 2015;12:64.
3.
go back to reference Jones LA, Lederman SJ. Human hand function. New York: Oxford University Press; 2006. p. 280. Jones LA, Lederman SJ. Human hand function. New York: Oxford University Press; 2006. p. 280.
4.
go back to reference Li Z, Canny JF, Sastry SS. On motion planning for dexterous manipulation. I. The problem formulation. 1989 Jun 14; 2015. p. 775–80. Li Z, Canny JF, Sastry SS. On motion planning for dexterous manipulation. I. The problem formulation. 1989 Jun 14; 2015. p. 775–80.
5.
go back to reference Bicchi A. Hands for dexterous manipulation and powerful grasping: a difficult road towards simplicity. Robot Res IEEE. 2000;16(6):652–62. Bicchi A. Hands for dexterous manipulation and powerful grasping: a difficult road towards simplicity. Robot Res IEEE. 2000;16(6):652–62.
6.
go back to reference Roland PE, Mortensen E. Somatosensory detection of microgeometry, macrogeometry and kinesthesia in man. Brain Res Rev Elsevier Science. 1987;12:1–42. Roland PE, Mortensen E. Somatosensory detection of microgeometry, macrogeometry and kinesthesia in man. Brain Res Rev Elsevier Science. 1987;12:1–42.
7.
go back to reference Hartmann S, et al. Functional connectivity in tactile object discrimination - A principal component analysis of an event related fMRI-study. PLoS One. 2008;3(12):e3831. Hartmann S, et al. Functional connectivity in tactile object discrimination - A principal component analysis of an event related fMRI-study. PLoS One. 2008;3(12):e3831.
8.
go back to reference Kägi G, Missimer JH, Abela E, Seitz RJ, Weder BJ. Neural networks engaged in tactile object manipulation: patterns of expression among healthy individuals. Behav Brain Funct BioMed Central Ltd. 2010;6(1):71. Kägi G, Missimer JH, Abela E, Seitz RJ, Weder BJ. Neural networks engaged in tactile object manipulation: patterns of expression among healthy individuals. Behav Brain Funct BioMed Central Ltd. 2010;6(1):71.
9.
go back to reference Stoeckel MC, Weder B, Binkofski F, Buccino G, Shah NJ, Seitz RJ. A fronto-parietal circuit for tactile object discrimination: an event-related fMRI study. Neuroimage Elsevier. 2003;19(3):1103–14. Stoeckel MC, Weder B, Binkofski F, Buccino G, Shah NJ, Seitz RJ. A fronto-parietal circuit for tactile object discrimination: an event-related fMRI study. Neuroimage Elsevier. 2003;19(3):1103–14.
10.
go back to reference Seitz RJ, Roland PE, Bohm C, Greitz T, Stone-Elander S. Somatosensory discrimination of shape: tactile exploration and cerebral activation. Eur J Neurosci. 1991;3(6):481–92. Seitz RJ, Roland PE, Bohm C, Greitz T, Stone-Elander S. Somatosensory discrimination of shape: tactile exploration and cerebral activation. Eur J Neurosci. 1991;3(6):481–92.
11.
go back to reference Weisstanner C, Kägi G, Krammer, W, Eap CB, Wiest R, Missimer JH, Weder BJ. The effect of a single dose of escitalopram on sensorimotor networks. Brain Behav. 2018;8(6):e00975. Weisstanner C, Kägi G, Krammer, W, Eap CB, Wiest R, Missimer JH, Weder BJ. The effect of a single dose of escitalopram on sensorimotor networks. Brain Behav. 2018;8(6):e00975.
12.
go back to reference Cutkosky MR. On grasp choice, grasp models, and the design of hands for manufacturing tasks - robotics and automation, IEEE transactions on. IEEE Trans Robot Autom. 1989;5(3):269–79. Cutkosky MR. On grasp choice, grasp models, and the design of hands for manufacturing tasks - robotics and automation, IEEE transactions on. IEEE Trans Robot Autom. 1989;5(3):269–79.
13.
go back to reference Bullock IM, Ma RR, Dollar AM. A hand-centric classification of human and robot dexterous manipulation. IEEE Trans Haptics IEEE. 2013;6(2):129–44. Bullock IM, Ma RR, Dollar AM. A hand-centric classification of human and robot dexterous manipulation. IEEE Trans Haptics IEEE. 2013;6(2):129–44.
14.
go back to reference Landsmeer JMF. Power grip and precision handling. Ann Rheum Dis BMJ Publishing Group. 1962;21(2):164–70. Landsmeer JMF. Power grip and precision handling. Ann Rheum Dis BMJ Publishing Group. 1962;21(2):164–70.
