Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Abdominal Radiology 5/2006

01-10-2006

Screening of patients after colectomy: virtual colonography

Authors: P. Leonardou, K. Striggaris, P. Pappas, D. Filippou, I. Bramis, N. Tsavaris, A. Gouliamos, L. Vlachos

Published in: Abdominal Radiology | Issue 5/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Virtual colonography is a powerful new method of imaging the entire colon and is useful to assess polyps and diagnose colon cancer. We evaluated virtual colonography in the postoperative screening of patients who had colon cancer.

Methods

Fifty-three patients were examined with virtual colonography 12 to 48 months postoperatively. Forty-four patients had received segmental colectomy with restoration of the gastrointestinal tract, and nine patients underwent abdominoperineal resection and permanent colostomy. After proper cleaning of the colon and distention with air, spiral computed tomographic examination of the abdomen with a slice thickness of 5 mm (table speed [TS] 10 mm, reconstruction interval [RI] 2.5 mm) was performed in the supine and prone positions (including intravenous contrast medium infusion). Images were transferred to a separate workstation (Philips Easy Vision) for postprocessing, three-dimensional rendering, and endoluminal viewing.

Results

Eleven recurrences (16.41%) were identified in 10 patients by virtual colonography, but one recurrence was missed. Conventional colonoscopy was incomplete in six cases, and two patients with colostomy refused colonoscopy. In these eight cases (15%), virtual colonoscopy was completed without problems. A second tumor in one patient who had received abdominoperineal resection was demonstrated by virtual colonography, but conventional colonoscopy failed to demonstrate the lesion. Liver metastases were identified in only one patient.

Conclusions

Virtual colonography seems to provide a good alternative in the follow-up of patients after colectomy. The technique is effective in the diagnosis of locoregional recurrences and distant metastases and is well accepted by patients, and results are equal to those of the conventional colonoscopy.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Winawer S, Fletcher R, Miller L, et al. Colorectal cancer screening: clinical guidelines and rationale. Gastroenterology 1997;112:594–642PubMedCrossRef Winawer S, Fletcher R, Miller L, et al. Colorectal cancer screening: clinical guidelines and rationale. Gastroenterology 1997;112:594–642PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Desch C, Benson A, Smith P, et al. Recommended colorectal cancer surveillance guidelines by the American Society of Clinical Oncology. J Clin Oncol 1999;17:1312–1321PubMed Desch C, Benson A, Smith P, et al. Recommended colorectal cancer surveillance guidelines by the American Society of Clinical Oncology. J Clin Oncol 1999;17:1312–1321PubMed
3.
go back to reference Kelvin F, Maglinte D. State of the art. Colorectal carcinoma: a radiological and clinical review. Radiology 1987;164:1–8PubMed Kelvin F, Maglinte D. State of the art. Colorectal carcinoma: a radiological and clinical review. Radiology 1987;164:1–8PubMed
4.
go back to reference Johnson C, Dachman A. CT colonography: the next colon screening examination? Radiology 2000;216:331–341PubMed Johnson C, Dachman A. CT colonography: the next colon screening examination? Radiology 2000;216:331–341PubMed
5.
go back to reference McFarland E, Brink J. Helical CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy): the challenge that exists between advancing technology and generalizability. AJR 1999;173:549–559PubMed McFarland E, Brink J. Helical CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy): the challenge that exists between advancing technology and generalizability. AJR 1999;173:549–559PubMed
6.
go back to reference Chaoui A, Blake MA, Barish M, Fenlon HM. Virtual colonoscopy and colorectal cancer screening. Abdom Imaging 2000;25:361–367PubMedCrossRef Chaoui A, Blake MA, Barish M, Fenlon HM. Virtual colonoscopy and colorectal cancer screening. Abdom Imaging 2000;25:361–367PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Winawer S, Zauber A, Ho M, et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. N Engl J Med 1993;328:1365–1371CrossRef Winawer S, Zauber A, Ho M, et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. N Engl J Med 1993;328:1365–1371CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Rex DK, Rahmani E, Haseman J, et al. Relative sensitivity of colonoscopy and barium enema for detection of colorectal cancer in clinical practise. Gastroenterology 1997;112:17–23PubMedCrossRef Rex DK, Rahmani E, Haseman J, et al. Relative sensitivity of colonoscopy and barium enema for detection of colorectal cancer in clinical practise. Gastroenterology 1997;112:17–23PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Rex D, Cutler C, Lemmel G, et al. Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Gastroenterology 1997;112:24–28PubMedCrossRef Rex D, Cutler C, Lemmel G, et al. Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Gastroenterology 1997;112:24–28PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Papalardo G, Polettini E, Fratarroli F, et al. Magnetic resonance colonography versus conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colonic endoluminal lesions. Gastroenterology 2000;119:300–304CrossRef Papalardo G, Polettini E, Fratarroli F, et al. Magnetic resonance colonography versus conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colonic endoluminal lesions. Gastroenterology 2000;119:300–304CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Morrin MM, Kryskal J, Farell G, et al. Role of virtual computed colonography in patients with colorectal cancers and obstructing colorectal lesions. Dis Colon Rectum 2000;43:303–311PubMedCrossRef Morrin MM, Kryskal J, Farell G, et al. Role of virtual computed colonography in patients with colorectal cancers and obstructing colorectal lesions. Dis Colon Rectum 2000;43:303–311PubMedCrossRef
13.
14.
go back to reference Spinzi G, Belloni G, Martegani A, et al. Computed tomographic colography and conventional colonoscopy for colon disease: a prospective blinded study. Am J Gastroenterol 2001;96:394–400PubMedCrossRef Spinzi G, Belloni G, Martegani A, et al. Computed tomographic colography and conventional colonoscopy for colon disease: a prospective blinded study. Am J Gastroenterol 2001;96:394–400PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Fenlon H, Clarke PD, Ferrucci J. Virtual colonoscopy: imaging features with colonoscopic correlation. AJR 1998;170:1303–1309PubMed Fenlon H, Clarke PD, Ferrucci J. Virtual colonoscopy: imaging features with colonoscopic correlation. AJR 1998;170:1303–1309PubMed
16.
go back to reference Luboldt W, Fletcher J, Vogl T. Colonography: current status, research directions and challenges. Update 2002. Eur Radiol 2002;12:502–524PubMed Luboldt W, Fletcher J, Vogl T. Colonography: current status, research directions and challenges. Update 2002. Eur Radiol 2002;12:502–524PubMed
Metadata
Title
Screening of patients after colectomy: virtual colonography
Authors
P. Leonardou
K. Striggaris
P. Pappas
D. Filippou
I. Bramis
N. Tsavaris
A. Gouliamos
L. Vlachos
Publication date
01-10-2006
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Abdominal Radiology / Issue 5/2006
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Electronic ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-005-0120-3

Other articles of this Issue 5/2006

Abdominal Radiology 5/2006 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine