Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2020

Open Access 01-12-2020 | Sectio Ceasarea | Research article

Analysis of cesarean section rates using Robson ten group classification system in a tertiary teaching hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study

Authors: Ferid A. Abubeker, Biruck Gashawbeza, Thomas Mekuria Gebre, Mekitie Wondafrash, Alula M. Teklu, Demis Degu, Delayehu Bekele

Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Cesarean section (CS) is an important indicator of access to, and quality of maternal health services. The World Health Organization recommends the Robson ten group classification system as a global standard for assessing, monitoring and comparing CS rates at all levels. This study aimed to assess the rate of CS and perform an analysis based on Robson classification system.

Methods

A facility-based cross-sectional study was conducted at a tertiary hospital in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Data were collected from medical charts of all women who delivered from January-June 2018. The overall CS rate was calculated then women were categorized into one of the ten Robson groups. Relative size of each group, contribution of each group to the overall CS rate, and CS rate within each group were calculated.

Results

A total of 4,200 deliveries were analyzed. Of these 1,459 (34.7%) were CS. The largest contributors to the overall CS rate were Group 10 (19.1%), Group 2 (18.3%), Group 5 (17.1%), and Group 4 (15.8%). There was also a high rate of pre-labor CS in Group 2, Group 4, and Group 10.

Conclusion

Through implementation of the Robson ten group classification system, we identified the contribution of each group to the overall CS rate as well as the CS rate within each group. Group 10 was the leading contributor to the overall CS rate. This study also revealed a high rate of CS among low-risk groups. These target groups require more in-depth analysis to identify possible modifiable factors and to apply specific interventions to reduce the CS rate. Evaluation of existing management protocols and further studies into indications of CS and outcomes are needed to design tailored strategies and improve outcomes.
Literature
1.
go back to reference World Health Organization. Appropriate technology for birth. Lancet. 1985;2:436–7. World Health Organization. Appropriate technology for birth. Lancet. 1985;2:436–7.
2.
go back to reference Ye J, Betrán AP, Guerrero Vela M, Souza JP, Zhang J. Searching for the optimal rate of medically necessary cesarean delivery. Birth. 2014;41(3):237–44.CrossRef Ye J, Betrán AP, Guerrero Vela M, Souza JP, Zhang J. Searching for the optimal rate of medically necessary cesarean delivery. Birth. 2014;41(3):237–44.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Betran AP, Torloni MR, Zhang J, Ye J, Mikolajczyk R, Deneux-Tharaux C, Oladapo OT, Souza JP, Tunçalp Ö, Vogel JP. What is the optimal rate of caesarean section at population level? A systematic review of ecologic studies. Reproductive health. 2015;12(1):57.CrossRef Betran AP, Torloni MR, Zhang J, Ye J, Mikolajczyk R, Deneux-Tharaux C, Oladapo OT, Souza JP, Tunçalp Ö, Vogel JP. What is the optimal rate of caesarean section at population level? A systematic review of ecologic studies. Reproductive health. 2015;12(1):57.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference WHO, UNFPA, UNICEF, AMDD. Monitoring emergency obstetric care: a handbook. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2009. WHO, UNFPA, UNICEF, AMDD. Monitoring emergency obstetric care: a handbook. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2009.
5.
go back to reference Ethiopian Public Health Institute, Federal Ministry of Health, Averting Maternal Death and Disability (AMDD). Ethiopian Emergency Obstetric and Newborn Care (EmONC) Assessment 2016; Final Report. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia Ethiopian Public Health Institute; 2017. Ethiopian Public Health Institute, Federal Ministry of Health, Averting Maternal Death and Disability (AMDD). Ethiopian Emergency Obstetric and Newborn Care (EmONC) Assessment 2016; Final Report. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia Ethiopian Public Health Institute; 2017.
6.
go back to reference World Health Organization. WHO statement on caesarean section rates, vol. WHO/RHR/15.02. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015. (WHO/RHR/15.02). World Health Organization. WHO statement on caesarean section rates, vol. WHO/RHR/15.02. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015. (WHO/RHR/15.02).
7.
go back to reference Robson M, Hartigan L, Murphy M. Methods of achieving and maintaining an appropriate caesarean section rate. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2013;27(2):297–308.CrossRef Robson M, Hartigan L, Murphy M. Methods of achieving and maintaining an appropriate caesarean section rate. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2013;27(2):297–308.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Robson MS. Classification of caesarean sections. Fetal Matern Med Rev. 2001;12(1):23–39.CrossRef Robson MS. Classification of caesarean sections. Fetal Matern Med Rev. 2001;12(1):23–39.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Torloni MR, Betran AP, Souza JP, Widmer M, Allen T, Gulmezoglu M, Merialdi M. Classifications for cesarean section: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2011;6(1):e14566.CrossRef Torloni MR, Betran AP, Souza JP, Widmer M, Allen T, Gulmezoglu M, Merialdi M. Classifications for cesarean section: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2011;6(1):e14566.