15.
go back to reference Kragic D, et al. The GRASP taxonomy of human grasp types. IEEE Trans Human-Machine Syst IEEE. 2015;46(1):66–77. Kragic D, et al. The GRASP taxonomy of human grasp types. IEEE Trans Human-Machine Syst IEEE. 2015;46(1):66–77.
16.
go back to reference Freund H-JJ. Time control of hand movements. Prog Brain Res Elsevier. 1986;64(C):287–94. Freund H-JJ. Time control of hand movements. Prog Brain Res Elsevier. 1986;64(C):287–94.
17.
go back to reference Oldfield RC, O RC, Oldfield RC. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia Elsevier. 1971;9(1):97–113. Oldfield RC, O RC, Oldfield RC. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia Elsevier. 1971;9(1):97–113.
18.
go back to reference Review C, Communication S. Principles G. 20. Helsinki2013; 2015. p. 2013–6. Review C, Communication S. Principles G. 20. Helsinki2013; 2015. p. 2013–6.
19.
go back to reference Mathiowetz V. Grip and pinch strength: normative data for adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1985;66(2):69–72. Mathiowetz V. Grip and pinch strength: normative data for adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1985;66(2):69–72.
20.
go back to reference Jebsen RH, Taylor N, Trieschmann RB, Trotter MJ, Howard LA. An objective and standardized test of hand function. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1969;50(6):311–9. Jebsen RH, Taylor N, Trieschmann RB, Trotter MJ, Howard LA. An objective and standardized test of hand function. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1969;50(6):311–9.
21.
go back to reference Tong J, Mao O, Goldreich D. Two-point orientation discrimination versus the traditional two-point test for tactile spatial acuity assessment. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013;7(September):1–11. Tong J, Mao O, Goldreich D. Two-point orientation discrimination versus the traditional two-point test for tactile spatial acuity assessment. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013;7(September):1–11.
22.
go back to reference Abela E, Missimer JH, Pastore-Wapp M, Krammer W, Wiest R, Weder BJ. Early prediction of long-term tactile object recognition performance after sensorimotor stroke. Cortex Elsevier. 2019;115:264–79. Abela E, Missimer JH, Pastore-Wapp M, Krammer W, Wiest R, Weder BJ. Early prediction of long-term tactile object recognition performance after sensorimotor stroke. Cortex Elsevier. 2019;115:264–79.
23.
go back to reference Hertling D, Kessler RM. Management of common musculoskeletal disorders : physical therapy principles and methods. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1996. p. 795. Hertling D, Kessler RM. Management of common musculoskeletal disorders : physical therapy principles and methods. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1996. p. 795.
24.
go back to reference Varela JV, Toro A, John ER. Schwartz. Perceptual framing and cortical alpha rhythm. Neuropsychologia Elsevier. 1981;19(5):675–86. Varela JV, Toro A, John ER. Schwartz. Perceptual framing and cortical alpha rhythm. Neuropsychologia Elsevier. 1981;19(5):675–86.
25.
go back to reference Alexander GE, Moeller JR. Application of the scaled subprofile model to functional imaging in neuropsychiatric disorders: a principal component approach to modeling brain function in disease. Hum Brain Mapp Wiley Online Library. 1994;2(1–2):79–94. Alexander GE, Moeller JR. Application of the scaled subprofile model to functional imaging in neuropsychiatric disorders: a principal component approach to modeling brain function in disease. Hum Brain Mapp Wiley Online Library. 1994;2(1–2):79–94.
26.
go back to reference Guttman L. Some necessary conditions for common-factor analysis. Psychometrika Springer. 1954;19(2):149–61. Guttman L. Some necessary conditions for common-factor analysis. Psychometrika Springer. 1954;19(2):149–61.
27.
go back to reference Bro R, Leardi R, Johnsen LG. Solving the sign indeterminacy for multiway models. J Chemom. John Wiley & Sons . Ltd. 2013;27(3–4):70–5. Bro R, Leardi R, Johnsen LG. Solving the sign indeterminacy for multiway models. J Chemom. John Wiley & Sons . Ltd. 2013;27(3–4):70–5.
28.
go back to reference Kruschwitz JD, List D, Waller L, Rubinov M, Walter H. GraphVar: a user-friendly toolbox for comprehensive graph analyses of functional brain connectivity. J Neurosci Methods Elsevier. 2015;245:107–15. Kruschwitz JD, List D, Waller L, Rubinov M, Walter H. GraphVar: a user-friendly toolbox for comprehensive graph analyses of functional brain connectivity. J Neurosci Methods Elsevier. 2015;245:107–15.
