Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 9/2019

01-09-2019 | Scoliosis | Letter to the Editor

Letter to the editor concerning “Head to pelvis alignment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients both in and out of brace” by Vergari C, Courtois I, Ebermeyer E, Pietton R, Bouloussa H, Vialle R, Skalli W (Eur Spine J; 2019: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-019-05981-8)

Authors: Hans-Rudolf Weiss, Deborah Turnbull

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 9/2019

Login to get access

Excerpt

We thank the authors for this very interesting insight into their investigations of the sagittal plane changes in braced patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). We have a few remarks to make with respect to the content of this study.
  • The authors in their article refer to ‘the brace’ as if there was only one single brace design available. The specific brace used in the study has not been described in any detail; neither has it been documented in a picture, nor did the authors name what kind of brace was used. There are in fact many different brace types currently available on the market. While it is a well-known fact that Boston-style braces reduce lumbar lordosis and increase thoracic flatback, in the recent Chêneau developments (Rigo-Chêneau/Gensingen brace) lumbar lordosis and thoracic kyphosis is implemented. In view of the many different approaches in studies involving braces, (1) the brace should be named, (2) the brace should be shown in at least one picture with a patient in-brace, and (3) the brace should be described in detail including the principles of correction applied, if applicable.
  • In figure 8, an X-ray of a patient with kyphoscoliosis is shown with and without a brace apparently demonstrating that the (undefined) brace used reduces thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis as well. The patient shown in this picture, to the trained individual, does not have a typical distortion usually seen in AIS sagittal alignment (flatback). The pictures shown in figure 8 seem to demonstrate that the brace is flattening the sagittal curvatures both in the thoracic and lumbar regions, which is a negative outcome, seen in typical AIS (flatback) alignments.
  • In figure 8, it is also documented that there is no correction of the Cobb angle in the brace. Therefore, the reasons and aims of using such a brace, to improve or even halt scoliosis progression, need to be further clarified. It is well known that in-brace correction of the Cobb angle and compliance (brace wearing time) are the most important parameters to determine treatment success.
Metadata
Title
Letter to the editor concerning “Head to pelvis alignment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients both in and out of brace” by Vergari C, Courtois I, Ebermeyer E, Pietton R, Bouloussa H, Vialle R, Skalli W (Eur Spine J; 2019: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-019-05981-8)
Authors
Hans-Rudolf Weiss
Deborah Turnbull
Publication date
01-09-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 9/2019
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-019-06049-3

Other articles of this Issue 9/2019

European Spine Journal 9/2019 Go to the issue