Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Obesity Surgery 2/2019

01-02-2019 | Original Contributions

Safety and Feasibility of a Lower-Cost Stapler in Bariatric Surgery

Authors: Kurt E. Roberts, L. Renee Hilton, Danielle T. Friedman, Joel S. Frieder, Xuchen Zhang, Andrew J. Duffy

Published in: Obesity Surgery | Issue 2/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic staplers are integral to bariatric surgery. Their pricing significantly impacts the overall cost of procedures. An independent device company has designed a stapler handle and single-use reloads for cross-compatibility and equivalency with existing manufacturers, at a lower cost.

Objectives

We aim to demonstrate non-inferior function and cross-compatibility of a newly introduced stapler handle and reloads compared to our institution’s current stapling system in a large animal survival study.

Setting

University-affiliated animal research facility, USA.

Methods

Matched small bowel anastomoses were created in four pigs, one with each stapler (a total of two per animal). After 14 days, investigators blinded to stapler type evaluated the anastomoses grossly and microscopically. Each anastomosis was scored on multiple measures of healing. Individual parameters were added for a global “healing score.”

Results

Clinical stapler function and gross quality of anastomoses were similar between stapler groups. Individual scores for anastomotic ulceration, reepithelialization, granulation tissue, mural healing, eosinophilic infiltration, serosal inflammation, and microscopic adherences were also statistically similar. The mean “healing scores” were equal. While this study was underpowered for subtle differences, safe and reliable performance in large animals still supports the feasibility of introducing new devices into human use.

