Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Urogynecology Journal 10/2016

01-10-2016 | Original Article

Seeking new surgical predictors of mesh exposure after transvaginal mesh repair

Authors: Pei-Ying Wu, Chih-Hung Chang, Meng-Ru Shen, Cheng-Yang Chou, Yi-Ching Yang, Yu-Fang Huang

Published in: International Urogynecology Journal | Issue 10/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

The purpose of this study was to explore new preventable risk factors for mesh exposure.

Methods

A retrospective review of 92 consecutive patients treated with transvaginal mesh (TVM) in the urogynecological unit of our university hospital. An analysis of perioperative predictors was conducted in patients after vaginal repairs using a type 1 mesh. Mesh complications were recorded according to International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) definitions. Mesh-exposure-free durations were calculated by using the Kaplan−Meier method and compared between different closure techniques using log-rank test. Hazard ratios (HR) of predictors for mesh exposure were estimated by univariate and multivariate analyses using Cox proportional hazards regression models.

Results

The median surveillance interval was 24.1 months. Two late occurrences were found beyond 1 year post operation. No statistically significant correlation was observed between mesh exposure and concomitant hysterectomy. Exposure risks were significantly higher in patients with interrupted whole-layer closure in univariate analysis. In the multivariate analysis, hematoma [HR 5.42, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.26–23.35, P = 0.024), Prolift mesh (HR 5.52, 95 % CI 1.15–26.53, P = 0.033), and interrupted whole-layer closure (HR 7.02, 95 % CI 1.62–30.53, P = 0.009) were the strongest predictors of mesh exposure.

