Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2020

01-12-2020 | Sectio Ceasarea | Research article

General methods for measuring and comparing medical interventions in childbirth: a framework

Authors: Alessandro Svelato, Antonio Ragusa, Piero Manfredi

Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The continue increase of interventions during labour in low risk population is a controversial issue of the current obstetric literature, given the lack of evidence demonstrating the benefits of unnecessary interventions for women or infants’ health. This makes it important to have approaches to assess the burden of all medical interventions performed.

Methods

Exploiting the nature of childbirth intervention as a staged process, we proposed graphic representations allowing to generate alternative formulas for the simplest measures of the intervention intensity namely, the overall and type-specific treatment ratios. We applied the approach to quantify the change in interventions following a protocol termed Comprehensive Management (CM), using data from Robson classification, collected in a prospective longitudinal cohort study carried out at the Obstetric Unit of the Cà Granda Niguarda Hospital in Milan, Italy.

Results

Following CM a substantial reduction was observed in the Overall Treatment Ratio, as well as in the ratios for augmentation (amniotomy and synthetic oxytocin use) and for caesarean section ratio, without any increase in neonatal and maternal adverse outcomes. The key component of this reduction was the dramatic decline in the proportion of women progressing to augmentation, which resulted not only the most practiced intervention, but also the main door towards further treatments.

