Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Health Research Policy and Systems 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Research

Seizing the strategic opportunities of emerging technologies by building up innovation system: monoclonal antibody development in China

Authors: Mao-Yu Zhang, Jian Li, Hao Hu, Yi-Tao Wang

Published in: Health Research Policy and Systems | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), as an emerging technology, have become increasingly important in the development of human therapeutic agents. How developing countries such as China could seize this emerging technological opportunity remains a poorly studied issue in prior literature. Thus, this paper aims to investigate the research and development of mAbs in China based on an innovation system functions approach and probes into the question of how China has been taking advantage of emerging technologies to overcome its challenges of building up a complete innovation system in developing mAbs.

Methods

Mixed research methods were applied by combining archival data and field interviews. Archival data from the China Food and Drug Administration, Web of Science, the United States Patent and Trademark Office, the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, and the National Science and Technology Report Service were used to examine the status quo of the technology and research and development (R&D) activities in China, while the opinions of researchers and managers in this field were synthesized from the interviews.

Results

From the perspective of innovation system functions, technological development of mAb in China is being driven by incentives such as the subsidies from the State and corporate R&D funding. Knowledge diffusion has been well served over the last 10 years through exchanging information on networks and technology transfer with developed countries. The State has provided clear guidance on search of emerging mAb technologies. Legitimacy of mAb in China has gained momentum owing to the implementation of government policies stipulated in the “The Eleventh Five-year Plan” in 2007, as well as national projects such as the “973 Program” and “863 Program”, among others. The potential of market formation stays high because of the rising local demand and government support. Entrepreneurial activities for mAb continue to prosper. In addition, the situation of resource supply has been improved with the support of the State.

