Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 5/2010

01-05-2010

Sacral Neuromodulation: Does It Affect the Rectoanal Angle in Patients with Fecal Incontinence?

Authors: Ö. Uludağ, S. M. P. Koch, R. F. Vliegen, C. H. C. Dejong, W. G. van Gemert, C. G. M. I. Baeten

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 5/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In the past decade numerous studies have been published on the successful treatment of fecal incontinence with sacral neuromodulation (SNM). The underlying mechanism of action for lower bowel motility disorders has been unclear. In the present study, the effect of SNM on the rectoanal angle in patients with fecal incontinence was investigated.

Patients and Methods

In 12 consecutive patients who qualified for SNM an X-defecography study was performed before SNM and at 6 months after permanent implant. Three single lateral rectal views were taken: one during rest, one during squeeze, and one during Valsalva’s maneuver, after which the patient was asked to evacuate as rapidly and completely as possible during lateral fluoroscopy. At 6 months two further defecography studies were performed, one during stimulation with the pacemaker on and one with the pacemaker off.

Results

The defecography studies showed that the rectoanal angle decreased during rest, squeeze, and Valsalva’s maneuver. A slight increase in rectoanal angle was seen during defecation. However, the differences did not reach statistical significance. Sacral neuromodulation improved fecal continence significantly in all patients at 6 months. Median incontinence episodes per week decreased from 6.2 to 1.0 (P = 0.001), and incontinent days per week decreased from 3.7 to 1.0 (P = 0.001) with SNM. There were no significant changes in the median resting and squeeze anal canal pressures, 46.5 versus 49.7 mmHg and 67.1 versus 72.3 mmHg, respectively. Median stimulation amplitude at follow-up was 2.7 V (range: 0.9–5.3 V).

