Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Surgery 1/2024

Open Access 01-12-2024 | Sacrocolpopexy | Research

Transvaginal extraperitoneal single-port laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for apical prolapse after total/subtotal hysterectomy: Chinese surgeons’ initial experience

Authors: Zhiying Lu, Yisong Chen, Chengzhen Xiao, Keqin Hua, Changdong Hu

Published in: BMC Surgery | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

To introduce a novel technique of transvaginal extraperitoneal single-port laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (ESLS) for apical prolapse and to evaluate the feasibility and short-term outcomes of this technique.

Methods

Sixteen patients were enrolled to undergo ESLS between January 2020 and May 2021. Perioperative outcomes were included. Short-term results were assessed by Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 (PFDI-20), Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) scores, mesh exposure and prolapse recurrence.

Results

A total of 14/16 cases (87.5%) were successfully completed. The mean operation time was 118 min (range 85–160), and the mean blood loss was 68 ml (range 20–100). The mean postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) pain score at 24 h was 0.7. No intraoperative complications occurred except for one patient who developed subcutaneous emphysema. All patients gained a significant improvement in both physical prolapse and quality of life at 12 months after surgery, and there was no mesh exposure or prolapse recurrence.

Conclusions

Our experience showed that transvaginal ESLS is a feasible and effective technique for apical prolapse with a previous hysterectomy. However, this technique should be performed by surgeons with extensive experience both in vaginal surgery and laparoscopic single-port surgery.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Karmakar D, Dwyer PL, Thomas E, Schierlitz L. Extraperitoneal uterosacral suspension technique for post hysterectomy apical prolapse in 472 women: results from a longitudinal clinical study. BJOG. 2019;126(4):536–42.CrossRefPubMed Karmakar D, Dwyer PL, Thomas E, Schierlitz L. Extraperitoneal uterosacral suspension technique for post hysterectomy apical prolapse in 472 women: results from a longitudinal clinical study. BJOG. 2019;126(4):536–42.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference van Steensel S, van den Hil LCL, Schreinemacher MHF, Ten Broek RPG, van Goor H, Bouvy ND. Adhesion awareness in 2016: an update of the national survey of surgeons. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(8):e0202418.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral van Steensel S, van den Hil LCL, Schreinemacher MHF, Ten Broek RPG, van Goor H, Bouvy ND. Adhesion awareness in 2016: an update of the national survey of surgeons. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(8):e0202418.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Sheyn D, Bretschneider CE, Mahajan ST, Ridgeway B, Davenport A, Pollard R. Incidence and risk factors of early postoperative small bowel obstruction in patients undergoing hysterectomy for benign indications. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;220(3):251e1–9.CrossRef Sheyn D, Bretschneider CE, Mahajan ST, Ridgeway B, Davenport A, Pollard R. Incidence and risk factors of early postoperative small bowel obstruction in patients undergoing hysterectomy for benign indications. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;220(3):251e1–9.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Farag S, Padilla PF, Smith KA, Sprague ML, Zimberg SE. Management, Prevention, and sequelae of adhesions in women undergoing laparoscopic gynecologic Surgery: a systematic review. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018;25(7):1194–216.CrossRefPubMed Farag S, Padilla PF, Smith KA, Sprague ML, Zimberg SE. Management, Prevention, and sequelae of adhesions in women undergoing laparoscopic gynecologic Surgery: a systematic review. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018;25(7):1194–216.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference ten Broek RP, Issa Y, van Santbrink EJ, et al. Burden of adhesions in abdominal and pelvic Surgery: systematic review and met-analysis. BMJ. 2013;347:f5588.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral ten Broek RP, Issa Y, van Santbrink EJ, et al. Burden of adhesions in abdominal and pelvic Surgery: systematic review and met-analysis. BMJ. 2013;347:f5588.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Matthews CA, Geller EJ, Henley BR, et al. Permanent compared with Absorbable suture for vaginal mesh fixation during total hysterectomy and sacrocolpopexy: a Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;136(2):355–64.CrossRefPubMed Matthews CA, Geller EJ, Henley BR, et al. Permanent compared with Absorbable suture for vaginal mesh fixation during total hysterectomy and sacrocolpopexy: a Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;136(2):355–64.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Kowalski JT, Mehr A, Cohen E, Bradley CS. Systematic review of definitions for success in pelvic organ prolapse Surgery. Int Urogynecol J. 2018;29(11):1697–704.CrossRefPubMed Kowalski JT, Mehr A, Cohen E, Bradley CS. Systematic review of definitions for success in pelvic organ prolapse Surgery. Int Urogynecol J. 2018;29(11):1697–704.