Conclusions

This study finds that a complete innovation system for mAb has begun to take shape in China. MAb innovators in China are capitalizing on this emerging technological opportunity to participate in the global drive of developing the value chain for the innovative drug. In the long run, the build-up of the research system for mAb in China could bring about more driving forces to the mAb innovation system.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Buss N, Henderson S. Monoclonal antibody therapeutics: history and future. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2012;12:615–22.CrossRefPubMed Buss N, Henderson S. Monoclonal antibody therapeutics: history and future. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2012;12:615–22.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Chon JH, Zarbis-Papastoitsis G. Advances in the production and downstream processing of antibodies. N Biotechnol. 2011;28:458–63.CrossRefPubMed Chon JH, Zarbis-Papastoitsis G. Advances in the production and downstream processing of antibodies. N Biotechnol. 2011;28:458–63.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Köhler G, Milstein C. Continuous cultures of fused cells secreting antibody of predefined. Nature. 1975;256:495–7.CrossRefPubMed Köhler G, Milstein C. Continuous cultures of fused cells secreting antibody of predefined. Nature. 1975;256:495–7.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Ober RJ, Radu CG, Ghetie V, Ward ES. Differences in promiscuity for antibody-FcRn interactions across species: implications for therapeutic antibodies. Int Immunol. 2001;13:1551–9.CrossRefPubMed Ober RJ, Radu CG, Ghetie V, Ward ES. Differences in promiscuity for antibody-FcRn interactions across species: implications for therapeutic antibodies. Int Immunol. 2001;13:1551–9.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Morrison SL, Johnson MJ, Herzenberg LA, Oi VT. Chimeric human antibody molecules: mouse antigen-binding domains with human constant region domains. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984;81:6851–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Morrison SL, Johnson MJ, Herzenberg LA, Oi VT. Chimeric human antibody molecules: mouse antigen-binding domains with human constant region domains. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984;81:6851–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Reichert JM. Monoclonal antibodies as innovative therapeutics. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2008;9:423–30.CrossRefPubMed Reichert JM. Monoclonal antibodies as innovative therapeutics. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2008;9:423–30.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Nelson AL, Dhimolea E, Reichert JM. Development trends for human monoclonal antibody therapeutics. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2010;9:767–74.CrossRefPubMed Nelson AL, Dhimolea E, Reichert JM. Development trends for human monoclonal antibody therapeutics. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2010;9:767–74.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Wessner C. Government programs to encourage innovation by start-ups and SMEs: The role of US innovation awards. In: Handbook of research on entrepreneurship policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar; 2007. p. 172–85. Wessner C. Government programs to encourage innovation by start-ups and SMEs: The role of US innovation awards. In: Handbook of research on entrepreneurship policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar; 2007. p. 172–85.
10.
go back to reference Arora SK, Youtie J, Shapira P, Gao L, Ma TT. Entry strategies in an emerging technology: a pilot web-based study of graphene firms. Scientometrics. 2013;95:1189–207.CrossRef Arora SK, Youtie J, Shapira P, Gao L, Ma TT. Entry strategies in an emerging technology: a pilot web-based study of graphene firms. Scientometrics. 2013;95:1189–207.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Subramanian V, Woodson TS, Cozzens S. Nanotechnology in India: Inferring Links Between Emerging Technologies and Development. Springer New York: New York, NY; 2012. Subramanian V, Woodson TS, Cozzens S. Nanotechnology in India: Inferring Links Between Emerging Technologies and Development. Springer New York: New York, NY; 2012.
12.
go back to reference Khanagha S, Volberda H, Sidhu J, Oshri I. Management innovation and adoption of emerging technologies: the case of cloud computing. Eur Manag Rev. 2013;10:51–67.CrossRef Khanagha S, Volberda H, Sidhu J, Oshri I. Management innovation and adoption of emerging technologies: the case of cloud computing. Eur Manag Rev. 2013;10:51–67.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Youtie J, Hicks D. Pathways from discovery to commercialisation: using web sources to track small and medium-sized enterprise strategies in emerging nanotechnologies. Technol Anal Strateg Manag. 2012;24:981–95.CrossRef Youtie J, Hicks D. Pathways from discovery to commercialisation: using web sources to track small and medium-sized enterprise strategies in emerging nanotechnologies. Technol Anal Strateg Manag. 