Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pediatric Surgery International 6/2018

01-06-2018 | Original Article

Segmental reversal of distal small intestine in short bowel syndrome: a study on the influence on postoperative weight and intestinal topography in piglets

Authors: Pernille Kock Grave, Sabrina Valentin Thomsen, Pia Susanne Clark, Gunvor Iben Madsen, Niels Qvist, Mark Bremholm Ellebæk

Published in: Pediatric Surgery International | Issue 6/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The objective of the present study was to investigate the effect of segmental reversal of the distal 20 cm of the small intestine in piglets with induced SBS compared to controls with SBS alone. Primary endpoint was postoperative weight change over a period of 1 month. Secondary endpoints were the influence on cell proliferation and mucosal architecture shown by histological analysis.

Methods

Sixteen piglets underwent a 60% resection of the distal small intestine and were randomized into two groups. Group 1 short bowel syndrome alone (SBS) (n = 8) and group 2 with reversal of a distal small intestinal segment (SBS-RS) (n = 8). Body weight was measured daily and the pigs were euthanized after 1 month. Crypt depths, villus heights and muscle layers thicknesses were measured. For the evaluation of microvilli of the brush border of the epithelium and cell proliferation, immunohistochemical staining with Villin and Ki-67 was performed.

Results

No statistically significant differences were observed concerning weight gain. Mean ± SD weight gain was 2.31 ± 2.85 kg for SBS-RS and 2.03 ± 1.27 kg for SBS (p = 0.8). In the proximal jejunal segment a significant increase in villus heights was found in the SBS group and increase in the thickness of the circular and longitudinal muscle layers in the SBS-RS group. In the distal ileal segment the longitudinal muscle layer thicknesses were increased in the SBS group. Otherwise, no significant changes were found.