29.
go back to reference Blondel VD, Guillaume J-L, Lambiotte R, Lefebvre E. Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. J Stat Mech Theory Exp. 2008;2008(10):P10008. Blondel VD, Guillaume J-L, Lambiotte R, Lefebvre E. Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. J Stat Mech Theory Exp. 2008;2008(10):P10008.
30.
go back to reference Rubinov M, Sporns O. Complex network measures of brain connectivity: uses and interpretations. Neuroimage Academic Press. 2010;52(3):1059–69. Rubinov M, Sporns O. Complex network measures of brain connectivity: uses and interpretations. Neuroimage Academic Press. 2010;52(3):1059–69.
31.
go back to reference Kunesch E, Binkofski F, Freund H-J. Invariant temporal characteristics of manipulative hand movements. Exp Brain Res Springer. 1989;78(3):539–46. Kunesch E, Binkofski F, Freund H-J. Invariant temporal characteristics of manipulative hand movements. Exp Brain Res Springer. 1989;78(3):539–46.
32.
go back to reference Roland PE. Sensory feedback to the cerebral cortex during voluntary movement in man. Behav Brain Sci Cambridge University Press. 1978;1(1):129–47. Roland PE. Sensory feedback to the cerebral cortex during voluntary movement in man. Behav Brain Sci Cambridge University Press. 1978;1(1):129–47.
33.
go back to reference Santello M, Flanders M, Soechting JF. Postural hand synergies for tool use. J Neurosci. Soc Neuroscience. 1998;18(23):10105–15. Santello M, Flanders M, Soechting JF. Postural hand synergies for tool use. J Neurosci. Soc Neuroscience. 1998;18(23):10105–15.
34.
go back to reference Belic JJ, Faisal AA. Decoding of human hand actions to handle missing limbs in neuroprosthetics. Front Comput Neurosci. Frontiers. 2015;9:27. Belic JJ, Faisal AA. Decoding of human hand actions to handle missing limbs in neuroprosthetics. Front Comput Neurosci. Frontiers. 2015;9:27.
35.
go back to reference Thakur PH, Bastian AJ, Hsiao SS. Multidigit movement synergies of the human hand in an unconstrained haptic exploration task. J Neurosci Soc Neuroscience. 2008;28(6):1271–81. Thakur PH, Bastian AJ, Hsiao SS. Multidigit movement synergies of the human hand in an unconstrained haptic exploration task. J Neurosci Soc Neuroscience. 2008;28(6):1271–81.
36.
go back to reference Jarrassé N, Ribeiro AT, Sahbani A, Bachta W, Roby-Brami A. Analysis of hand synergies in healthy subjects during bimanual manipulation of various objects. J Neuroeng Rehabil BioMed Central. 2014;11(1):113. Jarrassé N, Ribeiro AT, Sahbani A, Bachta W, Roby-Brami A. Analysis of hand synergies in healthy subjects during bimanual manipulation of various objects. J Neuroeng Rehabil BioMed Central. 2014;11(1):113.
37.
go back to reference Mason CR, Gomez JE, Ebner TJ. Hand synergies during reach-to-grasp. J Neurophysiol. American Physiological Society Bethesda. MD. 2001;86(6):2896–910. Mason CR, Gomez JE, Ebner TJ. Hand synergies during reach-to-grasp. J Neurophysiol. American Physiological Society Bethesda. MD. 2001;86(6):2896–910.
38.
go back to reference Smeets JBJJ, Brenner E. A new view on grasping. Mot Control. 1999;3(3):237–71. Smeets JBJJ, Brenner E. A new view on grasping. Mot Control. 1999;3(3):237–71.
39.
go back to reference Hömke L, et al. Analysis of lesions in patients with unilateral tactile agnosia using cytoarchitectonic probabilistic maps. Hum brain Mapp. John Wiley & Sons. Ltd. 2009;30(5):1444–56. Hömke L, et al. Analysis of lesions in patients with unilateral tactile agnosia using cytoarchitectonic probabilistic maps. Hum brain Mapp. John Wiley & Sons. Ltd. 2009;30(5):1444–56.
40.
go back to reference Binkofski F, Kunesch E, Classen J, Seitz RJ, Freund H-J. Tactile apraxia: unimodal apractic disorder of tactile object exploration associated with parietal lobe lesions. Brain Oxford Univ Press. 2001;124(1):132–44. Binkofski F, Kunesch E, Classen J, Seitz RJ, Freund H-J. Tactile apraxia: unimodal apractic disorder of tactile object exploration associated with parietal lobe lesions. Brain Oxford Univ Press. 2001;124(1):132–44.
