Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2020

Open Access 01-12-2020 | Sectio Ceasarea | Research article

Cesarean delivery or induction of labor in pre-labor twin gestations: a secondary analysis of the twin birth study

Authors: C Dougan, L Gotha, N Melamed, A Aviram, EV Asztalos, S Anabusi, AR Willan, JFR Barrett, E Mei-Dan

Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In the Twin Birth Study, women at 320/7–386/7 weeks of gestation, in whom the first twin was in cephalic presentation, were randomized to planned vaginal delivery or cesarean section. The study found no significant differences in neonatal or maternal outcomes in the two planned mode of delivery groups. We aimed to compare neonatal and maternal outcomes of twin gestations without spontaneous onset of labor, who underwent induction of labor or pre-labor cesarean section as the intervention of induction may affect outcomes.

Methods

In this secondary analysis of the Twin Birth Study we compared those who had an induction of labor with those who had a pre-labor cesarean section. The primary outcome was a composite of fetal or neonatal death or serious neonatal morbidity. Secondary outcome was a composite of maternal morbidity and mortality. Trial Registration: NCT00187369.

Results

Of the 2804 women included in the Twin Birth Study, a total of 1347 (48%) women required a delivery before a spontaneous onset of labor occurred: 568 (42%) in the planned vaginal delivery arm and 779 (58%) in the planned cesarean arm. Induction of labor was attempted in 409 (30%), and 938 (70%) had a pre-labor cesarean section. The rate of intrapartum cesarean section in the induction of labor group was 41.3%. The rate of the primary outcome was comparable between the pre-labor cesarean section group and induction of labor group (1.65% vs. 1.97%; p = 0.61; OR 0.83; 95% CI 0.43–1.62). The maternal composite outcome was found to be lower with pre-labor cesarean section compared to induction of labor (7.25% vs. 11.25%; p = 0.01; OR 0.61; 95% CI 0.41–0.91).

