Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie 7/2016

01-07-2016 | Reports of Original Investigations

Safety and comparative costs of preoperative assessments for cataract surgery: traditional mandatory assessment versus a novel graded assessment system

Authors: André Jastrzebski, MD, Alex Villafranca, MSc, Subash Sethi, MD, Lorne Bellan, MD, on behalf of the Misericordia Health Centre Cataract Surgery Working Group

Published in: Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie | Issue 7/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

We conducted this study to evaluate the safety and costs of traditional mandatory preoperative assessment for cataract surgery patients compared with a novel graded preoperative assessment system.

Methods

Patients were recruited at a high-volume surgical centre from May to November 2013. Patients completed a health-related questionnaire which allowed for a graded preoperative assessment of all participants. Based on responses to the questionnaire, patients were classified preoperatively into a) low-risk patients not requiring a preoperative assessment and b) high-risk patients requiring this assessment. Anesthesiologists still assessed all patients immediately before surgery but with staff blinded to preoperative assessment information for low-risk patients. Observed complication rates and costs were compared with those expected in the mandatory assessment system.

Results

We examined 3,347 cataract surgeries on 2,766 patients and categorized 59.9% of patients as low risk. In the graded system cohort, there were no major complications and a low rate of minor complications occurred. Wherever a complication occurred in a low-risk patient, the anesthesiologist doubted that the preoperative assessment information would have prevented the complication. If implemented, the graded system would save approximately 4,414 preoperative assessments per year in our region, with an associated cost of approximately $40.00 per surgery, or $359,000 in total. The cost to prevent a single minor complication with the mandatory system was approximately $8,976, with a number needed to treat of 223.

