Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer 12/2019

01-12-2019 | Original Article

Rural-urban differences in financial burden among cancer survivors: an analysis of a nationally representative survey

Authors: Whitney E. Zahnd, Melinda M. Davis, Jason S. Rotter, Robin C. Vanderpool, Cynthia K. Perry, Jackilen Shannon, Linda K. Ko, Stephanie B. Wheeler, Cassie L. Odahowski, Paige E. Farris, Jan M. Eberth

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 12/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Rural cancer survivors may disproportionately experience financial problems due to their cancer because of greater travel costs, higher uninsured/underinsured rates, and other factors compared to their urban counterparts. Our objective was to examine rural-urban differences in reported financial problems due to cancer using a nationally representative survey.

Methods

We used data from three iterations of the National Cancer Institute’s Health Information and National Trends Survey (2012, 2014, and 2017) to identify participants who had a previous or current cancer diagnosis. Our outcome of interest was self-reported financial problems associated with cancer diagnosis and treatment. Rural-urban status was defined using 2003 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes. We calculated weighted percentages and Wald chi-square statistics to assess rural-urban differences in demographic and cancer characteristics. In multivariable logistic regression models, we examined the association between rural-urban status and other factors and financial problems, reporting the corresponding adjusted predicted probabilities.

Findings

Our sample included 1359 cancer survivors. Rural cancer survivors were more likely to be married, retired, and live in the Midwest or South. Over half (50.5%) of rural cancer survivors reported financial problems due to cancer compared to 38.8% of urban survivors (p = 0.02). This difference was attenuated in multivariable models, 49.3 and 38.7% in rural and urban survivors, respectively (p = 0.06).

Conclusions

A higher proportion of rural survivors reported financial problems associated with their cancer diagnosis and treatment compared to urban survivors. Future research should aim to elucidate these disparities and interventions should be tested to address the cancer-related financial problems experienced by rural survivors.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
5.
go back to reference Yabroff KR, Zhao J, Zheng Z, Rai A, Han X (2018) Medical financial hardship among cancer survivors in the United States: what do we know? What do we need to know? Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 27:1389–1397CrossRef Yabroff KR, Zhao J, Zheng Z, Rai A, Han X (2018) Medical financial hardship among cancer survivors in the United States: what do we know? What do we need to know? Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 27:1389–1397CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Charlton M, Schlichting J, Chioreso C, Ward M, Vikas P (2015) Challenges of rural cancer care in the United States. Oncology (Williston Park) 29(9):633–640 Charlton M, Schlichting J, Chioreso C, Ward M, Vikas P (2015) Challenges of rural cancer care in the United States. Oncology (Williston Park) 29(9):633–640
10.
go back to reference Mathews M, West R, Buehler S (2009) How important are out-of-pocket costs to rural patients’ cancer care decisions? Can J Rural Med 14(2):54–60PubMed Mathews M, West R, Buehler S (2009) How important are out-of-pocket costs to rural patients’ cancer care decisions? Can J Rural Med 14(2):54–60PubMed
11.
go back to reference Whitney RL, Bell JF, Reed SC, Lash R, Bold RJ, Kim KK et al (2016) Predictors of financial difficulties and work modifications among cancer survivors in the United States. J Cancer Surviv 10(2):241–250CrossRefPubMed Whitney RL, Bell JF, Reed SC, Lash R, Bold RJ, Kim KK et al (2016) Predictors of financial difficulties and work modifications among cancer survivors in the United States. J Cancer Surviv 10(2):241–250CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Greenberg AJ, Haney D, Blake KD, Moser RP, Hesse BW (2018) Differences in access to and use of electronic personal health information between rural and urban residents in the United States. J Rural Health 34 Suppl 1:s30-s8 doi 10.1111/jrh.12228:s30–s38CrossRefPubMed Greenberg AJ, Haney D, Blake KD, Moser RP, Hesse BW (2018) Differences in access to and use of electronic personal health information between rural and urban residents in the United States. J Rural Health 34 Suppl 1:s30-s8 doi 10.1111/jrh.12228:s30–s38CrossRefPubMed
20.
21.
go back to reference SAS Institute Inc. (2009) SAS/STAT ® 9.2 User’s Guide SEC. SAS Institute Inc, NC, p 2018 SAS Institute Inc. (2009) SAS/STAT ® 9.2 User’s Guide SEC. SAS Institute Inc, NC, p 2018
22.
go back to reference Probst JC, Moore CG, Glover SH, Samuels ME (2004) Person and place: the compounding effects of race/ethnicity and rurality on health. Am J Public Health 94(10):1695–1703CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Probst JC, Moore CG, Glover SH, Samuels ME (2004) Person and place: the compounding effects of race/ethnicity and rurality on health. Am J Public Health 94(10):1695–1703CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
go back to reference Shankaran V, Leahy T, Steelquist J, Watabayashi K, Linden H, Ramsey S et al (2018) Pilot feasibility study of an oncology financial navigation program. J Oncol Pract 14:e122–e129CrossRefPubMed Shankaran V, Leahy T, Steelquist J, Watabayashi K, Linden H, Ramsey S et al (2018) Pilot feasibility study of an oncology financial navigation program. J Oncol Pract 14:e122–e129CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Zullig LL, Wolf S, Vlastelica L, Shankaran V, Zafar SY (2017) The role of patient financial assistance programs in reducing costs for cancer patients. J Manag Care Spec Pharm 23:407–411PubMed Zullig LL, Wolf S, Vlastelica L, Shankaran V, Zafar SY (2017) The role of patient financial assistance programs in reducing costs for cancer patients. J Manag Care Spec Pharm 23:407–411PubMed
28.
go back to reference Zafar SY, Chino F, Ubel PA, Rushing C, Samsa G, Altomare I et al (2015) The utility of cost discussions between patients with cancer and oncologists. Am J Manag Care 21(9):607–615PubMed Zafar SY, Chino F, Ubel PA, Rushing C, Samsa G, Altomare I et al (2015) The utility of cost discussions between patients with cancer and oncologists. Am J Manag Care 21(9):607–615PubMed
35.
go back to reference Shih YT, Smielauskas F, Geynisman DM, Kelly RJ, Smith TJ (2015) Trends in the cost and use of targeted cancer therapies for the privately insured nonelderly: 2001 to 2011. J Clin Oncol 33(19):2190–2196CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Shih YT, Smielauskas F, Geynisman DM, Kelly RJ, Smith TJ (2015) Trends in the cost and use of targeted cancer therapies for the privately insured nonelderly: 2001 to 2011. J Clin Oncol 33(19):2190–2196CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
36.
Metadata
Title
Rural-urban differences in financial burden among cancer survivors: an analysis of a nationally representative survey
Authors
Whitney E. Zahnd
Melinda M. Davis
Jason S. Rotter
Robin C. Vanderpool
Cynthia K. Perry
Jackilen Shannon
Linda K. Ko
Stephanie B. Wheeler
Cassie L. Odahowski
Paige E. Farris
Jan M. Eberth
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 12/2019
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-019-04742-z

Other articles of this Issue 12/2019

Supportive Care in Cancer 12/2019 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine