Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 4/2019

01-04-2019 | Sectio Ceasarea | Maternal-Fetal Medicine

Outcome of small for gestational age-fetuses in breech presentation at term according to mode of delivery: a nationwide, population-based record linkage study

Authors: Pia Hinnenberg, Anna Toijonen, Mika Gissler, Seppo Heinonen, Georg Macharey

Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Issue 4/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate whether a trial of planned vaginal labor is associated with adverse perinatal outcome in singleton, small for gestational agefetuses in breech presentation at term.

Methods

This is a Finnish nationwide, population-based record linkage study. The studied population included all small for gestational age breech labors from January 1, 2004 to December 31, 2014. “Small for gestational age” was defined as birth weight below the 10th percentile according to gestational age. An odds ratio with 95% confidence intervals was used to estimate the relative risk for perinatal mortality and morbidity in a trial of vaginal labor. The reference group included all small for gestational age infants born in breech presentation by planned cesarean section.

Results

During the study period of eleven years, 1841 small for gestational age infants were delivered in breech position at term. A trial of vaginal breech labor is associated with a higher rate of neonates with an umbilical pH below seven [odds ratio 7.82 (1–61.21)], a lower 5-min Apgar score < 7 [adjusted odds ratio 6.39 (1.43–28.46)] and < 4 [adjusted odds ratio 6.39 (1.43–28.46)], a higher rate of postpartum neonatal intubations [adjusted odds ratio 6.52 (1.93–22)], an increased rate of neonatal antibiotic therapy [adjusted odds ratio 3.31 (1.85–5.93)], and with a higher rate of combined severe adverse perinatal outcome [adjusted odds ratio 4.24 (1.43–12.61)].