41.
go back to reference Han L, Trinkle JC. Dextrous manipulation by rolling and finger gaiting. In: Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation; 1998. p. 730–5. Han L, Trinkle JC. Dextrous manipulation by rolling and finger gaiting. In: Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation; 1998. p. 730–5.
42.
go back to reference Ingram JN, Körding KP, Howard IS, Wolpert DM. The statistics of natural hand movements. Exp Brain Res Springer. 2008;188(2):223–36. Ingram JN, Körding KP, Howard IS, Wolpert DM. The statistics of natural hand movements. Exp Brain Res Springer. 2008;188(2):223–36.
43.
go back to reference Todorov E, Jordan MI. Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination. Nat Neurosci Nat Publishing Group. 2002;5(11):1226. Todorov E, Jordan MI. Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination. Nat Neurosci Nat Publishing Group. 2002;5(11):1226.
44.
go back to reference Faisal A, Stout D, Apel J, Bradley B. The manipulative complexity of lower paleolithic stone toolmaking. PLoS One. 2010;5:11. Faisal A, Stout D, Apel J, Bradley B. The manipulative complexity of lower paleolithic stone toolmaking. PLoS One. 2010;5:11.
45.
go back to reference Kamper DG, Cruz EG, Siegel MP. Stereotypical fingertip trajectories during grasp. J Neurophysiol. 2003;90(6):3702–10. Kamper DG, Cruz EG, Siegel MP. Stereotypical fingertip trajectories during grasp. J Neurophysiol. 2003;90(6):3702–10.
46.
go back to reference Schieber MH, Santello M. Hand function: peripheral and central constraints on performance. J Appl Physiol. 2004;96(6):2293–300. Schieber MH, Santello M. Hand function: peripheral and central constraints on performance. J Appl Physiol. 2004;96(6):2293–300.
47.
go back to reference Okamura AM, Turner ML, Cutkosky MR. Haptic exploration of objects with rolling and sliding 2002; 2014. p. 2485–90. Okamura AM, Turner ML, Cutkosky MR. Haptic exploration of objects with rolling and sliding 2002; 2014. p. 2485–90.
48.
go back to reference Santello M, Flanders M, Soechting JF. Patterns of hand motion during grasping and the influence of sensory guidance. J Neurosci. 2018;22(4):1426–35. Santello M, Flanders M, Soechting JF. Patterns of hand motion during grasping and the influence of sensory guidance. J Neurosci. 2018;22(4):1426–35.
49.
go back to reference Gentner R, Classen J. Modular Organization of Finger Movements by the human central nervous system. Neuron. 2006;52(4):731–42. Gentner R, Classen J. Modular Organization of Finger Movements by the human central nervous system. Neuron. 2006;52(4):731–42.
50.
go back to reference Berniker M, Kording KP. Deep networks for motor control functions. Front Comput Neurosci. 2015;9:32. Berniker M, Kording KP. Deep networks for motor control functions. Front Comput Neurosci. 2015;9:32.
51.
go back to reference Bassett DS, Bullmore ET. Small-world brain networks revisited. Neuroscientist United States. 2017;23(5):499–516. Bassett DS, Bullmore ET. Small-world brain networks revisited. Neuroscientist United States. 2017;23(5):499–516.
52.
go back to reference Stam CJ, van Straaten ECW. The organization of physiological brain networks. Clin Neurophysiol. 2012;123(6):1067–87. Stam CJ, van Straaten ECW. The organization of physiological brain networks. Clin Neurophysiol. 2012;123(6):1067–87.
53.
go back to reference Latora V, Marchiori M. Efficient behavior of small-world networks. Phys Rev Lett APS. 2001;87(19):198701. Latora V, Marchiori M. Efficient behavior of small-world networks. Phys Rev Lett APS. 2001;87(19):198701.
54.
go back to reference van den Heuvel MP, Sporns O. Network hubs in the human brain. Trends Cogn Sci. 2013;17(12):683–96. van den Heuvel MP, Sporns O. Network hubs in the human brain. Trends Cogn Sci. 2013;17(12):683–96.
55.
go back to reference Bicchi A, Gabiccini M, Santello M. Modelling natural and artificial hands with synergies. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci. 2011;366(1581):3153–61. Bicchi A, Gabiccini M, Santello M. Modelling natural and artificial hands with synergies. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci. 2011;366(1581):3153–61.