Conclusions

The proposed framework, once combined with Robson Classification, provides useful tools to make medical interventions performed during childbirth quantitatively measurable and comparable. The framework allowed to identifying the key components of interventions reduction following CM. In its turn, CM proved useful to reduce the number of medical interventions carried out during childbirth, without worsening neonatal and maternal outcomes.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Committee on Obstetric Practice. Committee Opinion No. 687: Approaches to Limit Intervention During Labor and Birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;129(2):e20–8. Committee on Obstetric Practice. Committee Opinion No. 687: Approaches to Limit Intervention During Labor and Birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;129(2):e20–8.
2.
go back to reference American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (College); Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Caughey AB, Cahill AG, Guise JM, Rouse DJ. Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;210:179–93.CrossRef American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (College); Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Caughey AB, Cahill AG, Guise JM, Rouse DJ. Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;210:179–93.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Tracy SK, Sullivan E, Wang YA, et al. Birth outcomes associated with interventions in labour amongst low risk women: a population-based study. Women Birth. 2007;20(2):41–8.CrossRef Tracy SK, Sullivan E, Wang YA, et al. Birth outcomes associated with interventions in labour amongst low risk women: a population-based study. Women Birth. 2007;20(2):41–8.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Selin L, Almström E, Wallin G, Berg M. Use and abuse of oxytocin for augmentation of labor. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2009;88:1352–7.CrossRef Selin L, Almström E, Wallin G, Berg M. Use and abuse of oxytocin for augmentation of labor. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2009;88:1352–7.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Lee SM, Lee KA, Lee J, Park CW, Yoon BH. “Early rupture of membranes” after the spontaneous onset of labor as a risk factor for cesarean delivery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010;148:152–7.CrossRef Lee SM, Lee KA, Lee J, Park CW, Yoon BH. “Early rupture of membranes” after the spontaneous onset of labor as a risk factor for cesarean delivery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010;148:152–7.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Bragg F, Cromwell DA, Edozien LC, Gurol-Urganci I, Mahmood TA, Templeton A, van der Meulen JH. Variation in rates of caesarean section among English NHS trusts after accounting for maternal and clinical risk: cross sectional study. BMJ. 2010;341:c5065.CrossRef Bragg F, Cromwell DA, Edozien LC, Gurol-Urganci I, Mahmood TA, Templeton A, van der Meulen JH. Variation in rates of caesarean section among English NHS trusts after accounting for maternal and clinical risk: cross sectional study. BMJ. 2010;341:c5065.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Ministero della Salute Italiana. Rapporto annuale sull’attività ospedaliera (Dati SDO 2015). Data rilascio September 2016. Ministero della Salute Italiana. Rapporto annuale sull’attività ospedaliera (Dati SDO 2015). Data rilascio September 2016.
8.
go back to reference Betran AP, Torloni MR, Zhang JJ, Gülmezoglu AM, WHO Working Group on Caesarean Section. WHO statement on caesarean section rates. BJOG. 2016;123:667–70.CrossRef Betran AP, Torloni MR, Zhang JJ, Gülmezoglu AM, WHO Working Group on Caesarean Section. WHO statement on caesarean section rates. BJOG. 2016;123:667–70.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Mitteroecker P, Huttegger SM, Fischer B, Pavlicev M. Cliff-edge model of obstetric selection in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113:14680–5.CrossRef Mitteroecker P, Huttegger SM, Fischer B, Pavlicev M. Cliff-edge model of obstetric selection in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113:14680–5.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Gregory KD, Jackson S, Korst L, Fridman M. Cesarean versus vaginal delivery: whose risks? Whose benefits? Am J Perinatol. 2012;29:7–18.CrossRef Gregory KD, Jackson S, Korst L, Fridman M. Cesarean versus vaginal delivery: whose risks? Whose benefits? Am J Perinatol. 2012;29:7–18.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Black M, Bhattacharya S, Philip S, Norman JE, McLernon DJ. Planned cesarean delivery at term and adverse outcomes in childhood health. JAMA. 2015;314:2271–9.CrossRef Black M, Bhattacharya S, Philip S, Norman JE, McLernon DJ. Planned cesarean delivery at term and adverse outcomes in childhood health. JAMA. 2015;314:2271–9.