2012;24:981–95.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Thukral IS, Von Ehr J, Walsh S, Groen AJ, van der S, Adham KA. Entrepreneurship, emerging technologies, emerging markets. Int Small Bus J. 2008;26:101–16.CrossRef Thukral IS, Von Ehr J, Walsh S, Groen AJ, van der S, Adham KA. Entrepreneurship, emerging technologies, emerging markets. Int Small Bus J. 2008;26:101–16.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Hsieh C-R, Löfgren H. Biopharmaceutical innovation and industrial developments in South Korea, Singapore and Taiwan. Aust Health Rev. 2009;33:245–57.CrossRefPubMed Hsieh C-R, Löfgren H. Biopharmaceutical innovation and industrial developments in South Korea, Singapore and Taiwan. Aust Health Rev. 2009;33:245–57.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Guo Y, Huang L, Porter A. A hybrid innovation management model for emerging technology: Bibliometrics, qualitative methodology, and empirical study. Proc PICMET’12 Technol Manag Emerg Technol. 2012. p. 105–13. Guo Y, Huang L, Porter A. A hybrid innovation management model for emerging technology: Bibliometrics, qualitative methodology, and empirical study. Proc PICMET’12 Technol Manag Emerg Technol. 2012. p. 105–13.
17.
go back to reference Hopkins MM, Martin PA, Nightingale P, Kraft A, Mahdi S. The myth of the biotech revolution: An assessment of technological, clinical and organisational change. Res Policy. 2007;36:566–89.CrossRef Hopkins MM, Martin PA, Nightingale P, Kraft A, Mahdi S. The myth of the biotech revolution: An assessment of technological, clinical and organisational change. Res Policy. 2007;36:566–89.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Castorena DG, Rivera GR, González AV. Technological foresight model for the identification of business opportunities (TEFMIBO). Foresight. 2013;15:492–516.CrossRef Castorena DG, Rivera GR, González AV. Technological foresight model for the identification of business opportunities (TEFMIBO). Foresight. 2013;15:492–516.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Hekkert MP, Suurs RAA, Negro SO, Kuhlmann S, Smits REHM. Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analysing technological change. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2007;74:413–32.CrossRef Hekkert MP, Suurs RAA, Negro SO, Kuhlmann S, Smits REHM. Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analysing technological change. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2007;74:413–32.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Hekkert MP, Negro SO. Functions of innovation systems as a framework to understand sustainable technological change: Empirical evidence for earlier claims. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2009;76:584–94.CrossRef Hekkert MP, Negro SO. Functions of innovation systems as a framework to understand sustainable technological change: Empirical evidence for earlier claims. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2009;76:584–94.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Negro SO, Hekkert MP, Smits REHM. Explaining the failure of the Dutch innovation system for biomass digestion—a functional analysis. Energy Policy. 2007;35:925–38.CrossRef Negro SO, Hekkert MP, Smits REHM. Explaining the failure of the Dutch innovation system for biomass digestion—a functional analysis. Energy Policy. 2007;35:925–38.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Negro SO, Suurs RAA, Hekkert MP. The bumpy road of biomass gasification in the Netherlands: Explaining the rise and fall of an emerging innovation system. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2008;75:57–77.CrossRef Negro SO, Suurs RAA, Hekkert MP. The bumpy road of biomass gasification in the Netherlands: Explaining the rise and fall of an emerging innovation system. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2008;75:57–77.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Leydesdorff L, Strand Ø. The Swedish system of innovation: regional synergies in a knowledge-based economy. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol. 2013;64:1890–902.CrossRef Leydesdorff L, Strand Ø. The Swedish system of innovation: regional synergies in a knowledge-based economy. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol. 2013;64:1890–902.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Carlsson B, Stankiewicz R. On the nature, function and composition of technological system. J Evol Econ. 1991;1:93–118.CrossRef Carlsson B, Stankiewicz R. On the nature, function and composition of technological system. J Evol Econ. 1991;1:93–118.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Suurs RAA, Hekkert MP. Cumulative causation in the formation of a technological innovation system: The case of biofuels in the Netherlands. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2009;76:1003–20.CrossRef Suurs RAA, Hekkert MP. Cumulative causation in the formation of a technological innovation system: The case of biofuels in the Netherlands. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2009;76:1003–20.