Conclusions

Rectoanal angle did not decrease significantly in patients with fecal incontinence during SNM.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Oerlemans DJ, van Kerrebroeck PE (2008) Sacral nerve stimulation for neuromodulation of the lower urinary tract. Neurourol Urodyn 27:28–33CrossRefPubMed Oerlemans DJ, van Kerrebroeck PE (2008) Sacral nerve stimulation for neuromodulation of the lower urinary tract. Neurourol Urodyn 27:28–33CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Matzel KE (2007) Sacral nerve stimulation for fecal disorders: evolution, current status, and future directions. Acta Neurochir 97(Suppl):351–357 Matzel KE (2007) Sacral nerve stimulation for fecal disorders: evolution, current status, and future directions. Acta Neurochir 97(Suppl):351–357
3.
go back to reference Uludag O, Koch SM, van Gemert WG et al (2004) Sacral neuromodulation in patients with fecal incontinence: a single-center study. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1350–1357CrossRefPubMed Uludag O, Koch SM, van Gemert WG et al (2004) Sacral neuromodulation in patients with fecal incontinence: a single-center study. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1350–1357CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Tjandra JJ, Chan MK, Yeh CH et al (2008) Sacral nerve stimulation is more effective than optimal medical therapy for severe fecal incontinence: a randomized, controlled study. Dis Colon Rectum 51:494–502CrossRefPubMed Tjandra JJ, Chan MK, Yeh CH et al (2008) Sacral nerve stimulation is more effective than optimal medical therapy for severe fecal incontinence: a randomized, controlled study. Dis Colon Rectum 51:494–502CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Sheldon R, Kiff ES, Clarke A et al (2005) Sacral nerve stimulation reduces corticoanal excitability in patients with faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 92:1423–1431CrossRefPubMed Sheldon R, Kiff ES, Clarke A et al (2005) Sacral nerve stimulation reduces corticoanal excitability in patients with faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 92:1423–1431CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Uludag O, Morren GL, Dejong CH et al (2005) Effect of sacral neuromodulation on the rectum. Br J Surg 92:1017–1023CrossRefPubMed Uludag O, Morren GL, Dejong CH et al (2005) Effect of sacral neuromodulation on the rectum. Br J Surg 92:1017–1023CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Blok BF, Groen J, Bosch JL et al (2006) Different brain effects during chronic and acute sacral neuromodulation in urge incontinent patients with implanted neurostimulators. BJU Int 98:1238–1243CrossRefPubMed Blok BF, Groen J, Bosch JL et al (2006) Different brain effects during chronic and acute sacral neuromodulation in urge incontinent patients with implanted neurostimulators. BJU Int 98:1238–1243CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Michelsen HB, Christensen P, Krogh K et al (2008) Sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence alters colorectal transport. Br J Surg 95:779–784CrossRefPubMed Michelsen HB, Christensen P, Krogh K et al (2008) Sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence alters colorectal transport. Br J Surg 95:779–784CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Matzel KE, Schmidt RA, Tanagho EA (1990) Neuroanatomy of the striated muscular anal continence mechanism. Implications for the use of neurostimulation. Dis Colon Rectum 33:666–673CrossRefPubMed Matzel KE, Schmidt RA, Tanagho EA (1990) Neuroanatomy of the striated muscular anal continence mechanism. Implications for the use of neurostimulation. Dis Colon Rectum 33:666–673CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Koch SM, van Gemert WG, Baeten CG (2005) Determination of therapeutic threshold in sacral nerve modulation for faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 92:83–87CrossRefPubMed Koch SM, van Gemert WG, Baeten CG (2005) Determination of therapeutic threshold in sacral nerve modulation for faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 92:83–87CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Matzel KE, Kamm MA, Stosser M et al (2004) Sacral spinal nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence: multicentre study. Lancet 363:1270–1276CrossRefPubMed Matzel KE, Kamm MA, Stosser M et al (2004) Sacral spinal nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence: multicentre study. Lancet 363:1270–1276CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Baeten CG, Konsten J, Spaans F et al (1991) Dynamic graciloplasty for treatment of faecal incontinence. Lancet 338:1163–1165CrossRefPubMed Baeten CG, Konsten J, Spaans F et al (1991) Dynamic graciloplasty for treatment of faecal incontinence. Lancet 338:1163–1165CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Sultan AH (1997) Anal incontinence after childbirth. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 9:320–324PubMed Sultan AH (1997) Anal incontinence after childbirth. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 9:320–324PubMed
15.
go back to reference Melenhorst J, Koch SM, Uludag O et al (2008) Is a morphologically intact anal sphincter necessary for success with sacral nerve modulation in patients with faecal incontinence? Colorectal Dis 10:257–262CrossRefPubMed Melenhorst J, Koch SM, Uludag O et al (2008) Is a morphologically intact anal sphincter necessary for success with sacral nerve modulation in patients with faecal incontinence? Colorectal Dis 10:257–262CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Salvioli B, Bharucha AE, Rath-Harvey D et al (2001) Rectal compliance, capacity, and rectoanal sensation in fecal incontinence. Am J Gastroenterol 96:2158–2168CrossRefPubMed Salvioli B, Bharucha AE, Rath-Harvey D et al (2001) Rectal compliance, capacity, and rectoanal sensation in fecal incontinence. Am J Gastroenterol 96:2158–2168CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Chan CL, Lunniss PJ, Wang D et al (2005) Rectal sensorimotor dysfunction in patients with urge faecal incontinence: evidence from prolonged manometric studies. Gut 54:1263–1272CrossRefPubMed Chan CL, Lunniss PJ, Wang D et al (2005) Rectal sensorimotor dysfunction in patients with urge faecal incontinence: evidence from prolonged manometric studies. Gut 54:1263–1272CrossRefPubMed
18.
19.
go back to reference Jorge JM, Habr-Gama A, Wexner SD (2003) Biofeedback therapy in the colon and rectal practice. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback 28:47–61CrossRefPubMed Jorge JM, Habr-Gama A, Wexner SD (2003) Biofeedback therapy in the colon and rectal practice. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback 28:47–61CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Ko CY, Tong J, Lehman RE et al (1997) Biofeedback is effective therapy for fecal incontinence and constipation. Arch Surg 132:829–833 discussion 833–824PubMed Ko CY, Tong J, Lehman RE et al (1997) Biofeedback is effective therapy for fecal incontinence and constipation. Arch Surg 132:829–833 discussion 833–824PubMed
21.
go back to reference Sangwan YP, Coller JA, Barrett RC et al (1995) Can manometric parameters predict response to biofeedback therapy in fecal incontinence? Dis Colon Rectum 38:1021–1025CrossRefPubMed Sangwan YP, Coller JA, Barrett RC et al (1995) Can manometric parameters predict response to biofeedback therapy in fecal incontinence? Dis Colon Rectum 38:1021–1025CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Terra MP, Dobben AC, Berghmans B et al (2006) Electrical stimulation and pelvic floor muscle training with biofeedback in patients with fecal incontinence: a cohort study of 281 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 49:1149–1159CrossRefPubMed Terra MP, Dobben AC, Berghmans B et al (2006) Electrical stimulation and pelvic floor muscle training with biofeedback in patients with fecal incontinence: a cohort study of 281 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 49:1149–1159CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Fitzpatrick M, O’Brien C, O’Connell PR et al (2003) Patterns of abnormal pudendal nerve function that are associated with postpartum fecal incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189:730–735CrossRefPubMed Fitzpatrick M, O’Brien C, O’Connell PR et al (2003) Patterns of abnormal pudendal nerve function that are associated with postpartum fecal incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189:730–735CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Sun WM, Read NW, Miner PB (1990) Relation between rectal sensation and anal function in normal subjects and patients with faecal incontinence. Gut 31:1056–1061CrossRefPubMed Sun WM, Read NW, Miner PB (1990) Relation between rectal sensation and anal function in normal subjects and patients with faecal incontinence. Gut 31:1056–1061CrossRefPubMed
25.
26.
go back to reference Fowler CJ, Swinn MJ, Goodwin RJ et al (2000) Studies of the latency of pelvic floor contraction during peripheral nerve evaluation show that the muscle response is reflexly mediated. J Urol 163:881–883CrossRefPubMed Fowler CJ, Swinn MJ, Goodwin RJ et al (2000) Studies of the latency of pelvic floor contraction during peripheral nerve evaluation show that the muscle response is reflexly mediated. J Urol 163:881–883CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Mahony R, Behan M, Daly L et al (2007) Internal anal sphincter defect influences continence outcome following obstetric anal sphincter injury. Am J Obstet Gynecol 196:217 e211–215CrossRefPubMed Mahony R, Behan M, Daly L et al (2007) Internal anal sphincter defect influences continence outcome following obstetric anal sphincter injury. Am J Obstet Gynecol 196:217 e211–215CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Malaguti S, Spinelli M, Giardiello G et al (2003) Neurophysiological evidence may predict the outcome of sacral neuromodulation. J Urol 170:2323–2326CrossRefPubMed Malaguti S, Spinelli M, Giardiello G et al (2003) Neurophysiological evidence may predict the outcome of sacral neuromodulation. J Urol 170:2323–2326CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Sacral Neuromodulation: Does It Affect the Rectoanal Angle in Patients with Fecal Incontinence?
Authors
Ö. Uludağ
S. M. P. Koch
R. F. Vliegen
C. H. C. Dejong
W. G. van Gemert
C. G. M. I. Baeten
Publication date
01-05-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 5/2010
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-010-0474-8

Other articles of this Issue 5/2010

World Journal of Surgery 5/2010 Go to the issue