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Grivell RM, Dodd JM. Short and long-term outcomes after cesarean section. Expert Rev of Obstet Gynecol. 2011;6:205–15.CrossRef Grivell RM, Dodd JM. Short and long-term outcomes after cesarean section. Expert Rev of Obstet Gynecol. 2011;6:205–15.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kristensen K, Henriksen L. Cesarean section and disease associated with immune function. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016;137:587–90.CrossRef Kristensen K, Henriksen L. Cesarean section and disease associated with immune function. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016;137:587–90.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Belizán JM, Althabe F, Barros FC, Alexander S. Rates and implications of caesarean sections in Latin America: ecological study. BMJ. 1999;319:1397–400.CrossRef Belizán JM, Althabe F, Barros FC, Alexander S. Rates and implications of caesarean sections in Latin America: ecological study. BMJ. 1999;319:1397–400.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Robson SJ, de Costa CM. Thirty years of the World Health Organization's target caesarean section rate: time to move on. Med J Aust. 2017;206:181–5.CrossRef Robson SJ, de Costa CM. Thirty years of the World Health Organization's target caesarean section rate: time to move on. Med J Aust. 2017;206:181–5.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Peng FS, Lin HM, Lin HH, Tu FC, Hsiao CF, Hsiao SM. Impact of clinical audits on cesarean section rate. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;55:530–3.CrossRef Peng FS, Lin HM, Lin HH, Tu FC, Hsiao CF, Hsiao SM. Impact of clinical audits on cesarean section rate. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;55:530–3.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Dekker S, Bergström J, Amer-Wåhlin I, Cilliers P. Complicated, complex and compliant: best practice in obstetrics. Cogn Tech Work. 2013;15:189–95.CrossRef Dekker S, Bergström J, Amer-Wåhlin I, Cilliers P. Complicated, complex and compliant: best practice in obstetrics. Cogn Tech Work. 2013;15:189–95.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Ragusa A, Gizzo S, Noventa M, Ferrazzi E, Deiana S, Svelato A. Prevention of primary caesarean delivery: comprehensive management of dystocia in nulliparous patients at term. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016;294:753–61.CrossRef Ragusa A, Gizzo S, Noventa M, Ferrazzi E, Deiana S, Svelato A. Prevention of primary caesarean delivery: comprehensive management of dystocia in nulliparous patients at term. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016;294:753–61.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Robson MS. Classification of caesarean sections. Fetal Maternal Rev. 2001;12:23–39.CrossRef Robson MS. Classification of caesarean sections. Fetal Maternal Rev. 2001;12:23–39.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference WHO recommendations: Intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018. WHO recommendations: Intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018.
21.
go back to reference Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. The Use of Electronic Fetal Monitoring: The Use and Interpretation of Cardiotocography in Intrapartum Fetal Monitoring. 8. London: RCOG Press; 2001. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. The Use of Electronic Fetal Monitoring: The Use and Interpretation of Cardiotocography in Intrapartum Fetal Monitoring. 8. London: RCOG Press; 2001.
22.
go back to reference Sibanda T, Fox R, Draycott TJ, et al. Intrapartum care quality indicators: a systematic approach for achieving consensus. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013;166:23–9.CrossRef Sibanda T, Fox R, Draycott TJ, et al. Intrapartum care quality indicators: a systematic approach for achieving consensus. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013;166:23–9.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Sprague AE, Dunn SI, Fell DB, et al. Measuring quality in maternalnewborn care: developing a clinical dashboard. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2013;35:29–38.CrossRef Sprague AE, Dunn SI, Fell DB, et al. Measuring quality in maternalnewborn care: developing a clinical dashboard. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2013;35:29–38.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Khan K. Chief editors of journals participating in the CI. The CROWN initiative: journal editors invite researchers to develop core outcomes in women's health. BJOG. 2016;123(Suppl 3):103–4.CrossRef Khan K. Chief editors of journals participating in the CI. The CROWN initiative: journal editors invite researchers to develop core outcomes in women's health. BJOG. 2016;123(Suppl 3):103–4.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Morese A, Ragusa A. Organizzazione e formazione nelle urgenze ed emergenze in sala parto. In: Ragusa A, Crescini C, editors. Urgenze ed Emergenze in Sala Parto. Piccin Nuova Libraria S.p.A; 2016. p. 3–10. Morese A, Ragusa A. Organizzazione e formazione nelle urgenze ed emergenze in sala parto. In: Ragusa A, Crescini C, editors. Urgenze ed Emergenze in Sala Parto. Piccin Nuova Libraria S.p.A; 2016. p. 3–10.