Conclusion

Findings indicate the risks of mesh exposure and reoperation may be prevented by avoiding hematoma, large amount of mesh, or interrupted whole-layer closure in TVM surgeries. If these risk factors are prevented, hysterectomy may not be a relative contraindication for TVM use. We also provide evidence regarding mesh exposure and the necessity for more than 1 year of follow-up and preoperative counselling.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Handa VL, Garrett E, Hendrix S, Gold E, Robbins J (2004) Progression and remission of pelvic organ prolapse: a longitudinal study of menopausal women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 190:27–32CrossRefPubMed Handa VL, Garrett E, Hendrix S, Gold E, Robbins J (2004) Progression and remission of pelvic organ prolapse: a longitudinal study of menopausal women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 190:27–32CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Hendrix SL, Clark A, Nygaard I, Aragaki A, Barnabei V, McTiernan A (2002) Pelvic organ prolapse in the Women’s Health Initiative: gravity and gravidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 186:1160–1166CrossRefPubMed Hendrix SL, Clark A, Nygaard I, Aragaki A, Barnabei V, McTiernan A (2002) Pelvic organ prolapse in the Women’s Health Initiative: gravity and gravidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 186:1160–1166CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Iglesia CB, Sokol AI, Sokol ER, Kudish BI, Gutman RE, Peterson JL et al (2010) Vaginal mesh for prolapse: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 116:293–303CrossRefPubMed Iglesia CB, Sokol AI, Sokol ER, Kudish BI, Gutman RE, Peterson JL et al (2010) Vaginal mesh for prolapse: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 116:293–303CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Nieminen K, Hiltunen R, Takala T, Heiskanen E, Merikari M, Niemi K et al (2010) Outcomes after anterior vaginal wall repair with mesh: a randomized, controlled trial with a 3 year follow-up. Am J Obstet Gynecol 203(235):e1–e8PubMed Nieminen K, Hiltunen R, Takala T, Heiskanen E, Merikari M, Niemi K et al (2010) Outcomes after anterior vaginal wall repair with mesh: a randomized, controlled trial with a 3 year follow-up. Am J Obstet Gynecol 203(235):e1–e8PubMed
6.
go back to reference Withagen MI, Milani AL, den Boon J, Vervest HA, Vierhout ME (2011) Trocar-guided mesh compared with conventional vaginal repair in recurrent prolapse: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 117:242–250CrossRefPubMed Withagen MI, Milani AL, den Boon J, Vervest HA, Vierhout ME (2011) Trocar-guided mesh compared with conventional vaginal repair in recurrent prolapse: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 117:242–250CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Caquant F, Collinet P, Debodinance P, Berrocal J, Garbin O, Rosenthal C et al (2008) Safety of trans vaginal mesh procedure: retrospective study of 684 patients. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 34:449–456CrossRefPubMed Caquant F, Collinet P, Debodinance P, Berrocal J, Garbin O, Rosenthal C et al (2008) Safety of trans vaginal mesh procedure: retrospective study of 684 patients. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 34:449–456CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Mistrangelo E, Mancuso S, Nadalini C, Lijoi D, Costantini S (2007) Rising use of synthetic mesh in transvaginal pelvic reconstructive surgery: a review of the risk of vaginal erosion. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 14:564–569CrossRefPubMed Mistrangelo E, Mancuso S, Nadalini C, Lijoi D, Costantini S (2007) Rising use of synthetic mesh in transvaginal pelvic reconstructive surgery: a review of the risk of vaginal erosion. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 14:564–569CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Hefni M, Yousri N, El-Toukhy T, Koutromanis P, Mossa M, Davies A (2007) Morbidity associated with posterior intravaginal slingplasty for uterovaginal and vault prolapse. Arch Gynecol Obstet 276:499–504CrossRefPubMed Hefni M, Yousri N, El-Toukhy T, Koutromanis P, Mossa M, Davies A (2007) Morbidity associated with posterior intravaginal slingplasty for uterovaginal and vault prolapse. Arch Gynecol Obstet 276:499–504CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Withagen MI, Vierhout ME, Hendriks JC, Kluivers KB, Milani AL (2011) Risk factors for exposure, pain, and dyspareunia after tension-free vaginal mesh procedure. Obstet Gynecol 118:629–636CrossRefPubMed Withagen MI, Vierhout ME, Hendriks JC, Kluivers KB, Milani AL (2011) Risk factors for exposure, pain, and dyspareunia after tension-free vaginal mesh procedure. Obstet Gynecol 118:629–636CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Elmér C, Falconer C, Hallin A, Larsson G, Ek M, Altman D et al (2012) Risk factors for mesh complications after trocar guided transvaginal mesh kit repair of anterior vaginal wall prolapse. Neurourol Urodyn 31:1165–1169CrossRefPubMed Elmér C, Falconer C, Hallin A, Larsson G, Ek M, Altman D et al (2012) Risk factors for mesh complications after trocar guided transvaginal mesh kit repair of anterior vaginal wall prolapse. Neurourol Urodyn 31:1165–1169CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference American Urogynecologic Society (AUGS) Response: FDA Safety Communication: UPDATE on serious complications associated with transvaginal placement of surgical mesh for pelvic organ prolapse (July 2011) [Internet]. United States: AUGS; 2011 Jul [cited 2015 July 15]. Available from: http://www.augs.org/p/cm/ld/fid=163 American Urogynecologic Society (AUGS) Response: FDA Safety Communication: UPDATE on serious complications associated with transvaginal placement of surgical mesh for pelvic organ prolapse (July 2011) [Internet]. United States: AUGS; 2011 Jul [cited 2015 July 15]. Available from: http://​www.​augs.​org/​p/​cm/​ld/​fid=​163
13.
go back to reference Lipscomb GH (2001) Wound healing, suture material, and surgical instrumentation. In: Rock JA, Jones HW III (eds) TeLinde’s operative gynecology, 10th edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 226–242 Lipscomb GH (2001) Wound healing, suture material, and surgical instrumentation. In: Rock JA, Jones HW III (eds) TeLinde’s operative gynecology, 10th edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 226–242
14.
go back to reference Takeyama M (2011) Basic procedures in tension-free vaginal mesh operation for pelvic organ prolapse. Int J Urol 18:555–556CrossRefPubMed Takeyama M (2011) Basic procedures in tension-free vaginal mesh operation for pelvic organ prolapse. Int J Urol 18:555–556CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference von Theobald P (2011) Place of mesh in vaginal surgery, including its removal and revision. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 25:197–203CrossRef von Theobald P (2011) Place of mesh in vaginal surgery, including its removal and revision. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 25:197–203CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Feiner B, Jelovs.ek J, Maher C (2009) Efficacy and safety of transvaginal mesh kits in the treatment of prolapse of the vaginal apex: a systematic review. BJOG 116:15–24CrossRefPubMed Feiner B, Jelovs.ek J, Maher C (2009) Efficacy and safety of transvaginal mesh kits in the treatment of prolapse of the vaginal apex: a systematic review. BJOG 116:15–24CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Karram MM (2006) Vaginal operation for prolapse. In: Baggish MS, Karram MM (eds) Atlas of pelvic anatomy and gynecologic surgery, 2nd edn. Elsevier Saunders, Philadelphia, p 668 Karram MM (2006) Vaginal operation for prolapse. In: Baggish MS, Karram MM (eds) Atlas of pelvic anatomy and gynecologic surgery, 2nd edn. Elsevier Saunders, Philadelphia, p 668
20.
go back to reference Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bø K, Brubaker LP, DeLancey JO, Klarskov P et al (1996) The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175:10–17CrossRefPubMed Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bø K, Brubaker LP, DeLancey JO, Klarskov P et al (1996) The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175:10–17CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Haylen BT, Freeman RM, Swift SE, Cosson M, Davila GW, Deprest J et al (2011) An international urogynecological association (IUGA)/international continence society (ICS) joint terminology and classification of the complications related directly to the insertion of prostheses (meshes, implants, tapes) and grafts in female pelvic floor surgery. Neurourol Urodyn 30:2–12CrossRefPubMed Haylen BT, Freeman RM, Swift SE, Cosson M, Davila GW, Deprest J et al (2011) An international urogynecological association (IUGA)/international continence society (ICS) joint terminology and classification of the complications related directly to the insertion of prostheses (meshes, implants, tapes) and grafts in female pelvic floor surgery. Neurourol Urodyn 30:2–12CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Deffieux X, de Tayrac R, Huel C, Bottero J, Gervaise A, Bonnet K et al (2007) Vaginal mesh erosion after transvaginal repair of cystocele using Gynemesh or Gynemesh-soft in 138 women: a comparative study. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 18:73–79CrossRefPubMed Deffieux X, de Tayrac R, Huel C, Bottero J, Gervaise A, Bonnet K et al (2007) Vaginal mesh erosion after transvaginal repair of cystocele using Gynemesh or Gynemesh-soft in 138 women: a comparative study. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 18:73–79CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Chen HY, Ho M, Chang YY, Hung YC, Chen WC (2011) Risk factors for surgical failure after posterior intravaginal slingplasty: a case series. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 155:106–109CrossRefPubMed Chen HY, Ho M, Chang YY, Hung YC, Chen WC (2011) Risk factors for surgical failure after posterior intravaginal slingplasty: a case series. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 155:106–109CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Collinet P, Belot F, Debodinance P, Ha Duc E, Lucot JP, Cosson M (2006) Transvaginal mesh technique for pelvic organ prolapse repair: mesh exposure management and risk factors. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 17:315–320CrossRefPubMed Collinet P, Belot F, Debodinance P, Ha Duc E, Lucot JP, Cosson M (2006) Transvaginal mesh technique for pelvic organ prolapse repair: mesh exposure management and risk factors. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 17:315–320CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Ehsani N, Ghafar MA, Antosh DD, Tan-Kim J, Warner WB, Mamik MM et al (2012) Risk factors for mesh extrusion after prolapse surgery: a case-control study. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 18:357–361CrossRefPubMed Ehsani N, Ghafar MA, Antosh DD, Tan-Kim J, Warner WB, Mamik MM et al (2012) Risk factors for mesh extrusion after prolapse surgery: a case-control study. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 18:357–361CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Gold KP, Ward RM, Zimmerman CW, Biller DH, McGuinn S, Slaughter JC et al (2012) Factors associated with exposure of transvaginally placed polypropylene mesh for pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 23:1461–1466CrossRefPubMed Gold KP, Ward RM, Zimmerman CW, Biller DH, McGuinn S, Slaughter JC et al (2012) Factors associated with exposure of transvaginally placed polypropylene mesh for pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 23:1461–1466CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Nazemi TM, Kobashi KC (2007) Complications of grafts used in female pelvic floor reconstruction: mesh erosion and extrusion. Indian J Urol 23:153–160CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Nazemi TM, Kobashi KC (2007) Complications of grafts used in female pelvic floor reconstruction: mesh erosion and extrusion. Indian J Urol 23:153–160CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
go back to reference Huebner M, Hsu Y, Fenner DE (2006) The use of graft materials in vaginal pelvic floor surgery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 92:279–288CrossRefPubMed Huebner M, Hsu Y, Fenner DE (2006) The use of graft materials in vaginal pelvic floor surgery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 92:279–288CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Huang LY, Chu LC, Chiang HJ, Chuang FC, Kung FT, Huang KH (2015) Medium-term comparison of uterus preservation vs. hysterectomy in pelvic organ prolapsed treatment with Prolift™ mesh. Int Urogynecol J 26:1013–1020CrossRefPubMed Huang LY, Chu LC, Chiang HJ, Chuang FC, Kung FT, Huang KH (2015) Medium-term comparison of uterus preservation vs. hysterectomy in pelvic organ prolapsed treatment with Prolift™ mesh. Int Urogynecol J 26:1013–1020CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Davila GW, Jijon A (2012) Managing vaginal mesh exposure/erosions. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 24:343–348CrossRefPubMed Davila GW, Jijon A (2012) Managing vaginal mesh exposure/erosions. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 24:343–348CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Robson MC, Steed DL, Franz MG (2001) Wound healing: biologic features and approaches to maximize healing trajectories. Curr Probl Surg 38:72–140CrossRefPubMed Robson MC, Steed DL, Franz MG (2001) Wound healing: biologic features and approaches to maximize healing trajectories. Curr Probl Surg 38:72–140CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Velnar T, Bailey T, Smrkolj V (2009) The wound healing process: an overview of the cellular and molecular mechanisms. J Int Med Res 37:1528–1542CrossRefPubMed Velnar T, Bailey T, Smrkolj V (2009) The wound healing process: an overview of the cellular and molecular mechanisms. J Int Med Res 37:1528–1542CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, Rosier P, Ulmsten U et al (2002) The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the standardisation sub-committee of the international continence society. Neurourol Urodyn 21:167–178CrossRefPubMed Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, Rosier P, Ulmsten U et al (2002) The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the standardisation sub-committee of the international continence society. Neurourol Urodyn 21:167–178CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Seeking new surgical predictors of mesh exposure after transvaginal mesh repair
Authors
Pei-Ying Wu
Chih-Hung Chang
Meng-Ru Shen
Cheng-Yang Chou
Yi-Ching Yang
Yu-Fang Huang
Publication date
01-10-2016
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
International Urogynecology Journal / Issue 10/2016
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-016-2996-6

Other articles of this Issue 10/2016

International Urogynecology Journal 10/2016 Go to the issue