Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Pediatrics 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Sectio Ceasarea | Research article

Perinatal factors influencing the neonatal hearing screening results

Authors: Mahbod Kaveh, Seyedeh Nastaran Mirjalali, Mamak Shariat, Mohammad Reza Zarkesh

Published in: BMC Pediatrics | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Previous studies have indicated that the majority of cases with “failed” results related to transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (OAE) test have the normal hearing. The present study aimed to assess the possible relationships between perinatal factors and the false-positive OAE results.

Methods

A case-control study was carried out in an Iranian Hospital in 2020. Based on the OAE results on the first day of life, newborns were divided into 2 groups; Control group included subjects with “Pass” OAE results. Every neonate with “Fail” OAE result was referred for auditory brainstem response (ABR). Neonates with bilateral fail OAE but normal ABR results (false-positive OAE) were considered as the case group. All recorded data were analyzed to assess the possible correlations between maternal/neonatal factors and the false-positive OAE results.

Results

One hundred and eighty-one neonates entered the study. Of all included neonates, 87 (48.1%) cases showed bilateral fail OAE and 94 (51.9%) subjects passed the OAE test. Normal ABR results (false-positive OAE) were observed in all cases with bilateral fail OAE. Comparisons of variables affecting the OAE results showed that of all perinatal factors, neonate’s sex (p = 0.046) and cesarean section (p = 0.003) were the only influencing factors that increased the risk of false-positive OAE results.

