Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Investigational New Drugs 6/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | PHASE II STUDIES

Safety and effectiveness of eribulin in Japanese patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer: a post-marketing observational study

Authors: Junichiro Watanabe, Yoshinori Ito, Shozo Ohsumi, Mitsuhiro Mizutani, Hideya Tashiro, Kenichi Sakurai, Masato Takahashi, Tsuyoshi Saito, Junji Tsurutani, Hirofumi Mukai, Tetsuhiro Yoshinami, Shintaro Takao, Yasuhisa Yamamoto, Toshiyuki Matsuoka, Hirotaka Iwase, Hiroji Iwata, Seigo Nakamura, Toshiaki Saeki

Published in: Investigational New Drugs | Issue 6/2017

Login to get access

Summary

Background This large-scale study was conducted to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of eribulin for the treatment of inoperable or recurrent breast cancer in real-world settings in Japan. Methods Between July and December 2011, eligible patients with inoperable or recurrent breast cancer receiving eribulin for the first time were centrally registered and observed for 1 year. Eribulin was administered intravenously (1.4 mg/m2) on days 1 and 8 of every 3-week cycle. The primary endpoint was the frequency and intensity of adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR) and time to treatment failure (TTF). Results Of 968 patients registered at 325 institutions, 951 and 671 were included in the safety and effectiveness analyses, respectively. In the safety population, ADRs were observed in 841 patients (88.4%). The most common (≥15% incidence) were neutropenia (66.6%), leukopenia (62.4%), lymphopenia (18.4%), and peripheral neuropathy (16.8%). The most common grade ≥ 3 ADRs (>5% incidence) were neutropenia (59.8%), leukopenia (50.5%), lymphopenia (16.1%), and febrile neutropenia (7.7%). In the effectiveness population, ORR was 16.5% (95% confidence interval: 13.7, 19.4). The median TTF was 127 days (95% confidence interval: 120, 134). Conclusions The safety and effectiveness profile of eribulin was consistent with prior studies. Eribulin had a favorable risk-benefit balance when used in real-world clinical settings.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
3.
go back to reference Cardoso F, Harbeck N, Fallowfield L, Kyriakides S, Senkus E, ESMO Guidelines Working Group (2012) Locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 23(Suppl 7):vii11–vii19CrossRefPubMed Cardoso F, Harbeck N, Fallowfield L, Kyriakides S, Senkus E, ESMO Guidelines Working Group (2012) Locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 23(Suppl 7):vii11–vii19CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Partridge AH, Rumble RB, Carey LA, Come SE, Davidson NE, Di Leo A et al (2014) Chemotherapy and targeted therapy for women with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (or unknown) advanced breast cancer: American society of clinical oncology clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol 32:3307–3329CrossRefPubMed Partridge AH, Rumble RB, Carey LA, Come SE, Davidson NE, Di Leo A et al (2014) Chemotherapy and targeted therapy for women with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (or unknown) advanced breast cancer: American society of clinical oncology clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol 32:3307–3329CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Hayat MJ, Howlader N, Reichman ME, Edwards BK (2007) Cancer statistics, trends, and multiple primary cancer analyses from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) program. Oncologist 12:20–37CrossRefPubMed Hayat MJ, Howlader N, Reichman ME, Edwards BK (2007) Cancer statistics, trends, and multiple primary cancer analyses from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) program. Oncologist 12:20–37CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Smith JA, Wilson L, Azarenko O, Zhu X, Lewis BM, Littlefield BA et al (2010) Eribulin binds at microtubule ends to a single site on tubulin to suppress dynamic instability. Biochemistry 49:1331–1337CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Smith JA, Wilson L, Azarenko O, Zhu X, Lewis BM, Littlefield BA et al (2010) Eribulin binds at microtubule ends to a single site on tubulin to suppress dynamic instability. Biochemistry 49:1331–1337CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Inoue K, Saito T, Okubo K, Kimizuka K, Yamada H, Sakurai T et al (2016) Phase II clinical study of eribulin monotherapy in Japanese patients with metastatic breast cancer who had well-defined taxane resistance. Breast Cancer Res Treat 157:295–305CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Inoue K, Saito T, Okubo K, Kimizuka K, Yamada H, Sakurai T et al (2016) Phase II clinical study of eribulin monotherapy in Japanese patients with metastatic breast cancer who had well-defined taxane resistance. Breast Cancer Res Treat 157:295–305CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Crombag MR, Joerger M, Thürlimann B, Schellens JH, Beijnen JH, Huitema AD (2016) Pharmacokinetics of selected anticancer drugs in elderly cancer patients: focus on breast cancer. Cancers 8:6CrossRefPubMedCentral Crombag MR, Joerger M, Thürlimann B, Schellens JH, Beijnen JH, Huitema AD (2016) Pharmacokinetics of selected anticancer drugs in elderly cancer patients: focus on breast cancer. Cancers 8:6CrossRefPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Cortes J, O'Shaughnessy