Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology 1/2023

Open Access 01-12-2023 | Scaphoid Fracture | Original article

Standard views do not suffice in assessing distal scaphoid articular cannulated screw penetration

Authors: Pierre-Emmanuel Chammas, Maxime Pastor, Michel Chammas, Geert Alexander Buijze

Published in: Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Articular screw penetration is one of the most common hardware-related problems after scaphoid fracture fixation, occurring in up to two-thirds of patients, in particular into the scaphotrapezotrapezoidal (STT) joint. The aim of this study was to investigate whether this clinically important issue could be detected using standard anteroposterior (AP) and lateral, as well as additional nonstandard fluoroscopic views using direct open visualization with magnifying loupes as reference standard.

Materials and methods

Ten fresh cadaver wrists were used for this imaging study. A 2.2 mm cannulated compression screws with a length of 24 mm was placed in the scaphoid and incrementally left to protrude at the STT joint up to 2 mm. Eight fluoroscopic views of the wrist were then obtained by rotating the forearm using goniometric measurements, keeping the image beam parallel to the floor: (1) anteroposterior with the wrist in neutral rotation, (2) anteroposterior with the wrist in ulnar deviation, (3) supinated oblique 60° from neutral (60° supinated oblique), (4) supinated oblique 45° from neutral (45° supinated oblique), (5) a true lateral, (6) a true lateral with the wrist in radial deviation, (7) pronated oblique 45° from neutral (45° pronated oblique), and (8) a pronated oblique 60° from neutral (60° pronated oblique).

Results

Standard anteroposterior and lateral fluoroscopy views (radiographically calibrated) of a percutaneous cannulated screw fixation of a scaphoid fracture were insufficient to detect distal articular penetration, missing half the amount of screw penetrations in the current study. The 45° pronated oblique view was found as the most sensitive in detecting STT penetration (p < 0.0001).