26.
go back to reference Sen R, Paterson-Brown S. Prioritisation on the delivery suite. Curr Obstet Gynaecol. 2005;15:228–36.CrossRef Sen R, Paterson-Brown S. Prioritisation on the delivery suite. Curr Obstet Gynaecol. 2005;15:228–36.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Svelato A, Di Tommaso M, Spinoso R, Ragusa A. The reduction of first cesarean sections: a cultural issue. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016;95:1319.CrossRef Svelato A, Di Tommaso M, Spinoso R, Ragusa A. The reduction of first cesarean sections: a cultural issue. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016;95:1319.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Oladapo OT, Tunçalp Ö, Bonet M, Lawrie TA, Portela A, Downe S, Gülmezoglu AM. WHO model of intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience: transforming care of women and babies for improved health and wellbeing. BJOG. 2018;125:918–22.CrossRef Oladapo OT, Tunçalp Ö, Bonet M, Lawrie TA, Portela A, Downe S, Gülmezoglu AM. WHO model of intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience: transforming care of women and babies for improved health and wellbeing. BJOG. 2018;125:918–22.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Souza JP, Oladapo OT, Fawole B, Mugerwa RR, Barbosa-Junior F, Oliveira-Ciabati L, Alves D, Gülmezoglu AM. Cervical dilatation over time is a poor predictor of severe adverse birth outcomes: a diagnostic accuracy study. BJOG. 2018;125:991–1000.CrossRef Souza JP, Oladapo OT, Fawole B, Mugerwa RR, Barbosa-Junior F, Oliveira-Ciabati L, Alves D, Gülmezoglu AM. Cervical dilatation over time is a poor predictor of severe adverse birth outcomes: a diagnostic accuracy study. BJOG. 2018;125:991–1000.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Oladapo OT, Diaz V, Bonet M, Abalos E, Thwin SS, Souza H, Perdoná G, Souza JP, Gülmezoglu AM. Cervical dilatation patterns of 'low-risk' women with spontaneous labour and normal perinatal outcomes: a systematic review. BJOG. 2018;125:944–54.CrossRef Oladapo OT, Diaz V, Bonet M, Abalos E, Thwin SS, Souza H, Perdoná G, Souza JP, Gülmezoglu AM. Cervical dilatation patterns of 'low-risk' women with spontaneous labour and normal perinatal outcomes: a systematic review. BJOG. 2018;125:944–54.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Vousden N, Cargill Z, Briley A, Tydeman G, Shennan AH. Caesarean section at full dilatation: incidence, impact and current management. Obstetrician Gynaecologist. 2014;16:199–205.CrossRef Vousden N, Cargill Z, Briley A, Tydeman G, Shennan AH. Caesarean section at full dilatation: incidence, impact and current management. Obstetrician Gynaecologist. 2014;16:199–205.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Souza JP, Betran AP, Dumont A, de Mucio B, Gibbs Pickens CM, Deneux-Tharaux C, Ortiz-Panozo E, Sullivan E, Ota E, Togoobaatar G, Carroli G, Knight H, Zhang J, Cecatti JG, Vogel JP, Jayaratne K, Leal MC, Gissler M, Morisaki N, Lack N, Oladapo OT, Tunçalp Ö, Lumbiganon P, Mori R, Quintana S, Costa Passos AD, Marcolin AC, Zongo A, Blondel B, Hernández B, Hogue CJ, Prunet C, Landman C, Ochir C, Cuesta C, Pileggi-Castro C, Walker D, Alves D, Abalos E, Moises E, Vieira EM, Duarte G, Perdona G, Gurol-Urganci I, Takahiko K, Moscovici L, Campodonico L, Oliveira-Ciabati L, Laopaiboon M, Danansuriya M, Nakamura-Pereira M, Costa ML, Torloni MR, Kramer MR, Borges P, Olkhanud PB, Pérez-Cuevas R, Agampodi SB, Mittal S, Serruya S, Bataglia V, Li Z, Temmerman M, Gülmezoglu AM. A global reference for caesarean section rates (C-Model): a multicountry cross-sectional study. BJOG. 2016;123:427–36.CrossRef Souza JP, Betran AP, Dumont A, de Mucio B, Gibbs Pickens CM, Deneux-Tharaux C, Ortiz-Panozo E, Sullivan E, Ota E, Togoobaatar G, Carroli G, Knight H, Zhang J, Cecatti JG, Vogel JP, Jayaratne K, Leal MC, Gissler M, Morisaki N, Lack N, Oladapo OT, Tunçalp Ö, Lumbiganon P, Mori R, Quintana S, Costa Passos AD, Marcolin AC, Zongo A, Blondel B, Hernández B, Hogue CJ, Prunet C, Landman C, Ochir C, Cuesta C, Pileggi-Castro C, Walker D, Alves D, Abalos E, Moises E, Vieira EM, Duarte G, Perdona G, Gurol-Urganci I, Takahiko K, Moscovici L, Campodonico L, Oliveira-Ciabati L, Laopaiboon M, Danansuriya M, Nakamura-Pereira M, Costa ML, Torloni MR, Kramer MR, Borges P, Olkhanud PB, Pérez-Cuevas R, Agampodi SB, Mittal S, Serruya S, Bataglia V, Li Z, Temmerman M, Gülmezoglu AM. A global reference for caesarean section rates (C-Model): a multicountry cross-sectional study. BJOG. 2016;123:427–36.