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference da Costa AG, Borghesi Y, Hudry D, et al. Extraperitoneal Para-aortic Lymphadenectomy by Robot-assisted Laparoscopy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018;25(5):861–6.CrossRefPubMed da Costa AG, Borghesi Y, Hudry D, et al. Extraperitoneal Para-aortic Lymphadenectomy by Robot-assisted Laparoscopy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018;25(5):861–6.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Diaz-Feijoo B, Luna-Guibourg R, Cabrera S, Manrique S, Gil-Moreno A. Laparoscopic extraperitoneal pelvic lymph node debulking in locally Advanced Cervical Cancer. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019;26(2):366.CrossRefPubMed Diaz-Feijoo B, Luna-Guibourg R, Cabrera S, Manrique S, Gil-Moreno A. Laparoscopic extraperitoneal pelvic lymph node debulking in locally Advanced Cervical Cancer. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019;26(2):366.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Dumont F, Thibaudeau E, Benhaïm L, et al. Single-port endoscopic mesocolic and mesorectal excision using an extraperitoneal approach. Surg Endosc. 2017;31(1):469–75.CrossRefPubMed Dumont F, Thibaudeau E, Benhaïm L, et al. Single-port endoscopic mesocolic and mesorectal excision using an extraperitoneal approach. Surg Endosc. 2017;31(1):469–75.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Escolino M, Riccipetitoni G, Yamataka A, et al. Retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy in children: a multicentric international comparative study between lateral versus prone approach. Surg Endosc. 2019;33(3):832–9.CrossRefPubMed Escolino M, Riccipetitoni G, Yamataka A, et al. Retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy in children: a multicentric international comparative study between lateral versus prone approach. Surg Endosc. 2019;33(3):832–9.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Arezzo A, Bullano A, Cochetti G, et al. Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy for adrenal tumours in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;12(12):CD011668.PubMed Arezzo A, Bullano A, Cochetti G, et al. Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy for adrenal tumours in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;12(12):CD011668.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Lower AM, Hawthorn RJ, Ellis H, O’Brien F, Buchan S, Crowe AM. The impact of adhesions on hospital readmissions over ten years after 8849 open gynaecological operations: an assessment from the Surgical and Clinical Adhesions Research Study. BJOG. 2000;107(7):855–62.CrossRefPubMed Lower AM, Hawthorn RJ, Ellis H, O’Brien F, Buchan S, Crowe AM. The impact of adhesions on hospital readmissions over ten years after 8849 open gynaecological operations: an assessment from the Surgical and Clinical Adhesions Research Study. BJOG. 2000;107(7):855–62.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference van Goor H. Consequences and Complications of peritoneal adhesions. Colorectal Dis. 2007;9(Suppl 2):25–34.CrossRefPubMed van Goor H. Consequences and Complications of peritoneal adhesions. Colorectal Dis. 2007;9(Suppl 2):25–34.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference ten Broek RP, Strik C, Issa Y, Bleichrodt RP, van Goor H. Adhesiolysis-related morbidity in abdominal Surgery. Ann Surg. 2013;258(1):98–106.CrossRefPubMed ten Broek RP, Strik C, Issa Y, Bleichrodt RP, van Goor H. Adhesiolysis-related morbidity in abdominal Surgery. Ann Surg. 2013;258(1):98–106.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Moris D, Chakedis J, Rahnemai-Azar AA, et al. Postoperative abdominal adhesions: clinical significance and advances in Prevention and Management. J Gastrointest Surg. 2017;21(10):1713–22.CrossRefPubMed Moris D, Chakedis J, Rahnemai-Azar AA, et al. Postoperative abdominal adhesions: clinical significance and advances in Prevention and Management. J Gastrointest Surg. 2017;21(10):1713–22.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Sahay N, Sharma S, Bhadani UK, et al. Effect of Pneumoperitoneum and Patient Positioning on Intracranial pressures during Laparoscopy: a prospective comparative study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018;25(1):147–52.CrossRefPubMed Sahay N, Sharma S, Bhadani UK, et al. Effect of Pneumoperitoneum and Patient Positioning on Intracranial pressures during Laparoscopy: a prospective comparative study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018;25(1):147–52.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Transvaginal extraperitoneal single-port laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for apical prolapse after total/subtotal hysterectomy: Chinese surgeons’ initial experience
Authors
Zhiying Lu
Yisong Chen
Chengzhen Xiao
Keqin Hua
Changdong Hu
Publication date
01-12-2024
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Surgery / Issue 1/2024
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2482
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-023-02304-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

BMC Surgery 1/2024 Go to the issue