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Betran AP, Vindevoghel N, Souza JP, Gulmezoglu AM, Torloni MR. A systematic review of the Robson classification for caesarean section: what works, doesn’t work and how to improve it. PLoS One. 2014;9(6):e97769.CrossRef Betran AP, Vindevoghel N, Souza JP, Gulmezoglu AM, Torloni MR. A systematic review of the Robson classification for caesarean section: what works, doesn’t work and how to improve it. PLoS One. 2014;9(6):e97769.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference FIGO Working Group on Challenges in Care of Mothers and Infants during Labour and Delivery. Best practice advice on the 10-Group Classification System for cesarean deliveries. International Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics. 2016;135(2):232–3.CrossRef FIGO Working Group on Challenges in Care of Mothers and Infants during Labour and Delivery. Best practice advice on the 10-Group Classification System for cesarean deliveries. International Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics. 2016;135(2):232–3.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Visser G, Ayres-de-Campos D, Barnea E, de Bernis L, Di Renzo G, Vidarte M, Lloyd I, Nassar A, Nicholson W, Shah P. FIGO position paper: how to stop the caesarean section epidemic. The Lancet. 2018;392(10155):1286–7.CrossRef Visser G, Ayres-de-Campos D, Barnea E, de Bernis L, Di Renzo G, Vidarte M, Lloyd I, Nassar A, Nicholson W, Shah P. FIGO position paper: how to stop the caesarean section epidemic. The Lancet. 2018;392(10155):1286–7.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Costa ML, Cecatti JG, Souza JP, Milanez HM, Gulmezoglu MA. Using a Caesarean Section Classification System based on characteristics of the population as a way of monitoring obstetric practice. Reprod Health. 2010;7:13.CrossRef Costa ML, Cecatti JG, Souza JP, Milanez HM, Gulmezoglu MA. Using a Caesarean Section Classification System based on characteristics of the population as a way of monitoring obstetric practice. Reprod Health. 2010;7:13.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Litorp H, Kidanto HL, Nystrom L, Darj E, Essen B. Increasing caesarean section rates among low-risk groups: a panel study classifying deliveries according to Robson at a university hospital in Tanzania. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13:107.CrossRef Litorp H, Kidanto HL, Nystrom L, Darj E, Essen B. Increasing caesarean section rates among low-risk groups: a panel study classifying deliveries according to Robson at a university hospital in Tanzania. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13:107.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Triunfo S, Ferrazzani S, Lanzone A, Scambia G. Identification of obstetric targets for reducing cesarean section rate using the Robson Ten Group Classification in a tertiary level hospital. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015;189:91–5.CrossRef Triunfo S, Ferrazzani S, Lanzone A, Scambia G. Identification of obstetric targets for reducing cesarean section rate using the Robson Ten Group Classification in a tertiary level hospital. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015;189:91–5.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Sah S, Goel R, Goel JK. Analysis of caesarean section rate according to Robson’s criteria in tertiary care centre. International Journal of Reproduction Contraception Obstetrics Gynecology. 2018;7(8):3060–4.CrossRef Sah S, Goel R, Goel JK. Analysis of caesarean section rate according to Robson’s criteria in tertiary care centre. International Journal of Reproduction Contraception Obstetrics Gynecology. 2018;7(8):3060–4.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Ethiopian Ministry of Health. Technical and Procedural Guidelines for Safe Abortion Services in Ethiopia. Second ed. Addis Ababa: Federal Ministry of Health; 2013. Ethiopian Ministry of Health. Technical and Procedural Guidelines for Safe Abortion Services in Ethiopia. Second ed. Addis Ababa: Federal Ministry of Health; 2013.
18.
go back to reference World Health Organization. Physical status: The use of and interpretation of anthropometry, Report of a WHO Expert Committee. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1995. World Health Organization. Physical status: The use of and interpretation of anthropometry, Report of a WHO Expert Committee. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1995.
19.
