Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Sectio Ceasarea | Research

A study on the timing of uterine artery embolization followed by pregnancy excision for cesarean scar pregnancy: a prospective study in China

Authors: Liping Yu, Bikang Yang, Qinyang Xu, Yincheng Teng, Zhuowei Xue

Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) remains a sporadic and special form of ectopic pregnancy in which the fertilized ovum is implanted on a previous cesarean scar within 12 weeks. This study aims to evaluate the optimal time interval between uterine artery embolization (UAE) and curettage modalities in order to provide the best clinical outcomes.

Methods

From January 2018 to December 2020, we recruited 61 patients with CSP. They were randomly divided into two groups depending on whether the time interval between UAE and dilatation and curettage (D&C) requires additional hospitalization: 31 patients received prophylactic UAE followed by D&C on the same day (0–12 h; group A) and 30 patients need hospitalization (12–72 h; group B). The clinical characteristics, diagnostic data, and outcomes of the two groups were compared and analyzed.

Results

A total of 59 (96.72%) cases had responded well to the first treatment. One patient in each arm undergone retreatment, but none of the 61 patients needed additional hysterectomy. There was no considerable relationship between the two groups with respect to the intraoperative hemorrhage during D&C, serum index (containing β-hCG, hemoglobin, CRP, and D-dimer) on the first day after D&C, side effects (containing fever and abdominal pain), renal, hepatic, and coagulation function, time of CSP residual mass disappearance, and hospitalization cost. The time of serum β-hCG resolution after surgery was 41.22 ± 14.97 days in group A and 66.67 ± 36.64 days in group B (P = 0.027), and group A treatment resulted in a shorten hospital stay as compared with group B (4.81 ± 2.74 days vs. 6.80 ± 2.14 days, P <  0.001). However, the average hourly serum β-hCG decrease rate within 24 h and the leukocytes on the first day after D&C in group B were superior than in group A (P <  0.050).

