Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pediatric Radiology 4/2015

01-04-2015 | Minisymposium

Running a postmortem service — a business case and clinical experience

Published in: Pediatric Radiology | Issue 4/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

The purpose of the postmortem examination is to offer answers to explain the cause and manner of death. In the case of perinatal, infant and paediatric postmortem examinations, the goal is to identify unsuspected associated features, to describe pathogenic mechanisms and new conditions, and to evaluate the clinical management and diagnosis. Additionally, the postmortem examination is useful to counsel families regarding the probability of recurrence in future pregnancies and to inform family planning. Worldwide the rate of paediatric autopsy examinations has significantly declined during the last few decades. Religious objections to postmortem dissection and organ retention scandals in the United Kingdom provided some of the impetus for a search for non-invasive alternatives to the traditional autopsy; however, until recently, imaging studies remained an adjunct to, rather than a replacement for, the traditional autopsy. In 2012, Sheffield Children’s Hospital National Health Service Foundation Trust set up the service provision of minimally invasive fetal, perinatal and neonatal autopsy, while a postmortem imaging service has been running in Melbourne, Australia, since 2008. Here we summarise the essentials of a business case and practical British and Australian experiences in terms of the pathological and radiologic aspects of setting up a minimally invasive clinical service in the United Kingdom and of developing a clinical postmortem imaging service as a complementary tool to the traditional autopsy in Australia.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Laing IA (2004) Clinical aspects of neonatal death and autopsy. Sem Neonatol 9:247–254CrossRef Laing IA (2004) Clinical aspects of neonatal death and autopsy. Sem Neonatol 9:247–254CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Landefeld CS, Chren MM, Myers A et al (1998) Diagnostic yield of the autopsy in a university hospital and a community hospital. N Engl J Med 318:1249–1254CrossRef Landefeld CS, Chren MM, Myers A et al (1998) Diagnostic yield of the autopsy in a university hospital and a community hospital. N Engl J Med 318:1249–1254CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Swinton CH, Weiner J, Okah FA (2013) The neonatal autopsy: can it be revived? Am J Perinatol 30:739–744CrossRefPubMed Swinton CH, Weiner J, Okah FA (2013) The neonatal autopsy: can it be revived? Am J Perinatol 30:739–744CrossRefPubMed
4.
5.
go back to reference Brodie M, Laing IA, Keeling JW et al (2002) Ten years of neonatal autopsies in tertiary referral centre: retrospective study. Br Med J 324:761–763CrossRef Brodie M, Laing IA, Keeling JW et al (2002) Ten years of neonatal autopsies in tertiary referral centre: retrospective study. Br Med J 324:761–763CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Cohen M, Drut R (2003) The pediatric autopsy. The situation in a pediatric hospital in Argentina. Arch Arg Ped 101:166–170 Cohen M, Drut R (2003) The pediatric autopsy. The situation in a pediatric hospital in Argentina. Arch Arg Ped 101:166–170
7.
go back to reference Weston MJ, Porter HJ, Andrews HS et al (1993) Correlation of antenatal ultrasonography and pathological examination in 153 malformed fetuses. J Clin Ultrasound 21:387–392CrossRefPubMed Weston MJ, Porter HJ, Andrews HS et al (1993) Correlation of antenatal ultrasonography and pathological examination in 153 malformed fetuses. J Clin Ultrasound 21:387–392CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Cartlidge PHT, Dawson AT, Stewart JH et al (1995) Value and quality of perinatal and infant postmortem examinations: cohort analysis of 400 consecutive deaths. Br Med J 310:155–158CrossRef Cartlidge PHT, Dawson AT, Stewart JH et al (1995) Value and quality of perinatal and infant postmortem examinations: cohort analysis of 400 consecutive deaths. Br Med J 310:155–158CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Burton JL, Underwood JCE (2003) Necropsy practice after the ‘organ retention scandal’: requests, performance, and tissue retention. J Clin Pathol 56:537–541CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Burton JL, Underwood JCE (2003) Necropsy practice after the ‘organ retention scandal’: requests, performance, and tissue retention. J Clin Pathol 56:537–541CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
12.
go back to reference Sullivan J, Monagle P (2011) Bereaved parents’ perceptions of the autopsy examination of their child. Pediatrics 127:e1012–e1020CrossRef Sullivan J, Monagle P (2011) Bereaved parents’ perceptions of the autopsy examination of their child. Pediatrics 127:e1012–e1020CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Bisset R (1998) Magnetic resonance imaging may be alternative to necropsy. Br Med J 317:1450CrossRef Bisset R (1998) Magnetic resonance imaging may be alternative to necropsy. Br Med J 317:1450CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Brookes JS, Hall-Craggs MA (1997) Postmortem perinatal examination: the role of magnetic resonance imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 9:145–147CrossRefPubMed Brookes JS, Hall-Craggs MA (1997) Postmortem perinatal examination: the role of magnetic resonance imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 9:145–147CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Whitby EH, Paley MN, Cohen M et al (2005) Postmortem MR imaging of the fetus: an adjunct or a replacement for conventional autopsy? Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 10:475–483CrossRefPubMed Whitby EH, Paley MN, Cohen M et al (2005) Postmortem MR imaging of the fetus: an adjunct or a replacement for conventional autopsy? Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 10:475–483CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Olsen ØE, Espeland A, Maartmann-Moe H et al (2003) Diagnostic value of radiography in cases of perinatal death: a population based study. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 88:F521–524CrossRefPubMedCentral Olsen ØE, Espeland A, Maartmann-Moe H et al (2003) Diagnostic value of radiography in cases of perinatal death: a population based study. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 88:F521–524CrossRefPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Roberts IS, Benamore RE, Benbow EW et al (2012) Post-mortem imaging as an alternative to autopsy in the diagnosis of adult deaths: a validation study. Lancet 379:136–142CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Roberts IS, Benamore RE, Benbow EW et al (2012) Post-mortem imaging as an alternative to autopsy in the diagnosis of adult deaths: a validation study. Lancet 379:136–142CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
18.
go back to reference Roberts ISD, Cohen MC, Benbow EW (2007) The non-invasive or minimally invasive autopsy. In: Underwood J (ed) Recent advances in histopathology: 22. The Royal Society of Medicine Press, London, pp 181–193 Roberts ISD, Cohen MC, Benbow EW (2007) The non-invasive or minimally invasive autopsy. In: Underwood J (ed) Recent advances in histopathology: 22. The Royal Society of Medicine Press, London, pp 181–193
19.
go back to reference Widjaja E, Whitby EH, Cohen M et al (2006) Post-mortem MRI of the foetal spine and spinal cord. Clin Radiol 61:679–685CrossRefPubMed Widjaja E, Whitby EH, Cohen M et al (2006) Post-mortem MRI of the foetal spine and spinal cord. Clin Radiol 61:679–685CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Cohen M, Whitby E (2007) The use of magnetic resonance in the hospital and coronial pediatric postmortem examination. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 3:289–296CrossRef Cohen M, Whitby E (2007) The use of magnetic resonance in the hospital and coronial pediatric postmortem examination. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 3:289–296CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Cohen M, Paley M, Griffiths P et al (2008) Less invasive autopsy: benefits and limitations of the use of magnetic resonance imaging in the perinatal postmortem. Ped Develop Pathol 11:1–9CrossRef Cohen M, Paley M, Griffiths P et al (2008) Less invasive autopsy: benefits and limitations of the use of magnetic resonance imaging in the perinatal postmortem. Ped Develop Pathol 11:1–9CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Thayyil S, Chandrasekaran M, Elbourne D et al (2010) Diagnostic accuracy, cost-benefit and acceptability of less invasive autopsy by post-mortem magnetic resonance imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Radiol 75:E142–E148CrossRefPubMed Thayyil S, Chandrasekaran M, Elbourne D et al (2010) Diagnostic accuracy, cost-benefit and acceptability of less invasive autopsy by post-mortem magnetic resonance imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Radiol 75:E142–E148CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Cannie M, Votino C, Moerman P et al (2012) Acceptance, reliability and confidence of diagnosis of fetal and neonatal virtuopsy compared with conventional autopsy: a prospective study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 39:659–665CrossRefPubMed Cannie M, Votino C, Moerman P et al (2012) Acceptance, reliability and confidence of diagnosis of fetal and neonatal virtuopsy compared with conventional autopsy: a prospective study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 39:659–665CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Ben-Sasi K, Chitty LS, Franck LS et al (2013) Acceptability of a minimally invasive perinatal/pediatric autopsy: healthcare professionals’ views and implications for practice. Prenat Diagn 33:301–312CrossRef Ben-Sasi K, Chitty LS, Franck LS et al (2013) Acceptability of a minimally invasive perinatal/pediatric autopsy: healthcare professionals’ views and implications for practice. Prenat Diagn 33:301–312CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Thayyil S, Sebire NJ, Chitty LS et al (2013) Post-mortem MRI versus conventional autopsy in foetuses and children: a prospective validation study. Lancet 382:223–233CrossRefPubMed Thayyil S, Sebire NJ, Chitty LS et al (2013) Post-mortem MRI versus conventional autopsy in foetuses and children: a prospective validation study. Lancet 382:223–233CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Breeze AC, Jessop FA, Set PA et al (2011) Minimally invasive fetal autopsy using magnetic resonance imaging and percutaneous organ biopsies: clinical value and comparison to conventional autopsy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 37:317–323CrossRefPubMed Breeze AC, Jessop FA, Set PA et al (2011) Minimally invasive fetal autopsy using magnetic resonance imaging and percutaneous organ biopsies: clinical value and comparison to conventional autopsy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 37:317–323CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Sebire NJ, Weber MA, Thayyil S et al (2012) Minimally invasive perinatal autopsies using magnetic resonance imaging and endoscopic post-mortem examination (‘keyhole autopsy’). J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 25:513–518CrossRefPubMed Sebire NJ, Weber MA, Thayyil S et al (2012) Minimally invasive perinatal autopsies using magnetic resonance imaging and endoscopic post-mortem examination (‘keyhole autopsy’). J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 25:513–518CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Running a postmortem service — a business case and clinical experience
Publication date
01-04-2015
Published in
Pediatric Radiology / Issue 4/2015
Print ISSN: 0301-0449
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1998
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-014-3156-0

Other articles of this Issue 4/2015

Pediatric Radiology 4/2015 Go to the issue