Conclusion

A trial of vaginal breech labor in SGA fetuses is associated with adverse perinatal outcome and should be avoided.
Literature
1.
go back to reference American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (2013) ACOG Practice bulletin no 134: fetal growth restriction. Obstet Gynecol 121(5):1122–1133CrossRef American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (2013) ACOG Practice bulletin no 134: fetal growth restriction. Obstet Gynecol 121(5):1122–1133CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Nardozza LM, Araujo Junior E, Barbosa MM, Caetano AC, Lee DJ, Moron AF (2012) Fetal growth restriction: current knowledge to the general Obs/Gyn. Arch Gynecol Obstet 286(1):1–13CrossRefPubMed Nardozza LM, Araujo Junior E, Barbosa MM, Caetano AC, Lee DJ, Moron AF (2012) Fetal growth restriction: current knowledge to the general Obs/Gyn. Arch Gynecol Obstet 286(1):1–13CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Froen JF, Gardosi JO, Thurmann A, Francis A, Stray-Pedersen B (2004) Restricted fetal growth in sudden intrauterine unexplained death. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 83(9):801–807CrossRefPubMed Froen JF, Gardosi JO, Thurmann A, Francis A, Stray-Pedersen B (2004) Restricted fetal growth in sudden intrauterine unexplained death. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 83(9):801–807CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Illanes S, Soothill P (2004) Management of fetal growth restriction. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 9(5):395–401CrossRefPubMed Illanes S, Soothill P (2004) Management of fetal growth restriction. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 9(5):395–401CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Weiss E, Ulrich S, Berle P (1992) Condition at birth of infants with previously absent or reverse umbilical artery end-diastolic flow velocities. Arch Gynecol Obstet 252(1):37–43CrossRefPubMed Weiss E, Ulrich S, Berle P (1992) Condition at birth of infants with previously absent or reverse umbilical artery end-diastolic flow velocities. Arch Gynecol Obstet 252(1):37–43CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Karsdorp VH, van Vugt JM, van Geijn HP, Kostense PJ, Arduini D, Montenegro N et al (1994) Clinical significance of absent or reversed end diastolic velocity waveforms in umbilical artery. Lancet 344(8938):1664–1668CrossRefPubMed Karsdorp VH, van Vugt JM, van Geijn HP, Kostense PJ, Arduini D, Montenegro N et al (1994) Clinical significance of absent or reversed end diastolic velocity waveforms in umbilical artery. Lancet 344(8938):1664–1668CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Kehl S, Dotsch J, Hecher K, Schlembach D, Schmitz D, Stepan H et al (2017) Intrauterine growth restriction. Guideline of the German Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics (S2k-Level, AWMF Registry no. 015/080, October 2016). Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 77(11):1157–1173CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kehl S, Dotsch J, Hecher K, Schlembach D, Schmitz D, Stepan H et al (2017) Intrauterine growth restriction. Guideline of the German Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics (S2k-Level, AWMF Registry no. 015/080, October 2016). Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 77(11):1157–1173CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Jang DG, Jo YS, Lee SJ, Kim N, Lee GS (2011) Perinatal outcomes and maternal clinical characteristics in IUGR with absent or reversed end-diastolic flow velocity in the umbilical artery. Arch Gynecol Obstet 284(1):73–78CrossRefPubMed Jang DG, Jo YS, Lee SJ, Kim N, Lee GS (2011) Perinatal outcomes and maternal clinical characteristics in IUGR with absent or reversed end-diastolic flow velocity in the umbilical artery. Arch Gynecol Obstet 284(1):73–78CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hewson SA, Hodnett ED, Saigal S, Willan AR (2000) Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial term breech trial collaborative group. Lancet 356(9239):1375–1383CrossRef Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hewson SA, Hodnett ED, Saigal S, Willan AR (2000) Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial term breech trial collaborative group. Lancet 356(9239):1375–1383CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Macharey G, Gissler M, Rahkonen L, Ulander VM, Vaisanen-Tommiska M, Nuutila M et al (2017) Breech presentation at term and associated obstetric risks factors-a nationwide population based cohort study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 295:833–838CrossRefPubMed Macharey G, Gissler M, Rahkonen L, Ulander VM, Vaisanen-Tommiska M, Nuutila M et al (2017) Breech presentation at term and associated obstetric risks factors-a nationwide population based cohort study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 295:833–838CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Goffinet F, Carayol M, Foidart JM, Alexander S, Uzan S, Subtil D et al (2006) Is planned vaginal delivery for breech presentation at term still an option? Results of an observational prospective survey in France and Belgium. Am J Obstet Gynecol 194(4):1002–1011CrossRefPubMed Goffinet F, Carayol M, Foidart JM, Alexander S, Uzan S, Subtil D et al (2006) Is planned vaginal delivery for breech presentation at term still an option? Results of an observational prospective survey in France and Belgium. Am J Obstet Gynecol 194(4):1002–1011CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Macharey G, Ulander VM, Heinonen S, Kostev K, Nuutila M, Vaisanen-Tommiska M (2016) Risk factors and outcomes in "well-selected" vaginal breech deliveries: a retrospective observational study. J Perinat Med 45(3):291–297 Macharey G, Ulander VM, Heinonen S, Kostev K, Nuutila M, Vaisanen-Tommiska M (2016) Risk factors and outcomes in "well-selected" vaginal breech deliveries: a retrospective observational study. J Perinat Med 45(3):291–297
14.