Conclusion

For patients with CSP, UAE followed by D&C on the same day (0–12 h) appears to have more advantages in hospitalization and recovery time, while the long time interval (12–72 h) may have a lower risk of inflammation and a more rapid decrease in serum β-hCG level within 24 h after D&C surgery. The treatment of CSP should be individualized based on the conditions of patients.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Donnez O. Cesarean scar defects: management of an iatrogenic pathology whose prevalence has dramatically increased. Fertil Steril. 2020;113(4):704–16.CrossRef Donnez O. Cesarean scar defects: management of an iatrogenic pathology whose prevalence has dramatically increased. Fertil Steril. 2020;113(4):704–16.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Liang J, Mu Y, Li X, et al. Relaxation of the one child policy and trends in caesarean section rates and birth outcomes in China between 2012 and 2016: observational study of nearly seven million health facility births. BMJ. 2018;360:k817.CrossRef Liang J, Mu Y, Li X, et al. Relaxation of the one child policy and trends in caesarean section rates and birth outcomes in China between 2012 and 2016: observational study of nearly seven million health facility births. BMJ. 2018;360:k817.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Long Y, Zhu H, Hu Y, et al. Interventions for non-tubal ectopic pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;7(7):CD011174.PubMed Long Y, Zhu H, Hu Y, et al. Interventions for non-tubal ectopic pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;7(7):CD011174.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Kamel R, Eissa T, Sharaf M, et al. Position and integrity of uterine scar are determined by degree of cervical dilatation at time of cesarean section. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021;57(3):466–70.CrossRef Kamel R, Eissa T, Sharaf M, et al. Position and integrity of uterine scar are determined by degree of cervical dilatation at time of cesarean section. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021;57(3):466–70.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Zhang Y, Zhang Z, Liu X, et al. Risk factors for massive hemorrhage during the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021;303(2):321–8.CrossRef Zhang Y, Zhang Z, Liu X, et al. Risk factors for massive hemorrhage during the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021;303(2):321–8.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Levin G, Zigron R, Dior UP, et al. Conservative management of caesarean scar pregnancies with systemic multidose methotrexate: predictors of treatment failure and reproductive outcomes. Reprod BioMed Online. 2019;39(5):827–34.CrossRef Levin G, Zigron R, Dior UP, et al. Conservative management of caesarean scar pregnancies with systemic multidose methotrexate: predictors of treatment failure and reproductive outcomes. Reprod BioMed Online. 2019;39(5):827–34.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Gerday A, Lourtie A, Pirard C, et al. Experience with medical treatment of cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy (CSEP) with local ultrasound-guided injection of methotrexate. Front Med (Lausanne). 2020;7:564764.CrossRef Gerday A, Lourtie A, Pirard C, et al. Experience with medical treatment of cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy (CSEP) with local ultrasound-guided injection of methotrexate. Front Med (Lausanne). 2020;7:564764.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Le A, Li M, Xu Y, et al. Different surgical approaches to 313 cesarean scar pregnancies. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019;26(1):148–52.CrossRef Le A, Li M, Xu Y, et al. Different surgical approaches to 313 cesarean scar pregnancies. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019;26(1):148–52.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Wu Q, Liu X, Zhu L, et al. Clinical assessment of ultrasound-guided local lauromacrogol injection combined with curettage and hysteroscopy for cesarean scar pregnancy. Front Pharmacol. 2020;11:601977.CrossRef Wu Q, Liu X, Zhu L, et al. Clinical assessment of ultrasound-guided local lauromacrogol injection combined with curettage and hysteroscopy for cesarean scar pregnancy. Front Pharmacol. 2020;11:601977.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Timor-Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A, Calì G, et al. Cesarean scar pregnancy: patient counseling and management. Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am. 2019;46(4):813–28.CrossRef Timor-Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A, Calì G, et al. Cesarean scar pregnancy: patient counseling and management. Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am. 2019;46(4):813–28.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Wang Y, Niu Z, Tao L, et al. Early intervention for heterotopic caesarean scar pregnancy to preserve intrauterine pregnancy may improve outcomes: a retrospective cohort study. Reprod BioMed Online. 2020;41(2):290–9.CrossRef Wang Y, Niu Z, Tao L, et al. Early intervention for heterotopic caesarean scar pregnancy to preserve intrauterine pregnancy may improve outcomes: a retrospective cohort study. Reprod BioMed Online. 2020;41(2):290–9.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Gonzalez N, Tulandi T. Cesarean scar pregnancy: a systematic review. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017;24(5):731–8.CrossRef Gonzalez N, Tulandi T. Cesarean scar pregnancy: a systematic review. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017;24(5):731–8.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Qian Z, Huang L, Zhu X. Curettage or operative hysteroscopy in the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015;292(5):1055–61.CrossRef Qian Z, Huang L, Zhu X. Curettage or operative hysteroscopy in the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015;292(5):1055–61.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Wang J, Qian Z, Zhuang Y, et al. Risk factors for intraoperative hemorrhage at evacuation of a cesarean scar pregnancy following uterine artery embolization. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2013;123(3):240–3.CrossRef Wang J, Qian Z, Zhuang Y, et al. Risk factors for intraoperative hemorrhage at evacuation of a cesarean scar pregnancy following uterine artery embolization. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2013;123(3):240–3.