Conclusions

Standard anteroposterior and lateral fluoroscopy views of a percutaneous cannulated screw fixation of a scaphoid waist fracture are insufficient to detect STT screw penetration. According to the current study, standard views would have missed half the amount of screw penetrations, which seems to reflect the high incidence of this problem in current practice. The most sensitive view was the 45° pronated oblique view, which detected STT screw penetration in all cases.
Level of Evidence Not applicable.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Buijze GA, Bulstra AE, Ho PC (2021) Management of complications of scaphoid fracture fixation. In: management of complications in common hand and wrist procedures. FESSH instructional course book 2021, 1st edn. Thieme Publishers, New York, pp 89–104 Buijze GA, Bulstra AE, Ho PC (2021) Management of complications of scaphoid fracture fixation. In: management of complications in common hand and wrist procedures. FESSH instructional course book 2021, 1st edn. Thieme Publishers, New York, pp 89–104
2.
go back to reference Dias JJ, Brealey SD, Fairhurst C et al. (2020) Surgery versus cast immobilisation for adults with a bicortical fracture of the scaphoid waist (SWIFFT): a pragmatic, multicentre, open-label, randomised superiority trial. Lancet Lond Engl 396(10248):390–401CrossRef Dias JJ, Brealey SD, Fairhurst C et al. (2020) Surgery versus cast immobilisation for adults with a bicortical fracture of the scaphoid waist (SWIFFT): a pragmatic, multicentre, open-label, randomised superiority trial. Lancet Lond Engl 396(10248):390–401CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Bushnell BD, McWilliams AD, Messer TM (2007) Complications in dorsal percutaneous cannulated screw fixation of nondisplaced scaphoid waist fractures. J Hand Surg 32(6):827–833CrossRef Bushnell BD, McWilliams AD, Messer TM (2007) Complications in dorsal percutaneous cannulated screw fixation of nondisplaced scaphoid waist fractures. J Hand Surg 32(6):827–833CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Buijze GA, Doornberg JN, Ham JS, Ring D, Bhandari M, Poolman RW (2010) Surgical compared with conservative treatment for acute nondisplaced or minimally displaced scaphoid fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92(6):1534–1544CrossRefPubMed Buijze GA, Doornberg JN, Ham JS, Ring D, Bhandari M, Poolman RW (2010) Surgical compared with conservative treatment for acute nondisplaced or minimally displaced scaphoid fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92(6):1534–1544CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Kim RY, Lijten ECE, Strauch RJ (2008) Pronated oblique view in assessing proximal scaphoid articular cannulated screw penetration. J Hand Surg 33(8):1274–1277CrossRef Kim RY, Lijten ECE, Strauch RJ (2008) Pronated oblique view in assessing proximal scaphoid articular cannulated screw penetration. J Hand Surg 33(8):1274–1277CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Dias J, Brealey S, Cook L et al. (2020) Surgical fixation compared with cast immobilisation for adults with a bicortical fracture of the scaphoid waist: the SWIFFT RCT. Health Technol Assess Winch Engl 24(52):1–234CrossRef Dias J, Brealey S, Cook L et al. (2020) Surgical fixation compared with cast immobilisation for adults with a bicortical fracture of the scaphoid waist: the SWIFFT RCT. Health Technol Assess Winch Engl 24(52):1–234CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Tumilty JA, Squire DS (1996) Unrecognized chondral penetration by a Herbert screw in the scaphoid. J Hand Surg 21(1):66–68CrossRef Tumilty JA, Squire DS (1996) Unrecognized chondral penetration by a Herbert screw in the scaphoid. J Hand Surg 21(1):66–68CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Dias JJ, Dhukaram V, Abhinav A, Bhowal B, Wildin CJ (2008) Clinical and radiological outcome of cast immobilisation versus surgical treatment of acute scaphoid fractures at a mean follow-up of 93 months. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90(7):899–905CrossRefPubMed Dias JJ, Dhukaram V, Abhinav A, Bhowal B, Wildin CJ (2008) Clinical and radiological outcome of cast immobilisation versus surgical treatment of acute scaphoid fractures at a mean follow-up of 93 months. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90(7):899–905CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Saedén B, Törnkvist H, Ponzer S, Höglund M (2001) Fracture of the carpal scaphoid. A prospective, randomised 12-year follow-up comparing operative and conservative treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83(2):230–4CrossRefPubMed Saedén B, Törnkvist H, Ponzer S, Höglund M (2001) Fracture of the carpal scaphoid. A prospective, randomised 12-year follow-up comparing operative and conservative treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83(2):230–4CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Lehman WB, Menche D, Grant A, Norman A, Pugh J (1984) The problem of evaluating in situ pinning of slipped capital femoral epiphysis: an experimental model and a review of 63 consecutive cases. J Pediatr Orthop 4(3):297–303CrossRefPubMed Lehman WB, Menche D, Grant A, Norman A, Pugh J (1984) The problem of evaluating in situ pinning of slipped capital femoral epiphysis: an experimental model and a review of 63 consecutive cases. J Pediatr Orthop 4(3):297–303CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Patel S, Giugale J, Tiedeken N, Debski RE, Fowler JR (2019) Impact of screw length on proximal scaphoid fracture biomechanics. J Wrist Surg 8(5):360–365CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Patel S, Giugale J, Tiedeken N, Debski RE, Fowler JR (2019) Impact of screw length on proximal scaphoid fracture biomechanics. J Wrist Surg 8(5):360–365CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Standard views do not suffice in assessing distal scaphoid articular cannulated screw penetration
Authors
Pierre-Emmanuel Chammas
Maxime Pastor
Michel Chammas
Geert Alexander Buijze
Publication date
01-12-2023
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology / Issue 1/2023
Print ISSN: 1590-9921
Electronic ISSN: 1590-9999
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s10195-023-00735-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology 1/2023 Go to the issue