Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Drug Investigation 10/2016

01-10-2016 | Short Communication

Safety and Feasibility of Treatment with Rivaroxaban for Non-Canonical Indications: A Case Series Analysis

Authors: Domenico Acanfora, Chiara Acanfora, Pietro Scicchitano, Marialaura Longobardi, Giuseppe Furgi, Gerardo Casucci, Bernardo Lanzillo, Ilaria Dentamaro, Annapaola Zito, Raffaele Antonelli Incalzi, Marco Matteo Ciccone

Published in: Clinical Drug Investigation | Issue 10/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background and objectives

The new oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are used for the prevention of thromboembolic complications in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) and those at risk of deep venous thrombosis. Their rapid onset of action and predictable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles make them the optimal alternative to warfarin in the treatment of these two categories of patients. Unfortunately, however, NOACs cannot be used in patients with valvular AF or valvular cardiac prostheses. Although mechanical valves are effectively a contraindication to NOAC use due to several pathophysiological mechanisms that promote the use of warfarin rather than NOACs, few data exist regarding the use of such new pharmacological compounds on patients with cardiac biological valves or those who have undergone mitral repair or tubular aortic graft implantation.

Methods

Our case series involved 27 patients [mean age 70 ± 10 years; mean CHA2DS2-VASc (Congestive heart failure, Hypertension, Age ≥75 years (doubled), Diabetes mellitus, Stroke/transient ischemic attack (doubled), Vascular disease, Age 65–74 years, Sex category): 6 ± 1.4; and mean HAS-BLED (Hypertension, Abnormal renal and liver function, Stroke, Bleeding, Labile international normalized ratios, Elderly, Drugs or alcohol): 4 ± 1] with AF and biological prostheses, repaired mitral valves, or tubular aortic graft who were treated with the factor Xa inhibitor rivaroxaban due to inefficacy or adverse effects of warfarin.

Results

The mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 48 ± 9 %, the left atrial diameter was 46.5 ± 7 mm, and the estimated glomerular filtration rate was 45 ± 21 mL/min/1.73 m2. The mean duration of treatment was 15 ± 2 months. No relevant complications or recurrent thromboembolic events occurred. Three patients had recurrent nose bleeding and two had hematuria that led to reduction of the rivaroxaban dose by the treating physician to 15 mg once a day after 4 months of therapy. No further bleeding episode was recorded after escalating the dose.