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Tian H, Li S, Jia W, et al. Risk factors for poor hemostasis of prophylactic uterine artery embolization before curettage in cesarean scar pregnancy. J Int Med Res. 2020;48(10):300060520964379.CrossRef Tian H, Li S, Jia W, et al. Risk factors for poor hemostasis of prophylactic uterine artery embolization before curettage in cesarean scar pregnancy. J Int Med Res. 2020;48(10):300060520964379.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Wang Q, Peng H, Zhao X, et al. When to perform curettage after uterine artery embolization for cesarean scar pregnancy: a clinical study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21(1):367.CrossRef Wang Q, Peng H, Zhao X, et al. When to perform curettage after uterine artery embolization for cesarean scar pregnancy: a clinical study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21(1):367.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Timor-Tritsch IE. Cesarean scar pregnancy: a therapeutic dilemma. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021;57(1):32–3.CrossRef Timor-Tritsch IE. Cesarean scar pregnancy: a therapeutic dilemma. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021;57(1):32–3.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Liu L, Ross WT, Chu AL, et al. An updated guide to the diagnosis and management of cesarean scar pregnancies. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2020;32(4):255–62.CrossRef Liu L, Ross WT, Chu AL, et al. An updated guide to the diagnosis and management of cesarean scar pregnancies. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2020;32(4):255–62.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Grechukhina O, Deshmukh U, Fan L, et al. Cesarean scar pregnancy, incidence, and recurrence: five-year experience at a single tertiary care referral center. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;132(5):1285–95.CrossRef Grechukhina O, Deshmukh U, Fan L, et al. Cesarean scar pregnancy, incidence, and recurrence: five-year experience at a single tertiary care referral center. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;132(5):1285–95.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Chen L, Xiao S, Zhu X, et al. Analysis of the reproductive outcome of patients with cesarean scar pregnancy treated by high-intensity focused ultrasound and uterine artery embolization: a retrospective cohort study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019;26(5):883–90.CrossRef Chen L, Xiao S, Zhu X, et al. Analysis of the reproductive outcome of patients with cesarean scar pregnancy treated by high-intensity focused ultrasound and uterine artery embolization: a retrospective cohort study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019;26(5):883–90.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Maheux-Lacroix S, Li F, Bujold E, et al. Cesarean scar pregnancies: a systematic review of treatment options. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017;24(6):915–25.CrossRef Maheux-Lacroix S, Li F, Bujold E, et al. Cesarean scar pregnancies: a systematic review of treatment options. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017;24(6):915–25.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Tumenjargal A, Tokue H, Kishi H, et al. Uterine artery embolization combined with dilation and curettage for the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy: efficacy and future fertility. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2018;41(8):1165–73.CrossRef Tumenjargal A, Tokue H, Kishi H, et al. Uterine artery embolization combined with dilation and curettage for the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy: efficacy and future fertility. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2018;41(8):1165–73.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Harb HM, Knight M, Bottomley C, et al. Caesarean scar pregnancy in the UK: a national cohort study. BJOG. 2018;125(13):1663–70.CrossRef Harb HM, Knight M, Bottomley C, et al. Caesarean scar pregnancy in the UK: a national cohort study. BJOG. 2018;125(13):1663–70.CrossRef
25.
26.
go back to reference Ou J, Peng P, Li C, et al. Assessment of the necessity of uterine artery embolization during suction and curettage for caesarean scar pregnancy: a prospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20(1):378.CrossRef Ou J, Peng P, Li C, et al. Assessment of the necessity of uterine artery embolization during suction and curettage for caesarean scar pregnancy: a prospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20(1):378.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference McLucas B, Voorhees WD, Elliott S. Fertility after uterine artery embolization: a review. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2016;25(1):1–7.CrossRef McLucas B, Voorhees WD, Elliott S. Fertility after uterine artery embolization: a review. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2016;25(1):1–7.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Qiu J, Fu Y, Xu J, et al. Analysis on clinical effects of dilation and curettage guided by ultrasonography versus hysteroscopy after uterine artery embolization in the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2019;15:83–9.CrossRef Qiu J, Fu Y, Xu J, et al. Analysis on clinical effects of dilation and curettage guided by ultrasonography versus hysteroscopy after uterine artery embolization in the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2019;15:83–9.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Wozniak S, Pyra K, Kłudka-Sternik M, et al. Uterine artery embolization using gelatin sponge particles performed due to massive vaginal bleeding caused by ectopic pregnancy within a cesarean scar: a case study. Ginekol Pol. 2013;84(11):966–9.CrossRef Wozniak S, Pyra K, Kłudka-Sternik M, et al. Uterine artery embolization using gelatin sponge particles performed due to massive vaginal bleeding caused by ectopic pregnancy within a cesarean scar: a case study. Ginekol Pol. 2013;84(11):966–9.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Petersen KB, Hoffmann E, Larsen CR, et al. Cesarean scar pregnancy: a systematic review of treatment studies. Fertil Steril. 2016;105(4):958–67.CrossRef Petersen KB, Hoffmann E, Larsen CR, et al. Cesarean scar pregnancy: a systematic review of treatment studies. Fertil Steril. 2016;105(4):958–67.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
A study on the timing of uterine artery embolization followed by pregnancy excision for cesarean scar pregnancy: a prospective study in China
Authors
Liping Yu
Bikang Yang
Qinyang Xu
Yincheng Teng
Zhuowei Xue
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2393
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-04180-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2021 Go to the issue