Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Supportive Care in Cancer
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer 2/2011

Open Access 01-02-2011 | Original Article

Screening for psychological distress in patients with lung cancer: results of a clinical audit evaluating the use of the patient Distress Thermometer

Authors: Johanna Lynch, Frances Goodhart, Yolande Saunders, Stephen J. O’Connor

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 2/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Patients with lung cancer frequently suffer psychological distress and guidelines in the United Kingdom recommend screening of all cancer patients for this problem. The audit investigated use of the Distress Thermometer in terms of staff adherence to locally developed guidelines, patient willingness to use the tool, its impact on referral rates to clinical psychology services and concordance between the tool and the clinical assessment.

Method

Use of the Distress Thermometer was audited over a 3-month period in one lung cancer outpatient clinic. Referrals to clinical psychology services in response to clearly delineated referral indicators were assessed. Patient-reported outcomes were compared with practitioner assessment of need during clinical consultations to see whether the tool was measuring distress effectively.

Results

Thirty three of 34 patients used the Distress Thermometer during the audit period. Ten reported distress levels above 4 in the emotional or family problems domains. On ten occasions, the clinical interview identified problems not elicited by the Distress Thermometer. Guidelines were adhered to by staff, and patients were offered information about local support services and referral to clinical psychology services where indicated. Whilst all patients were happy to receive written information about further sources of support, none wanted to be referred to psychological services at that time.