Conclusions

Rivaroxaban is a valuable treatment option for patients with biological prostheses, repaired mitral valves, or a tubular aortic graft in order to prevent thromboembolic complications.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Connoly SJ, Yusuf S, Eikelboom J, et al. Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:1139–51.CrossRef Connoly SJ, Yusuf S, Eikelboom J, et al. Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:1139–51.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Patel MR, Mahaffey KW, Garg J, et al. Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:883–91.CrossRefPubMed Patel MR, Mahaffey KW, Garg J, et al. Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:883–91.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Granger CB, Alexander JH, McMurray JJ, et al. Apixaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:981–92.CrossRefPubMed Granger CB, Alexander JH, McMurray JJ, et al. Apixaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:981–92.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Giugliano RP, Ruff CT, Braunwald E, et al. Edoxaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:2093–3014.CrossRefPubMed Giugliano RP, Ruff CT, Braunwald E, et al. Edoxaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:2093–3014.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Bauersachs R, Berkowitz SD, et al.; EINSTEIN Investigators. Oral rivaroxaban for symptomatic venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med. 2010; 363(26):2499–510. Bauersachs R, Berkowitz SD, et al.; EINSTEIN Investigators. Oral rivaroxaban for symptomatic venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med. 2010; 363(26):2499–510.
6.
go back to reference Schulman S, Kearon C, Kakkar AK, et al. Dabigatran versus warfarin in the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:2342–52.CrossRefPubMed Schulman S, Kearon C, Kakkar AK, et al. Dabigatran versus warfarin in the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:2342–52.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Agnelli G, Buller HR, Cohen A, et al. Oral apixaban for the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:799–808.CrossRefPubMed Agnelli G, Buller HR, Cohen A, et al. Oral apixaban for the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:799–808.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Büller HR, Décousus H, Hokusai-VTE Investigators, et al. Edoxaban versus warfarin for the treatment of symptomatic venous thrombembolism. N Engl J Med. 2013;10(369):1406–15. Büller HR, Décousus H, Hokusai-VTE Investigators, et al. Edoxaban versus warfarin for the treatment of symptomatic venous thrombembolism. N Engl J Med. 2013;10(369):1406–15.
9.
go back to reference Jaffer IH, Stafford AR, Fredenburgh JC, et al. Dabigatran is less effective than warfarin at attenuating mechanical heart valve-induced thrombin generation. J Am Heart Assoc. 2015;4:e002322.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jaffer IH, Stafford AR, Fredenburgh JC, et al. Dabigatran is less effective than warfarin at attenuating mechanical heart valve-induced thrombin generation. J Am Heart Assoc. 2015;4:e002322.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Eikelboom JW, Connolly SJ, Brueckmann M, et al. Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with mechanical heart valves. N Engl J Med. 2013;26(369):1206–14.CrossRef Eikelboom JW, Connolly SJ, Brueckmann M, et al. Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with mechanical heart valves. N Engl J Med. 2013;26(369):1206–14.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Oxenham H, Bloomfield P, Wheatley DJ, et al. Twenty year comparison of a Bjork–Shiley mechanical heart valve with porcine bioprostheses. Heart. 2003;89:715–21.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Oxenham H, Bloomfield P, Wheatley DJ, et al. Twenty year comparison of a Bjork–Shiley mechanical heart valve with porcine bioprostheses. Heart. 2003;89:715–21.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Whitlock RP, Sun JC, Fremes SE, et al. Antithrombotic and thrombolytic therapy for valvular disease: antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis, 9th edn: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest. 2012;141:e576S–600S.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Whitlock RP, Sun JC, Fremes SE, et al. Antithrombotic and thrombolytic therapy for valvular disease: antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis, 9th edn: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest. 2012;141:e576S–600S.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Di Biase L, Trivedi C, Mohanty P, et al. Periprocedural and long term safety and feasibility of treatment with novel oral anticoagulants in patients with biological heart valve and atrial fibrillation (poster). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;65(10_S). doi:10.1016/S0735-1097(15)60355-2. Di Biase L, Trivedi C, Mohanty P, et al. Periprocedural and long term safety and feasibility of treatment with novel oral anticoagulants in patients with biological heart valve and atrial fibrillation (poster). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;65(10_S). doi:10.​1016/​S0735-1097(15)60355-2.
14.