go back to reference Tura AK, Pijpers O, de Man M, Cleveringa M, Koopmans I, Gure T, Stekelenburg J. Analysis of caesarean sections using Robson 10-group classification system in a university hospital in eastern Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. BMJ open. 2018;8(4):e020520.CrossRef Tura AK, Pijpers O, de Man M, Cleveringa M, Koopmans I, Gure T, Stekelenburg J. Analysis of caesarean sections using Robson 10-group classification system in a university hospital in eastern Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. BMJ open. 2018;8(4):e020520.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Hanson C, Betrán A, Opondo C, Mkumbo E, Manzi F, Mbaruku G, Schellenberg J. Trends in caesarean section rates between 2007 and 2013 in obstetric risk groups inspired by the Robson classification: results from population-based surveys in a low‐resource setting. BJOG. 2019;126(6):690–700.CrossRef Hanson C, Betrán A, Opondo C, Mkumbo E, Manzi F, Mbaruku G, Schellenberg J. Trends in caesarean section rates between 2007 and 2013 in obstetric risk groups inspired by the Robson classification: results from population-based surveys in a low‐resource setting. BJOG. 2019;126(6):690–700.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Harrison MS, Pasha O, Saleem S, Ali S, Chomba E, Carlo WA, Garces AL, Krebs NF, Hambidge KM, Goudar SS. A prospective study of maternal, fetal and neonatal outcomes in the setting of cesarean section in low-and middle‐income countries. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017;96(4):410–20.CrossRef Harrison MS, Pasha O, Saleem S, Ali S, Chomba E, Carlo WA, Garces AL, Krebs NF, Hambidge KM, Goudar SS. A prospective study of maternal, fetal and neonatal outcomes in the setting of cesarean section in low-and middle‐income countries. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017;96(4):410–20.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Ethiopian Ministry of Health. Management protocol on selected obstetrics topics. Addis Ababa: Federal Ministry of Health; 2010. Ethiopian Ministry of Health. Management protocol on selected obstetrics topics. Addis Ababa: Federal Ministry of Health; 2010.
23.
go back to reference World Health Organization. WHO recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience: World Health Organization; 2016. World Health Organization. WHO recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience: World Health Organization; 2016.
24.
go back to reference Schantz C, Ravit M, Traoré AB, Aboubakar M, Goyet S, de Loenzien M, Dumont A. Why are caesarean section rates so high in facilities in Mali and Benin? Sexual & reproductive healthcare. 2018;16:10–4.CrossRef Schantz C, Ravit M, Traoré AB, Aboubakar M, Goyet S, de Loenzien M, Dumont A. Why are caesarean section rates so high in facilities in Mali and Benin? Sexual & reproductive healthcare. 2018;16:10–4.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Tognon F, Borghero A, Putoto G, Maziku D, Torelli GF, Azzimonti G, Betran AP. Analysis of caesarean section and neonatal outcome using the Robson classification in a rural district hospital in Tanzania: an observational retrospective study. BMJ open. 2019;9:12.CrossRef Tognon F, Borghero A, Putoto G, Maziku D, Torelli GF, Azzimonti G, Betran AP. Analysis of caesarean section and neonatal outcome using the Robson classification in a rural district hospital in Tanzania: an observational retrospective study. BMJ open. 2019;9:12.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Chong C, Su LL, Biswas A. Changing trends of cesarean section births by the Robson Ten Group Classification in a tertiary teaching hospital. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012;91(12):1422–7.CrossRef Chong C, Su LL, Biswas A. Changing trends of cesarean section births by the Robson Ten Group Classification in a tertiary teaching hospital. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012;91(12):1422–7.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Bolognani CV, Reis LBdSM, Dias A, Calderon IdMP. Robson 10-groups classification system to access C-section in two public hospitals of the Federal District/Brazil. PLoS One. 2018;13(2):e0192997.CrossRef Bolognani CV, Reis LBdSM, Dias A, Calderon IdMP. Robson 10-groups classification system to access C-section in two public hospitals of the Federal District/Brazil. PLoS One. 2018;13(2):e0192997.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hewson SA, Hodnett ED, Saigal S, Willan AR, Collaborative TBT. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. The Lancet. 2000;356(9239):1375–83.CrossRef Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hewson SA, Hodnett ED, Saigal S, Willan AR, Collaborative TBT. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. The Lancet. 2000;356(9239):1375–83.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Rietberg CCT, Elferink-Stinkens PM, Visser GH. The effect of the Term Breech Trial on medical intervention behaviour and neonatal outcome in The Netherlands: an analysis of 35,453 term breech infants. BJOG. 2005;112(2):205–9.CrossRef Rietberg CCT, Elferink-Stinkens PM, Visser GH. The effect of the Term Breech Trial on medical intervention behaviour and neonatal outcome in The Netherlands: an analysis of 35,453 term breech infants. BJOG. 2005;112(2):205–9.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Assefa F, Girma W, Woldie M, Getachew B. Birth outcomes of singleton term breech deliveries in Jimma University Medical Center, Southwest Ethiopia. BMC Res Notes. 2019;12(1):428.CrossRef Assefa F, Girma W, Woldie M, Getachew B. Birth outcomes of singleton term breech deliveries in Jimma University Medical Center, Southwest Ethiopia. BMC Res Notes. 2019;12(1):428.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Analysis of cesarean section rates using Robson ten group classification system in a tertiary teaching hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study
Authors
Ferid A. Abubeker
Biruck Gashawbeza
Thomas Mekuria Gebre
Mekitie Wondafrash
Alula M. Teklu
Demis Degu
Delayehu Bekele
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2393
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03474-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2020 Go to the issue