J, Loesch D, Blum JL, Vahdat LT, Petrakova K et al (2011) Eribulin monotherapy versus treatment of physician's choice in patients with metastatic breast cancer (EMBRACE): a phase 3 open-label randomised study. Lancet 377:914–923CrossRefPubMed Cortes J, O'Shaughnessy J, Loesch D, Blum JL, Vahdat LT, Petrakova K et al (2011) Eribulin monotherapy versus treatment of physician's choice in patients with metastatic breast cancer (EMBRACE): a phase 3 open-label randomised study. Lancet 377:914–923CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Kaufman PA, Awada A, Twelves C, Yelle L, Perez EA, Velikova G et al (2015) Phase III open-label randomized study of eribulin mesylate versus capecitabine in patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer previously treated with an anthracycline and a taxane. J Clin Oncol 33:594–601CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kaufman PA, Awada A, Twelves C, Yelle L, Perez EA, Velikova G et al (2015) Phase III open-label randomized study of eribulin mesylate versus capecitabine in patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer previously treated with an anthracycline and a taxane. J Clin Oncol 33:594–601CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Twelves C, Cortes J, Vahdat L, Olivo M, He Y, Kaufman PA et al (2014) Efficacy of eribulin in women with metastatic breast cancer: a pooled analysis of two phase 3 studies. Breast Cancer Res Treat 148:553–561CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Twelves C, Cortes J, Vahdat L, Olivo M, He Y, Kaufman PA et al (2014) Efficacy of eribulin in women with metastatic breast cancer: a pooled analysis of two phase 3 studies. Breast Cancer Res Treat 148:553–561CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Cortes J, Hudgens S, Twelves C, Perez EA, Awada A, Yelle L et al (2015) Health-related quality of life in patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer treated with eribulin mesylate or capecitabine in an open-label randomized phase 3 trial. Breast Cancer Res Treat 154:509–520CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cortes J, Hudgens S, Twelves C, Perez EA, Awada A, Yelle L et al (2015) Health-related quality of life in patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer treated with eribulin mesylate or capecitabine in an open-label randomized phase 3 trial. Breast Cancer Res Treat 154:509–520CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Aogi K, Iwata H, Masuda N, Mukai H, Yoshida M, Rai Y et al (2012) A phase II study of eribulin in Japanese patients with heavily pretreated metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol 23:1441–1448CrossRefPubMed Aogi K, Iwata H, Masuda N, Mukai H, Yoshida M, Rai Y et al (2012) A phase II study of eribulin in Japanese patients with heavily pretreated metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol 23:1441–1448CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Cortes J, Vahdat L, Blum JL, Twelves C, Campone M, Roché H et al (2010) Phase II study of the halichondrin B analog eribulin mesylate in patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer previously treated with an anthracycline, a taxane, and capecitabine. J Clin Oncol 28:3922–3928CrossRefPubMed Cortes J, Vahdat L, Blum JL, Twelves C, Campone M, Roché H et al (2010) Phase II study of the halichondrin B analog eribulin mesylate in patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer previously treated with an anthracycline, a taxane, and capecitabine. J Clin Oncol 28:3922–3928CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Vahdat LT, Pruitt B, Fabian C (2009) Phase II study of eribulin mesylate, a halichondrin B analog, in patients with metastatic breast cancer previously treated with an anthracycline and a taxane. J Clin Oncol 27:2954–2961CrossRefPubMed Vahdat LT, Pruitt B, Fabian C (2009) Phase II study of eribulin mesylate, a halichondrin B analog, in patients with metastatic breast cancer previously treated with an anthracycline and a taxane. J Clin Oncol 27:2954–2961CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Devriese LA, Witteveen PO, Marchetti S, Mergui-Roelvink M, Reyderman L, Wanders J et al (2012) Pharmacokinetics of eribulin mesylate in patients with solid tumors and hepatic impairment. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 70:823–832CrossRefPubMed Devriese LA, Witteveen PO, Marchetti S, Mergui-Roelvink M, Reyderman L, Wanders J et al (2012) Pharmacokinetics of eribulin mesylate in patients with solid tumors and hepatic impairment. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 70:823–832CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Safety and effectiveness of eribulin in Japanese patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer: a post-marketing observational study
Authors
Junichiro Watanabe
Yoshinori Ito
Shozo Ohsumi
Mitsuhiro Mizutani
Hideya Tashiro
Kenichi Sakurai
Masato Takahashi
Tsuyoshi Saito
Junji Tsurutani
Hirofumi Mukai
Tetsuhiro Yoshinami
Shintaro Takao
Yasuhisa Yamamoto
Toshiyuki Matsuoka
Hirotaka Iwase
Hiroji Iwata
Seigo Nakamura
Toshiaki Saeki
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Investigational New Drugs / Issue 6/2017
Print ISSN: 0167-6997
Electronic ISSN: 1573-0646
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-017-0486-4

Other articles of this Issue 6/2017

Investigational New Drugs 6/2017 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine