Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 3/2014

01-03-2014

Routine cholangiography during rigid-hybrid transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic cholecystectomy

Authors: Önder Ögredici, Georg R. Linke, Sebastian Lamm, Rachel Rosenthal, Andreas Zerz, Daniel C. Steinemann

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 3/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Transvaginal rigid-hybrid transluminal endoscopic cholecystectomy (tvCCE) has become a routine procedure in some laparoscopic departments in recent years. Although intraoperative cholangiography is an important adjunct to cholecystectomy, its feasibility and safety in tvCCE have not been demonstrated to date.

Methods

Patients undergoing tvCCE between April and October 2012 were included in this study. An intraoperative cholangiogram was obtained routinely for all the patients. Patient characteristics, operation data, feasibility, and duration of the cholangiography as well as the postoperative course were recorded prospectively.

Results

For 32 (97 %) of the 33 patients enrolled in this study, intraoperative cholangiography could be performed successfully. The median duration of cholangiography was 6 min (interquartile range, 4–7 min). Common bile duct stones were detected in three patients (10 %). Laparoscopic bile duct revision with the aid of one additional port was successful in two of these patients. One patient needed postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography due to the impossibility of extracting an impacted prepapillary concrement. One operation was converted to a four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. One additional port was used in 11 patients (33 %) and two additional ports in three patients (9 %). Three intraoperative minor complications (9 %) and one postoperative minor complication (3 %) occurred.