Conclusions

The Distress Thermometer is acceptable to patients with lung cancer in outpatient settings but it did not increase referrals for psychological support. Staff found it to be a useful tool in opening up communication about patient issues although it should not replace a comprehensive clinical interview.
Literature
1.
Adams C, Clover K, Carter G (2005) Concurrent validity of the Distress Thermometer with other validated measures of psychological distress. Asia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology 1(Suppl):A15
2.
Akizuki N, Akechi T, Nakanishi T, Elsho Y, Okamura M, Nakano T, Murakami Y, Uchitomi Y (2003) Development of a brief screening interview for adjustment disorders and major depression in patients with cancer. Cancer 97(10):2605–2613PubMedCrossRef
3.
Argyle M (1994) The psychology of social class. Routledge, London
4.
Bloom JR (2000) The role of family support in cancer control. In: Braider L, Cooper CL, De-Nour A (eds) Cancer and the family. Wiley, Chichester, pp 49–75
5.
Boudioni M, Mossman J, Boulton M, Ramirez A, Moynihan C, Leydon G (2000) An evaluation of a cancer counselling service. Eur J Cancer Care 9(4):212–220CrossRef
6.
Bowling A (2002) Research methods in health: Investigating health and health services. Open University Press, Maidenhead
7.
Braine ME (2006) Clinical governance: applying theory to practice. Nursing Standard 20(20):56–65PubMed
8.
Cardy P, Corner J, Evans J (2006) Worried sick: the emotional impact of cancer. [online] Available from: www.macmillan.org.uk (Accessed 24 October 2006)
9.
Carlson LE, Angen M, Cullum J, Goodey E, Koopmans J, Lamont L, MacRae JH, Martin M, Pelletier G, Robinson J, Simpson JSA, Speca M, Tillotson L, Bultz BD (2004) High levels of untreated distress and fatigue in cancer patients. Br J Cancer 90(12):2297–2304PubMed
10.
Claessens MT, Lynn J, Zhong A, Desbiens NA, Philips RS, Albert W, Harrell FE, Connors AF (2000) Dying with lung cancer or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Insights from SUPPORT. J Am Geriatr Soc 48(Suppl):146–153
11.
Cooley ME, Short TH, Moriarty HJ (2003) Symptom prevalence, distress, and change over time in adults receiving treatment for lung cancer. Psycho-Oncology 12:694–708PubMedCrossRef
12.
Darby S, Marr J, Crump A, Scurfield M (1999) Older people, nursing and mental health. Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford
13.
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 4th Ed (DSM-IV-TR) (2000) Washington: American Psychiatric Association
14.
Dugan W, McDonald M, Passik D, Rosenfield BD, Theobald D, Edgerton S (1998) Use of the Zung self-rating depression scale in cancer patients: feasibility as a screening tool. Psycho-oncology 7:483–493PubMedCrossRef
15.
Fallowfield L, Ratcliffe D, Jenkins V, Saul J (2001) Psychiatric morbidity and its recognition by doctors in patients with cancer. Br J Cancer 84(8):1011–1015PubMedCrossRef
16.
Gessler S, Low J, Daniells E, Williams R, Brough V, Tookman A, Jones C (2008) Screening for distress in cancer patients: is the Distress Thermometer a valid measure in the UK and does it measure change over time? A prospective validation study. Psychooncology 17(6):538–547PubMedCrossRef
17.
Gil F, Grassi L, Travado L, Tomamichel M, Gonzalez JR (2005) Use of distress and depression thermometers to measure psychosocial morbidity among southern European cancer patients. Support Care Cancer 13(8):600–606PubMedCrossRef
18.
Gilbody SM, House AO, Sheldon TA (2001) Routinely administered questionnaires for depression and anxiety: systematic review. Br Med J 322(7283):406–409CrossRef
19.
Goffman E (1963) Stigma: notes on the management of spoiled identity. Penguin, London
20.
Goldberg D, Williams P (1988) A user’s guide to the General Health Questionnaire. NFER-Nelson, Windsor
21.
Hansen HH (2000) Textbook of lung cancer. Dunitz, London
22.
Harvey G, Wensing M (2003) Methods for evaluation of small scale quality improvement projects. Qual Safe Health Care 12(3):210–214CrossRef
23.
Hoffman BM, Zevon MA, D’Arrigo MC, Cecchini TB (2004) Screening for distress in cancer patients: the NCCN Rapid-Screening Measure. Psycho-Oncology 13(11):792–799PubMedCrossRef
24.
Holland J et al (1999) NCCN practice guidelines for the management of psychosocial distress: national comprehensive cancer network proceedings. Oncology 13(Suppl A):113–147
25.
Hopwood P, Stephens RJ (2000) Depression in patients with lung cancer: prevalence and risk factors from quality-of-life data. J Clin Oncol 18(4):893–903PubMed
26.
Hughes R (2005) Is audit research? The relationship between clinical audit and social research. Int J Health Care Quality Assur 18(4):289–299CrossRef
27.
Jacobsen PB, Donovan KA, Trask PC, Fleishman SB, Zabora J, Baker F, Holland JC (2005) Screening for psychological distress in ambulatory cancer patients. A multicenter evaluation of the Distress Thermometer. Cancer 103(7):1494–1502PubMedCrossRef
28.
Katona C, Livingston G (2000) Impact of screening old people with physical illness for depression? Lancet 356(9224):91–92PubMedCrossRef
29.
Kogan M, Redfern S (1995) Making use of clinical audit. Open University Press, Buckingham
30.
Larouche S, Edgar L (2004) The measure of distress: a practical thermometer for outpatient screening. Oncol Exchange 3(3):34–39
31.
Madden J (2006) Use of the Distress Thermometer as a means of effectively assessing emotional distress in patients with cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum 33(2):484–485
32.
McDonald MV, Passik SD, Dugan W, Rosenfeld B, Theobald DE, Edgerton S (1999) Nurses recognition of depression in their patients with cancer. Oncol Nurses Forum 26(3):593–599
33.
Murphy S (2000) Provision of psychotherapy services for older people. Psychiatric Bulletin 24:184–187CrossRef
34.
35.
National Institute for Clinical Excellence (2002) Principles for best practice in clinical audit. Radcliffe, Oxon
36.
National Institute for Clinical Excellence (2004) Improving supportive and palliative care for adults with cancer: the manual. The Stationary Office, London
37.
Ollerton I (1995) Class barriers to psychotherapy and counselling. J Psychiatric Mental Health Nurs 2(2):91–95CrossRef
38.
Passik SD, Dugan W, McDonald MV, Rosenfeld B, Theobald DE, Edgerton S (1998) Oncologists’ recognition of depression in their patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol 16(4):1594–1600PubMed
39.
Reid-Pointe P (1992) Distress in cancer patient and primary nurses’ empathy skills. Cancer Nurs 15:283–293
40.
Roth AJ, Kornblith AB, Batel-Copel L, Peabody E, Scher HI, Holland JC (1998) Rapid screening for psychological distress in men with prostate cancer. A pilot study. Cancer 82(10):1904–1908PubMedCrossRef
41.
Sapsford R, Jupp V (1996) Data collection and analysis. Sage, London
42.
Trask P, Paterson A, Riba M, Brines B, Griffith K, Parker P, Weick J, Steele P, Kyro K, Ferrara J (2002) Assessment of psychological distress in prospective bone marrow transplant patients. Bone Marrow Transplant 29:917–925PubMedCrossRef
43.
Vachon M (2006) Psychosocial distress and coping after cancer treatment. Am J Nurs 106(3), (Suppl):26–31PubMed
44.
Zabora J, Brintzenhofeszoc K, Curbow B, Hooker C, Piantadosi S (2001) The prevalence of psychological distress by cancer site. Psycho-Oncol 10(1):19–28CrossRef
45.
Zabora J, Brintzenhofeszoc K, Jacobsen P, Curbow B, Piantadosi S, Hooker C, Owens A, Derogatis L (2001) A new psychosocial screening instrument for use with cancer patients. Psychosomatics 42(3):241–246PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Screening for psychological distress in patients with lung cancer: results of a clinical audit evaluating the use of the patient Distress Thermometer
Authors
Johanna Lynch
Frances Goodhart
Yolande Saunders
Stephen J. O’Connor
Publication date
01-02-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 2/2011
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-009-0799-8

Other articles of this Issue 2/2011

Supportive Care in Cancer 2/2011 Go to the issue

Original Article

Antihypertensive medication adherence in cancer survivors and its affecting factors: results of a Korean population-based study

Original Article

Incidence of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) infection in high-risk febrile neutropenic patients colonized with VRE

Original Article

Impact of changes in reimbursement policies and institutional practice algorithm for utilization of erythropoietic-stimulating agents on treatment patterns and costs in anemic lymphoma patients

Original Article

Transitoriness in cancer patients: a cross-sectional survey of lung and gastrointestinal cancer patients

Short Communication

Progress of oral care and reduction of oral mucositis—a pilot study in a hematopoietic stem cell transplantation ward

Original Article

From inside the bubble: migrants’ perceptions of communication with the cancer team
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Watch now

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Image Credits