Conclusion

Based on the results, the cesarean section delivery and neonate’s male sex increased the risk of false-positive results related to OAE test. Implementing other screening tests such as ABR or Automated ABR as the initial screening test could be suggested for such cases.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Valse D, Nagarathna HK. Efficacy of TEOAEs and BERA as screening tools for deafness in newborn. Int J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017;3(3):491–5.CrossRef Valse D, Nagarathna HK. Efficacy of TEOAEs and BERA as screening tools for deafness in newborn. Int J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017;3(3):491–5.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Qi B, Cheng X, En H, Liu B, Peng S, Zhen Y, Cai Z, Huang L, Zhang L, Han D. Assessment of the feasibility and coverage of a modified universal hearing screening protocol for use with newborn babies of migrant workers in Beijing. BMC Pediatr. 2013;13:116.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Qi B, Cheng X, En H, Liu B, Peng S, Zhen Y, Cai Z, Huang L, Zhang L, Han D. Assessment of the feasibility and coverage of a modified universal hearing screening protocol for use with newborn babies of migrant workers in Beijing. BMC Pediatr. 2013;13:116.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Crouch E, Probst J, Bennett K. Evaluating loss to follow-up in newborn hearing Screeningin a southern state. JEHDI. 2017;2(1):40–7. Crouch E, Probst J, Bennett K. Evaluating loss to follow-up in newborn hearing Screeningin a southern state. JEHDI. 2017;2(1):40–7.
4.
go back to reference Yousefi J, Ajalloueyan M, S Amirsalari S, Hassanali Fard M. The specificity and sensitivity of transient Otoacustic emission in neonatal hearing screening compared with diagnostic test of auditory brain stem response in Tehran hospitals. Iran J Pediatr. 2013;23(2):199–204.PubMedPubMedCentral Yousefi J, Ajalloueyan M, S Amirsalari S, Hassanali Fard M. The specificity and sensitivity of transient Otoacustic emission in neonatal hearing screening compared with diagnostic test of auditory brain stem response in Tehran hospitals. Iran J Pediatr. 2013;23(2):199–204.PubMedPubMedCentral
5.
6.
go back to reference Clemens CJ, Sherri A. Davis. Minimizing false-positives in universal newborn hearing screening: a simple solution. Pediatrics. 2001;107(3):1–3.CrossRef Clemens CJ, Sherri A. Davis. Minimizing false-positives in universal newborn hearing screening: a simple solution. Pediatrics. 2001;107(3):1–3.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Schwarz Y, Kaufman GN, Daniel SG. Newborn hearing screening failure and maternal factors during pregnancy. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2017;103:65–70.PubMedCrossRef Schwarz Y, Kaufman GN, Daniel SG. Newborn hearing screening failure and maternal factors during pregnancy. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2017;103:65–70.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Gülseven GS. The effect of mode of delivery on newborn hearing screening results. Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019;57(1):19–23.CrossRef Gülseven GS. The effect of mode of delivery on newborn hearing screening results. Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019;57(1):19–23.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Hamdi Kepekci A, Bestemi KA. Effect of delivery modes on hearing screening results. Glob J Otolaryngol. 2019;20(4):556045. Hamdi Kepekci A, Bestemi KA. Effect of delivery modes on hearing screening results. Glob J Otolaryngol. 2019;20(4):556045.
10.
go back to reference Amini E, Farahani Z, Rafiee Samani M, Hamedi H, Zamani A, Karimi Yazdi A, Nayeri F, Nili F, Rezaeizadeh G. Assessment of hearing loss by OAE in asphyxiated newborns. Iran Red Cres Med J. 2014;16(1):6812.CrossRef Amini E, Farahani Z, Rafiee Samani M, Hamedi H, Zamani A, Karimi Yazdi A, Nayeri F, Nili F, Rezaeizadeh G. Assessment of hearing loss by OAE in asphyxiated newborns. Iran Red Cres Med J. 2014;16(1):6812.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Durante AS, Carvallo RM, da Costa FS, Soares JC. Characteristics of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in newborn hearing screening program. Pro Fono. 2005;17(02):133–40.PubMedCrossRef Durante AS, Carvallo RM, da Costa FS, Soares JC. Characteristics of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in newborn hearing screening program. Pro Fono. 2005;17(02):133–40.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Lima MCMP, Rossi TRF, Françozo MFC, Marba ST, Lima GML, Santos MFC. Detection of hearing loss in neonates of a public hospital. Rev Soc Bras Fonoaudiol. 2010;15:1–6.CrossRef Lima MCMP, Rossi TRF, Françozo MFC, Marba ST, Lima GML, Santos MFC. Detection of hearing loss in neonates of a public hospital. Rev Soc Bras Fonoaudiol. 2010;15:1–6.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Maia RM, Silva MAM, Tavares PMB. Newborn hearing health: speech therapy acting on family health strategy. Rev CEFAC. 2012;2:206–14. Maia RM, Silva MAM, Tavares PMB. Newborn hearing health: speech therapy acting on family health strategy. Rev CEFAC. 2012;2:206–14.
14.
go back to reference da Silva RF, de Oliveira GC, De Conto J, Iantas M, Lüders D, Marques J. Hearing assessment of neonates at risk for hearing loss at a hearing health high complexity service: an electrophysiological assessment. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019;23(2):157–64.CrossRef da Silva RF, de Oliveira GC, De Conto J, Iantas M, Lüders D, Marques J. Hearing assessment of neonates at risk for hearing loss at a hearing health high complexity service: an electrophysiological assessment. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019;23(2):157–64.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Smolkin T, Mick O, Dabbah M, Blazer S, Grakovsky G, Gabay N, et al. Birth by cesarean delivery and failure on first otoacoustic emissions hearing test. Pediatrics. 2012;130:95–100.CrossRef Smolkin T, Mick O, Dabbah M, Blazer S, Grakovsky G, Gabay N, et al. Birth by cesarean delivery and failure on first otoacoustic emissions hearing test. Pediatrics. 2012;130:95–100.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Khoza-Shangase K, Joubert K. The influence of epidural anesthesia on new-born hearing screening: a pilot study. J Pharm Bioall Sci. 2011;3(1):135–41.CrossRef Khoza-Shangase K, Joubert K. The influence of epidural anesthesia on new-born hearing screening: a pilot study. J Pharm Bioall Sci. 2011;3(1):135–41.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Xiao T, Li Y, Xiao L, Jiang L, Hu Q. Association between mode of delivery and failure of neonatal acoustic emission test: a retrospective analysis. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2015;79:516–9.PubMedCrossRef Xiao T, Li Y, Xiao L, Jiang L, Hu Q. Association between mode of delivery and failure of neonatal acoustic emission test: a retrospective analysis. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2015;79:516–9.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Oghan F, Guvey A, Fatih Topuz M, Erdogan O, Guvey H. Effects of vaginal birth versus caesarean section on hearing screening results in a large series from the Aegean region. Int J Audiol. 2020;59(4):310–5.PubMedCrossRef Oghan F, Guvey A, Fatih Topuz M, Erdogan O, Guvey H. Effects of vaginal birth versus caesarean section on hearing screening results in a large series from the Aegean region. Int J Audiol. 2020;59(4):310–5.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Tabrizi A, Asadi M, Barati B, Shahabi M. Birth by cesarean delivery on newborn screening test: A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY. IJLPR. 2017;7(4):26–9. Tabrizi A, Asadi M, Barati B, Shahabi M. Birth by cesarean delivery on newborn screening test: A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY. IJLPR. 2017;7(4):26–9.
20.
go back to reference Farahani F, Hamidi Nahrani M, Seifrabiei MA, Emadi M. The effect of mode of delivery and hospital type on newborn hearing screening results using Otoacoustic emissions: based on screening age. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017;69(1):1–5.PubMedCrossRef Farahani F, Hamidi Nahrani M, Seifrabiei MA, Emadi M. The effect of mode of delivery and hospital type on newborn hearing screening results using Otoacoustic emissions: based on screening age. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017;69(1):1–5.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Perinatal factors influencing the neonatal hearing screening results
Authors
Mahbod Kaveh
Seyedeh Nastaran Mirjalali
Mamak Shariat
Mohammad Reza Zarkesh
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Pediatrics / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2431
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-020-02476-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

BMC Pediatrics 1/2021 Go to the issue