Conclusions

The new stapler system delivers a similar technical performance and is cross-compatible with currently marketed stapling devices. An equivalent quality device at a lower price point should enable case cost reduction, helping to maintain hospital case margin and procedure value in the face of potentially declining reimbursement. This device may provide a safe and functional alternative to currently used laparoscopic surgical staplers.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bendewald FP, Choi JN, Blythe LS, et al. Comparison of hand-sewn, linear-stapled, circular-stapled gastrojejunostomy in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2011;21:1671–5.CrossRefPubMed Bendewald FP, Choi JN, Blythe LS, et al. Comparison of hand-sewn, linear-stapled, circular-stapled gastrojejunostomy in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2011;21:1671–5.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Behzadi A, Nichols FC, Cassivi SD, et al. Esophagogastrectomy: the influence of stapled versus hand-sewn anastomosis on outcome. J Gastrointest Surg. 2005;9(8):1031–42.CrossRefPubMed Behzadi A, Nichols FC, Cassivi SD, et al. Esophagogastrectomy: the influence of stapled versus hand-sewn anastomosis on outcome. J Gastrointest Surg. 2005;9(8):1031–42.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Soper NJ, Brunt M, Fleshman Jr J, et al. Laparoscopic small bowel resection and anastomosis. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1993;3(1):6–12.PubMed Soper NJ, Brunt M, Fleshman Jr J, et al. Laparoscopic small bowel resection and anastomosis. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1993;3(1):6–12.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Hollis RB, Cannon JA, Singletary BA, et al. Understanding the value of both laparoscopic and robotic approaches compared to the open approach in colorectal surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech. 2016;26(11):850–6.CrossRef Hollis RB, Cannon JA, Singletary BA, et al. Understanding the value of both laparoscopic and robotic approaches compared to the open approach in colorectal surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech. 2016;26(11):850–6.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Braga M, Vignali A, Zuliani W, et al. Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery: cost-benefit analysis in a single-center randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2005;242(6):890–5. discussion 895–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Braga M, Vignali A, Zuliani W, et al. Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery: cost-benefit analysis in a single-center randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2005;242(6):890–5. discussion 895–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Kimura M, Kuwabara Y, Taniwaki S, et al. Improving the side-to-side stapled anastomosis: comparison of staplers for robust crotch formation. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018;14(1):16–21.CrossRefPubMed Kimura M, Kuwabara Y, Taniwaki S, et al. Improving the side-to-side stapled anastomosis: comparison of staplers for robust crotch formation. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018;14(1):16–21.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Covidien. Endo GIA™ Reloads with Tri-Staple™: Technical Brochure 2011. Covidien. Endo GIA™ Reloads with Tri-Staple™: Technical Brochure 2011.
9.
go back to reference Steichen FM. The use of staplers in anatomical side-to-side and functional end-to-end enteroanastomoses. Surgery. 1968;64:948–53.PubMed Steichen FM. The use of staplers in anatomical side-to-side and functional end-to-end enteroanastomoses. Surgery. 1968;64:948–53.PubMed
11.
12.
go back to reference Russell KW, O’Holleran, Bowen ME, et al. The Barcelona technique for ileostomy reversal. J Gastrointest Surg. 2015;19(12):2269–72.CrossRefPubMed Russell KW, O’Holleran, Bowen ME, et al. The Barcelona technique for ileostomy reversal. J Gastrointest Surg. 2015;19(12):2269–72.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Stahl R. Laparoscopic anastomotic techniques. SAGES (Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons). 2012. Website: sages.org /wiki/laparoscopic-anastomotic-techniques. Accessed 19 June 2017. Stahl R. Laparoscopic anastomotic techniques. SAGES (Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons). 2012. Website: sages.​org /wiki/laparoscopic-anastomotic-techniques. Accessed 19 June 2017.
14.
go back to reference Ntourakis D, Katsimpoulas M, Tanoglidi A, et al. Adhesions and healing of intestinal anastomoses: the effect of anti-adhesion barriers. Surg Innov. 2016;23(3):266–76.CrossRefPubMed Ntourakis D, Katsimpoulas M, Tanoglidi A, et al. Adhesions and healing of intestinal anastomoses: the effect of anti-adhesion barriers. Surg Innov. 2016;23(3):266–76.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Steichen FM. Problems and complications associated with the use of stapling. Probl Gen Surg. 1985;2:18–30. Steichen FM. Problems and complications associated with the use of stapling. Probl Gen Surg. 1985;2:18–30.
16.
go back to reference Enestvedt K, Thompson SK, Chang EY, et al. Clinical review: healing in gastrointestinal anastomoses, part II. Microsurgery. 2006;26:137–43.CrossRefPubMed Enestvedt K, Thompson SK, Chang EY, et al. Clinical review: healing in gastrointestinal anastomoses, part II. Microsurgery. 2006;26:137–43.CrossRefPubMed
18.
19.
go back to reference Steichen FM, Ravitch MM. Stapling in surgery. Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers Inc; 1984. p. 270–311. Steichen FM, Ravitch MM. Stapling in surgery. Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers Inc; 1984. p. 270–311.
20.
go back to reference Soper NJ, Barteau JA, Clayman RV, et al. Comparison of early postoperative results for laparoscopic vs. standard open cholecystectomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1992;174:114–8.PubMed Soper NJ, Barteau JA, Clayman RV, et al. Comparison of early postoperative results for laparoscopic vs. standard open cholecystectomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1992;174:114–8.PubMed
21.
go back to reference Martens MF, Hendriks T. Postoperative changes in collagen synthesis in intestinal anastomoses of the rat: differences between small and large bowel. Gut. 1991;32:1482–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Martens MF, Hendriks T. Postoperative changes in collagen synthesis in intestinal anastomoses of the rat: differences between small and large bowel. Gut. 1991;32:1482–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference Graham MF, Drucker DE, Diegelmann RF, et al. Collagen synthesis by human intestinal smooth muscle cells in culture. Gastroenterology. 1987;92:400–5.CrossRefPubMed Graham MF, Drucker DE, Diegelmann RF, et al. Collagen synthesis by human intestinal smooth muscle cells in culture. Gastroenterology. 1987;92:400–5.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Thompson SK, Chang EY, Jobe BA. Clinical review: healing in gastrointestinal anastomoses, part I. Microsurgery. 2006;26:131–6.CrossRefPubMed Thompson SK, Chang EY, Jobe BA. Clinical review: healing in gastrointestinal anastomoses, part I. Microsurgery. 2006;26:131–6.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Safety and Feasibility of a Lower-Cost Stapler in Bariatric Surgery
Authors
Kurt E. Roberts
L. Renee Hilton
Danielle T. Friedman
Joel S. Frieder
Xuchen Zhang
Andrew J. Duffy
Publication date
01-02-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Obesity Surgery / Issue 2/2019
Print ISSN: 0960-8923
Electronic ISSN: 1708-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-018-3580-6

Other articles of this Issue 2/2019

Obesity Surgery 2/2019 Go to the issue