Conclusion

The graded system resulted in no major complications and a low rate of minor complications. The information obtained from the mandatory assessment is unlikely to prevent complications. Additionally, the cost effectiveness of the mandatory system was poor. This novel graded preoperative assessment system for cataract surgery patients can save time and resources by eliminating unnecessary patient visits.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Age-Related Eye Disease Study Research Group. Risk factors associated with age-related nuclear and cortical cataract: a case-control study in the Age-Related Eye Disease Study, AREDS report No. 5. Ophthalmology 2001; 108: 1400-8.CrossRefPubMedCentral Age-Related Eye Disease Study Research Group. Risk factors associated with age-related nuclear and cortical cataract: a case-control study in the Age-Related Eye Disease Study, AREDS report No. 5. Ophthalmology 2001; 108: 1400-8.CrossRefPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Resnikoff S, Pascolini D, Etya’ale D, et al. Global data on visual impairment in the year 2002. Bull World Health Organ 2004; 82: 844-51.PubMedPubMedCentral Resnikoff S, Pascolini D, Etya’ale D, et al. Global data on visual impairment in the year 2002. Bull World Health Organ 2004; 82: 844-51.PubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Ryskulova A, Turczyn K, Makuc DM, Cotch ME, Klein RJ, Janiszewski R. Self-reported age-related eye diseases and visual impairment in the United States: results of the 2002 national health interview survey. Am J Public Health 2008; 98: 454-61.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ryskulova A, Turczyn K, Makuc DM, Cotch ME, Klein RJ, Janiszewski R. Self-reported age-related eye diseases and visual impairment in the United States: results of the 2002 national health interview survey. Am J Public Health 2008; 98: 454-61.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Schein OD, Katz J, Bass EB, et al. The value of routine preoperative medical testing before cataract surgery. Study of Medical Testing for Cataract Surgery. N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 168-75.CrossRefPubMed Schein OD, Katz J, Bass EB, et al. The value of routine preoperative medical testing before cataract surgery. Study of Medical Testing for Cataract Surgery. N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 168-75.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Imasogie N, Wong DT, Luk K, Chung F. Elimination of routine testing in patients undergoing cataract surgery allows substantial savings in laboratory costs. Can J Anesth 2003; 50: 246-8.CrossRefPubMed Imasogie N, Wong DT, Luk K, Chung F. Elimination of routine testing in patients undergoing cataract surgery allows substantial savings in laboratory costs. Can J Anesth 2003; 50: 246-8.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Klein BE, Howard KP, Lee KE, Klein R. Changing incidence of lens extraction over 20 years. Ophthalmology 2014; 121: 5-9.CrossRefPubMed Klein BE, Howard KP, Lee KE, Klein R. Changing incidence of lens extraction over 20 years. Ophthalmology 2014; 121: 5-9.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Bass EB, Steinberg EP, Luthra R, et al. Do ophthalmologists, anesthesiologists, and internists agree about preoperative testing in healthy patients undergoing cataract surgery? Arch Ophthalmol 1995; 113: 1248-56.CrossRefPubMed Bass EB, Steinberg EP, Luthra R, et al. Do ophthalmologists, anesthesiologists, and internists agree about preoperative testing in healthy patients undergoing cataract surgery? Arch Ophthalmol 1995; 113: 1248-56.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Kaplan EB, Sheiner LB, Boekmann AJ, et al. The usefulness of preoperative laboratory testing. JAMA 1985; 253: 3576-81.CrossRefPubMed Kaplan EB, Sheiner LB, Boekmann AJ, et al. The usefulness of preoperative laboratory testing. JAMA 1985; 253: 3576-81.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Keay L, Lindsley K, Tielsch J, Katz J, Schein O. Routine preoperative testing for cataract surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 3: CD007293. Keay L, Lindsley K, Tielsch J, Katz J, Schein O. Routine preoperative testing for cataract surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 3: CD007293.
11.
go back to reference Schein OD. Assessing what we do. The example of preoperative medical testing. Arch Ophthalmol 1996; 114: 1129-31.CrossRefPubMed Schein OD. Assessing what we do. The example of preoperative medical testing. Arch Ophthalmol 1996; 114: 1129-31.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Walters G, McKibbin M. The value of pre-operative investigations in local anaesthetic ophthalmic surgery. Eye (Lond) 1997; 11: 847-9.CrossRef Walters G, McKibbin M. The value of pre-operative investigations in local anaesthetic ophthalmic surgery. Eye (Lond) 1997; 11: 847-9.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Reeves SW, Tielsch JM, Katz J, Bass EB, Schein OD. A self administered health questionnaire for the preoperative risk stratification of patients undergoing cataract surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 2003; 135: 599-606.CrossRefPubMed Reeves SW, Tielsch JM, Katz J, Bass EB, Schein OD. A self administered health questionnaire for the preoperative risk stratification of patients undergoing cataract surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 2003; 135: 599-606.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Chen CL, Lin GA, Bardach NS, et al. Preoperative medical testing in Medicare patients undergoing cataract surgery. N Engl J Med 2015; 372: 1530-8.CrossRefPubMed Chen CL, Lin GA, Bardach NS, et al. Preoperative medical testing in Medicare patients undergoing cataract surgery. N Engl J Med 2015; 372: 1530-8.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Basta B, Gioia L, Gemma M, et al. Systemic adverse events during 2005 phacoemulsifications under monitered anesthesia care. Minerva Anestesiol 2011; 77: 877-83.PubMed Basta B, Gioia L, Gemma M, et al. Systemic adverse events during 2005 phacoemulsifications under monitered anesthesia care. Minerva Anestesiol 2011; 77: 877-83.PubMed
17.
go back to reference Moreno-Montanes J, Sabater AL, Barrio-Barrio J, Perez-Vadivieso JR, Cacho-Asenjo E, Garcia-Granero M. Risk factors and regression calculation of anesthesiologic intervention in topical and intracameral cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 2012; 38: 2144-53.CrossRefPubMed Moreno-Montanes J, Sabater AL, Barrio-Barrio J, Perez-Vadivieso JR, Cacho-Asenjo E, Garcia-Granero M. Risk factors and regression calculation of anesthesiologic intervention in topical and intracameral cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 2012; 38: 2144-53.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Rocha G, Turner C. Safety of cataract surgery under topical anesthesia with oral sedation without anesthetic monitoring. Can J Ophthalmol 2007; 42: 288-94.CrossRefPubMed Rocha G, Turner C. Safety of cataract surgery under topical anesthesia with oral sedation without anesthetic monitoring. Can J Ophthalmol 2007; 42: 288-94.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Safety and comparative costs of preoperative assessments for cataract surgery: traditional mandatory assessment versus a novel graded assessment system
Authors
André Jastrzebski, MD
Alex Villafranca, MSc
Subash Sethi, MD
Lorne Bellan, MD
on behalf of the Misericordia Health Centre Cataract Surgery Working Group
Publication date
01-07-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie / Issue 7/2016
Print ISSN: 0832-610X
Electronic ISSN: 1496-8975
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-016-0626-x

Other articles of this Issue 7/2016

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie 7/2016 Go to the issue