Skip to main content
Top

13-04-2024 | Scoliosis | Original Article

Early-term outcome of apical fusion with vertebral body tethering for thoracolumbar curves in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a preliminary study

Authors: Per D. Trobisch, Hong-Jin Kim, Stephanie Da Paz, Mahmoud Alkharsawi, Rene Castelein, Dong-Gune Chang

Published in: European Spine Journal

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Vertebral body tethering (VBT) has become an alternative option for select patients with idiopathic scoliosis. However, studies have shown a high number of tether breakages, specifically after thoracolumbar (TL) VBT, that can have a negative impact on the outcome, when the breakage occurs within the first year after surgery. In order to overcome this problem, we have started to apply an apical fusion (AF) in combination with TL VBT for select patients. This study aims to analyze the outcome after AF plus VBT.

Methods

This is a retrospective single surgeon’s data analysis. All patients were included who have had TL VBT after January 2022 and a follow-up of 12 months. Patients were grouped based on whether they only had VBT or VBT + AF.

Results

Twenty-five patients were analyzed (15 VBT, 10 VBT + AF). Both groups showed a significant curve correction for thoracic and TL curves. Minor loss of correction was observed in both groups. A significant difference was seen regarding early tether breakages, which were found in 60% of VBT patients and 10% of VBT + AF patients.