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Sagar AD, Holdren JP. Assessing the global energy innovation system: some key issues. Energy Policy. 2002;30:465–9.CrossRef Sagar AD, Holdren JP. Assessing the global energy innovation system: some key issues. Energy Policy. 2002;30:465–9.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Cockburn IM, Stern S. Finding the endless frontier: lessons from the life sciences innovation system for technology policy. Capital Soc. 2010;5(1):1.CrossRef Cockburn IM, Stern S. Finding the endless frontier: lessons from the life sciences innovation system for technology policy. Capital Soc. 2010;5(1):1.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Walz R, Delgado JN. Different routes to technology acquisition and innovation system building? China’s and India's wind turbine industries. Innov Dev. 2012;2:87–109.CrossRef Walz R, Delgado JN. Different routes to technology acquisition and innovation system building? China’s and India's wind turbine industries. Innov Dev. 2012;2:87–109.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference van Rijnsoever FJ, Hekkert MP, van den Berg J, Koch J. Technological variety in innovation systems: the role of actors, networks, resources and institutions. Proceedings of the 2013 EU-SPRI Forum Conference, Madrid 10–12 April 2013. European Forum for Studies of Policies for Research and Innovation. http://www.euspri-madrid2013.org/pdf/1074.pdf. van Rijnsoever FJ, Hekkert MP, van den Berg J, Koch J. Technological variety in innovation systems: the role of actors, networks, resources and institutions. Proceedings of the 2013 EU-SPRI Forum Conference, Madrid 10–12 April 2013. European Forum for Studies of Policies for Research and Innovation. http://​www.​euspri-madrid2013.​org/​pdf/​1074.​pdf.
30.
go back to reference Negro SO, Hekkert MP. Explaining the success of emerging technologies by innovation system functioning: the case of biomass digestion in Germany. Technol Anal Strateg Manag. 2008;20:465–82.CrossRef Negro SO, Hekkert MP. Explaining the success of emerging technologies by innovation system functioning: the case of biomass digestion in Germany. Technol Anal Strateg Manag. 2008;20:465–82.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Bergek A, Hekkert M, Jacobsson S. Functions in innovation systems: a framework for analysing energy system dynamics and identifying goals for system-building activities by entrepreneurs and policymakers. Foxon TJ, Kohler J, Oughton C (Eds.). Innovation for a Low Carbon Economy: Economic, Institutional and Management. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar; 2008. p. 79–111. Bergek A, Hekkert M, Jacobsson S. Functions in innovation systems: a framework for analysing energy system dynamics and identifying goals for system-building activities by entrepreneurs and policymakers. Foxon TJ, Kohler J, Oughton C (Eds.). Innovation for a Low Carbon Economy: Economic, Institutional and Management. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar; 2008. p. 79–111.
33.
go back to reference Geels FW. From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems. Res Policy. 2004;33:897–920.CrossRef Geels FW. From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems. Res Policy. 2004;33:897–920.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Scandura TA, Williams EA. Research methodology in management: current practices, trends, and implications for future research. Acad Manag J. 2014;43:1248–64.CrossRef Scandura TA, Williams EA. Research methodology in management: current practices, trends, and implications for future research. Acad Manag J. 2014;43:1248–64.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Jick TD. Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: triangulation in action. Adm Sci Q. 2014;24:602–11.CrossRef Jick TD. Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: triangulation in action. Adm Sci Q. 2014;24:602–11.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Yin RK. Case study research: design and methods (applied social research methods). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.; 2008. Yin RK. Case study research: design and methods (applied social research methods). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.; 2008.
37.
go back to reference Tang J. Opportunities and challenges brought by monoclonal antibodies rapid development to biopharmaceutical in China. Sci Technol Inf. 2010;19:247–8. Tang J. Opportunities and challenges brought by monoclonal antibodies rapid development to biopharmaceutical in China. Sci Technol Inf. 2010;19:247–8.
38.
go back to reference Reichert JM. Monoclonal antibodies as innovative anti-infective agents. Discov Med. 2005;5:544–7.PubMed Reichert JM. Monoclonal antibodies as innovative anti-infective agents. Discov Med. 2005;5:544–7.PubMed
39.
go back to reference Besley JC, Kramer VL, Priest SH. Expert opinion on nanotechnology: risks, benefits, and regulation. J Nanoparticle Res. 2007;10:549–58.CrossRef Besley JC, Kramer VL, Priest SH. Expert opinion on nanotechnology: risks, benefits, and regulation. J Nanoparticle Res. 2007;10:549–58.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Clayton MJ. Delphi: a technique to harness expert opinion for critical decision‐making tasks in education. Educ Psychol. 1997;17:373–86.CrossRef Clayton MJ. Delphi: a technique to harness expert opinion for critical decision‐making tasks in education. Educ Psychol. 1997;17:373–86.CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Chai Y. Biotech: antibody production of the world’s leading enterprises. Innovation. 2010;4:62–3. Chai Y. Biotech: antibody production of the world’s leading enterprises. Innovation. 2010;4:62–3.
43.
go back to reference Xu X. Diversity at domestic enterprises in China: a case study of Chengdu Huasun group. Master thesis. Chengdu: Southwestern University of Finance and Economics; 2004. Xu X. Diversity at domestic enterprises in China: a case study of Chengdu Huasun group. Master thesis. Chengdu: Southwestern University of Finance and Economics; 2004.
44.
go back to reference Zhang J, Sun Y, Wang K. Development and illumination: biopharmaceutical industry in the United States. Jiangsu Sci Inf. 2011;1:11–4. Zhang J, Sun Y, Wang K. Development and illumination: biopharmaceutical industry in the United States. Jiangsu Sci Inf. 2011;1:11–4.
45.
go back to reference Lian GY, Jin QY, Huang TK. Comparative research on the development of biopharmaceutical industry between foreign countries and China. China Pharm. 2007;16:20–1. Lian GY, Jin QY, Huang TK. Comparative research on the development of biopharmaceutical industry between foreign countries and China. China Pharm. 2007;16:20–1.
46.
go back to reference Sun F. Comparative research on the pharmaceutical industry policies in USA, India and China--From patent law perspective. Master Thesis, Suzhou University; 2004. Sun F. Comparative research on the pharmaceutical industry policies in USA, India and China--From patent law perspective. Master Thesis, Suzhou University; 2004.
47.
go back to reference Ahn MJ, Hajela A, Akbar M. High technology in emerging markets: building biotechnology clusters, capabilities and competitiveness in India. Asia-Pacific J Bus Adm. 2012;4:23–41.CrossRef Ahn MJ, Hajela A, Akbar M. High technology in emerging markets: building biotechnology clusters, capabilities and competitiveness in India. Asia-Pacific J Bus Adm. 2012;4:23–41.CrossRef
48.
go back to reference Ramani SV. Who is interested in biotech? R&D strategies, knowledge base and market sales of Indian biopharmaceutical firms. Res Policy. 2001;1300:1–18. Ramani SV. Who is interested in biotech? R&D strategies, knowledge base and market sales of Indian biopharmaceutical firms. Res Policy. 2001;1300:1–18.
49.
50.
go back to reference Konde V. Biotechnology business models: an Indian perspective. J Commer Biotechnol. 2008;15:215–26.CrossRef Konde V. Biotechnology business models: an Indian perspective. J Commer Biotechnol. 2008;15:215–26.CrossRef
51.
go back to reference Deng CC. The Patent Bill Amendment in India: its impacts on pharmaceuticals. South Asian Stud Q. 2005;2:30–5. Deng CC. The Patent Bill Amendment in India: its impacts on pharmaceuticals. South Asian Stud Q. 2005;2:30–5.
52.
go back to reference Palnitkar U. Growth of Indian biotech companies, in the context of the international biotechnology industry. J Commer Biotechnol. 2005;11:146–54.CrossRef Palnitkar U. Growth of Indian biotech companies, in the context of the international biotechnology industry. J Commer Biotechnol. 2005;11:146–54.CrossRef
53.
go back to reference Bhattacharya S, Patra SK. Assessing competency of a developing country in high technology?: A case study based on Indian patenting activity in the biotechnology sector. Collnet J Sci Inf Manag. 2010;4:21–34. Bhattacharya S, Patra SK. Assessing competency of a developing country in high technology?: A case study based on Indian patenting activity in the biotechnology sector. Collnet J Sci Inf Manag. 2010;4:21–34.
54.
go back to reference Liu Y, Zhao Y, Wang Z. Strategy analysis of antibody industrialization in China. China Biotechnol. 2006;26:93–7. Liu Y, Zhao Y, Wang Z. Strategy analysis of antibody industrialization in China. China Biotechnol. 2006;26:93–7.
56.
go back to reference Qiu L, Chen ZY, Lu DY, Hu H, Wang YT. Public funding and private investment for R&D: a survey in China’s pharmaceutical industry. Health Res Policy Syst. 2014;12:27.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Qiu L, Chen ZY, Lu DY, Hu H, Wang YT. Public funding and private investment for R&D: a survey in China’s pharmaceutical industry. Health Res Policy Syst. 2014;12:27.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Seizing the strategic opportunities of emerging technologies by building up innovation system: monoclonal antibody development in China
Authors
Mao-Yu Zhang
Jian Li
Hao Hu
Yi-Tao Wang
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Health Research Policy and Systems / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1478-4505
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-015-0056-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

Health Research Policy and Systems 1/2015 Go to the issue