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Brook RH, Chassin MR, Fink A, Solomon DH, Kosecoff J, Park RE. A method for the detailed assessment of the appropriateness of medical technologies. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1986;2:53–63.CrossRef Brook RH, Chassin MR, Fink A, Solomon DH, Kosecoff J, Park RE. A method for the detailed assessment of the appropriateness of medical technologies. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1986;2:53–63.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Park RE, Fink A, Brook RH, Chassin MR, Kahn KL, Merrick NJ, et al. Physician ratings of appropriate indications for six medical and surgical procedures. Am J Public Health. 1986;76:766–72.CrossRef Park RE, Fink A, Brook RH, Chassin MR, Kahn KL, Merrick NJ, et al. Physician ratings of appropriate indications for six medical and surgical procedures. Am J Public Health. 1986;76:766–72.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Boatin AA, Schlotheuber A, Betran AP, Moller AB, Barros AJD, Boerma T, Torloni MR, Victora CG, Hosseinpoor AR. Within country inequalities in caesarean section rates: observational study of 72 low and middle income countries. BMJ. 2018;360:k55.CrossRef Boatin AA, Schlotheuber A, Betran AP, Moller AB, Barros AJD, Boerma T, Torloni MR, Victora CG, Hosseinpoor AR. Within country inequalities in caesarean section rates: observational study of 72 low and middle income countries. BMJ. 2018;360:k55.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Blomberg M. Avoiding the first cesarean section – results of structured organizational and cultural changes. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016;95:580–6.CrossRef Blomberg M. Avoiding the first cesarean section – results of structured organizational and cultural changes. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016;95:580–6.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Fenaroli V, Molgora S, Dodaro S, Svelato A, Gesi L, Molidoro G, Saita E, Ragusa A. The childbirth experience: obstetric and psychological predictors in Italian primiparous women. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19(1):419.CrossRef Fenaroli V, Molgora S, Dodaro S, Svelato A, Gesi L, Molidoro G, Saita E, Ragusa A. The childbirth experience: obstetric and psychological predictors in Italian primiparous women. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19(1):419.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Lunze K, Higgins-Steele A, Simen-Kapeu A, Vesel L, Kim J, Dickson K. Innovative approaches for improving maternal and newborn health--a landscape analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15:337.CrossRef Lunze K, Higgins-Steele A, Simen-Kapeu A, Vesel L, Kim J, Dickson K. Innovative approaches for improving maternal and newborn health--a landscape analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15:337.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Lavin T, Preen DB. Term infants born at home in Peru are less likely to be hospitalised in the neonatal period than those born in hospital. Paediatr Int Child Health. 2017;37(3):210–6.CrossRef Lavin T, Preen DB. Term infants born at home in Peru are less likely to be hospitalised in the neonatal period than those born in hospital. Paediatr Int Child Health. 2017;37(3):210–6.CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Olsen O, Clausen JA. Planned hospital birth versus planned home birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;9:CD000352.PubMedCentral Olsen O, Clausen JA. Planned hospital birth versus planned home birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;9:CD000352.PubMedCentral
42.
go back to reference Homer CS, Thornton C, Scarf VL, Ellwood DA, Oats JJ, Foureur MJ, Sibbritt D, McLachlan HL, Forster DA, Dahlen HG. Birthplace in New South Wales, Australia: an analysis of perinatal outcomes using routinely collected data. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14:206.CrossRef Homer CS, Thornton C, Scarf VL, Ellwood DA, Oats JJ, Foureur MJ, Sibbritt D, McLachlan HL, Forster DA, Dahlen HG. Birthplace in New South Wales, Australia: an analysis of perinatal outcomes using routinely collected data. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14:206.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
General methods for measuring and comparing medical interventions in childbirth: a framework
Authors
Alessandro Svelato
Antonio Ragusa
Piero Manfredi
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2393
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-02945-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2020 Go to the issue