Conclusion

Reversal of a 20-cm distal segment showed no effect on weight gain, but there were some significant histological changes of unknown clinical significance.
Literature
1.
go back to reference O’Keefe SJ, Buchman AL, Fishbein TM, Jeejeebhoy KN, Jeppesen PB, Shaffer J (2006) Short bowel syndrome and intestinal failure. Consensus definitions and overview. Clin Grastroenterol Hepatol 4:6–10CrossRef O’Keefe SJ, Buchman AL, Fishbein TM, Jeejeebhoy KN, Jeppesen PB, Shaffer J (2006) Short bowel syndrome and intestinal failure. Consensus definitions and overview. Clin Grastroenterol Hepatol 4:6–10CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Warner BW (2016) The pathogenesis of resection-associated intestinal adaptation. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol 14:429–438CrossRef Warner BW (2016) The pathogenesis of resection-associated intestinal adaptation. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol 14:429–438CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Beyer-Beriot L, Joly F, Maggiori L et al (2012) Segmental reversal of small bowel can end permanent parenteral nutrition dependency. An experience of 38 adults with short bowel syndrome. Ann Surg 256:739–744CrossRef Beyer-Beriot L, Joly F, Maggiori L et al (2012) Segmental reversal of small bowel can end permanent parenteral nutrition dependency. An experience of 38 adults with short bowel syndrome. Ann Surg 256:739–744CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Layac S, Beyer L, Corcos O et al (2013) Increased intestinal absorption by segmental reversal of the small bowel in adult patients with short-bowel syndrome. A case control study. Am J Clin Nutr 97:100–108CrossRef Layac S, Beyer L, Corcos O et al (2013) Increased intestinal absorption by segmental reversal of the small bowel in adult patients with short-bowel syndrome. A case control study. Am J Clin Nutr 97:100–108CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Søndenaa K, Nesvik I, Nygaard K, Sauer T (1991) Mucosal surface area of reversed intestinal segment in rats. Scand J Gastroenterol 26:1240–1246CrossRefPubMed Søndenaa K, Nesvik I, Nygaard K, Sauer T (1991) Mucosal surface area of reversed intestinal segment in rats. Scand J Gastroenterol 26:1240–1246CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Chabert J, Pellissier S, Eribon O, Roche M (2000) Reversed bowel segments for the treatment of short bowel syndrome. Assessment of their minimal length in correlation with electromyographic pattern in the rat. Neurogastroenterol Motil 12:53–63CrossRefPubMed Chabert J, Pellissier S, Eribon O, Roche M (2000) Reversed bowel segments for the treatment of short bowel syndrome. Assessment of their minimal length in correlation with electromyographic pattern in the rat. Neurogastroenterol Motil 12:53–63CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Digalakis M, Papamichail M, Glava C et al (2011) Interposition of reversed jejunal segment enhances intestinal adaptation in short bowel syndrome. An experimental study on pigs. J Surg Res 171:551–557CrossRefPubMed Digalakis M, Papamichail M, Glava C et al (2011) Interposition of reversed jejunal segment enhances intestinal adaptation in short bowel syndrome. An experimental study on pigs. J Surg Res 171:551–557CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Koffeman GL, Hulscher JB, Schoots IG, van Gulik TM, Heij HA, Van Gemert WG (2015) Intestinal lengthening and reversed segment in a piglet short bowel syndrome model. J Surg Res 195:433–443CrossRefPubMed Koffeman GL, Hulscher JB, Schoots IG, van Gulik TM, Heij HA, Van Gemert WG (2015) Intestinal lengthening and reversed segment in a piglet short bowel syndrome model. J Surg Res 195:433–443CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Thompson JS, Quigley EM, Adrian TE (1995) Effect of reversed intestinal segments on intestinal structure and function. J Surg Res 58:19–27CrossRefPubMed Thompson JS, Quigley EM, Adrian TE (1995) Effect of reversed intestinal segments on intestinal structure and function. J Surg Res 58:19–27CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Weih S, Nickkholgh A, Kessler M et al (2013) Models of short bowel syndrome in pigs. A technical review. Eur Surg Res 51:66–78CrossRefPubMed Weih S, Nickkholgh A, Kessler M et al (2013) Models of short bowel syndrome in pigs. A technical review. Eur Surg Res 51:66–78CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Lee CH, Lo HC, Chou MC, Tsai HR (2007) Oral antibiotics attenuate bowel segment reversal-induced systemic inflammatory response and body weight loss in massively bowel-resected rats. JPN J Parenter Enter Nutr 31:397–405CrossRef Lee CH, Lo HC, Chou MC, Tsai HR (2007) Oral antibiotics attenuate bowel segment reversal-induced systemic inflammatory response and body weight loss in massively bowel-resected rats. JPN J Parenter Enter Nutr 31:397–405CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Gillard L, Mayeur C, Robert V et al (2017) Microbiota is involved in post-resection adaptation in humans with short bowel syndrome. Front Physiol 8:224CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gillard L, Mayeur C, Robert V et al (2017) Microbiota is involved in post-resection adaptation in humans with short bowel syndrome. Front Physiol 8:224CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Thompson JS, Langnas AN, Pinch LW et al (1995) Surgical approach to short bowel syndrome. Experience in a population of 160 patients. Ann Surg 222:600–605CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Thompson JS, Langnas AN, Pinch LW et al (1995) Surgical approach to short bowel syndrome. Experience in a population of 160 patients. Ann Surg 222:600–605CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Layec S, Beyer L, Corcos O et al (2013) Increased intestinal absorption by segmental reversal of the small bowel in adult patients with short-bowel syndrome. A case-control-study. Am J Clin Nutr 97:100–108CrossRefPubMed Layec S, Beyer L, Corcos O et al (2013) Increased intestinal absorption by segmental reversal of the small bowel in adult patients with short-bowel syndrome. A case-control-study. Am J Clin Nutr 97:100–108CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Segmental reversal of distal small intestine in short bowel syndrome: a study on the influence on postoperative weight and intestinal topography in piglets
Authors
Pernille Kock Grave
Sabrina Valentin Thomsen
Pia Susanne Clark
Gunvor Iben Madsen
Niels Qvist
Mark Bremholm Ellebæk
Publication date
01-06-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Pediatric Surgery International / Issue 6/2018
Print ISSN: 0179-0358
Electronic ISSN: 1437-9813
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-018-4269-6

Other articles of this Issue 6/2018

Pediatric Surgery International 6/2018 Go to the issue