Conclusions

Intraoperative cholangiography during tvCCE is feasible, safe, and easy to perform. The need for intraoperative cholangiography no longer represents a contraindication for tvCCE.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Zornig C, Emmermann A, von Waldenfels HA, Mofid H (2007) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy without visible scar: combined transvaginal and transumbilical approach. Endoscopy 39:913–915PubMedCrossRef Zornig C, Emmermann A, von Waldenfels HA, Mofid H (2007) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy without visible scar: combined transvaginal and transumbilical approach. Endoscopy 39:913–915PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Zornig C, Mofid H, Emmermann A, Alm M, von Waldenfels HA, Felixmüller C (2008) Scarless cholecystectomy with combined transvaginal and transumbilical approach in a series of 20 patients. Surg Endosc 22:1427–1429PubMedCrossRef Zornig C, Mofid H, Emmermann A, Alm M, von Waldenfels HA, Felixmüller C (2008) Scarless cholecystectomy with combined transvaginal and transumbilical approach in a series of 20 patients. Surg Endosc 22:1427–1429PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Zornig C, Mofid M, Emmermann A, Alm M, Waldenfels H-A, Freimüller C (2009) NOTES-Cholecystektomie ohne Narben. Chirurg 80:364–369PubMedCrossRef Zornig C, Mofid M, Emmermann A, Alm M, Waldenfels H-A, Freimüller C (2009) NOTES-Cholecystektomie ohne Narben. Chirurg 80:364–369PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Linke GR, Tarantino I, Hoetzel R, Warschkow R, Lange J, Lachat R, Zerz A (2010) Transvaginal rigid-hybrid NOTES cholecystectomy: evaluation in routine clinical practice. Surg Endosc 42:571–575CrossRef Linke GR, Tarantino I, Hoetzel R, Warschkow R, Lange J, Lachat R, Zerz A (2010) Transvaginal rigid-hybrid NOTES cholecystectomy: evaluation in routine clinical practice. Surg Endosc 42:571–575CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Cardoso Ramos A, Muratami A, Galvoneto M, Santana Galvao M, Souza Silva AC, Gonzalo Canseco E, Moyes Y (2008) NOTES transvaginal video-assisted cholecystectomy: first series. Endoscopy 40:572–575PubMedCrossRef Cardoso Ramos A, Muratami A, Galvoneto M, Santana Galvao M, Souza Silva AC, Gonzalo Canseco E, Moyes Y (2008) NOTES transvaginal video-assisted cholecystectomy: first series. Endoscopy 40:572–575PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Zornig C, Siemssen L, Emmermann A, Alm M, von Waldenfels HA, Felixmüller C, Mofid H (2011) NOTES cholecystectomy: matched-pair analysis comparing the transvaginal hybrid and conventional laparoscopic techniques in a series of 216 patients. Surg Endosc 25:1822–1826PubMedCrossRef Zornig C, Siemssen L, Emmermann A, Alm M, von Waldenfels HA, Felixmüller C, Mofid H (2011) NOTES cholecystectomy: matched-pair analysis comparing the transvaginal hybrid and conventional laparoscopic techniques in a series of 216 patients. Surg Endosc 25:1822–1826PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Van den Boezem PB, Kruyt FM, Stommel MW, Samlal RA, Sietses C (2011) Cholecystectomy without visible scars: the transvaginal method. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 155:A3617PubMed Van den Boezem PB, Kruyt FM, Stommel MW, Samlal RA, Sietses C (2011) Cholecystectomy without visible scars: the transvaginal method. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 155:A3617PubMed
8.
go back to reference Santos BF, Teitelbaum EN, Arafat FO, Milad MP, Soper NJ, Hungness ES (2012) Comparison of short-term outcomes between transvaginal hybrid NOTES cholecystectomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 26:3058–3066PubMedCrossRef Santos BF, Teitelbaum EN, Arafat FO, Milad MP, Soper NJ, Hungness ES (2012) Comparison of short-term outcomes between transvaginal hybrid NOTES cholecystectomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 26:3058–3066PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Solomon D, Shariff AH, Silasi DA, Duffy AJ, Bell RL, Roberts KE (2012) Transvaginal cholecystectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective cohort study. Surg Endosc 26:2823–2827PubMedCrossRef Solomon D, Shariff AH, Silasi DA, Duffy AJ, Bell RL, Roberts KE (2012) Transvaginal cholecystectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective cohort study. Surg Endosc 26:2823–2827PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Linke GR, Tarantino I, Bruderer T, Celeiro J, Warschkow R, Tarr PE, Müller-Stich BP, Zerz A (2012) Transvaginal access for NOTES: a cohort study of microbiological colonization and contamination. Endoscopy 44:684–689PubMedCrossRef Linke GR, Tarantino I, Bruderer T, Celeiro J, Warschkow R, Tarr PE, Müller-Stich BP, Zerz A (2012) Transvaginal access for NOTES: a cohort study of microbiological colonization and contamination. Endoscopy 44:684–689PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Agarwal BB, Mahajan KC (2010) Laparoscopic biliary tract injury prevention: zero tolerance, error free performance. Surg Endosc 24:728–729PubMedCrossRef Agarwal BB, Mahajan KC (2010) Laparoscopic biliary tract injury prevention: zero tolerance, error free performance. Surg Endosc 24:728–729PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Kum CK, Eypasch E, Lefering R, Paul A, Neugebauer E, Troidl H (1996) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: Is it really safe? World J Surg 20:43–48PubMedCrossRef Kum CK, Eypasch E, Lefering R, Paul A, Neugebauer E, Troidl H (1996) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: Is it really safe? World J Surg 20:43–48PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Schmitz SF, Krähenbühl S, Krähenbühl L (2010) Bile duct injury and use of cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 98:391–396PubMed Schmitz SF, Krähenbühl S, Krähenbühl L (2010) Bile duct injury and use of cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 98:391–396PubMed
14.
go back to reference Connor S, Garden OJ (2006) Bile duct injury in the era of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 93:158–168PubMedCrossRef Connor S, Garden OJ (2006) Bile duct injury in the era of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 93:158–168PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Ford JA, Soop M, Du J, Loveday BP, Rodgers M (2012) Systematic review of cholangiography in cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 99:160–167PubMedCrossRef Ford JA, Soop M, Du J, Loveday BP, Rodgers M (2012) Systematic review of cholangiography in cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 99:160–167PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Nuzzo G, Giuliante F, Giovanni I, Ardito F, D’Acapito F, Vellone M, Murazio M, Capelli G (2005) Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of an Italian national survey on 56,591 cholecystectomies. Arch Surg 140:986–992PubMedCrossRef Nuzzo G, Giuliante F, Giovanni I, Ardito F, D’Acapito F, Vellone M, Murazio M, Capelli G (2005) Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of an Italian national survey on 56,591 cholecystectomies. Arch Surg 140:986–992PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Davidoff AM, Pappas TN, Murray EA, Hilleren DJ, Johnson RD, Baker ME, Newman GE, Cotton PB, Meyers WC (1992) Mechanisms of major bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg 215:196–202PubMedCrossRef Davidoff AM, Pappas TN, Murray EA, Hilleren DJ, Johnson RD, Baker ME, Newman GE, Cotton PB, Meyers WC (1992) Mechanisms of major bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg 215:196–202PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Tylor OM, Sedman PC, Jones BM, Royston CM, Arulampalam T, Wellwood J (1997) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy without intraoperative cholangiogram: 2,038 cases over a 5-year period in two district general hospitals. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 79:376–380 Tylor OM, Sedman PC, Jones BM, Royston CM, Arulampalam T, Wellwood J (1997) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy without intraoperative cholangiogram: 2,038 cases over a 5-year period in two district general hospitals. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 79:376–380
19.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6,336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213PubMedCrossRef Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6,336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Trichat S (2003) Three-port versus four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 17:1434–1436CrossRef Trichat S (2003) Three-port versus four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 17:1434–1436CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Strasberg SM, Hertl M, Soper NJ (1995) An analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 180:101–125PubMed Strasberg SM, Hertl M, Soper NJ (1995) An analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 180:101–125PubMed
22.
go back to reference Vettoretto N, Saronni C, Harbi A, Balestra L, Taglietti L, Giovanetti M (2011) Critical view of safety during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Laparoendosc Surg 15:322–325 Vettoretto N, Saronni C, Harbi A, Balestra L, Taglietti L, Giovanetti M (2011) Critical view of safety during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Laparoendosc Surg 15:322–325
23.
go back to reference Linke GR, Luz S, Janczak J, Zerz A, Schmied BM, Siercks I, Warschkow R, Beutner U, Tarantino I (2013) Evaluation of sexual function in sexually active women 1 year after transvaginal NOTES: a prospective cohort study of 106 patients. Langenbecks Arch Surg 398:139–145PubMedCrossRef Linke GR, Luz S, Janczak J, Zerz A, Schmied BM, Siercks I, Warschkow R, Beutner U, Tarantino I (2013) Evaluation of sexual function in sexually active women 1 year after transvaginal NOTES: a prospective cohort study of 106 patients. Langenbecks Arch Surg 398:139–145PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Routine cholangiography during rigid-hybrid transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic cholecystectomy
Authors
Önder Ögredici
Georg R. Linke
Sebastian Lamm
Rachel Rosenthal
Andreas Zerz
Daniel C. Steinemann
Publication date
01-03-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 3/2014
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3246-3

Other articles of this Issue 3/2014

Surgical Endoscopy 3/2014 Go to the issue