Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Patient Safety in Surgery 1/2009

Open Access 01-12-2009 | Letter to the Editor

Safety and effectiveness of bariatric surgery: Roux-en-y gastric bypass is superior to gastric banding in the management of morbidly obese patients: a reply to the response by Bhoyrul et al

Authors: Ulrich Guller, Lazar V Klein, John A Hagen

Published in: Patient Safety in Surgery | Issue 1/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

We have read the letter by Bhoyrul et al. in response to our recently published article "Safety and effectiveness of bariatric surgery: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is superior to gastric banding in the management of morbidly obese patients". We strongly disagree with the content of the letter.

Results and discussion

Bhoyrul et al. base their letter mostly on low level evidence such as single-institutional case series (level IV evidence) and expert opinion (level V evidence). Surprisingly, they do not comment on the randomized controlled trial, which clearly favours gastric bypass over gastric banding.

Conclusion

The letter by Bhoyrul et al. is based on low level evidence and is itself biased, unsubstantiated, and not supported by the current literature.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bhoyrul S, Dixon J, Fielding G, Ren Fielding C, Patterson E, Grossbard L, Shayani V, Bessler M, Voellinger D, Billy H, Cywes R, Ehrlich TB, Jones DB, Watkins BM, Ponce J, Brengman M, Schroder G: Safety and effectiveness of bariatric surgery: Roux-en-y gastric bypass is superior to gastric banding in the management of morbidly obese patients: a response. Patient Saf Surg. 2009, 3: 17-10.1186/1754-9493-3-17.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Bhoyrul S, Dixon J, Fielding G, Ren Fielding C, Patterson E, Grossbard L, Shayani V, Bessler M, Voellinger D, Billy H, Cywes R, Ehrlich TB, Jones DB, Watkins BM, Ponce J, Brengman M, Schroder G: Safety and effectiveness of bariatric surgery: Roux-en-y gastric bypass is superior to gastric banding in the management of morbidly obese patients: a response. Patient Saf Surg. 2009, 3: 17-10.1186/1754-9493-3-17.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Guller U, Klein LV, Hagen J: Safety and effectiveness of bariatric surgery: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is superior to gastric banding in the management of morbidly obese patients. Patient Saf Surg. 2009, 3: 10-10.1186/1754-9493-3-10.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Guller U, Klein LV, Hagen J: Safety and effectiveness of bariatric surgery: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is superior to gastric banding in the management of morbidly obese patients. Patient Saf Surg. 2009, 3: 10-10.1186/1754-9493-3-10.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Angrisani L, Lorenzo M, Borrelli V: Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: 5-year results of a prospective randomized trial. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2007, 3: 127-32. 10.1016/j.soard.2006.12.005. discussion 132–123CrossRefPubMed Angrisani L, Lorenzo M, Borrelli V: Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: 5-year results of a prospective randomized trial. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2007, 3: 127-32. 10.1016/j.soard.2006.12.005. discussion 132–123CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Tice JA, Karliner L, Walsh J, Petersen AJ, Feldman MD: Gastric banding or bypass? A systematic review comparing the two most popular bariatric procedures. Am J Med. 2008, 121: 885-93. 10.1016/j.amjmed.2008.05.036.CrossRefPubMed Tice JA, Karliner L, Walsh J, Petersen AJ, Feldman MD: Gastric banding or bypass? A systematic review comparing the two most popular bariatric procedures. Am J Med. 2008, 121: 885-93. 10.1016/j.amjmed.2008.05.036.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Safety and effectiveness of bariatric surgery: Roux-en-y gastric bypass is superior to gastric banding in the management of morbidly obese patients: a reply to the response by Bhoyrul et al
Authors
Ulrich Guller
Lazar V Klein
John A Hagen
Publication date
01-12-2009
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Patient Safety in Surgery / Issue 1/2009
Electronic ISSN: 1754-9493
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-9493-3-20

Other articles of this Issue 1/2009

Patient Safety in Surgery 1/2009 Go to the issue