Conclusion

The preliminary data shows a significant reduction of early tether breakages when TL VBT is applied in combination with AF.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Samdani AF, Ames RJ, Kimball JS et al (2014) Anterior vertebral body tethering for idiopathic scoliosis: 2-year results. Spine 39:1688–1693CrossRefPubMed Samdani AF, Ames RJ, Kimball JS et al (2014) Anterior vertebral body tethering for idiopathic scoliosis: 2-year results. Spine 39:1688–1693CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Pehlivanoglu T, Oltulu I, Ofluoglu E et al (2020) Thoracoscopic vertebral body tethering for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a minimum of 2 years’ results of 21 patients. J Pediatr Orthop 40:575–580CrossRefPubMed Pehlivanoglu T, Oltulu I, Ofluoglu E et al (2020) Thoracoscopic vertebral body tethering for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a minimum of 2 years’ results of 21 patients. J Pediatr Orthop 40:575–580CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Hoernschemeyer DG, Boeyer ME, Robertson ME et al (2020) Anterior vertebral body tethering for adolescent scoliosis with growth remaining: a retrospective review of 2 to 5-year postoperative results. J Bone Joint Surg Am 102:1169–1176CrossRefPubMed Hoernschemeyer DG, Boeyer ME, Robertson ME et al (2020) Anterior vertebral body tethering for adolescent scoliosis with growth remaining: a retrospective review of 2 to 5-year postoperative results. J Bone Joint Surg Am 102:1169–1176CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Alanay A, Yucekul A, Abul K et al (2020) Thoracoscopic vertebral body tethering for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: follow-up curve behavior according to sanders skeletal maturity staging. Spine 45:E1483–E1492CrossRefPubMed Alanay A, Yucekul A, Abul K et al (2020) Thoracoscopic vertebral body tethering for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: follow-up curve behavior according to sanders skeletal maturity staging. Spine 45:E1483–E1492CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Pehlivanoglu T, Oltulu I, Erdag Y et al (2021) Double-sided vertebral body tethering of double adolescent idiopathic scoliosis curves: radiographic outcomes of the first 13 patients with 2 years of follow-up. Eur Spine J 30:1896–1904CrossRefPubMed Pehlivanoglu T, Oltulu I, Erdag Y et al (2021) Double-sided vertebral body tethering of double adolescent idiopathic scoliosis curves: radiographic outcomes of the first 13 patients with 2 years of follow-up. Eur Spine J 30:1896–1904CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Trobisch PD, Kobbe P, Baroncini A (2020) Dynamic scoliosis correction as alternative treatment for patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a non-fusion surgical technique. Z Orthop Unfall 158:641–646CrossRefPubMed Trobisch PD, Kobbe P, Baroncini A (2020) Dynamic scoliosis correction as alternative treatment for patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a non-fusion surgical technique. Z Orthop Unfall 158:641–646CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Trobisch PD, Baroncini A (2021) Preliminary outcomes after vertebral body tethering (VBT) for lumbar curves and subanalysis of a 1- versus a 2-tether construct. Eur Spine J 30:3570–3576CrossRefPubMed Trobisch PD, Baroncini A (2021) Preliminary outcomes after vertebral body tethering (VBT) for lumbar curves and subanalysis of a 1- versus a 2-tether construct. Eur Spine J 30:3570–3576CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Mathew SE, Milbrandt TA, Larson AN (2022) Measurable lumbar motion remains 1 year after vertebral body tethering. J Pediatr Orthop 42:e861–e867CrossRefPubMed Mathew SE, Milbrandt TA, Larson AN (2022) Measurable lumbar motion remains 1 year after vertebral body tethering. J Pediatr Orthop 42:e861–e867CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Trobisch PD, Castelein R, Da Paz S (2023) Radiographic outcome after vertebral body tethering of the lumbar spine. Eur Spine J 32:1895–1900CrossRefPubMed Trobisch PD, Castelein R, Da Paz S (2023) Radiographic outcome after vertebral body tethering of the lumbar spine. Eur Spine J 32:1895–1900CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Boeyer ME, Farid S, Wiesemann S, Hoernschemeyer DG (2023) Outcomes of vertebral body tethering in the lumbar spine. Spine Deform 11:909–918CrossRefPubMed Boeyer ME, Farid S, Wiesemann S, Hoernschemeyer DG (2023) Outcomes of vertebral body tethering in the lumbar spine. Spine Deform 11:909–918CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Baroncini A, Migliorini F, Eschweiler J, Hildebrand F, Trobisch P (2022) The timing of tether breakage influences clinical results after vbt. Eur Spine J 31:2362–2367CrossRefPubMed Baroncini A, Migliorini F, Eschweiler J, Hildebrand F, Trobisch P (2022) The timing of tether breakage influences clinical results after vbt. Eur Spine J 31:2362–2367CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Shankar D, Eaker L, von Treuheim TDP et al (2022) Anterior vertebral body tethering for idiopathic scoliosis: how well does the tether hold up? Spine Deform 10:799–809CrossRefPubMed Shankar D, Eaker L, von Treuheim TDP et al (2022) Anterior vertebral body tethering for idiopathic scoliosis: how well does the tether hold up? Spine Deform 10:799–809CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Yang MJ, Samdani AF, Pahys JM et al (2023) What happens after a vertebral body tether break? Incidence, location, and progression with five-year follow-up. Spine 48:742–747CrossRefPubMed Yang MJ, Samdani AF, Pahys JM et al (2023) What happens after a vertebral body tether break? Incidence, location, and progression with five-year follow-up. Spine 48:742–747CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Baroncini A, Trobisch P, Eschweiler J, Migliorini F (2022) Analysis of the risk factors for early tether breakage following vertebral body tethering in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 31:2348–2354CrossRefPubMed Baroncini A, Trobisch P, Eschweiler J, Migliorini F (2022) Analysis of the risk factors for early tether breakage following vertebral body tethering in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 31:2348–2354CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Nicolini LF, Kobbe P, Seggewiß J et al (2022) Motion preserving surgery for scoliosis with a vertebral body tethering system: a biomechanical study. Eur Spine J 31:1013–1021CrossRefPubMed Nicolini LF, Kobbe P, Seggewiß J et al (2022) Motion preserving surgery for scoliosis with a vertebral body tethering system: a biomechanical study. Eur Spine J 31:1013–1021CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Trobisch P, Baroncini A, Berrer A, Da Paz S (2022) Difference between radiographically suspected and intraoperatively confirmed tether breakages after vertebral body tethering for idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 31:1045–1050CrossRefPubMed Trobisch P, Baroncini A, Berrer A, Da Paz S (2022) Difference between radiographically suspected and intraoperatively confirmed tether breakages after vertebral body tethering for idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 31:1045–1050CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Larson AN, Marks MC, Gonzalez Sepulveda JM et al (2024) Non-fusion versus fusion surgery in pediatric idiopathic scoliosis: what trade-offs in outcomes are acceptable for the patient and family? J Bone Joint Surg Am 106:2–9CrossRefPubMed Larson AN, Marks MC, Gonzalez Sepulveda JM et al (2024) Non-fusion versus fusion surgery in pediatric idiopathic scoliosis: what trade-offs in outcomes are acceptable for the patient and family? J Bone Joint Surg Am 106:2–9CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Early-term outcome of apical fusion with vertebral body tethering for thoracolumbar curves in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a preliminary study
Authors
Per D. Trobisch
Hong-Jin Kim
Stephanie Da Paz
Mahmoud Alkharsawi
Rene Castelein
Dong-Gune Chang
Publication date
13-04-2024
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Keyword
Scoliosis
Published in
European Spine Journal
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-024-08242-5