go back to reference Molteni M, Plo FH, Primitz L, et al. The definition of valvular and non-valvular atrial fibrillation: results of a physicians’ survey. Europace. 2014;16:17205.CrossRef Molteni M, Plo FH, Primitz L, et al. The definition of valvular and non-valvular atrial fibrillation: results of a physicians’ survey. Europace. 2014;16:17205.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference De Caterina R, Camm AJ. What is ‘valvular’ atrial fibrillation? A reappraisal. Eur Heart J. 2014;35:3328–35.CrossRefPubMed De Caterina R, Camm AJ. What is ‘valvular’ atrial fibrillation? A reappraisal. Eur Heart J. 2014;35:3328–35.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Connolly SJ, Eikelboom J, Joyner C, et al. Apixaban in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:806–17.CrossRefPubMed Connolly SJ, Eikelboom J, Joyner C, et al. Apixaban in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:806–17.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Breithardt G, Baumgartner H, Berkowitz SD, et al. Clinical characteristics and outcomes with rivaroxaban versus warfarin in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation but underlying native mitral and aortic valve disease participating in the ROCKET AF trial. Eur Heart J. 2014;35:3377–85.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Breithardt G, Baumgartner H, Berkowitz SD, et al. Clinical characteristics and outcomes with rivaroxaban versus warfarin in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation but underlying native mitral and aortic valve disease participating in the ROCKET AF trial. Eur Heart J. 2014;35:3377–85.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Avezum A, Lopes RD, Schulte PJ, et al. Apixaban in comparison with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation and valvular hearty disease: finding from the Apixaban for Reduction in Stroke and other Thromboembolic Events in Atrial Fibrillation (ARISTOTLE) trial. Circulation. 2015;132:624–32.CrossRefPubMed Avezum A, Lopes RD, Schulte PJ, et al. Apixaban in comparison with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation and valvular hearty disease: finding from the Apixaban for Reduction in Stroke and other Thromboembolic Events in Atrial Fibrillation (ARISTOTLE) trial. Circulation. 2015;132:624–32.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Douglas PS, Garcia MJ, Haines DE, et al. ACCF/ASE/AHA/ASNC/HFSA/HRS/SCAI/SCCM/SCCT/SCMR 2011 appropriate use criteria for echocardiography. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, American Society of Echodardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2011;24:229–67.CrossRefPubMed Douglas PS, Garcia MJ, Haines DE, et al. ACCF/ASE/AHA/ASNC/HFSA/HRS/SCAI/SCCM/SCCT/SCMR 2011 appropriate use criteria for echocardiography. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, American Society of Echodardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2011;24:229–67.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Pepi M, Evangelista A, Nihoyannopoulos P, et al. Recommendations for echocardiography use in the diagnosis and management of cardiac sources of embolism: European Association of Echocardiography (EAE) (a registered branch of the ESC). Eur J Ecocardiogr. 2010;11:461–76.CrossRef Pepi M, Evangelista A, Nihoyannopoulos P, et al. Recommendations for echocardiography use in the diagnosis and management of cardiac sources of embolism: European Association of Echocardiography (EAE) (a registered branch of the ESC). Eur J Ecocardiogr. 2010;11:461–76.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Heidbuchel H, Verhamme P, Alings M, et al. European Hearth Rhythm Association practical guide on the use of new oral anticoagulants in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2013;15:625–51.CrossRefPubMed Heidbuchel H, Verhamme P, Alings M, et al. European Hearth Rhythm Association practical guide on the use of new oral anticoagulants in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2013;15:625–51.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Di Pasquale G, Mathieu G, Maggioni AP, et al. Current presentation and management of 7148 patients with atrial fibrillation in cardiology and internal medicine hospital centers: the ATA AF study. Int J Cardiol. 2013;167:2895–903.CrossRefPubMed Di Pasquale G, Mathieu G, Maggioni AP, et al. Current presentation and management of 7148 patients with atrial fibrillation in cardiology and internal medicine hospital centers: the ATA AF study. Int J Cardiol. 2013;167:2895–903.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Heidbuchel H, Verhamme P, Alings M, et al. Updated European Heart Rhythm Association practical guide on the use of non-vitamin K antagonist anticoagulants in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2015;17:1467–507.CrossRefPubMed Heidbuchel H, Verhamme P, Alings M, et al. Updated European Heart Rhythm Association practical guide on the use of non-vitamin K antagonist anticoagulants in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2015;17:1467–507.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Safety and Feasibility of Treatment with Rivaroxaban for Non-Canonical Indications: A Case Series Analysis
Authors
Domenico Acanfora
Chiara Acanfora
Pietro Scicchitano
Marialaura Longobardi
Giuseppe Furgi
Gerardo Casucci
Bernardo Lanzillo
Ilaria Dentamaro
Annapaola Zito
Raffaele Antonelli Incalzi
Marco Matteo Ciccone
Publication date
01-10-2016
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Clinical Drug Investigation / Issue 10/2016
Print ISSN: 1173-2563
Electronic ISSN: 1179-1918
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40261-016-0436-5

Other articles of this Issue 10/2016

Clinical Drug Investigation 10/2016 Go to the issue