Skip to main content
Top
Published in: HSS Journal ® 2/2020

01-12-2020 | Scoliosis | Original Article

The Clavicle Continues to Grow During Adolescence and Early Adulthood

Authors: Jessica L. Hughes, MD, Peter O. Newton, MD, Tracey Bastrom, MS, Peter D. Fabricant, MD, MPH, Andrew T. Pennock, MD

Published in: HSS Journal ® | Special Issue 2/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

As more adults undergo surgical fixation of clavicle fractures with improved outcomes, interest is renewed in managing clavicle fractures in adolescents. The medial clavicular physis does not fuse until 23 to 25 years of age, but studies report minimal clavicular growth during adolescence—studies that employed cross-sectional methodologies, which cannot not capture growth in patients over time. The assumption that clavicle length at each stage is uniform, as is the final overall length, may not be accurate if the age groups studied comprise various ethnicities, socioeconomic status, or height.

Questions/Purposes

We sought to quantify longitudinal clavicular growth on serial radiographs in adolescents and young adults. Our hypothesis was that substantial clavicular growth would be seen beyond the age of 12 years.

Methods

We conducted a longitudinal case series of non-syndromic patients in a single orthopedic clinic and analyzed serial radiographic images of the clavicles. For ethical reasons, only patients with non-neuromuscular scoliosis and kyphosis (in whom the existing standard of care includes serial thoracic radiographs) were considered for inclusion. Patients ages 10 to 25 years old were included in the study if three or more serial thoracic radiographs over a minimum 5 years were available that captured the entire length of at least one non-rotated clavicle. Three types of radiographs were included for analysis: digital low-dose-radiation stereoradiographic (EOS Imaging, Paris, France), non-EOS digital, and non-EOS printed. The overall longitudinal growth, yearly growth, and the yearly growth percentage were calculated for each clavicle.

Results

Fifty-seven patients (22 male and 35 female) met the inclusion criteria. In male patients, at ages 12 to 15 years, the clavicular growth was 4.9 mm/year, or 4%/year; at ages 16 to 19 years, growth was 3.2 mm/year, or 2.4%/year; and at ages 20 to 25 years, growth was 1.7 mm/year, or 1.1%/year. In female patients, at ages 12 to 15 years, growth was 4.7 mm/year, or 4%/year; at 16 to 19 years, growth was 2.2 mm/year, or 1.7%/year; and at ages 20 to 25 years, growth was 0.2 mm/year or 0.1%/year. We could not detect the age of terminal growth in either sex because growth was ongoing in most patients in the oldest group.

Conclusion

We found substantial clavicular growth potential after age 18 years, when growth is thought to be nearly finished, as well as remodeling potential even up to age 25 years. Further research is needed, but our findings suggest that strategies for managing clavicle fracture in adults may not be applied universally to adolescents and young adults.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Abraham E. Remodeling potential of long bones following angular osteotomies. J Pediatr Orthop. 1989;9(1):37–43. Abraham E. Remodeling potential of long bones following angular osteotomies. J Pediatr Orthop. 1989;9(1):37–43.
2.
go back to reference Bae DS, Shah AS, Kalish LA, Kwon JY, Waters PM. Shoulder motion, strength, and functional outcomes in children with established malunion of the clavicle. J Pediatr Orthop. 2013;33(5):544–550. Bae DS, Shah AS, Kalish LA, Kwon JY, Waters PM. Shoulder motion, strength, and functional outcomes in children with established malunion of the clavicle. J Pediatr Orthop. 2013;33(5):544–550.
3.
go back to reference Black S, Scheuer L. Age changes in the clavicle: from the early neonatal period to skeletal maturity. Int J Osteoarchaeol. 1996;6(5):425–434. Black S, Scheuer L. Age changes in the clavicle: from the early neonatal period to skeletal maturity. Int J Osteoarchaeol. 1996;6(5):425–434.
4.
go back to reference Canadian Orthopaedic Trauma Society. Nonoperative treatment compared with plate fixation of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures. A multicenter, randomized clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(1):1–10. Canadian Orthopaedic Trauma Society. Nonoperative treatment compared with plate fixation of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures. A multicenter, randomized clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(1):1–10.
5.
go back to reference Cicchetti DV. Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychol Assess. 1994;6(4):284. Cicchetti DV. Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychol Assess. 1994;6(4):284.
6.
go back to reference Glaser DA, Doan J, Newton PO. Comparison of 3-dimensional spinal reconstruction accuracy: biplanar radiographs with EOS versus computed tomography. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012;37(16):1391–1397. Glaser DA, Doan J, Newton PO. Comparison of 3-dimensional spinal reconstruction accuracy: biplanar radiographs with EOS versus computed tomography. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012;37(16):1391–1397.
7.
go back to reference Heyworth BE, Kocher MS. Shoulder instability in the young athlete. Instr Course Lect. 2013;62:435–444. Heyworth BE, Kocher MS. Shoulder instability in the young athlete. Instr Course Lect. 2013;62:435–444.
8.
go back to reference Heyworth B, Suppan C, Kocher M. Change in the volume of operative treatment of clavicle fractures in children and adolescents: national trends and practice patterns. American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine; 2014. Heyworth B, Suppan C, Kocher M. Change in the volume of operative treatment of clavicle fractures in children and adolescents: national trends and practice patterns. American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine; 2014.
9.
go back to reference Jit I, Kulkarni M. Times of appearance and fusion of epiphysis at the medial end of the clavicle. Indian J Med Res. 1976;64(5):773–782. Jit I, Kulkarni M. Times of appearance and fusion of epiphysis at the medial end of the clavicle. Indian J Med Res. 1976;64(5):773–782.
10.
go back to reference Li Y, Donohue KS, Robbins CB, et al. Reliability of radiographic assessments of adolescent midshaft clavicle fractures by the FACTS Multicenter Study Group. J Orthop Trauma. 2017;31(9):479–484. Li Y, Donohue KS, Robbins CB, et al. Reliability of radiographic assessments of adolescent midshaft clavicle fractures by the FACTS Multicenter Study Group. J Orthop Trauma. 2017;31(9):479–484.
11.
go back to reference Matsumura N, Ikegami H, Nakamichi N, et al. Effect of shortening deformity of the clavicle on scapular kinematics: a cadaveric study. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38(5):1000–1006. Matsumura N, Ikegami H, Nakamichi N, et al. Effect of shortening deformity of the clavicle on scapular kinematics: a cadaveric study. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38(5):1000–1006.
12.
go back to reference McGraw MA, Mehlman CT, Lindsell CJ, Kirby CL. Postnatal growth of the clavicle: birth to 18 years of age. J Pediatr Orthop. 2009;29(8):937–943. McGraw MA, Mehlman CT, Lindsell CJ, Kirby CL. Postnatal growth of the clavicle: birth to 18 years of age. J Pediatr Orthop. 2009;29(8):937–943.
13.
go back to reference McKee RC, Whelan DB, Schemitsch EH, McKee MD. Operative versus nonoperative care of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94(8):675–684. McKee RC, Whelan DB, Schemitsch EH, McKee MD. Operative versus nonoperative care of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94(8):675–684.