go back to reference Macharey G, Ulander VM, Heinonen S, Kostev K, Nuutila M, Vaisanen-Tommiska M (2016) Induction of labor in breech presentations at term: a retrospective observational study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 293(3):549–555CrossRefPubMed Macharey G, Ulander VM, Heinonen S, Kostev K, Nuutila M, Vaisanen-Tommiska M (2016) Induction of labor in breech presentations at term: a retrospective observational study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 293(3):549–555CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Parissenti TK, Hebisch G, Sell W, Staedele PE, Viereck V, Fehr MK (2017) Risk factors for emergency caesarean section in planned vaginal breech delivery. Arch Gynecol Obstet 295:51–58CrossRefPubMed Parissenti TK, Hebisch G, Sell W, Staedele PE, Viereck V, Fehr MK (2017) Risk factors for emergency caesarean section in planned vaginal breech delivery. Arch Gynecol Obstet 295:51–58CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Franz M, von Bismarck A, Delius M, Ertl-Wagner B, Deppe C, Mahner S, Hasbargen U, Hubener C (2017) MR pelvimetry: prognosis for successful vaginal delivery in patients with suspected fetopelvic disproportion or breech presentation at term. Arch Gynecol Obstet 295:351–359CrossRefPubMed Franz M, von Bismarck A, Delius M, Ertl-Wagner B, Deppe C, Mahner S, Hasbargen U, Hubener C (2017) MR pelvimetry: prognosis for successful vaginal delivery in patients with suspected fetopelvic disproportion or breech presentation at term. Arch Gynecol Obstet 295:351–359CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Gissler MHJ (2004) Finnish health and social welfare registers in epidemiological research. Norsk Epidemiol 14:113–120 Gissler MHJ (2004) Finnish health and social welfare registers in epidemiological research. Norsk Epidemiol 14:113–120
21.
go back to reference von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP et al (2008) The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Rev Esp Salud Publica 82(3):251–259 von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP et al (2008) The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Rev Esp Salud Publica 82(3):251–259
22.
go back to reference Li H, Gudmundsson S, Olofsson P (2003) Prospect for vaginal delivery of growth restricted fetuses with abnormal umbilical artery blood flow. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 82(9):828–833CrossRefPubMed Li H, Gudmundsson S, Olofsson P (2003) Prospect for vaginal delivery of growth restricted fetuses with abnormal umbilical artery blood flow. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 82(9):828–833CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference GRIT Study Group (2003) A randomised trial of timed delivery for the compromised preterm fetus: short term outcomes and Bayesian interpretation. BJOG 110(1):27–32CrossRef GRIT Study Group (2003) A randomised trial of timed delivery for the compromised preterm fetus: short term outcomes and Bayesian interpretation. BJOG 110(1):27–32CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Mostello D, Chang JJ, Bai F, Wang J, Guild C, Stamps K et al (2014) Breech presentation at delivery: a marker for congenital anomaly? J Perinatol 34(1):11–15CrossRefPubMed Mostello D, Chang JJ, Bai F, Wang J, Guild C, Stamps K et al (2014) Breech presentation at delivery: a marker for congenital anomaly? J Perinatol 34(1):11–15CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Krebs L, Langhoff-Roos J (2006) The relation of breech presentation at term to epilepsy in childhood. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 127(1):26–28CrossRefPubMed Krebs L, Langhoff-Roos J (2006) The relation of breech presentation at term to epilepsy in childhood. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 127(1):26–28CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Krebs L, Topp M, Langhoff-Roos J (1999) The relation of breech presentation at term to cerebral palsy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 106(9):943–947CrossRefPubMed Krebs L, Topp M, Langhoff-Roos J (1999) The relation of breech presentation at term to cerebral palsy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 106(9):943–947CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Ulander VM, Gissler M, Nuutila M, Ylikorkala O (2004) Are health expectations of term breech infants unrealistically high? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 83(2):180–186CrossRefPubMed Ulander VM, Gissler M, Nuutila M, Ylikorkala O (2004) Are health expectations of term breech infants unrealistically high? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 83(2):180–186CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Kotaska A, Menticoglou S, Gagnon R, Farine D, Basso M, Bos H et al (2009) SOGC clinical practice guideline: vaginal delivery of breech presentation: no 226, June 2009. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 107(2):169–176CrossRefPubMed Kotaska A, Menticoglou S, Gagnon R, Farine D, Basso M, Bos H et al (2009) SOGC clinical practice guideline: vaginal delivery of breech presentation: no 226, June 2009. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 107(2):169–176CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Martius G (1988) Lehrbuch der Geburtshilfe, 11th edn. Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart Martius G (1988) Lehrbuch der Geburtshilfe, 11th edn. Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart
Metadata
Title
Outcome of small for gestational age-fetuses in breech presentation at term according to mode of delivery: a nationwide, population-based record linkage study
Authors
Pia Hinnenberg
Anna Toijonen
Mika Gissler
Seppo Heinonen
Georg Macharey
Publication date
01-04-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Issue 4/2019
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-019-05091-2

Other articles of this Issue 4/2019

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 4/2019 Go to the issue

Gynecologic Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine

Androgen receptor gene polymorphism and sexual function in midlife women