56.
go back to reference Smeets JBJ, Brenner E. Independent movements of the digits in grasping. Exp Brain Res. 2001;139(1):92–100. Smeets JBJ, Brenner E. Independent movements of the digits in grasping. Exp Brain Res. 2001;139(1):92–100.
57.
go back to reference Guiard Y. Asymmetric division of labor in human skilled bimanual action: the kinematic chain as a model. J Mot Behav. 1987;19(4):486–517. Guiard Y. Asymmetric division of labor in human skilled bimanual action: the kinematic chain as a model. J Mot Behav. 1987;19(4):486–517.
58.
go back to reference Roland PE, Mortensen E. Somatosensory detection of microgeometry, macrogeometry and kinesthesia in man [published erratum appears in brain res 1987 may;434(2):241]. Brain Res Rev. Elsevier Science. 1987;12:1–42. Roland PE, Mortensen E. Somatosensory detection of microgeometry, macrogeometry and kinesthesia in man [published erratum appears in brain res 1987 may;434(2):241]. Brain Res Rev. Elsevier Science. 1987;12:1–42.
59.
go back to reference Kang SB, Ikeuchi K. Toward automatic robot instruction from perception - mapping human grasps to manipulator grasps. IEEE Trans Robot Autom. 1997;13(1):81–95. Kang SB, Ikeuchi K. Toward automatic robot instruction from perception - mapping human grasps to manipulator grasps. IEEE Trans Robot Autom. 1997;13(1):81–95.
60.
go back to reference Dijkerman HC, de Haan EHF. Somatosensory processes subserving perception and action. Behav Brain Sci England. 2007;30(2):139–89. Dijkerman HC, de Haan EHF. Somatosensory processes subserving perception and action. Behav Brain Sci England. 2007;30(2):139–89.
61.
go back to reference Abela E, et al. Lesions to primary sensory and posterior parietal cortices impair recovery from hand paresis after stroke. PLoS One United States. 2012;7(2):e31275. Abela E, et al. Lesions to primary sensory and posterior parietal cortices impair recovery from hand paresis after stroke. PLoS One United States. 2012;7(2):e31275.
62.
go back to reference Han L, Law-Gibson D, Reding M. Key neurological impairments influence function-related group outcomes after stroke. Stroke. 2002;33(7):1920–4. Han L, Law-Gibson D, Reding M. Key neurological impairments influence function-related group outcomes after stroke. Stroke. 2002;33(7):1920–4.
63.
go back to reference Tyson SF, Hanley M, Chillala J, Selley AB, Tallis RC. Sensory loss in hospital-admitted people with stroke: characteristics, associated factors, and relationship with function. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008;22(2):166–72. Tyson SF, Hanley M, Chillala J, Selley AB, Tallis RC. Sensory loss in hospital-admitted people with stroke: characteristics, associated factors, and relationship with function. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008;22(2):166–72.
64.
go back to reference Welmer AK, Holmqvist LW, Sommerfeld DK. Limited fine hand use after stroke and its association with other disabilities. J Rehabil Med. 2008 Sep;40(8):603–8. Welmer AK, Holmqvist LW, Sommerfeld DK. Limited fine hand use after stroke and its association with other disabilities. J Rehabil Med. 2008 Sep;40(8):603–8.
65.
go back to reference Wang Q, Markopoulos P, Yu B, Chen W, Timmermans A. Interactive wearable systems for upper body rehabilitation: a systematic review. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation. BioMed Central Ltd; 2017. Wang Q, Markopoulos P, Yu B, Chen W, Timmermans A. Interactive wearable systems for upper body rehabilitation: a systematic review. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation. BioMed Central Ltd; 2017.
66.
go back to reference Cuppone AV, Squeri V, Semprini M, Masia L, Konczak J. Robot-assisted proprioceptive training with added vibro-tactile feedback enhances somatosensory and motor performance. PLoS One Public Libr Sci. 2016;11(10):e0164511. Cuppone AV, Squeri V, Semprini M, Masia L, Konczak J. Robot-assisted proprioceptive training with added vibro-tactile feedback enhances somatosensory and motor performance. PLoS One Public Libr Sci. 2016;11(10):e0164511.
Metadata
Title
Sensing form - finger gaiting as key to tactile object exploration - a data glove analysis of a prototypical daily task
Authors
Werner Krammer
John H. Missimer
Simon Habegger
Manuela Pastore-Wapp
Roland Wiest
Bruno J. Weder
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1743-0003
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-020-00755-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 1/2020 Go to the issue