14.
go back to reference Mehlman CT, Yihua G, Bochang C, Zhigang W. Operative treatment of completely displaced clavicle shaft fractures in children. J Pediatr Orthop. 2009;29(8):851–855. Mehlman CT, Yihua G, Bochang C, Zhigang W. Operative treatment of completely displaced clavicle shaft fractures in children. J Pediatr Orthop. 2009;29(8):851–855.
15.
go back to reference Melhem E, Assi A, El Rachkidi R, Ghanem I. EOS® biplanar X-ray imaging: concept, developments, benefits, and limitations. J Child Orthop. 2016;10(1):1–14. Melhem E, Assi A, El Rachkidi R, Ghanem I. EOS® biplanar X-ray imaging: concept, developments, benefits, and limitations. J Child Orthop. 2016;10(1):1–14.
16.
go back to reference Pandya NK, Namdari S, Hosalkar HS. Displaced clavicle fractures in adolescents: facts, controversies, and current trends. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2012;20(8):498–505. Pandya NK, Namdari S, Hosalkar HS. Displaced clavicle fractures in adolescents: facts, controversies, and current trends. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2012;20(8):498–505.
17.
go back to reference Schulz J, Moor M, Roocroft J, Bastrom TP, Pennock AT. Functional and radiographic outcomes of nonoperative treatment of displaced adolescent clavicle fractures. J Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2013;95(13):1159–1165. Schulz J, Moor M, Roocroft J, Bastrom TP, Pennock AT. Functional and radiographic outcomes of nonoperative treatment of displaced adolescent clavicle fractures. J Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2013;95(13):1159–1165.
18.
go back to reference Shah RR, Kinder J, Peelman J, Moen TC, Sarwark J. Pediatric clavicle and acromioclavicular injuries. J Pediatr Orthop. 2010;30:S69–S72. Shah RR, Kinder J, Peelman J, Moen TC, Sarwark J. Pediatric clavicle and acromioclavicular injuries. J Pediatr Orthop. 2010;30:S69–S72.
19.
go back to reference Suppan CA, Bae DS, Donohue KS, Miller PE, Kocher MS, Heyworth BE. Trends in the volume of operative treatment of midshaft clavicle fractures in children and adolescents: a retrospective, 12-year, single-institution analysis. J Pediatr Orthop. B. 2016;25(4):305–309. Suppan CA, Bae DS, Donohue KS, Miller PE, Kocher MS, Heyworth BE. Trends in the volume of operative treatment of midshaft clavicle fractures in children and adolescents: a retrospective, 12-year, single-institution analysis. J Pediatr Orthop. B. 2016;25(4):305–309.
20.
go back to reference Vander Have KL, Perdue AM, Caird MS, Farley FA. Operative versus nonoperative treatment of midshaft clavicle fractures in adolescents. J Pediatr Orthop. 2010;30(4):307–312. Vander Have KL, Perdue AM, Caird MS, Farley FA. Operative versus nonoperative treatment of midshaft clavicle fractures in adolescents. J Pediatr Orthop. 2010;30(4):307–312.
21.
go back to reference Wallace ME, Hoffman EB. Remodelling of angular deformity after femoral shaft fractures in children. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 1992;74(5):765–769. Wallace ME, Hoffman EB. Remodelling of angular deformity after femoral shaft fractures in children. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 1992;74(5):765–769.
22.
go back to reference Wilkins KE. Principles of fracture remodeling in children. Injury. 2005;36 Suppl 1:A3–A11.CrossRef Wilkins KE. Principles of fracture remodeling in children. Injury. 2005;36 Suppl 1:A3–A11.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Yang S, Werner BC, Gwathmey FW Jr. Treatment trends in adolescent clavicle fractures. J Pediatr Orthop. 2015;35(3):229–233. Yang S, Werner BC, Gwathmey FW Jr. Treatment trends in adolescent clavicle fractures. J Pediatr Orthop. 2015;35(3):229–233.
24.
go back to reference Zlowodzki M, Zelle BA, Cole PA, Jeray K, McKee MD, Evidence-Based Orthopaedic Trauma Working Group. Treatment of acute midshaft clavicle fractures: systematic review of 2144 fractures: on behalf of the Evidence-Based Orthopaedic Trauma Working Group. J Orthop Trauma. 2005;19(7):504–507. Zlowodzki M, Zelle BA, Cole PA, Jeray K, McKee MD, Evidence-Based Orthopaedic Trauma Working Group. Treatment of acute midshaft clavicle fractures: systematic review of 2144 fractures: on behalf of the Evidence-Based Orthopaedic Trauma Working Group. J Orthop Trauma. 2005;19(7):504–507.
Metadata
Title
The Clavicle Continues to Grow During Adolescence and Early Adulthood
Authors
Jessica L. Hughes, MD
Peter O. Newton, MD
Tracey Bastrom, MS
Peter D. Fabricant, MD, MPH
Andrew T. Pennock, MD
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
HSS Journal ® / Issue Special Issue 2/2020
Print ISSN: 1556-3316
Electronic ISSN: 1556-3324
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11420-020-09754-8

Other articles of this Special Issue 2/2020

HSS Journal ® 2/2020 Go to the issue