Conclusion

In women with twin gestation between 320/7–386/7 weeks of gestation, induction of labor and pre-labor cesarean section have similar neonatal outcomes. Pre-labor cesarean section is associated with favorable maternal outcomes which differs from the overall Twin Birth Study results. These data may be used to better counsel women with twin gestation who are faced with the decision of interventional delivery.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Spong CY, Mercer BM, D'Alton M, Kilpatrick S, Blackwell S, Saade G. Timing of indicated late-preterm and early-term birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118(2 Pt 1):323–33.CrossRef Spong CY, Mercer BM, D'Alton M, Kilpatrick S, Blackwell S, Saade G. Timing of indicated late-preterm and early-term birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118(2 Pt 1):323–33.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Cheung YB, Yip P, Karlberg J. Mortality of twins and singletons by gestational age: a varying-coefficient approach. Am J Epidemiol. 2000;152(12):1107–16.CrossRef Cheung YB, Yip P, Karlberg J. Mortality of twins and singletons by gestational age: a varying-coefficient approach. Am J Epidemiol. 2000;152(12):1107–16.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Imaizumi Y. Perinatal mortality in twins and factors influencing mortality in Japan, 1980--98. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2001;15(3):298–305.CrossRef Imaizumi Y. Perinatal mortality in twins and factors influencing mortality in Japan, 1980--98. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2001;15(3):298–305.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Puissant F, Leroy F. A reappraisal of perinatal mortality factors in twins. Acta Genet Med Gemellol. 1982;31(3–4):213–9.CrossRef Puissant F, Leroy F. A reappraisal of perinatal mortality factors in twins. Acta Genet Med Gemellol. 1982;31(3–4):213–9.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Hartley RS, Emanuel I, Hitti J. Perinatal mortality and neonatal morbidity rates among twin pairs at different gestational ages: optimal delivery timing at 37 to 38 weeks' gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;184(3):451–8.CrossRef Hartley RS, Emanuel I, Hitti J. Perinatal mortality and neonatal morbidity rates among twin pairs at different gestational ages: optimal delivery timing at 37 to 38 weeks' gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;184(3):451–8.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Minakami H, Sato I. Reestimating date of delivery in multifetal pregnancies. Jama. 1996;275(18):1432–4.CrossRef Minakami H, Sato I. Reestimating date of delivery in multifetal pregnancies. Jama. 1996;275(18):1432–4.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Ghassani A, Ghiduci MC, Voglimaci M, Chollet C, Parant O. induction of labor in twin pregnancies compared to singleton pregnancies; risk factors for failure. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2015;44(3):237–45.CrossRef Ghassani A, Ghiduci MC, Voglimaci M, Chollet C, Parant O. induction of labor in twin pregnancies compared to singleton pregnancies; risk factors for failure. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2015;44(3):237–45.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Okby R, Shoham-Vardi I, Ruslan S, Sheiner E. Is induction of labor risky for twins compare to singleton pregnancies? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2013;26(18):1804–6.CrossRef Okby R, Shoham-Vardi I, Ruslan S, Sheiner E. Is induction of labor risky for twins compare to singleton pregnancies? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2013;26(18):1804–6.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Weisz B, Hogen L, Yinon Y, Mazaki S, Gindes L, Schiff E, Lipitz S. Mode of delivery and neonatal outcome in uncomplicated monochorionic twin pregnancies. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012;25(12):2721–4.CrossRef Weisz B, Hogen L, Yinon Y, Mazaki S, Gindes L, Schiff E, Lipitz S. Mode of delivery and neonatal outcome in uncomplicated monochorionic twin pregnancies. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012;25(12):2721–4.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Barrett JF, Hannah ME, Hutton EK, Willan AR, Allen AC, Armson BA, Gafni A, Joseph KS, Mason D, Ohlsson A, et al. A randomized trial of planned cesarean or vaginal delivery for twin pregnancy. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(14):1295–305.CrossRef Barrett JF, Hannah ME, Hutton EK, Willan AR, Allen AC, Armson BA, Gafni A, Joseph KS, Mason D, Ohlsson A, et al. A randomized trial of planned cesarean or vaginal delivery for twin pregnancy. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(14):1295–305.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Mei-Dan E, Dougan C, Melamed N, Asztalos EV, Aviram A, Willan AR, Barrett JFR. Planned cesarean or vaginal delivery for women in spontaneous labor with a twin pregnancy: A secondary analysis of the tTwin bBirth sStudy. Birth (Berkeley, Calif). 2019;46(1):193–200.CrossRef Mei-Dan E, Dougan C, Melamed N, Asztalos EV, Aviram A, Willan AR, Barrett JFR. Planned cesarean or vaginal delivery for women in spontaneous labor with a twin pregnancy: A secondary analysis of the tTwin bBirth sStudy. Birth (Berkeley, Calif). 2019;46(1):193–200.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Cammu H, Martens G, Ruyssinck G, Amy JJ. Outcome after elective labor induction in nulliparous women: a matched cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186(2):240–4.CrossRef Cammu H, Martens G, Ruyssinck G, Amy JJ. Outcome after elective labor induction in nulliparous women: a matched cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186(2):240–4.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Ehrenthal DB, Jiang X, Strobino DM. Labor induction and the risk of a cesarean delivery among nulliparous women at term. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116(1):35–42.CrossRef Ehrenthal DB, Jiang X, Strobino DM. Labor induction and the risk of a cesarean delivery among nulliparous women at term. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116(1):35–42.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Barrett JF. Delivery of the term twin. Best Pract Res Clin Obstetr Gynaecol. 2004;18(4):625–30.CrossRef Barrett JF. Delivery of the term twin. Best Pract Res Clin Obstetr Gynaecol. 2004;18(4):625–30.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Parrish KM, Holt VL, Easterling TR, Connell FA, LoGerfo JP. Effect of changes in maternal age, parity, and birth weight distribution on primary cesarean delivery rates. Jama. 1994;271(6):443–7.CrossRef Parrish KM, Holt VL, Easterling TR, Connell FA, LoGerfo JP. Effect of changes in maternal age, parity, and birth weight distribution on primary cesarean delivery rates. Jama. 1994;271(6):443–7.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Wang Y, Tanbo T, Abyholm T, Henriksen T. The impact of advanced maternal age and parity on obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton gestations. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2011;284(1):31–7.CrossRef Wang Y, Tanbo T, Abyholm T, Henriksen T. The impact of advanced maternal age and parity on obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton gestations. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2011;284(1):31–7.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Suzuki S, Otsubo Y, Sawa R, Yoneyama Y, Araki T. Clinical trial of induction of labor versus expectant management in twin pregnancy. Gynecol Obstet Investig. 2000;49(1):24–7.CrossRef Suzuki S, Otsubo Y, Sawa R, Yoneyama Y, Araki T. Clinical trial of induction of labor versus expectant management in twin pregnancy. Gynecol Obstet Investig. 2000;49(1):24–7.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Drassinower D, Timofeev J, Huang CC, Landy HJ. Racial disparities in outcomes of twin pregnancies: elective cesarean or trial of labor? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;211(2):160 e161–167.CrossRef Drassinower D, Timofeev J, Huang CC, Landy HJ. Racial disparities in outcomes of twin pregnancies: elective cesarean or trial of labor? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;211(2):160 e161–167.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Ylilehto E, Palomaki O, Huhtala H, Uotila J. Term twin birth - impact of mode of delivery on outcome. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017;96(5):589–96.CrossRef Ylilehto E, Palomaki O, Huhtala H, Uotila J. Term twin birth - impact of mode of delivery on outcome. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017;96(5):589–96.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Mei-Dan E, Asztalos EV, Willan AR, Barrett JF. The effect of induction method in twin pregnancies: a secondary analysis for the twin birth study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17(1):9.CrossRef Mei-Dan E, Asztalos EV, Willan AR, Barrett JF. The effect of induction method in twin pregnancies: a secondary analysis for the twin birth study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17(1):9.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Matilde Sanchez M, Chen X. Choosing the analysis population in non-inferiority studies: per protocol or intent-to-treat. Stat Med. 2006;25(7):1169–81.CrossRef Matilde Sanchez M, Chen X. Choosing the analysis population in non-inferiority studies: per protocol or intent-to-treat. Stat Med. 2006;25(7):1169–81.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Gupta SK. Intention-to-treat concept: a review. Perspect Clin Res. 2011;2(3):109–12.CrossRef Gupta SK. Intention-to-treat concept: a review. Perspect Clin Res. 2011;2(3):109–12.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Cesarean delivery or induction of labor in pre-labor twin gestations: a secondary analysis of the twin birth study
Authors
C Dougan
L Gotha
N Melamed
A Aviram
EV Asztalos
S Anabusi
AR Willan
JFR Barrett
E Mei-Dan
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2393
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03369-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2020 Go to the issue